Calls for Priest’s Removal After Church Hosts Speech by Farrakhan

Calls for Chicago Priest’s Removal After Church Hosts Speech by Louis Farrakhan Critical of the Talmud

"It is now up to the leaders of the Catholic church to remove their prominent priest from his hallowed post.”
 — Rabbi Abraham Cooper

By Michael Hoffman
www.RevisionistHistory.org

Cardinal Blase Cupich of Chicago has condemned liberal Catholic priest Fr. Michael Pfleger, pastor of St. Sabina church for hosting a speech on May 9 by Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan. The Cardinal says he is “shocked” by Farrakhan’s criticism of the Babylonian Talmud. Cupich is horrified that Farrakhan dared to: “suggest... that ‘Talmudic thought’ sanctioned pedophilia and misogyny.” 

All of the statements concerning the Talmud of Babylon which Minister Farrakhan made were accurate. Truth is not an issue in the controversy.

Before being elevated to his post in Chicago by Pope Francis, Cupich was Bishop of Spokane, Washington. There Cupich allegedly assisted members of the Jesuit order in hiding priests credibly accused of child molestation — with what is said to be the connivance of then-Bishop Cupich they were placed in secret at Cardinal Bea House, a Jesuit residential facility located on the campus of Gonzaga University and near St. Aloysius elementary school [see here and here].

Farrakhan spoke at the Chicago church as part of a community protest against his having been banned by Facebook and Instagram. In his address at St. Sabina, Minister Farrakhan valiantly defended Jesus and the Blessed Mother Mary from the Talmudic hate speech which is the basis of the halacha or law of Orthodox Judaism. No other national Islamic or Christian leader has been willing to sound the alarm and educate the public concerning this institutionalized, scurrilous vilification of the Messiah of Israel and His Mother. Farrakhan also made reference to the Talmud’s ghastly doctrine concerning sex with children. 

According to Chicago’s ABC News outlet (abc7chicago.com), “Pfleger invited Farrakhan to speak at St. Sabina a week after he was permanently banned from Facebook and Instagram for what the platform deemed hateful and even dangerous. Farrakhan spoke for about an hour to a standing room-only audience. Many in the church streamed his remarks live on Facebook.”  

Cupich said in a statement, "Without consulting me, Fr. Michael Pfleger invited Minister Louis Farrakhan to speak at St. Sabina Church in response to Facebook's decision to ban him from its platforms.”

CNN reports, “Farrakhan made several anti-Semitic statements during his speech, accusing Judaism of promoting pedophilia and saying that Jews do not like him because he ‘exposes their hatred of Jesus.’ He also said that he had a divine mission to ‘separate the good Jews from the Satanic Jews.”

How is truth a "statement of anti-Semitism”? If the Talmud does indeed grant permission, under certain circumstances, for the sexual molestation of young persons, how does the articulation of that fact constitute an offense against Semitic people? Is this not a salutary warning to them to defend their children against this dogma?

When investigators speak of the molestation of children by Rome’s Catholic clerics, are they making an “anti-Italian statement”? How would Italians or Judaic people —or anyone else for that matter — be harmed by a truth which helps to shed light on the exploitation of children?

"Such statements shock the conscience," Cupich replied. “I apologize to my Jewish brothers and sisters, whose friendship I treasure, from whom I learn so much, and whose covenant with God remains eternal," the cardinal continued.

He’s apologizing because a prominent black leader told the truth in a Catholic Church. This is apparently a grievous offense necessitating groveling of the most obsequious ignobility.

Wiesenthal Center Rabbi Orders Fr. Pfleger’s Removal

The Simon Wiesenthal Center has called on the Archdiocese of Chicago to remove Fr. Pfleger: "How is it that (Farrakhan) was invited to use a prominent Catholic church to denounce 'Satanic Jews' from the pulpit," asked Rabbi Abraham Cooper, the center's director of social action. "It is now up to the leaders of the Catholic church to remove their prominent priest from his hallowed post," Cooper continued. 

