Welcome Information Connoisseurs

Welcome Information Connoisseurs

Friday, September 02, 2022

Confronting a conservative Protestant Pastor who recommends a Talmudist as a Guide to the Bible

 Confronting a conservative Protestant Pastor who recommends a Talmudist as a Guide to the Bible

Dear Pastor Xxxx:

With regard to your statement in your blog of August 29 concerning the late Jonathan Sacks, Chief Rabbi of the United Hebrew Congregations of the Commonwealth of Great Britain from 1991 to 2013:

"And if Jonathan Alter is so good on certain aspects of the psalms, or the life of David, as he is, then why can’t Jonathan Sacks have valuable things to say about the Exodus and Sinai? He can, and he does.” 

Maybe so, but if you’re going to endorse him as a Biblical exegete, in light of 2 Cor. 6:14-18 you might wish to warn your readers that Rabbi Sacks placed the rabbis of the Talmud above Yahweh:

From the Babylonian Talmud, tractate (BT) Bava Metzia 59B, we learn that halachic (legal) disputes are resolved not by the Word of God but by a majority vote of the Rabbis. 

Bava Metzia 59B relates the tale that generations later, Rabbi Natan met the Old Testament Prophet Elijah. Rabbi Natan asked Elijah about an exchange between Rabbi Eliezer and Rabbi Yehoshua (who had refused to heed the voice of God). Natan asked him: “What did the Holy One, blessed be He, do at that time when Rabbi Yehoshua refused to heed the heavenly voice?” 

In reply, Elijah supposedly said to Rabbi Natan: “God smiled and said: ‘My sons have defeated Me, My sons have defeated Me!” 

This brag about defeating God is not something Orthodox Judaism is ashamed of, or even one that Talmudists always deny. “Lord Rabbi” Sacks, who is celebrated in the media as a “liberal, humane, progressive of the highest moral rectitude,” announces that he loves the claim that the rabbis have defeated God. 

In his review of Jonathan Rosen’s book The Talmud and the Internet,  Chief Rabbi Sacks wrote in the English newspaper The Guardian of December 21, 2001: 

“Rosen loves, as do I, that extraordinary moment in the Talmud in which God is outvoted on a point of Jewish law and celebrates the fact that His children have defeated him. In the world of the rabbis, not only do men study the word of God; God studies the words of men.” 

Where in our Biblical-Christian civilization is such diabolic pride to be found institutionalized as a dogma of our Faith? 

Rabbi Sacks and the “sages” of the Talmud represent the voice of the alien speaking from hell the “Non-Serviam” of its subterranean denizens.

I will anticipate a possible rejoinder: Well, Michael, how was I supposed to know every statement Sacks has ever made?

In considering the object of your  recommendation — a teacher of a religion which has as its holiest book the blasphemous, hate speech-riddled Talmud, you might have exercised prudential caution and thought twice about endorsing Sacks as a teacher with insight into the Hebrew scriptures.

The Talmud is malevolent and its malice is contagious. Due diligence is mandatory when approaching any of its votaries.

In the Most Holy Name of Jesus,

Michael Hoffman



(substitute @ for AT in the preceding e-mail address)


Michael’s scholarship and activism are made possible by donations from Truth seekers

His Judaica studies are here

Independent History and Research

Box 849

Coeur d’Alene, Idaho 83816 


Saturday, July 23, 2022

Jesuit Priest James Martin: A Wolf in Wolf’s Clothing

 Jesuit Priest James Martin: 

A Wolf in Wolf’s Clothing

The pope's media ambassador advocates in national forums for Communion for abortion-enablers

He's an elite spokesman for the dissolution of the last vestiges of the Bible’s authority in what remains of Catholicism. Our study reveals the depth of his intellectual dishonesty.

By Michael Hoffman


“Could my spoken words have checked, That whereby a house lay wrecked?” —Yeats

Pope Francis and Fr. James Martin, S.J.

St. Augustine wrote of the conflict between cupidity and charity, between the love of the world and the love of God. Cupidity seems to have overtaken the career of Vatican communications agent James Martin, S.J.

Jesuit priest Martin is the Vatican’s top English-language ambassador to those smitten by popular culture, “the most influential priest in the English-speaking world.”

