Legacy media whining about investigations into their bigotry

The Karmic Consequences of Heresy-Hunting 

Oozing with aristocratic entitlement and indignation, the legacy media are whining about the insolence of writers and broadcasters who have the effrontery to investigate the skeletons in their closet

By Michael Hoffman

Former reporter for the New York bureau of the Associated Press

www.RevisionistHistory.org

On the front page of the August 25 edition of the New York Times, two reporters, Kenneth P. Vogel and Jeremy W. Peters, decry a new movement by Right wing researchers among Donald Trump’s base, aimed at sleuthing into the background and statements of journalists in the employ of the legacy media 

These investigations have been declared to be off-limits and “clearly not journalism.” So saith Washington Post’s Lord High Emeritus Executive Editor, Leonard Downie Jr. 

He alleges that an "organized, wide-scale political effort to intentionally humiliate journalists and others who work for media outlets” is something new. 

One wonders on what desert island he’s been sojourning. The censorship, doxing, boycotts and obstruction of revisionists, black nationalists and Conservative and Christian journalists don’t seem to register or even exist for media Brahmins of the upper crust.

Follow the money: the legacy media will brook no competition that harms its lucrative monopoly on news. Therefore, we dissident journalists are supposed to know our place and be content with our lot as virtually invisible. The many attempts to humiliate, libel, obstruct and remove us from Google, YouTube, Facebook, Amazon, Twitter and Instagram are of no concern to the High and Mighty in the legacy press.

"It’s one thing for Spiro Agnew to call everyone in the press ‘nattering nabobs of negativism,’ Mr. Downie said, referring to Agnew's critique of how journalists covered President Nixon. “And another thing to investigate individuals in order to embarrass them publicly and jeopardize their employment.” 

This is precisely what several corporate newspaper chains, cable television news, websites, blogs and podcasts have been doing for years, including the NY Times — calling for the dismissal and loss of employment of alternative reporters who have been smeared as anti-Semitic, racist, sexist, homophobic, and so on.

A. G. Sulzberger, the publisher of The New York Times, said in a statement that exposure of shady biographical facts about Times reporters was a case of taking Trump's "campaign against a free press to a new level. They are seeking to harass and embarrass anyone affiliated with the leading news organizations that are asking tough questions and bringing uncomfortable truths to light,” Mr. Sulzberger declared. 

When such tactics are used against the “leading"news organizations they are immoral and wrong. However, when the Times, Washington Post and CNN smear, intimidate and prevent alternative journalists who work for smaller online operations from “asking tough questions and bringing uncomfortable truths to light,” then it’s not at all a matter for outrage. The news aristocrats have spoken. You may now kiss their designer shoes.

Mr. Sulzberger takes the moral high ground on behalf of his very profitable and powerful business behemoth: 

“The goal of this campaign is clearly to intimidate journalists from doing their job, which includes serving as a check on power and exposing wrongdoing when it occurs. The Times will not be intimidated or silenced.”

What about journalists who seek a check on your monopoly power and wrong-doing Mr. Sulzberger? What of your newspaper’s endeavor to jeopardize our employment?

Mr. Sulzberger’s heresy-hunting NY Times has shown zero interest in defending conservative reporters who are not members of the legacy media from calumny and blacklisting. 

Often the Times has been guilty of these odious tactics, which it now indignantly protests when its political rivals and business competitors employ them to deflate the reputation of the Times, and inform the public concerning the questionable character of some of its writers and editors.

In many cases Sulzberger’s newspaper has encouraged those attacks and covered up for thought police groups like Right Wing Watch and "Media Matters for America” that closely investigate and attack conservative journalists, and Sleeping Giants, which is sworn to threaten and shame any platform online that dares to host radical alternatives to politically correct dogma and revolutionary social change.

The Anti-Defamation League (ADL) is a prominent thought police group campaigning for the censorship of history books at Amazon, the silencing of black leaders like Louis Farrakhan, and of activists who are outside the established boundary of permissible opinions about Israeli settler-colonialism and the racist creed of the Babylonian Talmud. Over the years, the New York Times has been a dependable mouthpiece for the ADL and complicit in its libel and intimidation—yet the Times is horrified now that such tactics are being wielded against its own writers. Here we observe the grotesque hypocrisy of the entitled.

In June the heresy-hunters at Google’s YouTube removed several legitimate revisionist history videos, together with many white supremacist and hate speech videos. Having accepted without investigation Google’s deceitful description of all the videos it removed from YouTube as constituting "hate speech," the New York Times mechanically reported the entire ban in terms of taking down hate speech. Our video exposing Deborah Lipstadt’s hate speech toward historian David Irving was one of the films banned from YouTube. Consequently, our video which fulfilled a public service by advancing knowledge about the hate speech of an Establishment-revered Zionist celebrity (Lipstadt), was banned in the name of combating hate speech. The Times cooperated and was party to the masquerade. Revisionist researchers and activists are barely human in the eyes of the Times, and unworthy of the anguish and hand-wringing now being expended to defend their own hired hands from suppression and removal. This corrosive double standard undercuts Mr. Sulzberger’s protestations and reveals the corruption at the heart of his newspaper’s reporting.