Apparently there is either no such thing as a Judaic person who is Satanic, or, it is grounds for another ban, this time on Fr. Pfleger, for his guest speaker having called certain Satanists to account. Here we observe an expectation of special immunity, a derivative of Talmudic exceptionalism. When it is not conceded by Farrakhan and Pfleger, then enforcement is demanded. 

We live in an era when, to defend the indefensible Talmud from exposure, activists, scholars and religious leaders must be forbidden to speak on social media, officiate at churches or publish on Amazon. The watchword of the “tolerant” is “ban, ban, ban,” because that’s all they’ve got. The facts are on Farrakhan’s side, so instead of debate they suppress. How is human knowledge advanced by such a reactionary process? What we are witnessing is a new inquisition.

It’s an irony missed that a meeting called to protest the censorship and removal of Minister Louis Farrakhan from Facebook may result in the censorship and removal of Father Michael Pfleger from his parish church. There’s no end in sight to the megalomania of the censors who, from their lofty perch of self-righteous rectitude, presume to obstruct knowledge and freedom of speech in the name of “fighting hate.” 

The Anti-Defamation League has called Farrakhan, who has led the Nation of Islam since 1977, "quite possibly America's most popular anti-Semite." For the ADL one of his most extreme thought crimes is that "Farrakhan has alleged that the Jewish people were responsible for the slave trade."

CNN and the rest of the corporate media neglect to report that the Nation of Islam’s erudite history, The Secret Relationship Between Blacks and Jews, a three volume revisionist trilogy on the black slave trade and the Leo Frank case, was banned in February by Amazon, during Black History Month.

According to CNN, “Pfleger, who has long worked with African-American leaders in Chicago, said Farrakhan and the Nation of Islam are respected locally for their anti-violence and anti-drug campaigns. ‘Nobody has done more in the saving of young black men's lives and turning around lives than the Nation of Islam. His respect in the African-American community has been consistent."

“This is a free-speech issue," Fr. Pfleger told CNN. "I don't agree with everything Minister Farrakhan has said. I don't agree with anyone on everything, but we are in a dangerous time when we can no longer have dialogue without demonizing one another."

Before the address, Pfleger said Farrakhan "has been a bold voice against injustice done against black people in this country and his voice deserves and needs to be heard."

Fr. Pfleger reports that e-mail and phone calls have poured in denouncing him for hosting Farrakhan and threatening to withdraw donations to the church and its programs. "If you would have heard and seen the stuff sent and spoken to me over this last week," he said. "I was shocked — and I have gotten a lot of hate in my life. People have told me that they will destroy me."

It is worth noting that reports of Farrakhan’s speech at St. Sabina by CNN, the ADL, the Wiesenthal Center, and the Southern Poverty Law Center, all avoid using the word “Talmud” to describe Minister Farrakhan’s criticisms. For the word Talmud they substitute the phrase, “Jewish writings.” It appears that they have a sense that the Talmud has an unsavory reputation in the minds of many Americans, and for that reason they avoid mentioning it in connection with Farrakhan’s fact-finding. 

“It is dangerous to me when we begin to stop free speech and seek to silence prophetic voices. There are many who say they do not like Minister Farrakhan because all they have heard is various sound bites. Perhaps that is why Facebook wanted to ban him — to keep people from hearing his whole talk, his entire message and the truth that he seeks to teach us.”  - Fr. Michael Pfleger

Cardinal Cupich’s Statement

Without consulting me, Fr. Michael Pfleger invited Minister Louis Farrakhan to speak at St. Sabina Church in response to Facebook's decision to ban him from its platforms. Minister Farrakhan could have taken the opportunity to deliver a unifying message of God's love for all his children. Instead, he repeatedly smeared the Jewish people, using a combination of thinly veiled discriminatory rhetoric and outright slander. He suggested that "Talmudic thought" sanctioned pedophilia and misogyny. He referred to Jewish people as "satanic," asserting that he was sent by God to separate the "good Jews" from the "satanic Jews." 

