Welcome Information Connoisseurs

Welcome Information Connoisseurs

Saturday, July 23, 2022

Jesuit Priest James Martin: A Wolf in Wolf’s Clothing

 Jesuit Priest James Martin: 

A Wolf in Wolf’s Clothing

The pope's media ambassador advocates in national forums for Communion for abortion-enablers

He's an elite spokesman for the dissolution of the last vestiges of the Bible’s authority in what remains of Catholicism. Our study reveals the depth of his intellectual dishonesty.

By Michael Hoffman


“Could my spoken words have checked, That whereby a house lay wrecked?” —Yeats

Pope Francis and Fr. James Martin, S.J.

St. Augustine wrote of the conflict between cupidity and charity, between the love of the world and the love of God. Cupidity seems to have overtaken the career of Vatican communications agent James Martin, S.J.

Jesuit priest Martin is the Vatican’s top English-language ambassador to those smitten by popular culture, “the most influential priest in the English-speaking world.”

He’s “really with it” and “helps to make the Church relevant.” One aspect of this “relevance” is his advocacy of what he calls “LGBTQ Catholicism.” Martin Scorcese, the Hollywood director who gave the world the movie, “The Last Temptation of Christ” portraying Our Lord as a demented sex freak and coward, is the executive producer of a 2022 documentary extolling Father Martin, “Building a Bridge” (Martin wrote a best-selling book of the same name). 

Jim Russell in Crisis Magazine observes Martin’s sly casuistry: “James Martin is a flagrant dissenter from Church teaching, flagrant in regard to his actions, but subtle in regard to his words. He verbally hides his rejection of Church teaching behind the façade of ‘not challenging’ it.” 

David Laidlaw in “Catholic World Report” writes, “Fr. James Martin plays rhetorical games with the truth about transgenderism.” 

Some of Martin’s mask fell off last May on the website, “Outreach: An LGBTQ Catholic Resource," where Fr. Martin wrote:

“I’ve become friends with several transgender Catholics…I have also accompanied parents and families who have had a child (or sibling or spouse) announce that they are ‘transitioning’…(W)hy (did) so many Catholic leaders began using the language of sin and repentance so quickly for a phenomenon that, at least publicly, is still so new, so little understood and still the source of so much scientific debate? How did the church move so swiftly to condemnation regarding a group who often say that they are striving to be whom God calls them to be, and who are severely at risk of suicide and self-harm, as well as violence and harassment, according to almost every report?

"…major medical organizations, including the American Medical Association, the American Academy of Pediatrics and the American Psychological Association, have concluded that ‘gender-affirming care is medically necessary for transgender youth and is backed by decades of research.

“…Among the more controversial treatments are hormone therapies for youth, sometimes called ‘puberty blockers.’ Many argue strongly against their use, primarily because the long-term side effects are still unknown. Others point out that they are reversible, “largely considered safe for short-term use” and an alternative to surgery, giving parents and youth more time to wait and discern. They also reduce rates of depression and suicide. A study in the Journal of the American Medical Association indicated that they reduce depression by as much as 60% and suicide by as much as 73%.” 

Martin neglected to mention that administering puberty blockers and mutilating surgeries increases profits for unscrupulous physicians by as much as 100% to 200%. 

 There's a new sin, according to Martin:

"Biological Reductionism"

In response to a 2019 Catholic theological document, “Male and Female He Created Them,” attempting to frame the controversy in Biblical terms, Fr. Martin implies such teaching is obsolete in light of recent “scientific” findings:

“…the document…neglects to engage in discussions about new scientific understandings and discoveries about gender. It relies mainly on what one Catholic moral theologian described to me as 'biological reductionism': the belief that gender is determined solely by one’s visible genitalia, which contemporary science has shown is not always an accurate way to categorize people. Gender is also biologically determined by genetics, hormones and brain chemistry—things that are not visible at birth. The congregation’s document relies heavily on categories of male and female that were shaped centuries ago, rather than with more contemporary scientific methods.”

Fr. Martin advances the legitimacy of those who bear xy chromosomes impersonating people who possess xx chromosomes. He counsels the Church’s cooperation with this delusional mockery as “a pastoral approach.” Those opposed are guilty of a new Orwellian sin, "biological reductionism."

Martin is a personal friend of Pope Francis and part of the Vatican’s worldwide communications team. He is considered an astute spokesman for Newchurch and the ongoing dissolution of the last vestiges of the Bible’s authority in what remains of Catholicism. 

This slick Jesuit media operator revealed the depth of his intellectual dishonesty in a July 22 op-ed column in the Wall Street Journal. We excerpt some of his argument below. To read this editorial in its entirety access the original essay.