He’s “really with it” and “helps to make the Church relevant.” One aspect of this “relevance” is his advocacy of what he calls “LGBTQ Catholicism.” Martin Scorcese, the Hollywood director who gave the world the movie, “The Last Temptation of Christ” portraying Our Lord as a demented sex freak and coward, is the executive producer of a 2022 documentary extolling Father Martin, “Building a Bridge” (Martin wrote a best-selling book of the same name). 

Jim Russell in Crisis Magazine observes Martin’s sly casuistry: “James Martin is a flagrant dissenter from Church teaching, flagrant in regard to his actions, but subtle in regard to his words. He verbally hides his rejection of Church teaching behind the façade of ‘not challenging’ it.” 

David Laidlaw in “Catholic World Report” writes, “Fr. James Martin plays rhetorical games with the truth about transgenderism.” 

Some of Martin’s mask fell off last May on the website, “Outreach: An LGBTQ Catholic Resource," where Fr. Martin wrote:

“I’ve become friends with several transgender Catholics…I have also accompanied parents and families who have had a child (or sibling or spouse) announce that they are ‘transitioning’…(W)hy (did) so many Catholic leaders began using the language of sin and repentance so quickly for a phenomenon that, at least publicly, is still so new, so little understood and still the source of so much scientific debate? How did the church move so swiftly to condemnation regarding a group who often say that they are striving to be whom God calls them to be, and who are severely at risk of suicide and self-harm, as well as violence and harassment, according to almost every report?

"…major medical organizations, including the American Medical Association, the American Academy of Pediatrics and the American Psychological Association, have concluded that ‘gender-affirming care is medically necessary for transgender youth and is backed by decades of research.

“…Among the more controversial treatments are hormone therapies for youth, sometimes called ‘puberty blockers.’ Many argue strongly against their use, primarily because the long-term side effects are still unknown. Others point out that they are reversible, “largely considered safe for short-term use” and an alternative to surgery, giving parents and youth more time to wait and discern. They also reduce rates of depression and suicide. A study in the Journal of the American Medical Association indicated that they reduce depression by as much as 60% and suicide by as much as 73%.” 

Martin neglected to mention that administering puberty blockers and mutilating surgeries increases profits for unscrupulous physicians by as much as 100% to 200%. 

 There's a new sin, according to Martin:

"Biological Reductionism"

In response to a 2019 Catholic theological document, “Male and Female He Created Them,” attempting to frame the controversy in Biblical terms, Fr. Martin implies such teaching is obsolete in light of recent “scientific” findings:

“…the document…neglects to engage in discussions about new scientific understandings and discoveries about gender. It relies mainly on what one Catholic moral theologian described to me as 'biological reductionism': the belief that gender is determined solely by one’s visible genitalia, which contemporary science has shown is not always an accurate way to categorize people. Gender is also biologically determined by genetics, hormones and brain chemistry—things that are not visible at birth. The congregation’s document relies heavily on categories of male and female that were shaped centuries ago, rather than with more contemporary scientific methods.”

Fr. Martin advances the legitimacy of those who bear xy chromosomes impersonating people who possess xx chromosomes. He counsels the Church’s cooperation with this delusional mockery as “a pastoral approach.” Those opposed are guilty of a new Orwellian sin, "biological reductionism."

Martin is a personal friend of Pope Francis and part of the Vatican’s worldwide communications team. He is considered an astute spokesman for Newchurch and the ongoing dissolution of the last vestiges of the Bible’s authority in what remains of Catholicism. 

This slick Jesuit media operator revealed the depth of his intellectual dishonesty in a July 22 op-ed column in the Wall Street Journal. We excerpt some of his argument below. To read this editorial in its entirety access the original essay.

Abortion and the Grumbling Crowd 

The case against denying communion: 

Jesus broke bread with sinners

By James Martin 

The Wall Street Journal, July 22, p. A13

Should a Catholic politician who supports abortion rights receive communion? …The communion question, at least for Mr. Biden, seemed settled. Cardinal Wilton Gregory, the archbishop of Washington D.C., said he wouldn’t deny communion to Mr. Biden. The pastor of Holy Trinity Parish in Georgetown, where the president often attends Mass, agreed. But earlier this year, Archbishop Salvatore J. Cordileone of San Francisco declared that Speaker Nancy Pelosi would be barred from receiving communion in his archdiocese. 

Archbishop Cordileone…has written that a Catholic legislator who supports “procured abortion” commits “a manifestly grave sin which is a cause of most serious scandal to others.” Universal church law, Archbishop Cordileone pointed out in his declaration, provides that such persons “are not to be admitted to Holy Communion (Code of Canon Law, can. 915).”

