Is truth “Anti-Semitic”?

California GOP Condemns Another Candidate Over Anti-Semitism

By Aiden Pink  | Forward newspaper | May 30, 2018   https://forward.com

(Michael Hoffman's Afterword follows this report)

The California Republican Party has distanced itself from a candidate running under its party banner over charges of anti-Semitism for the second time this year.  John Fitzgerald is the only Republican running in the heavily-Democratic 11th District, northeast of Oakland. 

His campaign website includes false claims that 9% of U.S. government officials are dual citizens of Israel and that Jews played a “prominent role” in the African slave trade, and celebrates a “courageous” elderly German woman who was sentenced to two years in prison for denying the Holocaust. 

“Why is the holocaust the ONLY historical issue that cannot be questioned without fear of fines and/or imprisonment in eighteen countries–and counting– throughout the world?” Fitzgerald wrote on May 16. 

The website also harshly criticizes Israel’s response to protests on the Gaza border. 

The state party has taken a stand against the only Republican candidate in the race. “Tonight, the California Republican Party’s Board of Directors took swift and decisive action to eliminate any support for John Fitzgerald due to anti-Semitic comments he made recently — those views have no home in the Republican Party,” California Republican Party chairman Jim Brulte said in a statement two days later.

 “As always, California Republicans reject anti-Semitism, and all forms of religious bigotry, in the harshest terms possible. We reject John Fitzgerald’s campaign and encourage all voters to do the same.” 

“We absolutely and unequivocally condemn John Fitzgerald and his campaign for Congress,” added Republican Jewish Coalition executive director Matt Brooks. “His anti-Semitic views have no place in our political system, and especially not in our Republican party. Fitzgerald clearly has no grasp of the facts when it comes to the Jewish people, Israel and our nation’s relationship with the only democracy in the Middle East, and history in general.” 

Fitzgerald’s website does not seem to show a response to the state party’s statement, but it does include a rebuttal to similar accusations of anti-Semitism from former state party chair Ron Nehring. 

“I am not an anti-Semite by any means, I am strictly an honest and ethical person who has the temerity to state fact: Israel has an absolute stranglehold over U.S. foreign-policy, and has for decades, at the expense and peril of our soldiers and America’s best interests,” Fitzgerald wrote... 

Read more at https://forward.com 

Michael Hoffman’s Afterword 

The Zionist newspaper Forward inserts an editorial opinion —  in what is supposed to be an objective news report —  that it is a “false claim” to state that Judaic persons played a prominent role in the African slave trade. Actually, this fact is demonstrably true, as documented in  the magisterial two-volume history, The Secret Relationship Between Blacks and Jews. 

Moreover, if Ursula Haverbeck, who has been demonized by the western media as “the Nazi Grandma,” is not courageous for questioning the existence of homicidal gas chambers in Auschwitz, for which the punishment in Zionist Germany is five years’ imprisonment, then courage has a new meaning only Orwell would recognize.

Name-calling, libel, censorship, inquisition and the dungeon are all that the Zionists and their lapdogs in the government of Germany and the corporate media possess as a means for upholding the holy execution gas chamber idol.  That an 89-year-old woman was sent to prison this month for merely asking probing questions about one detail of the the alleged history of World War II, is a shame and a disgrace that ought to be recognized as such by even half-sane persons. But sanity is a commodity in short supply in our world today.

Hoffman is the author of The Great Holocaust Trial: The Landmark Battle for the Right to Doubt the West’s Most Sacred Relic.

___________________

What Pope Francis might have said to the Irish

What Pope Francis might have said to the Irish

By Michael Hoffman

www.RevisionistHistory.org

The chatterbox Pope Francis, who appears to have an opinion on everything, had no opinion in the run-up to the vote in Ireland to end that once-Catholic nation’s ban on the killing of children in the womb. He was silent while the debate raged.

Why does this not surprise this writer? As the author of a 723 page book pioneering the shocking hidden history of the Church, I know that the post-Conciliar Catholic Church is the exoteric fulfillment of the esoteric Hermetic-Kabbalism which seized the papacy in the late 15th century. 

This was a disease of the hierarchy. The Catholic people in general were too alert and militant in their faith to have had this conspiracy revealed to them prior to the 1960s. For 500 years the parish priests, nuns and the lay people in the pews were by and large what medieval Catholics had always been in terms of intolerance toward rabbinic and other types of perfidy, and loyalty to the immemorial Mass.

