Israeli Puppet Trump Shows His True Colors

Israeli Puppet Trump Shows His True Colors

By Michael Hoffman

www.RevisionistHistory.org

Retired four star Marine Corps General and former Secretary of Defense James Mattis was being kind when he wrote that President Donald Trump is of “limited cognitive ability.” 

A less diplomatic observer who had been as close to the president as Gen. Mattis, might have said that he was of limited intelligence (though possessed of street smarts and cunning).

We saw Mr. Trump’s dim light bulb emitting its low wattage as he stood with American military officers spouting the same monotonous and risible talking points that emanate from the mouth of the president’s ventriloquist, Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu.

To call Trump an Israeli agent is to do him an injustice. He is more than that. Like others in his cabinet (Pompeo and Pence) he is an Israeli golem. In legend, the golem was a non-Judaic Frankenstein created in Renaissance Prague by the Kabbalistic Rabbi Judah Loew to kill the enemies of the Talmudic theocracy that masquerades as an Old Testament creed. The golem is mindless and not subject to reason or logic, just like Trump and his gang of Neocon chicken hawks, sanctioners, and Israeli idolators.

Observe Mr Trump’s pathetic regurgitation of Israeli propaganda talking points on the morning of January 8 in his speech to the nation, wherein he termed Iranians the number one terrorists in the world. 

Really? So soon he forgets ISIS, the terror army inspired by a blueprint established by the 100% toxic Saudi Wahhabist theology, responsible for inspiring massive terrorism in the Middle East, including wholesale slaughter of the Christians of Syria and Iraq, while launching dozens of terror-massacres in Britain, Europe and America. Nowhere is there an Iranian hand in any of this.

ISIS, formed from remnants of al Qaeda, gets a pass from Trump because ISIS does not threaten Israeli control of Palestine, while the Iranian government consistently demands justice for Palestine. Our foreign policy is driven by Israeli needs and requirements, not the interests of the American people.

We have a pretend media which, along with Trump, pretends Iran-backed Shiite militias did the most harm to U.S. troops in Iraq. In truth, the main killer of Americans in Iraq were the Saudi-backed Sunni remnants of Saddam Hussein’s army, which years later became ISIS. Who in the mainstream media—Left or Right— reports this fact as a challenge to Mr. Trump’s repetition of Israeli disinformation?

Secretary of State Mike Pompeo is said to have urged Trump to assassinate Qasem Soleimani, the Iranian general who drove ISIS terrorists out of Iraq and al-Qaeda terrorists from Syria. Soleimani saved Christian lives in the Middle East, but these are mostly Greek Orthodox and Catholic lives, about whom Protestant fundamentalists in the U.S. care next to nothing, preferring Talmudists to them.

Mr. Pompeo is a war-golem of the Israeli-worshipping fundamentalist “Rapture” theology of US Churchianity.

“We will continue to fight these battles. It is a never-ending struggle...until the Rapture, be part of it, be in the fight.” 

—Mike Pompeo, God and Country Rally,” Summit Church, Wichita, Kansas, June 28, 2015. 

The lunatic Rapture doctrine was invented in the 1800s as part of the Protestant "Dispensationalist" doctrine favored by fundamentalist partisans of counterfeit "Israel.” The Church had no knowledge of it before the nineteenth century.

The fact that the theology dominant in the Israeli state which the Rapture enthusiasts adore is essentially Talmudic Antichrist, is not an issue for Messers Pence, Pompeo and their millions of fellow, alleged “evangelicals."

Americans need to have the tools to deconstruct the fake Christianity of powerful Talmudic “evangelicals” such as Mike Pence and Mike Pompeo. One such tool is Judaism’s Strange Gods: Revised and Expanded — banned almost everywhere books are sold. 

If we do not unmask the foundation of the Israeli Antichrist theology, sooner or later the “America First” Commander-in-Chief who has promised to extricate us from endless conflicts and entanglements overseas, will take us into war for “Israel” with the 80-million Persian nation that is four times the size of France and very different from the Arabs we have starved and mass murdered with impunity in Iraq, all in the name of democracy and “fighting terrorism” of course.