But there is another approach. Bishop Robert W. McElroy of San Diego, recently nominated by Pope Francis to become a cardinal, has argued against the “weaponization” of the Eucharist. After all, could any Catholic pass the test of worthiness for communion? “It is the moral obligation of Catholics to embrace all the teachings of the church in their entirety,” he writes. “But failure in fulfilling that obligation in its fullness cannot be the measure of eucharistic worthiness in a church of sinners and questioners, who must face intense pressures and complexities in their daily lives.”

Bishop McElroy also notes that the focus of these restrictions is often highly selective. Why target only abortion? There are other important “life issues.” Consider former Attorney General William Barr, who supported the death penalty, which the “Catechism of the Catholic Church” clearly declares “inadmissible.” Yet there was little outcry about Mr. Barr’s receiving communion. By focusing only on abortion, pastors risk politicizing something sacred. “The Eucharist must never be instrumentalized for a political end, no matter how important,” Bishop McElroy says.

Amid these controversies, Pope Francis offers the church guidance. The pope, like me and like virtually all Catholic clergy, is pro-life.…But he recognizes that abortion isn’t the only life issue. (In his apostolic exhortation “Gaudete et Exsultate he wrote), “Equally sacred…are the lives of the poor, those already born, the destitute, the abandoned and the underprivileged, the vulnerable infirm and elderly exposed to covert euthanasia, the victims of human trafficking, new forms of slavery, and every form of rejection.”

Pope Francis also is clear about the best on-the-ground applications of these teachings. “I have never denied communion to anyone,” he said last year. As for Mr. Biden’s receiving communion despite his “inconsistency” with church teaching, the pope deemed it a question for Mr. Biden’s conscience and his pastors. 

The best solution may be to observe Jesus in the Gospels...during his public ministry, Jesus also regularly dined with “tax collectors and sinners,” much to the consternation of not only the crowds but his disciples. 

In the Gospel of Luke, when Jesus invites himself to dine at the house of Zacchaeus, the chief tax collector in Jericho, “all who saw it began to grumble” (Luke 19:7). The crowd disapproved of Jesus’ breaking bread with Zacchaeus, who probably would have been seen as the “chief sinner” in the town thanks to his collusion with the Romans. 

When I asked the late New Testament scholar Father Daniel J. Harrington about this passage, he pointed to the Greek word panta, which means “all.” He says the grumblers “would have included the disciples.” Even Jesus’ closest advisers were against breaking bread with sinners. He wasn’t. It’s no surprise that the controversy, and the grumbling, continues. 

(End quote from Fr. Martin)

If Nancy Pelsoi or Joe Biden want to have a meal ("breaking bread” as Martin calls it), they can do so with the pope, the bishops, their pastor or this writer. That’s what Jesus did and unless you are a Holy Roller of the Four Square Church, you understand that such repasts have nothing to do with the Eucharist.

I was a visitor at a Protestant chapel which is in many respects commendably faithful to Scripture, although not with regard to the declaration of Jesus in John 6:53. On the Sunday we were present, in the midst of the service the supply of the communion bread the ministers were distributing was depleted. One individual called out, “Use the doughnuts” — the after-the-service snack provisions. Some in the congregation laughed. There was no admonition from the pastor. I was saddened by the profanation of what Communion embodies according to the scriptures.

As Catholics, Father Martin, Speaker Pelosi and President Biden are of course required to submit to the tenets of the Faith, according to which the Holy Eucharist ("Communion") is something entirely different from “breaking bread.” Martin conflates the two. The Eucharist is not a mere meal. It is the body and blood of Jesus Christ instituted at the Last Supper, and not before

In 1 Cor. 11:27-30 St. Paul solemnly warns of the consequences of receiving it unworthily: “Whoever, therefore, eats the bread or drinks the cup of the Lord in an unworthy manner will be guilty concerning the body and blood of the Lord. Let a person examine himself, then, and so eat of the bread and drink of the cup. For anyone who eats and drinks without discerning the body eats and drinks judgment on himself. That is why many of you are weak and ill, and some have died.” 

Confession exists to restore sinners to a relationship with God when they repent of their transgressions and demonstrate true contrition (James 5:16; I John 1:9; Matthew 18:18). Fr. Martin omits vital information and engages in deceptive word games to justify the sacrilege of receiving the Eucharist when not in the state of grace.