Such statements shock the conscience. People of faith are called to live as signs of God's love for the whole human family, not to demonize any of its members. This is all the more true of religious leaders, who have a sacred duty never to leverage the legitimacy of their ministry to heap blame upon a group of persons, and never to deploy inflammatory rhetoric, long proven to incite violence. Antisemitic rhetoric - discriminatory invective of any kind - has no place in American public life, let alone in a Catholic church. I apologize to my Jewish brothers and sisters, whose friendship I treasure, from whom I learn so much, and whose covenant with God remains eternal. 

I encourage Fr. Pfleger to accept the invitation of the Illinois Holocaust Museum and Education Center to meet with their leadership and dialogue with survivors. And I pledge to continue our work with our city's religious leaders and all people of good will to promote tolerance, respect, and nonviolence. As the Reverend Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. said, "Hate is too great a burden to bear." (end quote from Chicago Cardinal Cupich)

Michael Hoffman is the author of Judaism’s Strange Gods: Revised and Expanded, and eight other books of history and literature.

For further research:

Rally for Farrakhan to protest Facebook Censorship at St. Sabina Church, May 9, 2019
(Complete at 1 hour 44 min.)

"Facebook Censorship: White Supremacy of the Most Hypocritical Type"

Excerpts from Minister Farrakhan’s Remarks on the Talmud

Another clip is here:

Video clip: See why Zuckerberg banned Louis Farrakhan from Facebook. Minister Farrakhan says what your pope, priests, preachers and TV evangelists have never dared to say in defense of the Holy Name of Jesus, contra the hatred for Him in the Talmud—hatred approved by the System. pic.twitter.com/4AEP3vfd3G

— Michael Hoffman (@HoffmanMichaelA) May 10, 2019

___________________

Facebook Censorship: White supremacy of the most hypocritical type

Facebook Censorship: 

White Supremacy of the Most Hypocritical Type

The bold promise of a new liberty online is being circumscribed and narrowed by a thousand incremental acts of suppression, which if it continues, over time will forge an Internet which mirrors the decrepit censorship system it was supposed to surpass and overcome.

By Michael Hoffman

www.RevisionistHistory.org

Actor James Woods and Minister Louis Farrakhan

Facebook is receiving congratulations from the darkest corner of the web for reverting to the discredited gatekeeping of the legacy media and further eroding freedom of inquiry on the Internet, which in its early days gained popularity as an antidote to the very censorship we see Facebook (and Paypal and Amazon) imposing.

When they were all up and coming capitalists, the CEOs of these companies preached freedom of expression. Now that they’ve made it into the billionaire’s club they have abandoned the very ideals which brought them fame and fortune. Their conceit that they are avatars of new thinking for the digital age is now exposed as a cheap trick driven by the college campus nanny doctrine that there must be “safe spaces” erected where “micro-aggression” emanating from radical ideas cannot be allowed to penetrate.

Freedom of speech means nothing if it doesn’t mean freedom for your fiercest rivals in the ideological and political struggle. The Tech Tyrants have a megalomaniacal confidence in their own righteousness, which has increasingly transformed the Internet into a zone of conformity. As Heather Mac Donald notes, “They consider any disagreement with their own political outlook as a manifestation of 'hate,' and as such, fair game for suppression.”

What they ignore in their hubris is that there are few things more disturbing to Americans than suppression of the advancement of human knowledge through the free competition of ideas. Not so very long ago rights for homosexuals and their marriage were offensive topics proscribed by gatekeeping media. Today that suppression appears to modernists like a relic from a dark age, while suppressing conspiracy theorists and black Muslims is hailed as a virtue. It’s a case of the double standard, freedom of speech for me, but not for thee: my radical cause deserves to be publicized, while your radicalism is offensive to my dogma and therefore will be policed off Facebook and eventually, social media in general.

Mark Zuckerberg and his Facebook cohort have banned and removed Minister Louis Farrakhan of the Nation of Islam from Facebook and Instagram. Farrakhan dissents from the conformist narrative about Israeli Zionism and Talmudic Judaism, while having the highest respect for true Jews. He is demonized and expelled by invoking “anti-Semitism.” All it takes is for the charge to be made and under the dictatorship of the Tech Tyrants, the accused is banned without the right of appeal or due process. This is from the playbook of Communist despot Vladimir Lenin and Nazi Judge Roland Freisler.