Abortion and the Grumbling Crowd 

The case against denying communion: 

Jesus broke bread with sinners

By James Martin 

The Wall Street Journal, July 22, p. A13

Should a Catholic politician who supports abortion rights receive communion? …The communion question, at least for Mr. Biden, seemed settled. Cardinal Wilton Gregory, the archbishop of Washington D.C., said he wouldn’t deny communion to Mr. Biden. The pastor of Holy Trinity Parish in Georgetown, where the president often attends Mass, agreed. But earlier this year, Archbishop Salvatore J. Cordileone of San Francisco declared that Speaker Nancy Pelosi would be barred from receiving communion in his archdiocese. 

Archbishop Cordileone…has written that a Catholic legislator who supports “procured abortion” commits “a manifestly grave sin which is a cause of most serious scandal to others.” Universal church law, Archbishop Cordileone pointed out in his declaration, provides that such persons “are not to be admitted to Holy Communion (Code of Canon Law, can. 915).”

But there is another approach. Bishop Robert W. McElroy of San Diego, recently nominated by Pope Francis to become a cardinal, has argued against the “weaponization” of the Eucharist. After all, could any Catholic pass the test of worthiness for communion? “It is the moral obligation of Catholics to embrace all the teachings of the church in their entirety,” he writes. “But failure in fulfilling that obligation in its fullness cannot be the measure of eucharistic worthiness in a church of sinners and questioners, who must face intense pressures and complexities in their daily lives.”

Bishop McElroy also notes that the focus of these restrictions is often highly selective. Why target only abortion? There are other important “life issues.” Consider former Attorney General William Barr, who supported the death penalty, which the “Catechism of the Catholic Church” clearly declares “inadmissible.” Yet there was little outcry about Mr. Barr’s receiving communion. By focusing only on abortion, pastors risk politicizing something sacred. “The Eucharist must never be instrumentalized for a political end, no matter how important,” Bishop McElroy says.

Amid these controversies, Pope Francis offers the church guidance. The pope, like me and like virtually all Catholic clergy, is pro-life.…But he recognizes that abortion isn’t the only life issue. (In his apostolic exhortation “Gaudete et Exsultate he wrote), “Equally sacred…are the lives of the poor, those already born, the destitute, the abandoned and the underprivileged, the vulnerable infirm and elderly exposed to covert euthanasia, the victims of human trafficking, new forms of slavery, and every form of rejection.”

Pope Francis also is clear about the best on-the-ground applications of these teachings. “I have never denied communion to anyone,” he said last year. As for Mr. Biden’s receiving communion despite his “inconsistency” with church teaching, the pope deemed it a question for Mr. Biden’s conscience and his pastors. 

The best solution may be to observe Jesus in the Gospels...during his public ministry, Jesus also regularly dined with “tax collectors and sinners,” much to the consternation of not only the crowds but his disciples. 

In the Gospel of Luke, when Jesus invites himself to dine at the house of Zacchaeus, the chief tax collector in Jericho, “all who saw it began to grumble” (Luke 19:7). The crowd disapproved of Jesus’ breaking bread with Zacchaeus, who probably would have been seen as the “chief sinner” in the town thanks to his collusion with the Romans. 

When I asked the late New Testament scholar Father Daniel J. Harrington about this passage, he pointed to the Greek word panta, which means “all.” He says the grumblers “would have included the disciples.” Even Jesus’ closest advisers were against breaking bread with sinners. He wasn’t. It’s no surprise that the controversy, and the grumbling, continues. 

(End quote from Fr. Martin)

If Nancy Pelsoi or Joe Biden want to have a meal ("breaking bread” as Martin calls it), they can do so with the pope, the bishops, their pastor or this writer. That’s what Jesus did and unless you are a Holy Roller of the Four Square Church, you understand that such repasts have nothing to do with the Eucharist.

I was a visitor at a Protestant chapel which is in many respects commendably faithful to Scripture, although not with regard to the declaration of Jesus in John 6:53. On the Sunday we were present, in the midst of the service the supply of the communion bread the ministers were distributing was depleted. One individual called out, “Use the doughnuts” — the after-the-service snack provisions. Some in the congregation laughed. There was no admonition from the pastor. I was saddened by the profanation of what Communion embodies according to the scriptures.

As Catholics, Father Martin, Speaker Pelosi and President Biden are of course required to submit to the tenets of the Faith, according to which the Holy Eucharist ("Communion") is something entirely different from “breaking bread.” Martin conflates the two. The Eucharist is not a mere meal. It is the body and blood of Jesus Christ instituted at the Last Supper, and not before

In 1 Cor. 11:27-30 St. Paul solemnly warns of the consequences of receiving it unworthily: “Whoever, therefore, eats the bread or drinks the cup of the Lord in an unworthy manner will be guilty concerning the body and blood of the Lord. Let a person examine himself, then, and so eat of the bread and drink of the cup. For anyone who eats and drinks without discerning the body eats and drinks judgment on himself. That is why many of you are weak and ill, and some have died.” 