Below is our note, which we e-mailed to the two NY Times employees who, in the August 25 online edition, told of the supposedly immoral and impudent move to investigate the background and statements of their distinguished fellow reporters at the legacy media’s most honored and acclaimed flagship, to which every decent American is expected to demonstrate fealty.

Dear Messers Vogel and Peters

You wrote, "In the case of the pro-Trump network, research into journalists is being deployed for the political benefit of the White House.”

I can’t abide Trump but I consider these exposures of privileged  members of the legacy media delightful, due to the fact that said media have acquiesced in massive censorship and denial of service on Facebook, YouTube, Google and in Amazon’s censorship of historians’ dissident books. In these instances involving alternative writers and journalists who compete with the NY Times and other legacy media, there has been little or no solidarity offered by your fellow reporters and editors. 

In many cases where the harassed and interdicted alternative journalists are Conservatives, there have been expressions from members of the legacy media of satisfaction at the heresy-hunting, doxing and removals.

Now, when the shoe is on the other foot, we’re supposed to believe the process of sleuthing into journalists' public and private foibles and failings is somehow an outrage against press freedom? 

Freedom of the press does not begin at the gate of the legacy media. The Times, the Post, CNN etc. were the ones who first let the genie out of the bottle. You ought to deal with the karmic consequences without whining. 

Better yet, work for the freedom of expression of your lumpen proletariat rivals online.

Michael Hoffman

_____________

Your donation keeps Michael working for Truth

Donate now!

_____________

The “Aryan” Kabbalah

The “Aryan” Kabbalah

Mr. Hoffman: Since the Kabbalah is rabbinic, how would Hitler be influenced by it, as you have claimed?

Hoffman: Since the Renaissance, the syncretic religion of the western occult has conceived of the Kabbalah as a book of ancient Aryan wisdom, allegedly pre-dating rabbinic Judaism. This claim was summarized by Éliphas Levi: 

“All religions have preserved the remembrance of a primitive book, written in hieroglyphs by the sages of the earliest epoch of the world. This book was the symbolical summary of primitive tradition, called subsequently Kabbalah” (cf. Gnosis, Summer, 1997, p. 64). 

Éliphas Levi (1810-1875), was a black magician and “traditional Catholic” whose occultism was harbored and shielded by every notable 19th century Church authority we could locate in the annals of the pontificate of Pope Pius IX, himself a supposedly spotless paragon in the eyes of contemporary Right-wing papalists. 

Levi was the arch Kabbalist situated at the gateway to the fin de siècle era in the decadent France he helped to shape. Apart from his sorcery and demonism, Levi led the attack on the Old Testament as the Word of God. Levi was one channel of the esoteric doctrine that the occult teachers of Adolf Hitler passed to him. 

For Levi. cf. “Satanic Feminism” in Revisionist History® no. 94 (January, 2018).

and: 

“A Prequel to The Occult Renaissance Church of Rome”

_______________

Epstein’s Death: Contract killing ordered by Talmudic authorities?

Jeffrey Epstein’s Death in Custody: 

Contract killing Ordered by Talmudic authorities? 

The following is authored by the Historical Research Department of the Nation of Islam 

August 10, 2019

Jeffrey Epstein was the central figure in Mossad’s blackmail operation, by which they controlled the U.S. government. But through his own malfeasance he had put Israel at risk. That bleak outlook called into play a little-known Talmudic option that is afforded to Jews in such a predicament. In Hebrew it is called din moser (“law of the informer”) and din rodef (“law of the pursuer”), and they are concepts found in the Babylonian Talmud (Tractate Sanhedrin, 73a). These are literally contract killings ordered by Jewish authorities against a Jew that is thought to have betrayed or will betray Jewish interests. The Epstein case had now involved the highest Jewish authorities in America and put their reputations and their constituencies in league with a truly rogue character who had outlived his strategic value.

Scholars have now acknowledged that the 1995 assassination of Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin was just such a din rodef contract murder, ordered by a special court of Israeli rabbis. By conceding to the Palestinians land that many Jews believed was conferred to them by God Himself (in Genesis 15:17), Rabin was said to have betrayed the Jewish people. The assassin, rabbinical student Yigal Amir, justified his act on that very basis, telling police that he was acting on the basis of a rabbinical din rodef ruling. “Once something is a ruling, there is no longer a moral issue,” said Amir.