Last February Amazon banned three magisterial volumes of black history produced by the Nation of Islam’s scholars, The Secret Relationship Between Blacks and Jews. To add insult to injury, this ignominious book-banning occurred during Black History Month. Amazon claims for public relations’ purposes to be an anti-racist organization, yet here we observe the white liberals who own Amazon sneaking through a ban on brilliant and thus far irrefutable works of black history.

The Canadian-Israeli researcher David Sheen appears to draw upon these books as the foundation of his lectures on the forbidden fact of the Judaic role in the black slave trade. As a white Judaic man he has the privilege of saying without fear of being banned, what Louis Farrakhan and his organization were the first to uncover and publish. Is this not a privilege of white supremacy?

Underneath all the slogans and name-calling is the struggle between ideas.  The white nationalists who parade in the streets and fire guns at Judaic people, are too obtuse to perceive that their alleged combat contra Judaism is in truth a losing battle against their own philosophical allies. Talmudism of the “settler" type practiced since the founding of the Israeli state in 1948 is a form of racial-supremacist neo-Nazism. Hitler was under the influence of Kabbalistic and Talmudic ideology from 1919 onward. He was channeling the most ferocious racism on the planet.

Decades ago Hebrew University Prof. Yeshayahu Leibowitz warned of the ascendance of what he termed “Judeo-Nazis.” There are indeed Nazi rabbis teaching young people in the Israeli state today. They convey Hitler’s ideology to their students. For this writer to report it may cause me to be banned. 

Facts have been judged too hot for you to handle and your infantilization is enforced by self-appointed commissars of the news, imitating the old model of gatekeeping perfected by the increasingly obsolete legacy media. This is a betrayal of the very idea of the Internet. In the 1990s John Perry Barlow, one of the earliest advocates of the Internet, witnessed it functioning as a revolutionary alternative to the censorship common to television and the newspapers, "We are now, as a global group, going into a period where the old editorial system, the old way of stomping down consciousness to a bearable aperture is about to get blasted.”

This is less the case in 2019. The bold promise of a new liberty online is being circumscribed and narrowed by a thousand incremental acts of suppression, which if it continues, over time will forge an Internet which mirrors the decrepit censorship system it was supposed to surpass and overcome.

The archetypal representative of that stale, anachronistic system is the New York Times. The Times has judged it not helpful for you to know about the influential Israeli rabbi who promotes the burning of churches, or the Israeli professor who advocates the rape of Palestinian mothers and wives, or the Israeli chief army chaplain who agrees with this monstrous advocacy. 

Mass shooting and bombing of Palestinians by the Israeli military are considered by the establishment media to be unworthy of anything other than the most cursory notice, while violence to a Zionist, whether in America, Europe or the Israeli state, becomes a mini-holocaust of epic proportions, triggering a deluge of tears, legislation and intense media coverage. As the Talmud Bavli decrees, there is one standard for the Holy People and another for the goyim.

For the advancement of knowledge without interdiction by partisan expurgators masquerading as objective journalists, a free and untrammeled Internet is absolutely essential, indeed fundamental to what it means to be fully human. "Human rights” is an empty shibboleth if it does not signify the right to know and argue freely according to conscience, something John Milton proposed in 1644, in his essay Areopagitica. He wrote, “If reading is regulated, then music, conversation, every incident of social life must be regulated too.” Four hundred years later and we have yet to learn what Milton knew.

Facebook, Paypal and Amazon will not suppress the Nazi rabbis or the pro-rape rabbis. Just as Judeo-white supremacy is the covert weapon against blacks in the Nation of Islam who are not willing to submit to the plantation mentality, Nazi ideology and genetic supremacy can be preached with impunity as long as it is done under Zionist or Talmudic auspices. If you understand this, then you know what a mockery is the solemn piety and finger-wagging that accompanies the suppression of heretics like Paul Joseph Watson, Alex Jones and Louis Farrakhan.