Confession exists to restore sinners to a relationship with God when they repent of their transgressions and demonstrate true contrition (James 5:16; I John 1:9; Matthew 18:18). Fr. Martin omits vital information and engages in deceptive word games to justify the sacrilege of receiving the Eucharist when not in the state of grace.

Furthermore, Martin writes, “Bishop Robert W. McElroy of San Diego, recently nominated by Pope Francis to become a cardinal, has argued against the ‘weaponization’ of the Eucharist.” 

McElroy is Martin’s paradigm of a truly pastoral shepherd of the flock.

According to Monsignor Gene Thomas Gomulka: “The hierarchical structure of the Catholic Church is partially responsible for why bishops, including the pope, are not investigated or accountable to any external oversight body. As a consequence, one should not be surprised that only 7 out of 150 bishops credibly accused of abusing minors or vulnerable adults have actually been laicized. In the United States, with less than 200 dioceses, ‘more than 130 U.S. bishops’ have been accused of ‘failing to adequately respond to sexual misconduct in their dioceses.’ 

"The question of holding bishops accountable who engage in or cover up abuse has become all the more pressing in recent weeks following the announcement that San Diego Bishop Robert McElroy has been chosen by Pope Francis to be awarded the red hat despite his scandalous track record."

"In addition to being reported years ago for covering up the ritual rape of Rachel Mastrogiacomo by the San Diego priest Father Jacob Bertrand, McElroy is also alleged to have covered up ex-Cardinal Theodore McCarrick’s sexual predation of seminarians and young priests…McCarrick, who is believed to have helped orchestrate McElroy’s appointment to San Diego, is very similar to the relationship between Pope Francis and the late British Cardinal Cormac Murphy-O’Connor. As a member of the ‘St. Gallen mafia,’ Murphy-O’Connor was viewed as playing a pivotal role in getting Jorge Bergoglio elected pope in 2013. It was reported how Pope Francis did not want Cardinal Gerhard Müller investigating abuse allegations involving Murphy-O’Connor anymore than it appears McElroy wanted an investigation into the abuse allegations involving McCarrick…

“If there were a…board of trustees investigating McElroy and Francis for covering up McCarrick’s abuse, both McElroy and Francis might be convicted and laicized not only for covering up for McCarrick, but perhaps for countless other abuse victims in San Diego and Buenos Aires. Unfortunately, like most abuse cases handled within the Church, an ‘internal investigation’ was convened by Francis who, in this case, just happened to be the defendant accused of covering up McCarrick’s sexual predation. Francis was assured of being found innocent owing to the fact that his own defense attorney, Jeffrey Stanley Lena, researched and wrote the final whitewashed report without ever having deposed the plaintiff, Archbishop Viganò.

“…McElroy is betting mainstream and ‘Catholic’ media sources will continue to keep quiet about how he covered up the sexual predation of McCarrick; the rape of Rachel Mastrogiacomo; and the abuse of other victims in the San Diego Diocese. McElroy’s confidence in being able to avoid media scrutiny stems in part from how most media outlets throughout the world never reported on how Pope Francis covered up thousands of abuse cases in Buenos Aires despite having said ‘It [sexual abuse] never happened in my diocese." 

(End quote from Msgr. Gomulka)

Another of Martin's specious arguments centers on establishing an equivalence between legalizing abortion on demand and advocating for the execution of murderers. 

He writes, “There are other important ‘life issues.’ Consider former Attorney General William Barr, who supported the death penalty, which the Catechism of the Catholic Church clearly declares ‘inadmissible.’ Yet there was little outcry about Mr. Barr’s receiving communion. By focusing only on abortion, pastors risk politicizing something sacred.”

The death penalty is Biblical when applied with the safeguards Scripture demands: testimony from at least two witnesses to the crime (Numbers 35:30; Deuteronomy 17:6; 19:15), and in cases where there has been perjury, the perjurer is to receive the punishment he or she sought to impose on the falsely accused (Deuteronomy 19:16-19.) 

Where there is obedience to these divine precautions against execution of the innocent, the death penalty is permitted by the Word of God

Since the Renaissance, in certain respects Rome has been seduced by situation ethics and apportioned to itself the authority which belongs to the Bible alone. No ecclesiastical hierarchy has the right to contradict or usurp Scripture.  The hierarchy of the Church only has a valid claim on our conscience when it upholds the statutes and judgements of the Bible. The papal ecclesia cannot rightly ban someone from Communion for holding to a Biblical standard. Martin and McElroy’s objection fails.