Copyright ©2020 by Independent History and Research

Box 849, Coeur d’Alene, Idaho 83816

At this link, this column is available as a flyer for printing and public distribution

Michael Hoffman’s work is made possible by donations from truth seekers. 

___________________

Down Syndrome and the Gift of Innocence

Down Syndrome and the Gift of Innocence

By William McGurn  

Wall Street Journal 

Christmas Eve 2019 

Innocence isn’t much prized these days. Yet at Christmas it’s impossible to escape: The splendor of the music, the warm visions of hearth and home, the whole wonder of the season—all rest on the joy brought a weary world by innocence made incarnate. 

Even those of us who lost our innocence long ago sometimes look back wistfully on Christmases past, when as children we believed not only in Santa but in the loving world that went with him: safe, caring, kind. For most of us, this never rises above sentiment or nostalgia. 

But what if someone decided innocence was worth holding onto and built a whole way of life around it?

It might look like the lives led by a small group of contemplative nuns in the French countryside just outside Le Blanc. These are the Little Sisters Disciples of the Lamb, and among religious orders they enjoy a singular distinction: They exist so that “those who are in last place in the world”—women with Down syndrome—can “hold in the church the exceptional role of spouses of Christ.”

In practice this means that able-bodied sisters devote their lives to ensuring their fellow sisters with Down syndrome can live their vocations. Living with Down syndrome is not all sweetness and light, even among nuns. The difference is that these women take this innocence, leaven the difficult and imperfect parts with love, and gift it back to the world in more sublime form through both prayer and example. 

The order was founded in 1985 with a community of two: Mother Line, now prioress, and Sister Véronique, who felt a vocation but could not find an order to accept her because she has Down syndrome. Today there are 10 sisters, eight with Down syndrome. 

“The smiling faces of our little sisters with Down syndrome are a great message of hope for many injured families,” Mother Line tells me. “Our smallness will also say that we are made for very great things: to love and to be loved.” She particularly asks for prayers that able-bodied “young American girls” might consider life among her flock. 

A Christmas confession: I’m a sucker for those Facebook videos showing some basketball team letting the boy with Down syndrome shoot until he sinks a basket, or photos of a high-school senior with Down beaming because her classmates have elected her prom queen. Even the most jaded—maybe especially the most jaded—recognizes, and perhaps even envies, the special joy reserved for the pure of heart. 

Then you pull back and look at the faces of those cheering these things on—the fans at the basketball game, the other couples at the prom. Is their happiness any less? Not to mention the inner rejoicing of a tired mom who has just watched a crowd of people look at her child and see what she sees: a beautiful and unique human being who is a source of delight. 

This is the everyday witness of the Little Sisters Disciples of the Lamb. In the world outside their walls, innocence can be dismissed as childish ignorance or dangerous naiveté. Inside, the nuns choose to cherish and exalt innocence—and the unconditional love and trust that comes with it—as an example of how we are meant to live with one another. 

In Morris West’s novel The Clowns of God, Christ returns to earth, where people have trouble recognizing him. At one point he goes to a school for children with Down syndrome, and picks up a little girl.

“I know what you are thinking,” Jesus says. “You need a sign. What better one could I give but to make this little one whole and new? I could do it, but I will not...I gave this mite a gift I denied to all of you—eternal innocence. To you she looks imperfect—but to me she is flawless...” 

Read more at the Wall Street Journal

__________

For further research:

https://revisionistreview.blogspot.com/2018/03/the-real-neo-nazis.html

__________

Blaspheming Mary and the Birth of Jesus in the Talmud

Blaspheming Mary and the Birth of Jesus in the Talmud

By Michael Hoffman

www.RevisionistHistory.org

Let us begin by asking about the first Christmas. Does the Talmud teach that Jesus was born the bastard son of a Roman soldier and that His mother Mary was a harlot? Or is that one of those “anti-semitic tropes” that circulate on the Internet?

We shall answer from the documentary record.

In Yiddish “Yoshke Pandre,” is an insulting name for Jesus. Concerning the denotation of the first name, strictly speaking it denotes Yoysif (Joseph), but connotatively it is a play on Jesus’s name in Hebrew, Yeshu (a diminutive of Yeshua, or in long form, Yehoshua). Our primary interest is in the patronymic “Pandre,” which is Yiddish shorthand for “Pandera,” and therein hangs our narrative.