Rabbis at the Israeli-government-funded Bnei David academy, an elite yeshiva (Talmud school) preparing Israeli youth for leadership positions in the Israeli army, glorify Hitler and the Nazis and urge the enslavement of Arabs. Don’t ask Wikipedia or the legacy news about these Israeli Nazis. You’re not supposed to know. This is what Facebook, Paypal and Amazon are working toward: a vacuum where Correct Think can safely extinguish vital information that has been damned as hateful by people who hate freedom.

Rabbi Eliezer Kashtiel lectures his students at Bnei David academy as follows: 

“The gentiles will want to be our slaves. Being a slave to a Jew is the best. They’re glad to be slaves, they want to be slaves. Instead of just walking the streets and being stupid and violent and harming each other, once they’re slaves, their lives can begin to take shape....Yes, we’re racists. We believe in racism. There are races in the world and there are genetic traits inherent in nations. This demands that we think how to help them.  There are differences among races....There are nations around us with genetic defects.  The Arab wants to be under Occupation because they have a genetic defect. They don’t know how to run a state. They don’t know how to do anything. Look at how they act.” 

Rabbi Giora Radler, addressed the Bnei David academy youth: 

“Let’s begin by asking the question: was Hitler right or not? He is the most correct person there is. He was definitely right in every word he said. His ideology was correct. There is a male world which fights, which deals with honor and the brotherhood of soldiers. And there is the soft, ethical feminine world which turns the other cheek.”

As noted, Louis Farrakhan respects true Jews, as defined by the Book of Revelation. But he has righteous anger when he sees Palestinian civilians murdered weekly with no tears shed by the white rulers of America. Neither does he suffer gladly black youth being summarily gunned down by members of American police departments which have been trained by Israeli police in the same tactics they use to wantonly take the lives of Palestinian youth. 

Farrakhan does not sit mute and passive like “evangelists” Franklin Graham, Joel Osteen and T.D. Jakes, while the name of Jesus Christ is blasphemed in the Talmud. He thunders, he excoriates, he admonishes and he teaches. This is denounced as “extremism.”

The Internet Overlords are heading toward a dictatorship over the mind which they are imposing incrementally, using the pretext of combating white nationalism. (Last time we checked, Minister Farrakhan was not white). 

Combatting the white, Yiddish-Ashkenazi Talmudic extremism that is reviving the Hitler cult and has taken thousands of Palestinian lives is not on the agenda. How can it be, when the driving force behind Facebook’s censorship is its own deeply concealed Judeo-white supremacy?

Our thoughts turn to China and other nations not captive to the Anglo-Zionist networks. American diplomats and newspaper and Internet pundits pompously lecture China on freedom of expression and democracy, presuming, as the British empire did in the 19th century, that the Chinese are dull and slow-witted. Can anyone expect the Chinese to loosen their hold on the Internet when they see American tech tyrants such as Mr. Zuckerberg practicing censorship and limiting free expression?

Facebook boss Mark Zuckerberg is encouraging the closing of minds around the world in the name of opposing racism and hatred. Communist Party boss Xi Jinping censors to maintain “Confucian harmony.” Both are pretexts for thought control and the fear that a political or theological rival might get the best of the argument and win adherents.

Gaslighting Farrakhan presupposes that his support among people of color will decline because Facebook has silenced him. Yet the record shows that he has gone from strength to strength as a result of the attacks of the white power structure. Blacks in America are aware that Minister Farrakhan is being censored because he will not behave on the plantation. Moreover, his defiance is a lightning rod for people of all colors who are fed up with the crushing dominion of money over the free spirit of humanity. 

Mr. Farrakhan’s position in the black community is not dependent on where he’s at in digital cyberspace. He's the visionary who organized and led The Million Man March in the streets of Washington D.C. He is the one who has healed and empowered the black family. He has ennobled the black man and woman in the face of the pernicious hate and racism of the prestigious Rabbi Maimonides, who centuries ago taught the western world that blacks are lower than the level of human. Farrakhan reminds his people that they are the imago Dei, even as Maimonides classed them only slightly above apes. So who is the hater?