What is depraved about Fr. Martin’s statements in the Wall Street Journal is that he knows he is not telling the truth. His shoddy analogies are all in bad faith—blatant and deliberate misrepresentations of Jesus and the gospels. 

If Biden and Pelosi were white supremacists they would be refused the Eucharist by the pontiff and the entire hierarchy without delay, and rightly so. Yet, in most Catholic dioceses those who legalize the murder of unborn human beings unto the ninth month of pregnancy freely receive the body and blood of Our Lord. 

Jesuit Fr. James Martin no longer has the status of a dexterous, clandestine infiltrator, “a wolf in sheep’s clothing.” The transparent falsification he employs in soliciting for the reception of the Eucharist by infanticide-enablers shows him to be a wolf in wolf’s clothing.

Historian Michael Hoffman is the author of Usury in Christendom: The Mortal Sin That Was and Now is Not, and The Occult Renaissance Church of Rome.


Michael's writing is supported by donations from truth-seekers

Independent History and Research

Box 849 • Coeur d'Alene, Idaho 83816


Monday, June 27, 2022

The Talmud has affirmed LGBTQ doctrine for millennia

The Babylonian Talmud has affirmed LGBTQ doctrine for millennia

What your priest or pastor doesn’t know (and most would not tell you even if they did):  

Rabbi Yirmeya ben Elazar: "...when the Holy One created the first human, He created him as an androgynos (having both male and female sexual characteristics). "

This is confirmed by Mishnah Bikkurim 4:1 (and numerous other authoritative texts).

For the rabbis of the Talmud Bavli, the androgynos was a recognized legal category. 

The term appears no less than 32 times in the Mishnah and 283 times in the Talmud. 

Most of these citations are not variations but rather legal submissions that undertake how rabbinic law (halakhah) applies to one who has both male and female sexual characteristics.

Read more


This information is courtesy of Michael Hoffman

Truth campaigner and educator

“A voice crying in the wilderness”

These facts are published with love for Judaic people and all people captive to the counterfeit Torah sheBeal peh

"Salvation is of the Jews" (John 4:22)

Anti-semitism consists in deceiving Judaic people into imagining they can remain faithful to the Talmud Bavli, the antecedent of which Jesus excoriated in Mark 7 and Matthew 15, and still have salvation. There is no greater bigotry or misdirection. Our mission is compassionately dedicated to the salvation of all people in Christ.



Monday, June 13, 2022

Coeur d'Alene “Patriot Front” White Nationalist arrests

Another Cryptocracy Charade

Coeur d'Alene “Patriot Front” White Nationalist arrests

By Michael Hoffman • Copyright ©2022


I have been asked to comment on the tempest in a teapot here in Coeur d’Alene, Idaho concerning the preemptive detention of thirty-one “white nationalist” so-called “Patriot Front” members on June 11, which has been reported across America and throughout the western world

The players arrested fall into the category of (mostly) unconscious servants of the Leftist-Soviet imperium which is rapidly developing in the U.S. These "extras" from Central Casting help to Sovietize America by acting parts in the Cryptocracy’s script, like the patsies in Michigan ("Wolverine Watchmen") who were lured into the FBI’s plot to kidnap the Democratic governor of that state.

Apparently there is an endless supply of useful idiots and patsies willing to act out the Federal government's entrapment theatre, thereby further empowering the Far Left change agents who conspire to paint Idaho as a white racist redoubt (only one of those arrested was an Idaho resident), and further empower the LGBTQ ideology. They succeeded on both counts.

There are other issues at play: the rush to judgment on the part of a media that shreds the standard of innocent-until-proven-guilty — the storied pillar of American jurisprudence, as well as the preemptive nature of the arrests on difficult to prove “conspiracy” charges, which will probably be dropped months from now when the cameras and microphones are focused elsewhere. 

If those arrested have connections to lawyers they can probably sue the city of Coeur d’Alene for a large sum and deliver a painful lesson in civil liberties to those who perpetrated the preventive detention of individuals who had broken no laws (we would say the same if Leftists or anyone else were treated in this unconstitutional fashion by the Kootenai County District Attorney's office). 

However, the nature of these government-infiltrated patsy groups is such that they operate at a level that is one magnitude above mental retardation. The Patriot Front is not anitfa. I suspect the members of the "Front" have zero legal resources. It may be that they extricate themselves from legal jeopardy solely due to the flimsy nature of the conspiracy charge against them, but we don’t see them having the wherewithal to litigate their arrests in civil court.

Why does the Cryptocracy target north Idaho with these charades? Because we are a Christian Constitutionalist demographic and overwhelmingly so. 