In the 20th century "The Process” of indoctrination of the masses was put into effect, however. Popes began openly displaying the heretofore hidden Renaissance gnosis, first by trashing the ancient form of the Mass as ordered by Pope “Saint” Paul VI,  who suppressed all resistance as viciously as any Tudor-Anglican monarch. Then under Pope “Saint” John Paul II, entering the synagogue — not to convert the Judaic people and preach Christ crucified, as did Peter and other heroic saints like Vincent Ferrer — but to encourage the assembled Pharisees to continue in their sins while groveling before them by terming them, “Our elder brothers in the Faith” (what faith? — certainly not faith in Jesus).

From those papist craters followed the ersatz "conservative Pope Benedict XVI" who continued the adoration of the self-worshippers in the synagogue. When Benedict abdicated, there emerged a masterpiece of Renaissance occultism brought to full realization in the 21st century, in the person of Italian-Argentine Cardinal Bergoglio, "Pope Francis," the media’s heralded apostle of “luhv”—of everyone and everything except Christ’s loyal followers, except the territorial integrity of a Europe which once brought Christ's Church to its highest fruition, and except the most endangered “refugees" in all the world—the unborn children of mothers tragically seduced by feminism and convenience, in whose wombs there is no “sanctuary."

The pontiff urges compassion for the economic adventurers who cross land and sea to seek their fortune in Britain and Europe while occupying and conquering it for alien creeds, while Francis mocks traditional Catholics for breeding like rabbits — “Some think, excuse me if I use the word, that in order to be good Catholics, we have to be like rabbits — but no,” the pope told reporters in January, 2015.

Fertility and the large families this once prized blessing produced are, according to the “Holy Father in Rome,” not recommended for Catholics, though permissible for immigrant Arab Muslims and African animists. Pope Francis is a coffin-rider. His task is to ruin the Church and depopulate Britain, Ireland and Europe of its indigenous people. Ergo, his eerie silence on the momentous vote last week in Ireland.

He couldn’t address the issue, you say? Yeah, we’ve heard that alibi and we don’t buy it: "If he had spoken out it would have only alienated more voters."

Here’s what the uncharacterically silent pontiff might have said if he truly were a Roman Catholic shepherd preaching truth to media power:

“Dear Irish people: I am Pope Francis. You’ve heard me urge love for gays, transgender, immigrants and homeless. Now I urge you to be merciful and love dehumanized unborn babies. Recognize their humanity and vote no on legalized abortion.”

Thirty-nine words.

Thirty-nine words that in the years ahead might have saved the lives of tens of thousands of the most helpless and the most vulnerable in Ireland. At the very least, those words from the pope would have haunted the weak, though not yet dead conscience of the Irish, and brought to the forefront of the abortion debate the seldom-mentioned issue of dehumanization. 

As I wrote in the New York Times ("Sunday Review" section, April 15, p. 10): “On the day when the unborn child is recognized as a human being with unalienable rights, we will have advanced one giant step toward humanity outside the womb.”

Michael Hoffman is the editor of the informative newsletter Revisionist History, published six times a year (subscriptions and back issues here)

He is the author of textbooks on Judaism that are heavily suppressed and refused advertising space and publicity

The survival and expansion of Michael's Truth Mission depends upon publicity, sales and your donations.  Do you care enough to help?

______________

Molestation facilitator honored by “traditional Catholics"

Some “traditional Latin Mass Catholics” have issued a nauseating celebration of the life of a prelatical child molestation facilitator — Cardinal Dario Castrillon Hoyos — who died earlier this month

Cardinal Hoyos

By Michael Hoffman

www.RevisionistHistory.org

From the highly regarded Rorate Caeli blog: “Dario Cardinal Castrillón Hoyos passed away on the 17th of May, 2018, according to the Colombian Bishops’ Conference. He was 88. We ask all of our readers to pray and have Masses said for the repose of his soul...At the very least he was the one most outspoken in defending the rights of Traditionalists in the Church, and the Gregorian Rite itself...

“He celebrated more Pontifical Masses according to the 1962 Missal than his predecessors as PCED President, including the Solemn Pontifical Mass that he celebrated in Santa Maria Maggiore on May 24, 2003 in the presence of 5 other Cardinals, an Archbishop, 2 Bishops and 3,000 faithful. It was the first Solemn Pontifical Mass according to the 1962 Missal to be celebrated in any of the Major Basilicas since the liturgical reforms of Paul VI. 