Louis Farrakhan’s love for his people cannot be disputed. Telling the black community he is a hater flies in the face of everything they know about him. Meanwhile, buildings are named and statues are erected to Maimonides by the closeted liberal white supremacists who cleverly sear their rivals with the stigma of “hater." 

The world is to be made safe for white supremacist Talmudism by any means, including making a charade of the West’s own hallowed principles of free speech. The blowback has already begun, however. In the HipHop World they are saying, “Minister Farrakhan has been instrumental in quelling beef, guiding the leaders like (rapper) Snoop and mending wounds that have been long-standing in the community. He's a staple. Now, he has said something that people of a certain persuasion may take the wrong way, but what do you think Black people and others or color must contend with daily?”

The history of martyrdom demonstrates that blatantly repressive tactics against women and men who put their life on the line for their ideals will always help to propagate those ideals. Such a man is the Honorable Minister Louis Farrakhan. Zuckerberg, Bezos and the other Internet monopolists will never defeat him.

Copyright©2019 by Independent History and Research

Michael Hoffman is a former reporter for the New York bureau of the Associated Press. His writing has appeared in the New York Times and the New York Review of Books. He is the author of the textbook Judaism Discovered, and a popular condensation, Judaism’s Strange Gods: Revised and Expanded. Mr. Hoffman is managing editor of Revisionist History® newsletter.

_________________

PC bias police at Hobart and William Smith Colleges

Prof. Daniel McGowan and the pc bias police at Hobart and William Smith Colleges

Daniel McGowan, Professor Emeritus of Economics at Hobart and William Smith Colleges in upstate New York, and a noble (and smart!) campaigner for Palestinian rights against Israeli racism, is back in the news: 

https://www.fltimes.com/news/retired-professor-dan-mcgowan-keeps-up-quiche-vigils/article_a8e3eb76-9ba1-5006-a2f9-8e8c6d30dddd.html 

Dan’s a born fighter who we can’t help but admire on the basis of his valor and persistence alone. 

In this case he’s battling the hyper-sensitive pc thought police at Hobart and William Smith Colleges where he taught for decades, and he’s doing so in the street.

The colleges' "Bias Incident Response Team" (I kid you not), terminated his e-mail privileges after he poked mild fun at a solemn lesbian gathering. There was no appeal or due process. 

Shades of Maoist self-criticism, he was told his e-mail would be reinstated only if he wrote a four page statement concerning what he has learned from being such a bad boy. 

Dan is the former head of Deir Yassin Remembered (https://www.deiryassin.org), which is an organization that seeks to kindle the memory of the Israeli holocaust against the Palestinians — the murderous bias against them which is seldom an issue for any American “response teams.”

_________________________

Rabbi says Notre Dame burned because the Talmud was burned

A RABBINIC CURSE ON NOTRE DAME CATHEDRAL

 A religious duty (“mitzvah”) to burn churches 

Leading Israeli Rabbi Shlomo Aviner says Notre Dame was cursed with fire as divine retribution for medieval French Catholics having burned the Babylonian Talmud

By Michael Hoffman

www.RevisionistHistory.org

Cursing Notre Dame
Israeli Rosh Yeshiva Shlomo Aviner

"Notre Dame Fire May Be Divine Punishment, Says Prominent Settler Rabbi Urging ‘God-fearing Jews’ to refrain from grieving.

"Leading religious-Zionist figure invokes 13th-century Talmud book burning as possible reason for the devastating blaze.

"The conflagration at Notre Dame de Paris that badly damaged the ancient cathedral on Monday was possibly divine punishment, an influential Israeli rabbi said on Wednesday April 17, invoking a 13th-century burning of Jewish scriptures.

"...when answering the question 'So it can’t be said that it was punishment?' the rabbi wrote, 'It is possible, after all. The first big Talmud burning was in Paris, there in the plaza of the Notre Dame Cathedral.'

"Aviner said it was a result of the Paris trial, 'In which Jewish sages in France of that generation were forced into confrontation with the Christian sages. The result was the burning of the Talmud. The Talmud books were brought to the Notre Dame square in 20 wagons...and were burned there, meaning, 1,200 Talmud books.'