The Nation of Islam Research Group make a strong circumstantial case that the lynching of Leo Frank—the father of the ADL—was just such a din rodef contract murder (this is discussed in The Secret Relationship Between Blacks and Jews, Volume 3, pages 328-330).

Last, Epstein’s alleged partner in procuring the blackmail bait (young girls) was Ghislaine Maxwell, whose father was Mossad agent and billionaire publishing/media magnate Robert Maxwell (real name: Ján Ludvík Hyman Binyamin Hoch). He was also “suicided” by Mossad—found floating in the ocean near his yacht. 

Copyright ©2019 The Nation of Islam

___________________________

Michael Hoffman’s Truth Mission needs your support —  donate today!

___________________________

YouTube Bans Two Videos by Michael Hoffman

The New Inquisition Heats Up

In the name of promoting “tolerance," YouTube is helping to establish a dictatorship over the mind of man

By Michael Hoffman

www.RevisionistHistory.org

The Google-owned online video-streaming service YouTube has announced a new initiative to ban videos that advance human knowledge in ways that the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) of B’nai B’rith disapproves. This thought policing is being deceitfully painted in the controlled media under false pretenses, as a long overdue clamp-down on "neo-Nazis and white supremacists.” We are none of those things.  

This sweeping and inaccurate generalization is intended to mollify civil libertarians who might otherwise protest the ban if they knew that it is aimed at dissenting and non-conforming journalists and historians — which, in fact, it is. 

Meanwhile, we know of influential rabbis at elite yeshivas in the Israeli state who laud Adolf Hitler yet are not the subject of the latest inquisition, or any scrutiny or negative publicity from the American media. Unknown to the public at large, neo-Nazi ideology is supported by the Establishment without interdiction by YouTube, Facebook or other social media.

On June 5 YouTube banned two of our videos:

 “Deborah Lipstadt, Amalek and David Irving” studying racist denigration and violence against historian Irving,

 and:

 “Academic Freedom and Holocaust Denial Newspeak” — an analysis of Orwellian manipulation of language. 

Knowledge and reason are banned.

This follows Amazon’s ban last August on our book, Judaism’s Strange Gods: Revised and Expanded.

All of these acts of suppression of knowledge are intended to make the world safe for Zionist and Talmudic deception. The Internet was established for the purpose of the advancement of human knowledge. The attempt to demonize radical knowledge will only make that knowledge more attractive to truth-seekers.

YouTube’s censorship bears the hallmarks of a Soviet tribunal. Notice that no quotes from the allegedly offending videos are presented as evidence of “hate.” Why not? Because the raison d’être for our lectures and addresses is the exposure of hatred against marginalized human beings. No contrary evidence need be presented. It is enough that we are accused by the neo-Stalinists. Their accusation makes us guilty. Facts are irrelevant. If this isn’t tyranny, what is?

Yesterday we shipped a case of Judaism’s Strange Gods: Revised and Expanded to Pastor Chuck Baldwin in Montana. His secretary reports that they can’t keep up with the demand. Furthermore, The Nation of Islam is producing a 50 minute anti-racist video consisting of a seminar hosted by their distinguished Historical Research Department featuring this writer's intensive talk analyzing the Talmud and other racist rabbinic texts, to a gathering of some two hundred Black Muslim scholars in Chicago last February.

The ban on our videos and books tend to demonstrate that the ADL and similar unregistered agents of the Israeli terror state who pressure YouTube, have something to hide. 

They cannot answer informed critics of Talmudic and Kabbalistic dogma and the Israeli holocaust against the Palestinians, so they resort to despotic censorship. This betrays a terrible weakness and vulnerability on their part.

Seventy-five years ago today, June 6, Pastor Earl Jones of New Mexico and his brother, landed on the beaches of Normandy. His brother didn’t make it. Pastor Jones lived to teach this writer a thing or two, including that no matter how many bullets are flying, you keep moving forward.

Keep Michael Hoffman moving forward  — send a donation today!

_____________

Islam, Talmudism and ignorant “Christians"

“Fear him that can destroy both soul and body”

Islam, Talmudism and ignorant “Christians" 

By Michael Hoffman

www.RevisionistHistory.org

Islam is being portrayed in America as our worst enemy. By any standard, material or spiritual, this claim is a flagrant lie. In terms of the physical destruction of peoples, we have the witness of Alexander Solzhenitsyn:

“You must understand. The leading Bolsheviks who took over Russia were not Russians. They hated Russians. They hated Christians. Driven by ethnic hatred they tortured and slaughtered millions of Russians without a shred of human remorse...It cannot be overstated. Bolshevism committed the greatest human slaughter of all time. The fact that most of the world is ignorant and uncaring about this enormous crime is proof that the global media is in the hands of its perpetrators.” (200 Years Together).