Babylonian Talmud (BT) tractate Shabbat 104b:

“It was taught in a baraita that Rabbi Eliezer said to the Rabbis: Didn’t the infamous ben Stada take magic spells out of Egypt in a scratch on his flesh? 

“They said to him: He was a fool, and you cannot cite proof from a fool. That is not the way that most people write. 

“Incidentally, the Gemara asks: Why did they call him ben Stada, when he was the son of Pandeira? 

“Rav Ḥisda said: His mother’s husband, who acted as his father, was named Stada, but the one who had relations with his mother and fathered him was named Pandeira. 

“The Gemara asks: Wasn’t his mother’s husband Pappos ben Yehuda? 

“Rather, his mother was named Stada and he was named ben Stada after her. 

“The Gemara asks: But wasn’t his mother Miriam the hairdresser? 

“The Gemara explains: That is not a contradiction. Rather, Stada was merely a nickname, as they say in Pumbedita: This one has been unfaithful [setat da] to her husband” (end quote BT Shabbat 104b).

In the preceding Talmud passage we encounter “ben Stada,” “Pandera” (“Pandeira”), and “Miriam the hairdresser.” 

In the Babylonian Talmud, Jesus is the fool/magician, called "son of Stada" and "son of Pandera.” 

The Talmud is concerned about the fact that the same person is called by two different names. Rav Hisda (a Babylonian amora of the third generation and an important teacher at the academy of Sura, who died 309 A.D.), states that the person in question had, as it were, two “fathers,” because his mother had a husband and a sex partner, and that Jesus was called ‘son of Stada,’ when referring to the husband, and ‘son of Pandera,’ when referring to the sex partner. 

Shabbat 104b alternately states that Jesus’ mother's husband was not some “Stada,” but rather "Pappos b. Yehuda," (a Jewish-Palestinian scholar of the first half of the second century A.D.), and in fact it was Jesus’ mother who was called “Stada.”

We need to decrypt this code-name “Stada” for the mother of Jesus (another name for her in the Talmud is is Miriam). 

 “Stada” is a grave insult. Peter Schäfer, in his indispensable text, Jesus in the Talmud (Princeton University, 2007), found that “Stada” is derived from the Hebrew/Aramaic root word satah/seté (“to deviate from the right path, to go astray, to be unfaithful”). 

In other words, Jesus’s mother was also termed “Stada” because in the eyes of the rabbis she was a sotah, an adulteress. 

The Steinsaltz version of BT Sanhedrin 67a states: “...the inciter’s mother was Miryam the (woman’s) hairdresser...a promiscuous woman: that one (setat da) strayed from her husband.” (Steinsaltz Talmud [Random House, 1998], vol. XVIII, p. 227.)

So we have Jesus (the “inciter”) as one who “brought forth witchcraft from Egypt,” and his mother, “Miriam the hairdresser” as a promiscuous woman who had intercourse with men other than her husband. 

Prof. Schäfer: “If the Talmud takes it for granted that Jesus’ mother was having sex with someone other than her husband, then it follows that Jesus was a mamzer, a bastard. In order to be categorized as mamzer it didn’t matter whether his biological father was indeed his mother’s sex partner, and not her legal husband, the supposed fact that she had committed adultery made Jesus’ legal status dubious. Hence the uncertainty, in that his father is sometimes called Ben Stada and sometimes Ben Pandera.”

The context of BT tractates Shabbat 104b and Sanhedrin 67a suggest that Mary’s supposedly long and uncovered hair (“megadla neshayya”) was indicative of her allegedly indecent behavior. In the misogynist minds of the rabbis of the Gemara, a woman who appears bareheaded and with long hair, in public, is prone to all sorts of lewd conduct (cf. BT Gittin 90a). 

Of course there is no proof that Mary, the mother of Jesus, ever went about in this manner, but it indicates the resentment the rabbis experienced in the face of the liberty Jesus dispensed to His female followers. Describing his mother as allegedly going about without a head-covering—which remains a Talmudic requirement for many frum (“observant”) female followers of the rabbinic traditions to this day —is one expression of that resentment. 