Furthermore, Martin writes, “Bishop Robert W. McElroy of San Diego, recently nominated by Pope Francis to become a cardinal, has argued against the ‘weaponization’ of the Eucharist.” 

McElroy is Martin’s paradigm of a truly pastoral shepherd of the flock.

According to Monsignor Gene Thomas Gomulka: “The hierarchical structure of the Catholic Church is partially responsible for why bishops, including the pope, are not investigated or accountable to any external oversight body. As a consequence, one should not be surprised that only 7 out of 150 bishops credibly accused of abusing minors or vulnerable adults have actually been laicized. In the United States, with less than 200 dioceses, ‘more than 130 U.S. bishops’ have been accused of ‘failing to adequately respond to sexual misconduct in their dioceses.’ 

"The question of holding bishops accountable who engage in or cover up abuse has become all the more pressing in recent weeks following the announcement that San Diego Bishop Robert McElroy has been chosen by Pope Francis to be awarded the red hat despite his scandalous track record."

"In addition to being reported years ago for covering up the ritual rape of Rachel Mastrogiacomo by the San Diego priest Father Jacob Bertrand, McElroy is also alleged to have covered up ex-Cardinal Theodore McCarrick’s sexual predation of seminarians and young priests…McCarrick, who is believed to have helped orchestrate McElroy’s appointment to San Diego, is very similar to the relationship between Pope Francis and the late British Cardinal Cormac Murphy-O’Connor. As a member of the ‘St. Gallen mafia,’ Murphy-O’Connor was viewed as playing a pivotal role in getting Jorge Bergoglio elected pope in 2013. It was reported how Pope Francis did not want Cardinal Gerhard Müller investigating abuse allegations involving Murphy-O’Connor anymore than it appears McElroy wanted an investigation into the abuse allegations involving McCarrick…

“If there were a…board of trustees investigating McElroy and Francis for covering up McCarrick’s abuse, both McElroy and Francis might be convicted and laicized not only for covering up for McCarrick, but perhaps for countless other abuse victims in San Diego and Buenos Aires. Unfortunately, like most abuse cases handled within the Church, an ‘internal investigation’ was convened by Francis who, in this case, just happened to be the defendant accused of covering up McCarrick’s sexual predation. Francis was assured of being found innocent owing to the fact that his own defense attorney, Jeffrey Stanley Lena, researched and wrote the final whitewashed report without ever having deposed the plaintiff, Archbishop Viganò.

“…McElroy is betting mainstream and ‘Catholic’ media sources will continue to keep quiet about how he covered up the sexual predation of McCarrick; the rape of Rachel Mastrogiacomo; and the abuse of other victims in the San Diego Diocese. McElroy’s confidence in being able to avoid media scrutiny stems in part from how most media outlets throughout the world never reported on how Pope Francis covered up thousands of abuse cases in Buenos Aires despite having said ‘It [sexual abuse] never happened in my diocese." 

(End quote from Msgr. Gomulka)

Another of Martin's specious arguments centers on establishing an equivalence between legalizing abortion on demand and advocating for the execution of murderers. 

He writes, “There are other important ‘life issues.’ Consider former Attorney General William Barr, who supported the death penalty, which the Catechism of the Catholic Church clearly declares ‘inadmissible.’ Yet there was little outcry about Mr. Barr’s receiving communion. By focusing only on abortion, pastors risk politicizing something sacred.”

The death penalty is Biblical when applied with the safeguards Scripture demands: testimony from at least two witnesses to the crime (Numbers 35:30; Deuteronomy 17:6; 19:15), and in cases where there has been perjury, the perjurer is to receive the punishment he or she sought to impose on the falsely accused (Deuteronomy 19:16-19.) 

Where there is obedience to these divine precautions against execution of the innocent, the death penalty is permitted by the Word of God

Since the Renaissance, in certain respects Rome has been seduced by situation ethics and apportioned to itself the authority which belongs to the Bible alone. No ecclesiastical hierarchy has the right to contradict or usurp Scripture.  The hierarchy of the Church only has a valid claim on our conscience when it upholds the statutes and judgements of the Bible. The papal ecclesia cannot rightly ban someone from Communion for holding to a Biblical standard. Martin and McElroy’s objection fails.

