Thursday, July 17, 2014

Media beginning to soften up the public on child porn

Techniques for the alchemical transformation of humanity

By Michael Hoffman
www.revisionisthistory.org


July 17, 2014 • Spokesman-Review

As a former reporter for the Establishment media (Associated Press) I am particularly sensitive to indications that the media are using their power to subtly change minds and overcome traditional objections to forms of moral depravity. This usually begins with subtle changes and cues that emanate from executive editors at high levels of the corporate media.

Examine the clipping above. It was published in this morning’s (July 17, 2014) Spokesman-Review newspaper (Spokane, Washington), p. A3. The article concerns the arrest of child pornography supporters (“pedophiles”) including “doctors, lawyers” and ex-police officers.

The subtle processing is found in the second paragraph: “...sensational stories of the sexual abuse of minors regularly headline the tabloids, which some critics accuse of whipping up public hysteria over the issue.” 

Notice the article doesn't say child pornography is harmless; only that it has been “sensationalized” by disreputable “tabloids,” which “whip up public hysteria over the issue.”

Observe that the viewing of child pornography is described as an “issue,” not a crime. The article never refers to it as a crime. Apparently, viewing child pornography is not a sensational transgression in itself. It has been “sensationalized” by disreputable “tabloids.” Too much concern about child pornography is indicative of “hysteria.” 

This article would seem to be the first step in a measured campaign to soften up the American people so that we will approve of the decriminalization of child pornography, just as we were softened up for the decriminalization of sodomy and the legal marriage of sodomites.

This processing is almost always gradual and understated, so as not to frighten the targets of the brainwashing into the realization that they are in fact being conditioned to abandon their traditional morality and “keep up with the times.”

How likely is it that our “free and impartial” media would add to an ADL report on a putative “anti-semitic crime wave," a statement about how “sensational tales of anti-semitism are regularly issued by Zionist organizations which some critics accuse of whipping up public hysteria over the issue.” Imagine the outcry from the Israeli lobby and the thought cops. 

Will there be a preemptive outcry from We the People against what the media are starting to initiate with regard to the international cult of child molestation? You can be sure that within that cult are many extremely powerful people who would be delighted to see enforcement relaxed, as a first step in a  systematic journey toward the social acceptance of child pornography in an increasingly bestial American society.
***


Michael's column is made possible by donations from readers and the sale of his books and recordings.

***

4 comments:

aferrismoon said...

In the UK the cover-ups of pedophilia by celebrities and politicians , for decades, is on the minds of many. I wonder if the MSM is not also trying to trivialise and downplay their accusations.

Below is a link to an article on one 'Lord' who seems to have got away with pedophilia, again, due to ill-health.


thecolemanexperience.wordpress.com/2014/07/11/why-has-paedophile-greville-janner-been-allowed-to-escape-justice/

cheers

Otto Juerging said...

A degenerate judge in Australia has stated that incest between siblings is acceptable - http://kangaroocourtofaustralia.com Scroll down page to story.

Dion S said...

Hi Michael i am 3/4 way through your Judaism Discovered very well researched thorough scholarly book. Heres this:

The same piece of land as modern Israel and Palestine was ancient Canaan (~2200BC to 1400 BC) then Ancient Israel (~1100 BC to 980 BC) then the northern kingdom of Israel (980 BC to ~720 BC) and southern kigdom of judah (~980 BC to ~580 BC). King Saul a benjaminite then David a judahite then king solomon davids son ruled over the Initial kingdom. Solomon turned from God in 1 Kings 11 so God took 11 out of the 12 tribes away from him to rule over but left hum judah for David his fathers sake as David was Godly. Solomons blood descendents continued on being kings of Judah down to Zedekiah (~580 BC) which is when Judah was destroyed by Nebechudnezzar from the neo babylonian empire.

Jeremiah describes some of the Judahites behaviour they were quite evil God said this to Jeconiah the 2nd last king of the kingdom of Judah before it was destroyed.

Jeremiah 22:

30 Thus saith the Lord, Write ye this man childless, a man that shall not prosper in his days: for no man of his seed shall prosper, sitting upon the throne of David, and ruling any more in Judah.

Is there a 'race' of people on earth today who think they have a biblical right to rule that land answer yes there is the ashkenazi 'race' they established modern Israel in 1948 ~2500 years after this curse on Jeconiah.



-They want to rebuild the temple, king Solomon built the first one (~990 BC).
-They think very highly of King David and want to re establish his kingdom on earth, David was Solomons old boy.
- The hexagram on modern Israels flag in magic/occult tradition is one of the strongest if not strongest symbol for demonology/casting spells and per magic tradition Solomon took it when he went apostate and used it to do evil stuff, its aka the seal of Solomon.

Conclusion: Ashkenazi people are Solomons descendents down through Jeconiah the cursed blood line.

Revelation 13

16 And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads:

17 And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.

18 Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six.


1 Kings 10:14

14 Now the weight of gold that came to Solomon in one year was six hundred threescore and six talents of gold,

So Solomon = the 666 and he is known for that hexagram per non biblical sources so the mark of the beast (beast is analogy for kingdom or king in the book of daniel) is the hexagram which makes the beast modern Israel (potentially hasnt achieved its full size of reign yet).



Jeremiah 24:8 The good and the bad figs.

8 And as the evil figs, which cannot be eaten, they are so evil; surely thus saith the Lord, So will I give Zedekiah the king of Judah, and his princes, and the residue of Jerusalem, that remain in this land, and them that dwell in the land of Egypt:

9 And I will deliver them to be removed into all the kingdoms of the earth for their hurt, to be a reproach and a proverb, a taunt and a curse, in all places whither I shall drive them.

10 And I will send the sword, the famine, and the pestilence, among them, till they BE CONSUMED FROM OFF THE LAND* that I gave unto them and to their fathers.

Zedekiah, Jeconiahs son whom was Solomon bloodline was the last king of Judah before king Nebuchadnezzar came in and destroyed the kingdom and took the good fig judah ites into captivity as described in the first section of Jeremiah 24. The book of Jeremiah was written ~600 BC and Nebachadnezzar destroyed Judah ~580 BC and now in 1948 AD ~2500 years after the verse above with the star was said to the bad fig Judah Solomon Jeconiah Zedekiah-ites they are BACK ON THE SAME PIECE OF LAND LOL.

Ryu238 said...

"The subtle processing is found in the second paragraph: “...sensational stories of the sexual abuse of minors regularly headline the tabloids, which some critics accuse of whipping up public hysteria over the issue.”

Notice the article doesn't say child pornography is harmless; only that it has been “sensationalized” by disreputable “tabloids,” which “whip up public hysteria over the issue.”

Observe that the viewing of child pornography is described as an “issue,” not a crime. The article never refers to it as a crime. Apparently, viewing child pornography is not a sensational transgression in itself. It has been “sensationalized” by disreputable “tabloids.” Too much concern about child pornography is indicative of “hysteria.”" now you are engaging in wordplay yourself.