Rabbi Adin Steinsaltz, the one-time nasi of the revived Sanhderin, attempts to deny the Jesus/Pandera links: 

“Christian censors as well as popular tradition identified ‘ben Setada’ and ‘ben Pandera’ with Jesus of Nazareth because of the similarity of several aspects of the two stories. However, Tosafot regarded this identification as impossible because of the chronology” (Steinsaltz’s pilpul is elaborated in a margin note to Shabbat 104b in the Koren edition of the Steinsaltz Talmud: Koren Talmud Bavli [Jerusalem, 2012], vol. 3, p. 120).

Talmudic apologists assert that the Babylonian Talmud’s “Pandera” is a reference to the father of another ancient Jesus, not Jesus of Nazareth. They also allege that the name Pandera is a common one in Latin i.e. “gentile” inscriptions from the period, which is true. But, as Prof. Schäfer points out, the name Panthera/Pandera is highly uncommon in Hebrew and Aramaic usage, “and this fact alone makes the connection to Celsus’ Panthera obvious”).

Prof. Schäfer alludes to the independent evidence of the existence of the Jesus-Pandera teaching in Judaism, in the writings of Celsus, the second century A.D. pagan opponent of Christianity, who attacked it by quoting the calumnies of the rabbis which were current in his lifetime. Celsus's tract, Alethes Logos (“True Word”), repeats the libels cast on Jesus and Mary by the proto-Talmudic rabbinate:

“Celsus opens the way for his own attack by rehearsing the taunts leveled at the Christians by the Jews. They are: Jesus was born in adultery and nurtured on the wisdom of Egypt.” (Encyclopædia Britannica, eleventh edition (1910–1911), “Celsus.”)

Celsus’ works are lost, but we know of him through his third century Christian challenger, Origen, who quoted him at length in Contra Celsum (“Against Celsus”). 

Origen relates that Celsus deployed the teachings of the rabbis concerning Jesus, in his campaign against Christianity, in the form of a Jew about whom Celsus inquires concerning what this Jew may know about Jesus.

The Jew replies: “...he (Jesus) came from a Jewish village and from a poor country woman who was driven out by her husband, who was a carpenter by trade, since she had been convicted of adultery. After she had been driven out by her husband and while she was wandering about in a disgraceful manner, she secretly gave birth to Jesus. Because he (Jesus) was poor, he hired himself out as a workman in Egypt, and there tried his hand at certain magical powers on which the Egyptians pride themselves; he returned full of conceit, because of these powers, and on account of them gave himself the title of God.” (Origen, Contra Celsus, Book I, ch. 28).

Writing in 178 A.D., Celsus the pagan antagonist of the Christians, had reiterated precisely the insults toward Jesus and Mary that would be committed to writing in the Babylonian Talmud a few hundred years later. 

Origen analyzes the statement which the Jewish informant conveyed to Celsus:

 “Let us now return to where the Jew is introduced, speaking of the mother of Jesus, and saying that ‘when she was pregnant she was turned out of doors by the carpenter to whom she had been betrothed, as having been guilty of adultery, and that she bore a child to a certain (Roman) soldier named Panthera...those who have blindly concocted these fables about the adultery of the Virgin with Panthera...on account of its extremely miraculous character...It was to be expected, surely, that those who would not believe the miraculous birth of Jesus would invent some falsehood.” (Origen, Contra Celsus, Book I, ch. 32). 

As Origen reports, Celsus’s Jewish informant might as well have been quoting from a volume of the Talmud turned to Gittin 90a and Shabbath 104b. However, as noted, these calumnies would not be committed to writing in Talmud tractates for another few hundred years. This fact indicates that these malicious lies about Jesus, His mother and His patrimony, were well-established dogma in Judaism as early as 178 A.D. They were subsequently and formally institutionalized in the holiest books of Judaism. “It is certain, in any case, that the rabbinical sources also regard Jesus as the ‘son of Pandera.” (Jewish Encyclopedia, v. 6, p. 170 [NY: Funk and Wagnalls, 1912; also cf. BT Hullin 2:22 and 2:24.  