What is depraved about Fr. Martin’s statements in the Wall Street Journal is that he knows he is not telling the truth. His shoddy analogies are all in bad faith—blatant and deliberate misrepresentations of Jesus and the gospels. 

If Biden and Pelosi were white supremacists they would be refused the Eucharist by the pontiff and the entire hierarchy without delay, and rightly so. Yet, in most Catholic dioceses those who legalize the murder of unborn human beings unto the ninth month of pregnancy freely receive the body and blood of Our Lord. 

Jesuit Fr. James Martin no longer has the status of a dexterous, clandestine infiltrator, “a wolf in sheep’s clothing.” The transparent falsification he employs in soliciting for the reception of the Eucharist by infanticide-enablers shows him to be a wolf in wolf’s clothing.

Historian Michael Hoffman is the author of Usury in Christendom: The Mortal Sin That Was and Now is Not, and The Occult Renaissance Church of Rome.


Michael's writing is supported by donations from truth-seekers

Independent History and Research

Box 849 • Coeur d'Alene, Idaho 83816


Monday, June 27, 2022

The Talmud has affirmed LGBTQ doctrine for millennia

The Babylonian Talmud has affirmed LGBTQ doctrine for millennia

What your priest or pastor doesn’t know (and most would not tell you even if they did):  

Rabbi Yirmeya ben Elazar: "...when the Holy One created the first human, He created him as an androgynos (having both male and female sexual characteristics). "

This is confirmed by Mishnah Bikkurim 4:1 (and numerous other authoritative texts).

For the rabbis of the Talmud Bavli, the androgynos was a recognized legal category. 

The term appears no less than 32 times in the Mishnah and 283 times in the Talmud. 

Most of these citations are not variations but rather legal submissions that undertake how rabbinic law (halakhah) applies to one who has both male and female sexual characteristics.

Read more


This information is courtesy of Michael Hoffman

Truth campaigner and educator

“A voice crying in the wilderness”

These facts are published with love for Judaic people and all people captive to the counterfeit Torah sheBeal peh

"Salvation is of the Jews" (John 4:22)

Anti-semitism consists in deceiving Judaic people into imagining they can remain faithful to the Talmud Bavli, the antecedent of which Jesus excoriated in Mark 7 and Matthew 15, and still have salvation. There is no greater bigotry or misdirection. Our mission is compassionately dedicated to the salvation of all people in Christ.



Monday, June 13, 2022

Coeur d'Alene “Patriot Front” White Nationalist arrests

Another Cryptocracy Charade

Coeur d'Alene “Patriot Front” White Nationalist arrests

By Michael Hoffman • Copyright ©2022


I have been asked to comment on the tempest in a teapot here in Coeur d’Alene, Idaho concerning the preemptive detention of thirty-one “white nationalist” so-called “Patriot Front” members on June 11, which has been reported across America and throughout the western world

The players arrested fall into the category of (mostly) unconscious servants of the Leftist-Soviet imperium which is rapidly developing in the U.S. These "extras" from Central Casting help to Sovietize America by acting parts in the Cryptocracy’s script, like the patsies in Michigan ("Wolverine Watchmen") who were lured into the FBI’s plot to kidnap the Democratic governor of that state.

Apparently there is an endless supply of useful idiots and patsies willing to act out the Federal government's entrapment theatre, thereby further empowering the Far Left change agents who conspire to paint Idaho as a white racist redoubt (only one of those arrested was an Idaho resident), and further empower the LGBTQ ideology. They succeeded on both counts.

There are other issues at play: the rush to judgment on the part of a media that shreds the standard of innocent-until-proven-guilty — the storied pillar of American jurisprudence, as well as the preemptive nature of the arrests on difficult to prove “conspiracy” charges, which will probably be dropped months from now when the cameras and microphones are focused elsewhere. 

If those arrested have connections to lawyers they can probably sue the city of Coeur d’Alene for a large sum and deliver a painful lesson in civil liberties to those who perpetrated the preventive detention of individuals who had broken no laws (we would say the same if Leftists or anyone else were treated in this unconstitutional fashion by the Kootenai County District Attorney's office). 

However, the nature of these government-infiltrated patsy groups is such that they operate at a level that is one magnitude above mental retardation. The Patriot Front is not anitfa. I suspect the members of the "Front" have zero legal resources. It may be that they extricate themselves from legal jeopardy solely due to the flimsy nature of the conspiracy charge against them, but we don’t see them having the wherewithal to litigate their arrests in civil court.