Among the “ignorant” are untold numbers of “conservative Protestants” and “traditional Catholics” for whom Islam is foremost in their minds as history’s most criminal ideology, because this is what chameleon Talmudism wants them to believe and like obedient children, they believe it. We say, “chameleon” because when it has suited them, rabbis have been the staunchest allies of jihadist Islam, as we documented in our Revisionist History® newsletter no. 70; a fact forgotten by our nation of amnesiacs.

Neither can it be said from the spiritual point of view that Islam is our virulent enemy. Supposed followers of Christ seem to have forgotten their Master’s standard in this regard, “Fear ye not them that kill the body, and are not able to kill the soul: but rather fear him that can destroy both soul and body...” (Matthew 10:28; Rheims translation of 1582).

• As far as soul-killing is concerned, can it be said that Muslims are behind Hollywood’s numerous film depictions of Jesus as a demented sex freak and coward?

• Are Muslims operating America’s pornography industry, the largest in the world?

• Do Muslims control the media and encourage gun violence, nudity and promiscuity?

• Do Muslims permit the exhibition of art works such as “Piss Christ” and encourage the popularity of Terence McNally’s “queer Jesus” play, “Corpus Christi”? On the contrary, the Muslims protest these works whenever possible as well as the defamation of Jesus and Mary.

• Was it Muslims who were at the Second Vatican Council directing the Church to drop its charge of deicide against the Pharisees?

• Prior to that Council, was it Muslims who were mentioned by name as “perfidious” in the traditional Good Friday liturgy?

• Is it Muslims who direct the scourge of usury and the Federal Reserve Bank?

Our souls and the souls of our children are being rotted and eternally lost through an alliance between wicked gentiles and Talmudists and Zionists. 

Some Sunni Muslims of the Saudi Arabian Wahhabist/Salafist ideology kill our bodies. They have seldom if ever led the modern movements of rank perversion that kill our souls. By the criterion established by Jesus Christ Himself, we are to be vigilant against the Talmudic destroyers of our souls far above the Muslim destroyers of our bodies who, even in that respect, take a back seat to Bolshevism.

Excerpted from the January 2015 issue (no. 76) of Revisionist History® newsletter • Copyright©2015. 

Subscriptions: $40 for six issues in the U.S. • $50 Canada • $55 Overseas
 Independent History and Research • Box 849 • Coeur d’Alene, Idaho 83816 USA 

_______________

Calls for Priest’s Removal After Church Hosts Speech by Farrakhan

Calls for Chicago Priest’s Removal After Church Hosts Speech by Louis Farrakhan Critical of the Talmud

"It is now up to the leaders of the Catholic church to remove their prominent priest from his hallowed post.”
 — Rabbi Abraham Cooper

By Michael Hoffman
www.RevisionistHistory.org

Cardinal Blase Cupich of Chicago has condemned liberal Catholic priest Fr. Michael Pfleger, pastor of St. Sabina church for hosting a speech on May 9 by Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan. The Cardinal says he is “shocked” by Farrakhan’s criticism of the Babylonian Talmud. Cupich is horrified that Farrakhan dared to: “suggest... that ‘Talmudic thought’ sanctioned pedophilia and misogyny.” 

All of the statements concerning the Talmud of Babylon which Minister Farrakhan made were accurate. Truth is not an issue in the controversy.

Before being elevated to his post in Chicago by Pope Francis, Cupich was Bishop of Spokane, Washington. There Cupich allegedly assisted members of the Jesuit order in hiding priests credibly accused of child molestation — with what is said to be the connivance of then-Bishop Cupich they were placed in secret at Cardinal Bea House, a Jesuit residential facility located on the campus of Gonzaga University and near St. Aloysius elementary school [see here and here].

Farrakhan spoke at the Chicago church as part of a community protest against his having been banned by Facebook and Instagram. In his address at St. Sabina, Minister Farrakhan valiantly defended Jesus and the Blessed Mother Mary from the Talmudic hate speech which is the basis of the halacha or law of Orthodox Judaism. No other national Islamic or Christian leader has been willing to sound the alarm and educate the public concerning this institutionalized, scurrilous vilification of the Messiah of Israel and His Mother. Farrakhan also made reference to the Talmud’s ghastly doctrine concerning sex with children. 

According to Chicago’s ABC News outlet (abc7chicago.com), “Pfleger invited Farrakhan to speak at St. Sabina a week after he was permanently banned from Facebook and Instagram for what the platform deemed hateful and even dangerous. Farrakhan spoke for about an hour to a standing room-only audience. Many in the church streamed his remarks live on Facebook.”  

Cupich said in a statement, "Without consulting me, Fr. Michael Pfleger invited Minister Louis Farrakhan to speak at St. Sabina Church in response to Facebook's decision to ban him from its platforms.”