Ours is not a racist region. It is a place where Americans of all races are welcome to come and enjoy freedom to home school or enroll their children in multiple charter and private Christians academies. We are a state highly resistant to mask and vaccination mandates. We do not appreciate interdiction by Soviet-style bureaucrats who have made life miserable for freedom-seeking Christian families in places such as New York, Chicago, Seattle and Los Angeles.

Yes, there was an LGBTQ “pride” parade in Coeur d’Alene on June 11, sponsored by US Bank, Numerica Credit Union, Idaho State Police District 1, a local Methodist and a local Lutheran church, and the Temple of Satan, which operates 400 miles south. (Yes, Temple of Satan was an official co-sponsor— Revelation of the Method). This phenomenon is media and capitalist driven. The corporate media are mostly owned and run by diabolic liars intent on the human alchemy that erases traditional society in order to remake it anew, according to a revolutionary template, like the Jacobins in France in Year One (September 22, 1792), or the Bolsheviks in Russia (October, 1917). 

The business lobby in Idaho, with many honorable exceptions, consists of capitalist buccaneers. Our state's weakness and that of its churches, is that it pays little or no heed to Gospel economics. Hence, heinous 400% rates of usury are legal, and so too is largely unchecked development which avariciously crowds an unsustainable number of houses on tiny plots of acreage.  Our Rathdrum prairie is being consumed by this cancerous growth. The deluded Right wing imagines that if we protest this profanation of God's earth by the developers we are "socialists."

As in other states, Idaho corporations have decided that the LGBTQ movement is the Next Big Thing and they hop on the money-minting bandwagon without regard to what the Bible teaches and commands. That’s what capitalists do (free enterprise is distinguished from capitalism by its foundation in higher laws than the market and profit).

Alas, there’s no heaven on earth, not even in Idaho. Families do have a much better chance to thrive here than in many other areas of our nation, but media-induced amnesia and apathy remain at work in Idaho as elsewhere, as part of the larger processes of mind control which we delineated in our 2021 book, Twilight Language.

From now until the 21st of June we experience the longest, most wondrous, light-filled days of the year. After that, every day the sun will set a little sooner and the light of day will be shortened, until December 21, when this divine cycle of nature repeats itself. I trust you will be mindful and immerse yourself in the peak light that casts its splendor and illuminates our lives this week. God forbid we surrender our attention to the media cacophony while ignoring the beauty our Creator has deigned to bestow upon us.

As we look to the heavens for light and solace, let us ponder the words of Jesus in Matthew 15, when He rejected the mumbo jumbo traditions of men that are not entirely dissimilar from those of the arrogant media. Like the press in 2022 infuriated by our Christian family values and Biblical standards, the Pharisees were outraged by Our Savior's politically incorrect rejection of their anthropomorphic gnosis:

 "Then the disciples came and said to him, 'Do you know that the Pharisees were offended when they heard your saying?’ He answered, 'Every plant that my heavenly Father has not planted will be rooted up. Let them alone; they are blind guides.” (Matthew 15: 12-14).

Be of good cheer and have confidence, dear brethren. 


Historian Michael Hoffman is a former reporter for the New York bureau of the Associated Press and the editor of the periodical, Revisionist History®.



Wednesday, June 01, 2022

The Jubilee of Elizabeth II: The Queen of Depravity

 The Jubilee of Elizabeth II 

The Queen of Depravity

By Michael Hoffman


June 2 marks the start of celebrations in Britain for the Jubilee of 96-year-old Queen Elizabeth II. The media have enthusiastically joined in the hoopla, extending a blank check endorsement of the System's approved agent.

The queen has played host in the past to numerous blood-drenched communist dictators like Tito and overseen the most rapid dissolution of Britain in its entire history. The  mysteries surrounding the death of her daughter-in-law, Princess Diana, remain unanswered. 

Sir Jimmy Savile, OBE KCSG

The queen's son and heir apparent, Charles, Prince of Wales, was a known co-conspirator with Jimmy Savile, the demonic child molester who operated at the top of the British pyramid of power, while MI5 British Intelligence, which briefs Elizabeth and Charles, was fully apprised of his hundreds of child victims. While bestowing a gift upon Jimmy for his 80th birthday, Prince Charles told him, “Nobody will ever know what you’ve done for this country, Jimmy. This is to go some way in thanking you for that" (cf. Twilight Language, p. 311). 

Savile's decades-long, horrendous orgy of predation upon helpless children was shielded and enabled by Queen Elizabeth, Prince Charles, Home Secretary Leon Brittan and Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher. MI5 and MI6 (whose Deputy Director, Peter Hayman was accused of pederasty by Geoffrey Dickens; Hayman was known to possess child pornography), repeatedly blocked investigations of Savile. (Cf. The Guardian, April 9, 2013).