Why does the Cryptocracy target north Idaho with these charades? Because we are a Christian Constitutionalist demographic and overwhelmingly so. 

Ours is not a racist region. It is a place where Americans of all races are welcome to come and enjoy freedom to home school or enroll their children in multiple charter and private Christians academies. We are a state highly resistant to mask and vaccination mandates. We do not appreciate interdiction by Soviet-style bureaucrats who have made life miserable for freedom-seeking Christian families in places such as New York, Chicago, Seattle and Los Angeles.

Yes, there was an LGBTQ “pride” parade in Coeur d’Alene on June 11, sponsored by US Bank, Numerica Credit Union, Idaho State Police District 1, a local Methodist and a local Lutheran church, and the Temple of Satan, which operates 400 miles south. (Yes, Temple of Satan was an official co-sponsor— Revelation of the Method). This phenomenon is media and capitalist driven. The corporate media are mostly owned and run by diabolic liars intent on the human alchemy that erases traditional society in order to remake it anew, according to a revolutionary template, like the Jacobins in France in Year One (September 22, 1792), or the Bolsheviks in Russia (October, 1917). 

The business lobby in Idaho, with many honorable exceptions, consists of capitalist buccaneers. Our state's weakness and that of its churches, is that it pays little or no heed to Gospel economics. Hence, heinous 400% rates of usury are legal, and so too is largely unchecked development which avariciously crowds an unsustainable number of houses on tiny plots of acreage.  Our Rathdrum prairie is being consumed by this cancerous growth. The deluded Right wing imagines that if we protest this profanation of God's earth by the developers we are "socialists."

As in other states, Idaho corporations have decided that the LGBTQ movement is the Next Big Thing and they hop on the money-minting bandwagon without regard to what the Bible teaches and commands. That’s what capitalists do (free enterprise is distinguished from capitalism by its foundation in higher laws than the market and profit).

Alas, there’s no heaven on earth, not even in Idaho. Families do have a much better chance to thrive here than in many other areas of our nation, but media-induced amnesia and apathy remain at work in Idaho as elsewhere, as part of the larger processes of mind control which we delineated in our 2021 book, Twilight Language.

From now until the 21st of June we experience the longest, most wondrous, light-filled days of the year. After that, every day the sun will set a little sooner and the light of day will be shortened, until December 21, when this divine cycle of nature repeats itself. I trust you will be mindful and immerse yourself in the peak light that casts its splendor and illuminates our lives this week. God forbid we surrender our attention to the media cacophony while ignoring the beauty our Creator has deigned to bestow upon us.

As we look to the heavens for light and solace, let us ponder the words of Jesus in Matthew 15, when He rejected the mumbo jumbo traditions of men that are not entirely dissimilar from those of the arrogant media. Like the press in 2022 infuriated by our Christian family values and Biblical standards, the Pharisees were outraged by Our Savior's politically incorrect rejection of their anthropomorphic gnosis:

 "Then the disciples came and said to him, 'Do you know that the Pharisees were offended when they heard your saying?’ He answered, 'Every plant that my heavenly Father has not planted will be rooted up. Let them alone; they are blind guides.” (Matthew 15: 12-14).

Be of good cheer and have confidence, dear brethren. 


Historian Michael Hoffman is a former reporter for the New York bureau of the Associated Press and the editor of the periodical, Revisionist History®.



Wednesday, June 01, 2022

The Jubilee of Elizabeth II: The Queen of Depravity

 The Jubilee of Elizabeth II 

The Queen of Depravity

By Michael Hoffman


June 2 marks the start of celebrations in Britain for the Jubilee of 96-year-old Queen Elizabeth II. The media have enthusiastically joined in the hoopla, extending a blank check endorsement of the System's approved agent.

The queen has played host in the past to numerous blood-drenched communist dictators like Tito and overseen the most rapid dissolution of Britain in its entire history. The  mysteries surrounding the death of her daughter-in-law, Princess Diana, remain unanswered. 

Sir Jimmy Savile, OBE KCSG

The queen's son and heir apparent, Charles, Prince of Wales, was a known co-conspirator with Jimmy Savile, the demonic child molester who operated at the top of the British pyramid of power, while MI5 British Intelligence, which briefs Elizabeth and Charles, was fully apprised of his hundreds of child victims. While bestowing a gift upon Jimmy for his 80th birthday, Prince Charles told him, “Nobody will ever know what you’ve done for this country, Jimmy. This is to go some way in thanking you for that" (cf. Twilight Language, p. 311). 