"To mark the coming into effect of Summorum Pontificum he celebrated a Solemn Pontifical Mass in the Lower Church at the Basilica of the Holy House of Loreto on September 14, 2007. As late as 2013 and 2016 he celebrated Pontifical Masses for the annual Summorum Pontificum Pilgrimage to Rome. 

"His cordial attitude towards the Society of St. Pius X was indispensable to forming the necessary atmosphere for the resumption of the dialogue between them and the Vatican. Again and again he underlined that the SSPX is neither schismatic nor heretical...”

Source: https://rorate-caeli.blogspot.com/2018/05/in-memoriam-dario-cardinal-castrillon.html#more online May 19 at 8 a.m. Pacific Daylight time.

It doesn’t matter to these obsessive Latin Mass advocates that Cardinal Hoyos is on record congratulating French Bishop Pierre Pican for not notifying the police about a priest, Rev. Fr. René Bissey, who was molesting boys. He wrote to Bishop Pican: 

“I congratulate you on not having spoken out to civil authorities against a priest,” wrote Cardinal Dario Castrillon Hoyos, who at the time was prefect of the Congregation for the Clergy. “You have done well and I am delighted…” 

Cf. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/8624763.stm

Hoyos’ statement is the legacy of the secret, “higher soul” Kabbalistic doctrine that infiltrated the Church beginning in the Renaissance: that because of a “mark” conferred upon the souls of priests at their ordination, they have a higher type of soul than the Catholic laity (cf. The Occult Renaissance Church of Rome, a book given “the silent treatment” by “conservative” and  “traditional Catholic” editors and journalists).  

Hence, for the sake of the alleged higher-souled priest, the molestation of little boys ought to be covered up and a bishop who, in the words of Cardinal Hoyos, in charge of all priests throughout the world, the guilty priest is to be protected from the police.

In 2018 nothing has changed about the molestation of children by the papalists; the rhetoric has been altered, and yes, whatever investigations and prosecutions necessary to placate a public now on the alert, have been implemented. But the diabolic doctrine remains in place and the Vatican, along with many (though not all) “traditional Catholics,” continues to bestow high honors on molestation facilitators such as Hoyos, and before him, the fugitive from justice Cardinal Bernard Law. 

When the public furor over molestations dies down, the molestation epidemic will resume, because it is inherent to the Hermetic-Kabbalistic post-Renaissance Church of Rome. Woe to those who share in these transgressions against children by making an idol out of advocacy of the Latin Mass while ignoring the corrupt of the earth who promote it for Machiavellian purposes.

Ignoramuses imagine that the “traditional Catholic Church of the great popes of yesteryear” fought the Talmud and totally defeated its theology. This was true of the pontiffs of the medieval True Catholic Church. It was subverted and overthrown beginning under the Medici popes however, starting with Leo X, who promoted the publication of the Talmud and protected the advocates of the Kabbalah (Pope Leo was not unique in this regard as the hidden record of his successors demonstrates).

The best edition of the Babylonian Talmud produced in world history up to that time was published with the blessing and assistance of Pope Leo X and his co-conspirators. 

Recall that the Talmud in BT Sanhedrin 54b absolves the Judaic adult male from all sin, and exempts him from all responsibility in the matter of molesting boys under the age of nine. This halacha was confirmed by the supreme legal authority in Ashkenazi Judaism, the “Rambam” — Rabbi Moses Maimonides, in his Sefer Kedusha, Hilchot Issurei Bia (1:14).

You know you are in the realm of the Talmud when you encounter a two tier legal system: one law for the privileged class and another for everyone else. This is the very root of tyranny: the Communist Party members and the non-communist people; the Judaic adult male and little children; the Church of Rome’s priests and children.

As a researcher investigating these recondite matters for the past 20 years, one would expect that my work would be welcomed, publicized and promoted by those who claim they are fighting for Jesus Christ. Instead, I am censored and suppressed at almost every turn by those claiming to be on God’s side in the fight for Truth. 

The con game by the corrupt of the earth continues.