Savile's sex ring provided children to the patricians of British society and government, including members of Parliament, the House of Lords, the Anglican Church of England, the aristocracy, and big business, some of whom were members of the "Pedophile Information Exchange," which quietly lobbied for the age of consent for sex with children to be abolished. (Twilight Language, pp. 312-313).


Savile either personally raped or facilitated the rape of at least 328 children, even though by the 1980s Savile's horrors were becoming public knowledge. Rock singer John Lydon was interviewed by the British Broadcasting Service (BBC) in 1978 wherein he accused Savile and stated, "We all know about it but we're not allowed to talk about it." The interview was never aired and he was temporarily banned by the BBC. "Sir Jimmy" died a multimillionaire in 2011, respected and honored by Queen Elizabeth, who knighted him in 1990. Throughout his life this ghoul enjoyed total immunity from arrest, prosecution and imprisonment.

As if all this were not sufficient to uncover enough rocks to indict the British royal family for these crimes and their coverup, it turns out that Queen Elizabeth's son, Prince Andrew, was part of the notorious Jeffrey Epstein sex ring. 

In February the prince paid Virginia Giuffre, the sex slave furnished to him by Epstein, $16 million in return for her dropping her lawsuit against him. The next month, on March 29, the queen chose Prince Andrew for a place of honor in her royal entourage as she commemorated the anniversary of the death of her husband, Prince Phillip, defiantly selecting Andrew for the high profile role of her escort in Westminster Abbey, knowing the photo of that escort would be published around the world, thereby demonstrating her contempt for the victims of her son and his crony, Epstein.

Elizabeth enjoys good press like her namesake Elizabeth I, who was steeped in the occult of her astrologer royal, Dr. John "007" Dee. The first Queen Elizabeth  is portrayed in Hollywood films as a paragon of decency, like the current monarch, who enjoys the unalloyed adulation of the media. Child molestation among the royals? Don't let it bother you, peasant.

The Cryptocracy has seen to it that the masonic Crown and royal house of England survived, while other hereditary monarchies were destroyed. In issue no. 117 of our newsletter Revisionist History®, the occultism and slave-trading activities of Elizabeth I and the prophecies for the longevity of the aristocracy of England are detailed. 

Elizabeth made a fortune from the slave trade which her personal pirate, John Hawkins, pioneered under her commission. 

She employed an expert torturer, Richard Topcliffe to dispatch as agonizingly as possible, dissidents who questioned the legitimacy of her rule. She tortured to death hundreds of them. 

Furthermore, she made it a crime punishable by imprisonment to attend the Latin Mass upheld even by her father, King Henry VIII.  Attendance at the liturgy which her Church of England promulgated was mandatory. Absence was punishable with confiscatory fines.  (Revisionist History® no. 117, "The Pirate Queen's Slave Traders: Elizabeth I and the Conjuring of the British Empire," can be ordered here - scroll down to issue no. 117). 

As the overcrowded little island of Britain drowns in a sea of immigration and its historic Christian faith is subsumed in a melting pot of other creeds often hostile to it,  as their freedom of speech is increasingly subject to draconian repression, it is more important than ever to "keep up appearances." 

Hence, the bamboozled British people are treated to a revival of the spectacle of royal pageantry. By staging these elaborate ceremonies, a hypnotic impression is conveyed, reassuring the people that despite all the indices of decay, destruction and masonic oppression, "Things aren't as bad as they seem." 

In the Society of the Spectacle, illusion predominates. There is no society in the West more spectacular than England when it fans the feathers of its "glorious" monarchy, enacting a ritual splendor intended to conceal the rot. 

Michael Hoffman is a former reporter for the New York bureau of the Associated Press and the author of ten books of history and literature.


Wednesday, May 25, 2022

To President Joe “Herod” Biden in the Aftermath of the Ulvade Massacre

UPDATE MAY 27: Columbine mass murderers: Eric Harris was taking the antidepressant Luvox. Dylan Klebold was under the influence of Paxil & Zoloft. Luvox, Paxil and Zoloft are mild-altering drugs known as Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRIs). Congress must pass a law mandating blood tests and blood samples be taken from accused mass murderers to determine if they were under the influence of anti-depressants or other mind control-type medications which deaden the conscience—and identify those who prescribed or otherwise furnished the pharmaceuticals. 

UPDATE MAY 26: Were police under orders to allow the shooter to achieve maximum casualties? He was left untouched while shooting outside the school for 12 minutes. He was then allowed to maintain uncontested control inside the school room for 40 minutes while numerous police officers lingeredoutside waiting for bullet proof vests, sniper rifles and other "resources and supplies." Parents begged police to intervene and stop the slaughter, to no avail. 