"French-born Shlomo Aviner, now the rabbi of West Bank settlement Beit El, also said it is a mitzvah - a deed done from religious duty - to set fire to churches in Israel..." 

Source: Yotam Berger, Israeli newspaper Haaretz, April 17, 2019

"Rabbi Shlomo Aviner, the rabbi of the Beit El settlement and head of the Ateret Yerushalayim yeshiva, said Christianity 'is our number one enemy throughout history.” 

Source: Times of Israel, April 17, 2019

“The great Christian Church in Paris is on fire. Should we feel sorry for that, or should we rejoice, as it [the cathedral] is idolatry, which is a mitzvah to burn?' — Israeli Rabbi Shlomo Aviner

"Several immensely important rabbinic rulers, most prominent among them Maimonides, ruled that churches are places of idolatry and ought to be destroyed. The rulings are very clear."

Source: Mondoweiss

MICHAEL HOFFMAN’S AFTERWORD

Catholic Church of the Loaves and Fishes burned by Israeli arsonists, June 17, 2015, on the site of where it is believed Jesus fed thousands with five loaves and two fishes.

There are numerous buildings in America that bear the name of Rabbi Moses Maimonides, the “sage” who is revered by liberal and Right wing intelligentsia in the West, notwithstanding the fact that Rabbi Maimonides:

•Declared that Jesus got what He deserved when he was killed.

•Taught that Christian churches should be burned. (Maimonides remains the halachic inspiration for church arson to this day).

•Declared that black people are not human (cf. Maimonides, The Guide of the Perplexed [University of Chicago Press, 1963, with an introduction by Leo Strauss], vol. 2, pp. 618-619). 

The Babylonian Talmud itself is the holiest book of Orthodox Judaism, replete with nullification of God’s Biblical law, admonitions to burn Christian books, and lie, commit evil anonymously, and destroy non-Jews. Furthermore the Babylonian Talmud teaches that Jesus was a sorcerer, His Mother Mary a whore, and that Jesus is now in hell burning forever in hot excrement. 

It is important to note that many noble Judaic people object to the contents of the Talmud and have rejected it. 

Even with regard to the adherents of Talmudic Orthodox Judaism, Jesus commanded us to love our enemies and do good to those who persecute us. Only an opponent of Christ would perpetrate attacks on Judaic people. Telling the truth as Jesus did is sufficient; the rest we leave to to God (Romans 12:19).

Judaic people are  themselves victims of Talmudic dogma. For instance, permission for the molestation of infant Judaic girls under the age of three and Judaic boys under the age of nine is granted in the Talmud. This is not a “canard” or a “trope.” This datum is not "taken out of context." It is a readily verifiable, tragic and unfortunate truth. We wish it were not. Presumably it is still ethical and legal to advance human knowledge and publish demonstrable facts.

The early and medieval Catholic Church did indeed oppose the Talmud, predicated in large part on the testimony of former Judaic Talmud scholars such as the learned Nicholas Donin, who converted to Catholicism and participated in the Paris debate contra the rabbis. 

Centuries later however, during the Renaissance, the hierarchy of the Church of Rome was infiltrated and the popes began to covertly honor and emulate the rabbinic traditions and the doctrine contained in the Kabbalah and Talmud. For example, the finest edition of the Talmud up to that time, the Bomberg edition, was published under papal auspices in Renaissance Venice, 1519-1523. 

These revisionist facts are seldom mentioned in the  media or western academia, the better to keep people ignorant, maintain political correctness and suppress knowledge.

Selections from the Talmud of Babylon:

For Further Study and Documentation:

The Occult Renaissance Church of Rome (723 pages)

Judaism Discovered (textbook, 1100 pages)

The Truth About the Talmud (blog)

_______________

Support our worldwide educational outreach:

Please make a donation to our Truth Mission
_________________

Blaming the Romans and Pilate for Killing Jesus

Blaming the Romans 

and Pontius Pilate for Killing Jesus

By Michael Hoffman

www.RevisionistHistory.org

Former Fox News talk show host Bill O’Reilly promotes the manifestly ridiculous Romans-are-to-blame-for the-Crucifixion imposture in his book, The Last Days of Jesus. 