Truth from the documentary record is not “anti-semitic.” 

Truth cannot be “anti” anyone. 

The truth sets all people—be they Jew or goy—free. 

Jesus was Himself a Semite. The defense of His holy name and that of His semitic mother is a pro-Semitic act. This would be plain to see were it not for the fear of the ADL and other thought police instilled in academics, journalists and owners of social media.

Whatever the cost, it is a signal privilege to defend from calumny Our Lord Jesus Christ and His Blessed Virgin Mother at Christmas 2019.

— Michael Hoffman

Michael is a student of the Talmud Bavli and cognate rabbinic writings. He is the author of the textbook, Judaism Discovered (2008), and a condensed edition for the general public, Judaism’s Strange Gods: Revised and Expanded (2010). His Judaica studies continue in the periodical, Revisionist History.

After pressure from the ADL, in August of 2019 YouTube canceled his account and banned all of his videotaped lectures. Michael’s research and writing continues to be made possible through the sale of his books, newsletters, audio and video recordings and donations from truth-seekers.

Copyright©2019 by Independent History and Research

Box 849, Coeur d’Alene, Idaho 83816 USA

www.RevisionistHistory.org

_______________

Synchronic Twilight Language Signaling

Friday the 13th of December, 2019

_____________________

It’s not a "coincidence"

Synchronic Twilight Language Signaling

If you haven’t read Michael Hoffman's book, Secret Societies and Psychological Warfare you may not be able to understand the connection, or recognize the sub-rosa signal to the Group Mind:

December 10: Tragic Jersey City, New Jersey kosher grocery store shootings kill anti-Zionist Satmar Judaics. The shooters who murdered the Satmar exhibited symptoms of mind control. 

December 11: President Trump signs an executive order making radical, Satmar-type exposés of racist, Nazi-like Zionism, illegal in Federal programs. 

On Dec 14, 2019, at 4:01 a.m., Bill wrote:

Re: Synchronic Twilight Language Signaling

Michael:

I have the book (Secret Societies and Psychological Warfare), I've read the book and I still have difficulty cyphering the twilight language! I'm consigned to bring processed in ignorance. Unless you enlighten me!

Dear Bill

The supposition is that at a hypnotic level of public, subconscious “Group Mind” cognition, a link was made and brazenly shown (within 24 hours) between the attack on the anti-Zionist Satmar Judaics at the kosher grocery store and Trump’s executive order silencing those (like the Satmar), who are engaged in educational efforts demonstrating that Zionism is a racist, Nazi-type ideology.

This twilight language communication is a sort of evil-doers’ joke on the dead Satmar Judaics and all those people, Judaic and non-Judaic, whose humanity is dismissed and are therefore expendable, because they will not idolize the “Holy State” of "Israeli."

There is a surfeit of Jew-haters who adore the Israeli state because they believe it to be a successful prototype for neo-Nazi type of rule in their own nations. They escape being silenced by Trump’s executive order, as well as death at the hands of mind-controlled assassins. Theirs is the establishment-condoned neo-Nazism that operates from the subterranean bowels of the Cryptocracy.

The fact that Hitler’s Nazism is a template for Israeli leaders (religious and secular) is one of the worst-kept secrets of our time. Only the western media profess to know nothing of it. 

Zionist Rabbi Eliezer Kashtiel, Bnei David Academy, 2019 (Israeli media)

Earlier this year, Zionist Rabbi Giora Radler, addressed the elite Bnei David academy for Israeli military youth as follows:  “Let’s begin by asking the question: was Hitler right or not? He is the most correct person there is. He was definitely right in every word he said. His ideology was correct. There is a male world which fights, which deals with honor and the brotherhood of soldiers. And there is the soft, ethical feminine world which turns the other cheek.”

Most people will deny the existence of twilight language. They are misdirected away from detecting patterns, but only consciously. They are directed to the attack on the Satmar grocery and misdirected away from fully comprehending the attack on the Satmar ideology ordered several hours later by Donald Trump, the ventriloquist’s dummy.