Joe “Herod” Biden in the Aftermath of the Ulvade Massacre

Michael Hoffman • May 25, 2022

Copyright ©2022


President Biden is implicated in the abortion-slaughter of countless unborn human beings whose human rights he denies and whose dehumanization in the womb contributes to violence and marginalization of human life outside the womb. 

The pretense is that this carnage does not register in the souls of Americans. The blood and viscera of the murdered infants may not be seen, but  they are felt as a psychic wave that translates into America's skyrocketing rates of suicide and the killing of family members. The perpetrator in Ulvade personified all of those characteristics. He killed his own grandmother and then the children of his own heritage and he did not expect to emerge from the school alive.

Like Herod of old (Matthew 2:16), the nearly invisible abortion of the most helpless and vulnerable of all human beings doesn’t register with Biden, just as it has no impact on the corporate media. Shamelessly, Joe had the impudence on the evening of May 24 to appear on national television and quote from "Scripture" in order to lend his iniquity a patina of godliness. 

Never once in the course of his sanctimonious hectoring did he cite the psychic rot induced by Hollywood and New York's popular culture, crammed with the degenerate, violence-steeped multi-billion dollar "shooter" video games that put virtual mass murderers in the driver's seat of high tech fantasy bloodbaths. 

Equally denied are the  twilight language subliminals embedded in in mass communications promoting homicide, diabolism and death. 

Moreover, Biden is part of the environmental death cult in which the birth of children is seen as a curse and the world is prophesied to end in ten years as a result of global warming. In this nightmare visualization, life becomes meaningless and self-annihilation a path out of a hell on earth.

The signposts of America's depraved and hopeless thanatos "culture" are ignored. In the course of his imperious scolding of gun owners Biden took no notice of these factors which contribute to the decay of the spiritual and mental health of millions. Biden the automaton limited himself strictly to the Democrat party line — the disarming of the people by any means necessary.

The president blamed a firearm, a technological tool, for the depredations of the shooter in Ulvade who was in thrall to Satan. After Darrell Brooks allegedly used a sports utility vehicle to kill six people and injure sixty-two others last November in Waukesha, Wisconsin we saw no pleas for a ban on SUVs. The very thought is too ridiculous. But rifles and pistols rather than demonic humans and the profoundly sick society that produced them, get the blame after every massacre.

In the aftermath of the Ulvade horror Mr. Biden asserted that “AR15 assault" rifles are “only for killing” and must be banned. In reality, he wants to make such weapons illegal for the American people to possess. Those guarding Biden and other members of the ruling class will undoubtedly continue to possess assault rifles. 

From this day forward let us put to Biden the following question: Mr. President, will your guards be legally compelled to give up their assault rifles after you make them illegal? 

We know what tyranny looks like. It consists of a two-tiered legal system in which there is one law for politicians and oligarchs and another for everyone else. 

The president and Dr. Jill, Kamala and Mrs. Pelosi, and many thousands of other grandees are now and will be in the future, protected by AR15s and similar weapons. 

Why not the American people? 

Why, Mr. President are only you and your chosen elite permitted this defense? Why do you demonize the protection which those firearms afford when we the people seek to exercise the same right of self-defense as you and your cronies?

Historian Michael Hoffman is a former reporter for the New York bureau of the Associated Press, the author of ten books, and the editor of the periodical Revisionist History®.

The Hoffman Wire is reader supported.

Independent History and Research

Box 849 • Coeur d’Alene, Idaho 83816


Monday, May 23, 2022

The Shekinah Etiology

 LGBTQ+ in the Kabbalah

By Michael Hoffman ©2022


Denying easily verifiable scientific differences between human beings possessed of xx and xy chromsomes is fundamentally a matter of occult intervention in human affairs. It is our mission to make this truth better known by providing the source documentation.

“God’s Shekinah glory.”

We’ve tracked the entry of that non-biblical term into Protestant theology over the past three centuries (it having entered rarefied precincts of Rome’s theology even earlier—see “The Sefirotic Tree of the Ten Emanations” [Shekinah is the 10th emanation], in The Occult Renaissance Church of Rome, pp. 350-351 and 637-641). 

Strictly speaking, Shekinah is a concept most closely linked to and derived from the Kabbalah, specifically the Zohar, wherein it signifies the energy of the goddess manifesting as the feminine sefirah of Malkhut

One glimpses the roots of LGBTQ+ ideology in medieval (and earlier) Zoharic esoterica. In this case, the Zohar’s trans-feminization and fluid gender identification of King David with the Shekinah. 