CNN reports, “Farrakhan made several anti-Semitic statements during his speech, accusing Judaism of promoting pedophilia and saying that Jews do not like him because he ‘exposes their hatred of Jesus.’ He also said that he had a divine mission to ‘separate the good Jews from the Satanic Jews.”

How is truth a "statement of anti-Semitism”? If the Talmud does indeed grant permission, under certain circumstances, for the sexual molestation of young persons, how does the articulation of that fact constitute an offense against Semitic people? Is this not a salutary warning to them to defend their children against this dogma?

When investigators speak of the molestation of children by Rome’s Catholic clerics, are they making an “anti-Italian statement”? How would Italians or Judaic people —or anyone else for that matter — be harmed by a truth which helps to shed light on the exploitation of children?

"Such statements shock the conscience," Cupich replied. “I apologize to my Jewish brothers and sisters, whose friendship I treasure, from whom I learn so much, and whose covenant with God remains eternal," the cardinal continued.

He’s apologizing because a prominent black leader told the truth in a Catholic Church. This is apparently a grievous offense necessitating groveling of the most obsequious ignobility.

Wiesenthal Center Rabbi Orders Fr. Pfleger’s Removal

The Simon Wiesenthal Center has called on the Archdiocese of Chicago to remove Fr. Pfleger: "How is it that (Farrakhan) was invited to use a prominent Catholic church to denounce 'Satanic Jews' from the pulpit," asked Rabbi Abraham Cooper, the center's director of social action. "It is now up to the leaders of the Catholic church to remove their prominent priest from his hallowed post," Cooper continued. 

Apparently there is either no such thing as a Judaic person who is Satanic, or, it is grounds for another ban, this time on Fr. Pfleger, for his guest speaker having called certain Satanists to account. Here we observe an expectation of special immunity, a derivative of Talmudic exceptionalism. When it is not conceded by Farrakhan and Pfleger, then enforcement is demanded. 

We live in an era when, to defend the indefensible Talmud from exposure, activists, scholars and religious leaders must be forbidden to speak on social media, officiate at churches or publish on Amazon. The watchword of the “tolerant” is “ban, ban, ban,” because that’s all they’ve got. The facts are on Farrakhan’s side, so instead of debate they suppress. How is human knowledge advanced by such a reactionary process? What we are witnessing is a new inquisition.

It’s an irony missed that a meeting called to protest the censorship and removal of Minister Louis Farrakhan from Facebook may result in the censorship and removal of Father Michael Pfleger from his parish church. There’s no end in sight to the megalomania of the censors who, from their lofty perch of self-righteous rectitude, presume to obstruct knowledge and freedom of speech in the name of “fighting hate.” 

The Anti-Defamation League has called Farrakhan, who has led the Nation of Islam since 1977, "quite possibly America's most popular anti-Semite." For the ADL one of his most extreme thought crimes is that "Farrakhan has alleged that the Jewish people were responsible for the slave trade."

CNN and the rest of the corporate media neglect to report that the Nation of Islam’s erudite history, The Secret Relationship Between Blacks and Jews, a three volume revisionist trilogy on the black slave trade and the Leo Frank case, was banned in February by Amazon, during Black History Month.

According to CNN, “Pfleger, who has long worked with African-American leaders in Chicago, said Farrakhan and the Nation of Islam are respected locally for their anti-violence and anti-drug campaigns. ‘Nobody has done more in the saving of young black men's lives and turning around lives than the Nation of Islam. His respect in the African-American community has been consistent."

“This is a free-speech issue," Fr. Pfleger told CNN. "I don't agree with everything Minister Farrakhan has said. I don't agree with anyone on everything, but we are in a dangerous time when we can no longer have dialogue without demonizing one another."

Before the address, Pfleger said Farrakhan "has been a bold voice against injustice done against black people in this country and his voice deserves and needs to be heard."

Fr. Pfleger reports that e-mail and phone calls have poured in denouncing him for hosting Farrakhan and threatening to withdraw donations to the church and its programs. "If you would have heard and seen the stuff sent and spoken to me over this last week," he said. "I was shocked — and I have gotten a lot of hate in my life. People have told me that they will destroy me."

It is worth noting that reports of Farrakhan’s speech at St. Sabina by CNN, the ADL, the Wiesenthal Center, and the Southern Poverty Law Center, all avoid using the word “Talmud” to describe Minister Farrakhan’s criticisms. For the word Talmud they substitute the phrase, “Jewish writings.” It appears that they have a sense that the Talmud has an unsavory reputation in the minds of many Americans, and for that reason they avoid mentioning it in connection with Farrakhan’s fact-finding. 