He's not alone. On Holy Thursday (April 17) 2014, Andrew P. Napolitano, better known as “Judge Napolitano,” a widely admired figure among “Conservatives," at the website of the usury advocate Lew Rockwell (LewRockwell.com), wrote a column in which he stated: 

“On the first Good Friday, the Romans executed Jesus because they were persuaded that by claiming to be the Son of God, He might foment a revolution against them...they feared a revolution that would disrupt their worldly power, and so they condemned Him to death by crucifixion.”

Pharisaic Jews are not mentioned anywhere in Napolitano’s column.

To assert that the Romans bear the lion’s share of responsibility is a contrived argument that serves to appease rabbinic and Zionist power on earth.

The fact that Christ praised a Roman officer above everyone in Israel (Matthew 8:5-13), and that the Roman administrator Pilate urgently sought to save Christ’s life, calling him a just man, and being threatened by a mob of Jews as a result, is washed down the memory hole. 

Moreover, the disinformation that renders the Romans the main malefactors is undercut by none other than the Babylonian Talmud itself, in Sanhedrin 43a, where it is stated that the Romans were favorable toward Jesus and did not want to execute him: 

“Rather it must be that the case against Jesus was different, because he had close connections with the non-Jewish authorities, and those authorities were interested in his acquittal.” 

The Steinsaltz Talmud, volume 17, p. 159 (Random House, 1998) 

What is there to debate? We have God’s Word in 1 Thessalonians 2:14-15: 

“...the Jews who both killed the Lord Jesus, and their own prophets, and have persecuted us; and they please not God, and are contrary to all men.” 

 We have this unambiguous statement. This Scripture passage was made by the Apostle Paul without qualifications of any kind. 

We can find no qualifications or shades of ambiguity in Matthew 27:25: 

“Then answered all the people, and said, His blood be on us, and on our children.” This a text about which the author of The Last Days of Jesus has nothing to say. 

Tough-guy O’Reilly told United Press International (UPI) on April 10, 2014: “...kids in public schools should learn about Christianity if they are American children. If they don’t like it, that’s too bad,’ he says.” 

Wow, what a mensch. One question: which Christ is O’Reilly presenting in his history, the Christ of the Gospel or the Christ of the synagogue? 

The most authoritative rabbi in the western Judaic world is Moses Maimonides, “the Rambam.” He is venerated in the elite media and academia, though few of his gentile enthusiasts have bothered to discover what he actually taught. 

Maimonides was an unabashed Christ-hater. We realize we are not to use those words; that they are politically incorrect and “offensive.” 

We have no fear of uttering truth however, and in the case of Rabbi Maimonides, this is the truth. In his magnum opus, the Mishneh Torah, he wrote, “The Christians are idol worshippers” (Avodah Zara 9:4). Idol worshippers are subject to execution under the Noahide Laws promoted by every American President from Ronald Reagan forward, under the rubric of “Education Day USA."

Maimonides also stated that Jesus was killed “by the court,” referring to the rabbinic court. Nowhere does Rabbi Maimonides, the supreme halachic authority for western Judaics, blame the Romans, as Bill O’Reilly and Judge Napolitano do: 

"Yeshu the Christian, who imagined himself the messiah and was killed by the court...” (Mishneh Torah: Laws of the King 11:4). 

There are literally hundreds of “conservative” leaders like O’Reilly and Napolitano who minimize the role of Orthodox Pharisaic Judaism in the killing of the Son of God, putting the onus on the Romans and Pilate, so as to curry favor with those who rule the United States government and the corporate media. 

With the misdirection perpetrated by "conservative friends" like these, Jesus Christ doesn’t need any enemies. 

Copyright© 2019 by Michael Hoffman

This column is excerpted from a 20 page dossier, O'Reilly's Midrash on Jesus, by Michael Hoffman 

__________________