I have been fascinated since childhood with stage magic and have attended magic shows in order to study the magician’s misdirection—the foundation of the successful execution of so much of the psychological control-mechanisms by which we are fleeced and enthralled.

Sincerely,

Michael Hoffman

Resources and Suggestions for Activists and Researchers

TWITTER

E-MAIL: hoffman[at]revisionisthistory.org

PRAY for us: John 15:16

PURCHASE a revisionist history book, newsletter, CD or DVD:

http://www.revisionisthistory.org/page7/page7.html

DONATE: http://tinyurl.com/4hwh7dz

PUBLICIZE our website: www.revisionisthistory.org

On the Contrary is a public service of 

Independent History and Research 

Box 849, Coeur d'Alene, Idaho 83816 USA 

Copyright ©2019

__________

"Hoffman: Jewish Sycophant and Enemy of Historical Truth"

“Michael Hoffman: Jewish Sycophant and Enemy of Historical Truth” 

The preceding is the headline neo-Nazi Hitler-enthusiasts are circulating in the aftermath of the publication of my book, Adolf Hitler: Enemy of the Germany People.  

They are also distributing online a poster, using my photo and the same slogan. 

It doesn’t appear that my book has been read by these critics; nor do they address the facts in the book.

Their attack comes in the wake of the (successful) ADL campaign to ban our videos from YouTube, where they had been viewed 178,000 times.

Both the Hitler cult and the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith are doing their best to libel this writer, reduce our readership and viewers, and terminate our Truth Mission. 

Why am I not surprised? 

__________

In Memoriam: Gregor Strasser, German Reformer

In Memoriam

Gregor Strasser (1892 - June 30, 1934)

 German-Christian National Socialist

A reformer, a fighter for all humanity including people of color, a sworn enemy of the Money Power — murdered by Adolf Hitler without so much as even a show trial

“Gregor Strasser, in particular, was convinced that Germany should make common cause with the ‘have-nots’ of the world, including colonized peoples of color. He saw Germany as one of the global underdogs, and envisaged her leading a ‘League of Oppressed Peoples’ in alliance with Russia, Morocco, Persia, India and other wretched of the earth. ‘The fragmented, martyred, exploited, [and] enslaved Germany,’ Strasser argued, 'was the natural  protagonist and ally of all national liberation fighters,' wherever they were oppressed by ‘French tyranny, British imperialism, [and] American financial exploitation…”

— Brendan Simms, Hitler: A Global Biography (2019), p. 106

Dear Michael

"I am reading your book now. I have already read your articles in Revisionist History® on this, so some of it is review. I’m glad to have it all together.  

"I grew up reading revisionist books that extolled Hitler as 'The Hero' who stood up to the internationalists, globalists, and all the other ‘ists' that are anti-Christian and want to rob us of our freedoms. So, your book is a tough read. 

'Two things I have learned about you is that 1) you will do your research and 2) you will tell the truth as you see it. That’s why I keep buying and reading your stuff.  Your book does not disappoint in the sense of being interesting and challenging! Convincing? Starting to be. 

"Your chapter on Gregor Strasser is eye-opening and is alone worth the price of the book. This essay has both the historical facts of Strasser’s life and work and Hitler’s despicable treatment of him, as well as the emotional impact of wondering what might have been if this honorable man had been allowed to live and influence the direction of Germany. 

"When you think of the fifteen or so million German deaths from World War II, you can’t help but grieve Strasser’s death even after 80-plus years. You have fueled my interest in this man and his work.
   

"Thanks for writing Adolf Hitler: Enemy of the German People.

— W.B., Kansas

________________

The killing of Gregor Strasser near the start of Hitler’s Nazi dictatorship was an incalculable loss to Germany, and the world. It was a harbinger of the murder of many more innocents, and it fomented a terrible blowback of which only a writer of Shakespeare's caliber is capable of rendering an adequate account. —Michael Hoffman

Macbeth, Act I, Scene 7: 

"...here, upon this bank and shoal of time... 

We still have judgment here, that we but teach 

Bloody instructions, which, being taught, return 

To plague the inventor: this even-handed justice 

Commends the ingredients of our poisoned chalice 

To our own lips." 

_____________

Requiescat in pace

_____________