“It is dangerous to me when we begin to stop free speech and seek to silence prophetic voices. There are many who say they do not like Minister Farrakhan because all they have heard is various sound bites. Perhaps that is why Facebook wanted to ban him — to keep people from hearing his whole talk, his entire message and the truth that he seeks to teach us.”  - Fr. Michael Pfleger

Cardinal Cupich’s Statement

Without consulting me, Fr. Michael Pfleger invited Minister Louis Farrakhan to speak at St. Sabina Church in response to Facebook's decision to ban him from its platforms. Minister Farrakhan could have taken the opportunity to deliver a unifying message of God's love for all his children. Instead, he repeatedly smeared the Jewish people, using a combination of thinly veiled discriminatory rhetoric and outright slander. He suggested that "Talmudic thought" sanctioned pedophilia and misogyny. He referred to Jewish people as "satanic," asserting that he was sent by God to separate the "good Jews" from the "satanic Jews." 

Such statements shock the conscience. People of faith are called to live as signs of God's love for the whole human family, not to demonize any of its members. This is all the more true of religious leaders, who have a sacred duty never to leverage the legitimacy of their ministry to heap blame upon a group of persons, and never to deploy inflammatory rhetoric, long proven to incite violence. Antisemitic rhetoric - discriminatory invective of any kind - has no place in American public life, let alone in a Catholic church. I apologize to my Jewish brothers and sisters, whose friendship I treasure, from whom I learn so much, and whose covenant with God remains eternal. 

I encourage Fr. Pfleger to accept the invitation of the Illinois Holocaust Museum and Education Center to meet with their leadership and dialogue with survivors. And I pledge to continue our work with our city's religious leaders and all people of good will to promote tolerance, respect, and nonviolence. As the Reverend Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. said, "Hate is too great a burden to bear." (end quote from Chicago Cardinal Cupich)

Michael Hoffman is the author of Judaism’s Strange Gods: Revised and Expanded, and eight other books of history and literature.

For further research:

Rally for Farrakhan to protest Facebook Censorship at St. Sabina Church, May 9, 2019
(Complete at 1 hour 44 min.)

"Facebook Censorship: White Supremacy of the Most Hypocritical Type"

Excerpts from Minister Farrakhan’s Remarks on the Talmud

Another clip is here:

Video clip: See why Zuckerberg banned Louis Farrakhan from Facebook. Minister Farrakhan says what your pope, priests, preachers and TV evangelists have never dared to say in defense of the Holy Name of Jesus, contra the hatred for Him in the Talmud—hatred approved by the System. pic.twitter.com/4AEP3vfd3G

— Michael Hoffman (@HoffmanMichaelA) May 10, 2019

___________________

Facebook Censorship: White supremacy of the most hypocritical type

Facebook Censorship: 

White Supremacy of the Most Hypocritical Type

The bold promise of a new liberty online is being circumscribed and narrowed by a thousand incremental acts of suppression, which if it continues, over time will forge an Internet which mirrors the decrepit censorship system it was supposed to surpass and overcome.

By Michael Hoffman

www.RevisionistHistory.org

Actor James Woods and Minister Louis Farrakhan

Facebook is receiving congratulations from the darkest corner of the web for reverting to the discredited gatekeeping of the legacy media and further eroding freedom of inquiry on the Internet, which in its early days gained popularity as an antidote to the very censorship we see Facebook (and Paypal and Amazon) imposing.

When they were all up and coming capitalists, the CEOs of these companies preached freedom of expression. Now that they’ve made it into the billionaire’s club they have abandoned the very ideals which brought them fame and fortune. Their conceit that they are avatars of new thinking for the digital age is now exposed as a cheap trick driven by the college campus nanny doctrine that there must be “safe spaces” erected where “micro-aggression” emanating from radical ideas cannot be allowed to penetrate.

Freedom of speech means nothing if it doesn’t mean freedom for your fiercest rivals in the ideological and political struggle. The Tech Tyrants have a megalomaniacal confidence in their own righteousness, which has increasingly transformed the Internet into a zone of conformity. As Heather Mac Donald notes, “They consider any disagreement with their own political outlook as a manifestation of 'hate,' and as such, fair game for suppression.”

What they ignore in their hubris is that there are few things more disturbing to Americans than suppression of the advancement of human knowledge through the free competition of ideas. Not so very long ago rights for homosexuals and their marriage were offensive topics proscribed by gatekeeping media. Today that suppression appears to modernists like a relic from a dark age, while suppressing conspiracy theorists and black Muslims is hailed as a virtue. It’s a case of the double standard, freedom of speech for me, but not for thee: my radical cause deserves to be publicized, while your radicalism is offensive to my dogma and therefore will be policed off Facebook and eventually, social media in general.

Mark Zuckerberg and his Facebook cohort have banned and removed Minister Louis Farrakhan of the Nation of Islam from Facebook and Instagram. Farrakhan dissents from the conformist narrative about Israeli Zionism and Talmudic Judaism, while having the highest respect for true Jews. He is demonized and expelled by invoking “anti-Semitism.” All it takes is for the charge to be made and under the dictatorship of the Tech Tyrants, the accused is banned without the right of appeal or due process. This is from the playbook of Communist despot Vladimir Lenin and Nazi Judge Roland Freisler.