This memesis of femaleness caused the Kabbalists to refer to the study of their ersatz oral “Torah" (Torah sheBeal peh, i.e. the Talmud, Kabbalah, Mishneh Torah etc.) as a “womanly male” activity. In that oxymoron we espy the Solve et Coagula of the human alchemy operant for centuries in the revolutionary social engineering which others term “mind control.” 

Shekinah is freighted with intentional occult change-agency and it has entered the churches, albeit with more benign-seeming connotations. But why employ it at all? 

Granted, these facts may appear far-fetched perhaps to those not acquainted with the theurgic recesses of the Zohar and cognate Kabbalistic texts. Yet they are seeded throughout mystical Orthodox (particularly Haredi) rabbinic praxis. 

For instance, a pillar of the Kabbalah is the notion that without the mediation of the tenth sefirah—“without the mediation of the Shekinah, there can be no Presence of God in this world at all, since she alone is the link in the chain of divinity that joins the two realms.” 

(Cf. “King David as the Shekhina in the Zohar: A Theological Revolution,” in Ruth Kara-Ivanov, The Feminine Messiah [Brill, 2021, p. 41, emphasis supplied]). 

The main Kabbalistic texts related to this aspect of Shekinah will be found in the first four volumes of the Zohar translated and published uncensored in English by Stanford University Press.

The theology is also present in less explicit form in the Talmud of Babylon (cf. Sanhedrin 96b, 98b, 104b, 107a, Berakhot 4a, 7b, 10a; Shabbat 30a, 55b, 56a, 152b; Eruvin 13b, Eruvin 96a, etc.).

There is nothing new about the psychosis of terming a human being possessing xx chromosomes as exactly the same as a human who possesses xy chromosomes. The denial of so stark and fundamental a biological reality distinguishing female and male requires nothing short of an occult transvaluation of all values. This is the missing link in the attempt to discern the roots of the LGBTQ+ movement and its current ascendance.


This alchemy has a very long Kabbalistic pedigree which “conservative Christians” either cannot or will not credit. Consequently the key of knowledge is lost and Conservatives are left in the dark, hostage to futile writing and chatting about what are in fact mere symptoms, rather than etiology.

The anti-Christians who say they are “Torah-true” have been counterfeiting God’s word for two millennia. Sadly outmatched “Conservatives” desperate to believe a lie so as to maintain their careers, reputations and bank accounts, permit themselves to be seduced by the cheat. 

The faux oral “Torah" (Torah sheBeal peh) is the recrudescence of the occult science of Egypt and Babylon. One of its numerous manifestations in our time is the tragic derangement of trans-sexuality which began to be heavily propagated as far back as the 17th century by the Kabbalastically inspired network known as the Rosicrucian Fraternity, which promoted the image of the human body as an androgyne possessed of male and female genitalia  (cf. Twilight Language, pp. 247-253), which is the yet-to-be fulfilled objective of genetic Frankenscience.

Michael Hoffman is the author of a 1,102 page textbook for specialists, Judaism Discovered, and a condensation for the general reader, Judaism’s Strange Gods (381 pages), as well as eight other books of history and literature. He is the editor of the periodical, Revisionist History®.

8th graders to be charged with sexual harassment under Title IX

"Malicious misgendering" 

Rick Esenberg and Luke Berg report:

May 23, 2022—Wisconsin’s Kiel Area School District, in...Manitowoc and Calumet counties along the western shore of Lake Michigan, has uncovered a new form of harassment. On April 25 they accused three eighth-grade boys of sexual harassment—and launched a Title IX investigation—for something called “mispronouning.”

These children used “her” to refer to a classmate who wants to be called “them.”

...The boys’ parents first heard about the charges when they received a call from the district that their sons were about to be charged with sexual harassment under Title IX. There had been no prior warning or discussions with the families about pronoun use at school, nor did the district initially explain what the boys had done to warrant being investigated for a violation of federal law. When the families were finally informed that the alleged sexual harassment—the boys’ potential federal offense—was “using incorrect pronouns,” terror quickly turned to bewilderment...

The district appears to believe that once a student announces different pronouns to others, any subsequent use of the biologically and grammatically correct pronouns—even when not directed to the student—may be punishable as sexual harassment under Title IX...

A school board in Virginia is reportedly considering adding a policy to prohibit “malicious misgendering.” The Biden administration is about to unveil its long-awaited update to Title IX regulations and, given the president’s pronouncement that transgender discrimination is the civil-rights issue of our time, it wouldn’t be surprising if the new rules call for the policing of pronouns. All of this may soon be coming to a school near you. (End quote) 

Read more at: www.wsj.com/articles/the-pronoun-police-middle-schoolers-sexual-harassment-title-ix-nine-mispronouning-transgender-lgbtqia-free-speech-pronoun-11653337766