For further research:

“Vatican Compares Molestation Scandal to “Persecution of the Jews”

https://revisionistreview.blogspot.com/2010/04/vatican-compares-molestation-scandal-to.html

“The Silent Partner in America’s Molestation Culture”

https://revisionistreview.blogspot.com/2017/11/the-silent-partner-in-americas.html

Your donation = the survival of our Truth Mission

https://revisionisthistorystore.blogspot.com 

_______________

Talmud’s view of non-Judaic women

Documenting and exposing hate speech:

The Babylonian Talmud’s hateful attitude toward non-Judaic women

By Michael Hoffman 

Copyright©2018 by RevisionistHistory.org

The general tenor of the Babylonian Talmud and cognate halachic successor texts (Mishneh Torah, Shulchan Aruch etc.) is that all non-Jewish women are represented by the acronym NSHGZ, which signifies Niddah, Shifchah, Goyyah, Zona (menstrual filth, slaves, heathens and whores - cf. BT Sanhedrin 81b-82a). 

In Yiddish slang, a non-Judaic woman is a shiksa ( שיקסע) which personifies the corrosive “NSHGZ” stereotype.

Caution needs to be exercised here, however, because the Babylonian Talmud has a low view of women generally, whether Judaic or gentile. Admittedly, Orthodox Judaism's view of non-Judaic females is much lower by comparison with Judaic women,  and unreservedly toxic. In Israeli, Judaic-American and Yiddish culture, the popular view of the non-Judaic female is that of a highly promiscuous woman, contrasted with the supposedly more sexually modest Judaic woman. 

This view was in the news last January when a researcher with the Washington Post sifted through Hollywood director Woody Allen’s writings and discovered this nugget by Mr. Allen: 

 “Unlike the Jewish girl the shiksa is not guilt-ridden—not a complainer—she is abandoned, fun-loving, and above all promiscuous. The shiksa will perform any sex act.” (Cf. Washington Post online, http://wapo.st/2DipDJ5 [January 4, 2017]).

In studying the halacha of permissible rape of gentiles, we find an expression from Bar-Ilan University Prof. Mordecai Kedar who is on record stating: “The only thing that can deter terrorists...is the knowledge that their sister or their mother will be raped.” (Kedar is also a research fellow at the Begin-Sadat Center for Strategic Studies at Bar-Ilan).

Though it will be claimed by the usual public relations hacks that Prof. Kedar's monstrous rape/deterrent observation is “condemned by the Jewish tradition” (citing, for example, BT Kiddushin 22), there are rabbinic escape clauses which justify rape of non-Judaic women. 

First, the rape target must be classified as a zonah (prostitute) or a nokri (hostile alien). The supreme Ashkenazic halachic authority, Rabbi Moses Maimonides, rules that a Judaic soldier may rape this type of female POW ("Yefas To’ar") when he is not actively fighting a battle (cf. Hilchos Melachim 8:3). For more on this line of thought consult Judaism Discovered, p. 904. 

Courtesy of Maurice Pinay, we have learned of a text from the Meorot theology journal of Yeshivat Chovevei Torah Rabbinic School, on permissible rape: "It is the consensus of many halachic decisors (judges of rabbinic law) that the yefat to’ar can be subject to involuntary intercourse...”  Cf. Dov. S. Zakheim, Meorot, vol. 6, no. 1 (2006), p. 5. (Mr. Zakheim was Under Secretary of Defense in the administration of George W. Bush, 2001-2004).  

Eyal Karim (also spelled "Qarim”), the Israeli military’s chief rabbi, agrees: "Just so, war removes some of the prohibitions on sexual relations (gilui arayot), and even though fraternizing with a gentile woman is a very serious matter, it was permitted during wartime (under the specific terms) out of understanding for the hardship endured by the warriors. And since the success of the whole at war is our goal, the Torah permitted the individual to satisfy the evil urge (yetzer ha’ra), under the conditions mentioned, for the purpose of the success of the whole.” Cf. https://972mag.com/idf-colonel-rabbi-implies-rape-is-permitted-in-war/39535/

_______________________________

Subscribe to Michael Hoffman's Revisionist History® newsletter and start your subscription with the current issue.

Or purchase the current issue only.
_______________________________

Youth for Palestine movement growing in the U.S.

Good News!

American youth movement for Justice for Palestinians is growing

April 2018 —  In another victory for the Palestinian rights movement on U.S. college campuses, students at elite Barnard College in New York City voted nearly two-thirds in favor of a referendum supporting divestment from companies profiting from Israeli war crimes and dispossession of Palestinians, most recently the slaughter of unarmed protestors at a border fence by Israeli army snipers. 

Israeli Brig. General Zvika Fogel

Concerning the murder of Palestinian civilians, including Palestinian children, Israeli General Zvika Fogel stated on Israeli radio April 21: “... if that’s the price that we have to pay to preserve the safety and quality of life of the residents of the State of Israel, then that’s the price.”