Last February Amazon banned three magisterial volumes of black history produced by the Nation of Islam’s scholars, The Secret Relationship Between Blacks and Jews. To add insult to injury, this ignominious book-banning occurred during Black History Month. Amazon claims for public relations’ purposes to be an anti-racist organization, yet here we observe the white liberals who own Amazon sneaking through a ban on brilliant and thus far irrefutable works of black history.

The Canadian-Israeli researcher David Sheen appears to draw upon these books as the foundation of his lectures on the forbidden fact of the Judaic role in the black slave trade. As a white Judaic man he has the privilege of saying without fear of being banned, what Louis Farrakhan and his organization were the first to uncover and publish. Is this not a privilege of white supremacy?

Underneath all the slogans and name-calling is the struggle between ideas.  The white nationalists who parade in the streets and fire guns at Judaic people, are too obtuse to perceive that their alleged combat contra Judaism is in truth a losing battle against their own philosophical allies. Talmudism of the “settler" type practiced since the founding of the Israeli state in 1948 is a form of racial-supremacist neo-Nazism. Hitler was under the influence of Kabbalistic and Talmudic ideology from 1919 onward. He was channeling the most ferocious racism on the planet.

Decades ago Hebrew University Prof. Yeshayahu Leibowitz warned of the ascendance of what he termed “Judeo-Nazis.” There are indeed Nazi rabbis teaching young people in the Israeli state today. They convey Hitler’s ideology to their students. For this writer to report it may cause me to be banned. 

Facts have been judged too hot for you to handle and your infantilization is enforced by self-appointed commissars of the news, imitating the old model of gatekeeping perfected by the increasingly obsolete legacy media. This is a betrayal of the very idea of the Internet. In the 1990s John Perry Barlow, one of the earliest advocates of the Internet, witnessed it functioning as a revolutionary alternative to the censorship common to television and the newspapers, "We are now, as a global group, going into a period where the old editorial system, the old way of stomping down consciousness to a bearable aperture is about to get blasted.”

This is less the case in 2019. The bold promise of a new liberty online is being circumscribed and narrowed by a thousand incremental acts of suppression, which if it continues, over time will forge an Internet which mirrors the decrepit censorship system it was supposed to surpass and overcome.

The archetypal representative of that stale, anachronistic system is the New York Times. The Times has judged it not helpful for you to know about the influential Israeli rabbi who promotes the burning of churches, or the Israeli professor who advocates the rape of Palestinian mothers and wives, or the Israeli chief army chaplain who agrees with this monstrous advocacy. 

Mass shooting and bombing of Palestinians by the Israeli military are considered by the establishment media to be unworthy of anything other than the most cursory notice, while violence to a Zionist, whether in America, Europe or the Israeli state, becomes a mini-holocaust of epic proportions, triggering a deluge of tears, legislation and intense media coverage. As the Talmud Bavli decrees, there is one standard for the Holy People and another for the goyim.

For the advancement of knowledge without interdiction by partisan expurgators masquerading as objective journalists, a free and untrammeled Internet is absolutely essential, indeed fundamental to what it means to be fully human. "Human rights” is an empty shibboleth if it does not signify the right to know and argue freely according to conscience, something John Milton proposed in 1644, in his essay Areopagitica. He wrote, “If reading is regulated, then music, conversation, every incident of social life must be regulated too.” Four hundred years later and we have yet to learn what Milton knew.

Facebook, Paypal and Amazon will not suppress the Nazi rabbis or the pro-rape rabbis. Just as Judeo-white supremacy is the covert weapon against blacks in the Nation of Islam who are not willing to submit to the plantation mentality, Nazi ideology and genetic supremacy can be preached with impunity as long as it is done under Zionist or Talmudic auspices. If you understand this, then you know what a mockery is the solemn piety and finger-wagging that accompanies the suppression of heretics like Paul Joseph Watson, Alex Jones and Louis Farrakhan.

Rabbis at the Israeli-government-funded Bnei David academy, an elite yeshiva (Talmud school) preparing Israeli youth for leadership positions in the Israeli army, glorify Hitler and the Nazis and urge the enslavement of Arabs. Don’t ask Wikipedia or the legacy news about these Israeli Nazis. You’re not supposed to know. This is what Facebook, Paypal and Amazon are working toward: a vacuum where Correct Think can safely extinguish vital information that has been damned as hateful by people who hate freedom.