Savile's decades-long, horrendous orgy of predation upon helpless children was shielded and enabled by Queen Elizabeth, Prince Charles, Home Secretary Leon Brittan and Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher. MI5 and MI6 (whose Deputy Director, Peter Hayman was accused of pederasty by Geoffrey Dickens; Hayman was known to possess child pornography), repeatedly blocked investigations of Savile. (Cf. The Guardian, April 9, 2013).

Savile's sex ring provided children to the patricians of British society and government, including members of Parliament, the House of Lords, the Anglican Church of England, the aristocracy, and big business, some of whom were members of the "Pedophile Information Exchange," which quietly lobbied for the age of consent for sex with children to be abolished. (Twilight Language, pp. 312-313).


Savile either personally raped or facilitated the rape of at least 328 children, even though by the 1980s Savile's horrors were becoming public knowledge. Rock singer John Lydon was interviewed by the British Broadcasting Service (BBC) in 1978 wherein he accused Savile and stated, "We all know about it but we're not allowed to talk about it." The interview was never aired and he was temporarily banned by the BBC. "Sir Jimmy" died a multimillionaire in 2011, respected and honored by Queen Elizabeth, who knighted him in 1990. Throughout his life this ghoul enjoyed total immunity from arrest, prosecution and imprisonment.

As if all this were not sufficient to uncover enough rocks to indict the British royal family for these crimes and their coverup, it turns out that Queen Elizabeth's son, Prince Andrew, was part of the notorious Jeffrey Epstein sex ring. 

In February the prince paid Virginia Giuffre, the sex slave furnished to him by Epstein, $16 million in return for her dropping her lawsuit against him. The next month, on March 29, the queen chose Prince Andrew for a place of honor in her royal entourage as she commemorated the anniversary of the death of her husband, Prince Phillip, defiantly selecting Andrew for the high profile role of her escort in Westminster Abbey, knowing the photo of that escort would be published around the world, thereby demonstrating her contempt for the victims of her son and his crony, Epstein.

Elizabeth enjoys good press like her namesake Elizabeth I, who was steeped in the occult of her astrologer royal, Dr. John "007" Dee. The first Queen Elizabeth  is portrayed in Hollywood films as a paragon of decency, like the current monarch, who enjoys the unalloyed adulation of the media. Child molestation among the royals? Don't let it bother you, peasant.

The Cryptocracy has seen to it that the masonic Crown and royal house of England survived, while other hereditary monarchies were destroyed. In issue no. 117 of our newsletter Revisionist History®, the occultism and slave-trading activities of Elizabeth I and the prophecies for the longevity of the aristocracy of England are detailed. 

Elizabeth made a fortune from the slave trade which her personal pirate, John Hawkins, pioneered under her commission. 

She employed an expert torturer, Richard Topcliffe to dispatch as agonizingly as possible, dissidents who questioned the legitimacy of her rule. She tortured to death hundreds of them. 

Furthermore, she made it a crime punishable by imprisonment to attend the Latin Mass upheld even by her father, King Henry VIII.  Attendance at the liturgy which her Church of England promulgated was mandatory. Absence was punishable with confiscatory fines.  (Revisionist History® no. 117, "The Pirate Queen's Slave Traders: Elizabeth I and the Conjuring of the British Empire," can be ordered here - scroll down to issue no. 117). 

As the overcrowded little island of Britain drowns in a sea of immigration and its historic Christian faith is subsumed in a melting pot of other creeds often hostile to it,  as their freedom of speech is increasingly subject to draconian repression, it is more important than ever to "keep up appearances." 

Hence, the bamboozled British people are treated to a revival of the spectacle of royal pageantry. By staging these elaborate ceremonies, a hypnotic impression is conveyed, reassuring the people that despite all the indices of decay, destruction and masonic oppression, "Things aren't as bad as they seem." 

In the Society of the Spectacle, illusion predominates. There is no society in the West more spectacular than England when it fans the feathers of its "glorious" monarchy, enacting a ritual splendor intended to conceal the rot. 

Michael Hoffman is a former reporter for the New York bureau of the Associated Press and the author of ten books of history and literature.