Barnard College, a partner of Columbia University, is a prestigious women’s college with a large Judaic student population. Students say that despite attempts to influence votes against the referendum, including smears accusing supporters of the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement of “anti-Semitism,” the referendum was approved on April 18. 

The referendum result comes in spite of recent attempts by the Barnard administration and Israeli lobby groups to bully, intimidate and smear students and faculty supportive of Palestinian rights at Columbia University and Barnard College. 

Earlier this month, Columbia dismissed a lengthy complaint against Columbia University Apartheid Divest (CUAD) by Students Supporting Israel (SSI) a national campus organization which is backed by Israel lobby groups and has ties to the Israeli government (imagine the outcry if a national campus organization had ties to the Russian government). 

The companies that organizers of the referendum have targeted for boycott and divestment are:

Hyundai Heavy Industries 

Caterpillar 

Lockheed Martin 

Boeing 

Elbit Systems 

Hewlett Packard Enterprise 

Bank Hapoalim 

HSBC Bank 
Mekorot 

Jewish Voice for Peace (JVP) has steadily advocated for divestment since its founding in 2016 (Jewish Voice for Peace has recently exposed the ADL). 

According to Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP), the Zionists’ complaint alleged that campus speech supporting Palestinian rights violated New York criminal law!

Students for Justice in Palestine notes that since 2016, the group Students Supporting Israel has filed “several complaints against professors and students for speech critical of Israeli policies,” but every complaint has been dismissed.  

Barnard’s alumnae, who count among their number actress and New York City mayoral candidate Cynthia Nixon, and entrepreneur and food personality Martha Stewart, are known for their strong connection to their alma mater. 

After Barnard students cast ballots that backed the boycott, a group of some 3,000 alumni pushed back with a petition condemning the referendum. They include Barnard board of trustees members Nina Rennert Davidson, and Ruth Horowitz, as well as former president of the New Israel Fund Naomi Chazan, and former Barnard Dean Dorothy Denburg.

Barnard President Sian Leah Beilock responded to the referendum on April 22 with defiance, saying that Barnard would not take any action to divest its endowment from companies complicit in the oppression of Palestinians: “First, taking an institutional stand amid the complexities of the Mideast conflict would risk chilling campus discourse on a set of issues that members of our community should be able to discuss and debate freely. Choosing a side therefore would be inconsistent with our mission,” President Beilock wrote. 

This is arrant nonsense. In the past Barnard took “an institutional stand” against apartheid in South Africa and the former white government there,  notwithstanding the “complexities of the conflict.” 

Those on the justice for Palestine side of the debate, are ecstatic after hearing the results of the referendum, sensing that the tide may be changing in support of their cause, though they were disappointed to read President Beilock’s letter. 

Meanwhile, at New York University (NYU), which has a satellite campus in Tel Aviv, more than fifty student groups recently endorsed a boycott of Israeli goods and academic institutions in an effort organized by NYU’s Jewish Voice for Peace. 

Rabbi Yehuda Sarna, executive director of NYU’s "Bronfman Center for Jewish Student Life," called the boycott “a source of sorrow and disappointment to me.” 

As a fall-back position, Zionists are claiming that the “boycott Israel” BDS movement is “creating an unsafe space on our campus.” 

This exemplifies the politically correct notion that the expression of certain kinds of political speech is dangerous and should be forbidden at colleges and universities. When the Left exhibits this attitude toward speech by conservatives and Republicans, Right wing newspapers such as the Wall Street Journal publish op-eds and editorials decrying it. Yet when it is Right wing Zionists who are demanding limits on freedom of speech at colleges, the Neocons are silent. 

Furthermore, watch for “anti-semitic incidents” clandestinely perpetrated by the Zionists themselves to erupt on these campuses as the last resort of those who have no other argument by which they can defeat the growing youth movement working for justice for Palestinians. The Deep State may also unleash neo-Nazi paraders at Barnard and NYU for the same purpose, to generate sympathy for the Israelis and associate the movement for Palestine “with a rising tide of anti-Semitism.”

These tactics have less effectiveness than ever in a  new media age where websites and Twitter and Facebook operate independent of the mainstream media and supply coverage of the slaughter of Palestinians in graphic detail, whereby the true nature of the genocidal Israeli government, increasingly staffed and led by hardcore Talmudic racists, cannot be denied.

______________

www.RevisionistHistory.org

Human Rights • Freedom of Speech • Revisionist History®

Open Your Mind!

______________