Rabbi Eliezer Kashtiel lectures his students at Bnei David academy as follows: 

“The gentiles will want to be our slaves. Being a slave to a Jew is the best. They’re glad to be slaves, they want to be slaves. Instead of just walking the streets and being stupid and violent and harming each other, once they’re slaves, their lives can begin to take shape....Yes, we’re racists. We believe in racism. There are races in the world and there are genetic traits inherent in nations. This demands that we think how to help them.  There are differences among races....There are nations around us with genetic defects.  The Arab wants to be under Occupation because they have a genetic defect. They don’t know how to run a state. They don’t know how to do anything. Look at how they act.” 

Rabbi Giora Radler, addressed the Bnei David academy youth: 

“Let’s begin by asking the question: was Hitler right or not? He is the most correct person there is. He was definitely right in every word he said. His ideology was correct. There is a male world which fights, which deals with honor and the brotherhood of soldiers. And there is the soft, ethical feminine world which turns the other cheek.”

As noted, Louis Farrakhan respects true Jews, as defined by the Book of Revelation. But he has righteous anger when he sees Palestinian civilians murdered weekly with no tears shed by the white rulers of America. Neither does he suffer gladly black youth being summarily gunned down by members of American police departments which have been trained by Israeli police in the same tactics they use to wantonly take the lives of Palestinian youth. 

Farrakhan does not sit mute and passive like “evangelists” Franklin Graham, Joel Osteen and T.D. Jakes, while the name of Jesus Christ is blasphemed in the Talmud. He thunders, he excoriates, he admonishes and he teaches. This is denounced as “extremism.”

The Internet Overlords are heading toward a dictatorship over the mind which they are imposing incrementally, using the pretext of combating white nationalism. (Last time we checked, Minister Farrakhan was not white). 

Combatting the white, Yiddish-Ashkenazi Talmudic extremism that is reviving the Hitler cult and has taken thousands of Palestinian lives is not on the agenda. How can it be, when the driving force behind Facebook’s censorship is its own deeply concealed Judeo-white supremacy?

Our thoughts turn to China and other nations not captive to the Anglo-Zionist networks. American diplomats and newspaper and Internet pundits pompously lecture China on freedom of expression and democracy, presuming, as the British empire did in the 19th century, that the Chinese are dull and slow-witted. Can anyone expect the Chinese to loosen their hold on the Internet when they see American tech tyrants such as Mr. Zuckerberg practicing censorship and limiting free expression?

Facebook boss Mark Zuckerberg is encouraging the closing of minds around the world in the name of opposing racism and hatred. Communist Party boss Xi Jinping censors to maintain “Confucian harmony.” Both are pretexts for thought control and the fear that a political or theological rival might get the best of the argument and win adherents.

Gaslighting Farrakhan presupposes that his support among people of color will decline because Facebook has silenced him. Yet the record shows that he has gone from strength to strength as a result of the attacks of the white power structure. Blacks in America are aware that Minister Farrakhan is being censored because he will not behave on the plantation. Moreover, his defiance is a lightning rod for people of all colors who are fed up with the crushing dominion of money over the free spirit of humanity. 

Mr. Farrakhan’s position in the black community is not dependent on where he’s at in digital cyberspace. He's the visionary who organized and led The Million Man March in the streets of Washington D.C. He is the one who has healed and empowered the black family. He has ennobled the black man and woman in the face of the pernicious hate and racism of the prestigious Rabbi Maimonides, who centuries ago taught the western world that blacks are lower than the level of human. Farrakhan reminds his people that they are the imago Dei, even as Maimonides classed them only slightly above apes. So who is the hater?

Louis Farrakhan’s love for his people cannot be disputed. Telling the black community he is a hater flies in the face of everything they know about him. Meanwhile, buildings are named and statues are erected to Maimonides by the closeted liberal white supremacists who cleverly sear their rivals with the stigma of “hater." 

The world is to be made safe for white supremacist Talmudism by any means, including making a charade of the West’s own hallowed principles of free speech. The blowback has already begun, however. In the HipHop World they are saying, “Minister Farrakhan has been instrumental in quelling beef, guiding the leaders like (rapper) Snoop and mending wounds that have been long-standing in the community. He's a staple. Now, he has said something that people of a certain persuasion may take the wrong way, but what do you think Black people and others or color must contend with daily?”

The history of martyrdom demonstrates that blatantly repressive tactics against women and men who put their life on the line for their ideals will always help to propagate those ideals. Such a man is the Honorable Minister Louis Farrakhan. Zuckerberg, Bezos and the other Internet monopolists will never defeat him.

Copyright©2019 by Independent History and Research

Michael Hoffman is a former reporter for the New York bureau of the Associated Press. His writing has appeared in the New York Times and the New York Review of Books. He is the author of the textbook Judaism Discovered, and a popular condensation, Judaism’s Strange Gods: Revised and Expanded. Mr. Hoffman is managing editor of Revisionist History® newsletter.

_________________