Welcome Information Connoisseurs

Welcome Information Connoisseurs

Wednesday, July 27, 2016

The Judaic-Muslim Monstrosity

Exploring the Zionist-(Salafist)-Muslim Alliance

By Michael Hoffman

As Salafist/Wahhabist Saudi theology proceeds to commissar the Sunnis by means of ISIS recruitment, and while their Muslim victims among the Shiites are marginalized, Israeli Zionism and Orthodox Judaism are riding high in prestige in the West.

The Zionists' “I told you so” platitudes about how, if we had only gotten tough on Muslims the way Israelis do, we would be better off, are now ubiquitous in the media. This narrative fits the Neocon “clash of civilizations” script perfectly.

Certainly there is such a clash. It originated on Calvary more than 2,000 years ago. Why do we keep forgetting? Goldwin Smith, Regius Professor of History at Oxford in the Victorian age, wrote:

“The nobler part of the Jewish nation, the real heirs of David and the Prophets, heard the Gospel, and became the founders of a humane religion; the less noble part, led by national pride and ceremonialism embodied in the Pharisee, rejected humanity, and themselves fell back into a narrower and a harder tribalism than before. Exciting the hatred of other nations and the fears of the Empire, they lost their country, and wandered forth over the world with their tribal feeling intensified, and their religion more than ever identified with it...Cosmopolitans they could not be, as they were still in the thrall of tribalism: plutopolitans they of necessity became.” (Revisionist History newsletter 85, p. 12).

“...rejected humanity...” What does this rejection entail, if not pitting races, religions and regions against one another for the greater good of the tribe to which Prof. Smith alludes? The collusion between Saudi Arabia and the Israeli state against the two Arab nations, Assad’s Syria and Saddam Hussein’s Iraq renowned for protecting their Christian minority populations, is justly infamous in the Middle East, where the U.S. serves as the Israeli golem. The Saudis, guardians of Mecca and Medina, which contain the two holiest shrines in Islam, decades ago sold the Palestinians to the Israelis, now to be dispatched as Netanyahu chooses. This is more than treason in the Islamic world, it is a species of treachery almost unimaginable, since it concedes al-Quds (Jerusalem), home to Islam’s third holiest center, to the Zionists.

The Shiites, who have lost more civilians to ISIS terrorism than any western nation, have never abandoned the Palestinians and have not conspired with the Israelis. Therefore, it is Shiite Iran and not Saudi Arabia that remains in the cross hairs of our Zionist-occupied Congress, Pentagon and media. Iran will likely feel the wrath of the American golem should Crooked Hillary gain the White House in November. The Saudis meanwhile, suffer not one US sanction despite having many covert ties to ISIS, as well as supplying the heretical Salafist “Muslim” theology which fuels its barbarism and which is backed by the United States government

In Europe this is better understood. Marine LePen, head of the patriotic Front National in France, in the wake of the murder of Catholic Father Jacques Hamel, called for the closing of "mosquées salafistes. She singled out Salafists and, quite rightly, did not refer to Shiites. Meanwhile in the U.S. we fail to make these important distinctions.

Judaism uses Judeo-Churchianity in the American South as an arm of its propaganda apparatus, even though Judaism execrates the true Gospel of Jesus Christ. Judaism has in the past and is now using elements of Sunni Islam, despite, as exhibited by Rabbi Maimonides in the Middle Ages, execrating Muhammad and his Quranic religion. 

ISIS is being used to bring about police states in Europe, Canada and the United States while burnishing the reputation of the Israeli subjugation of the Palestinians. The more ISIS terror the more civil liberties will be curtailed and the more the “Israeli way of dealing” with the Palestinians and Lebanese will become the template for restoring order in the West. After the slaying of the Roman Catholic priest in Normandy, Hervé Morin, president of the Normandy region and a defense minister under former President Nicolas Sarkozy, declared, "We need to Israelize our security conditions.” 

As this script is fulfilled, the Israelis emerge as the public relations winners and the supposed best friends of western civilization. It’s tragic that people concerned with this vital issue don’t pay more attention to Judaism's foundational rabbinic texts. In the Mishnah and Gemara (“Talmud”) and successive holy books such as Rabbi Joseph Karo’s Shulchan Aruch, there exists an ineradicably savage hostility toward gentile civilization. 

We find this in the Tisha B’Av (Ninth of Av) festival and in the Babylonian Talmud itself where killing, robbing and cheating gentiles is permitted. Even a brief tour of just a single Talmud tractate, Baba Kama, presents numerous examples of hostility toward non-Jews. In Baba Kama 113a we discover that “It is permitted to deceive a gentile.” In this same tractate, a sample court case is given which pits a Jew against a gentile. Here is the legal approach advised: “One approaches the case circuitously in order to vindicate the Jew.” 

Turn the page and one encounters Baba Kama 113b, in which lost items are not to be returned to the gentile who owns them, after which follows instructions on how to cheat non-Jews in business:

“It is permitted to financially benefit from a  business error of a gentile.” Cases are given by way of illustration. One of my personal favorites is the example of the palm tree that is to be chopped up and the wood shared by a Jewish merchant and a gentile merchant. In the Talmud the clever Jew outsmarts his non-Jewish partner, ordering his servant to: “Hurry and precede the gentile so that you can bring my share of the wood from the trunk of the tree, which is thicker than the upper part of the tree, as the gentile only knows the number of logs that he is due to receive and will not realize that you are taking thicker pieces.” (Baba Kama 113b). This mentality of cheating non-Jews is institutionalized in adherents of Orthodox Judaism.  “Rabbis are liable to alter their words, and the accuracy of their statements is not to be relied upon.” —The Talmud: The Steinsaltz Edition (Vol. II, pp. 48-49). 

Murder, rape, child molestation, sodomy, misogyny, magic, idolatry: the Talmud recommends all of these in one form or another. The 1100 pages in this writer’s book, Judaism Discovered were not enough to contain more than a fragment. In anticipation of objections: no, none of the quoted texts are “taken out of context;” no, the Talmud is not merely a “series of debates”  it is the hallowed source of the halacha (laws of Judaism) of Chazal (the revered collective authors [“sages”] of the Talmud).

Islam having derived from both Christianity and Talmudic Judaism, does contain some echo of the mistreatment and deception of non-believers as found in the Babylonian Talmud, but nothing on the same scale, and none of it justified by a racial criteria. Yet in the U.S. sharia law is far more notorious and feared than rabbinic halachic law.

We need not proceed only from Judaism’s holy rule books for racketeers. We also have the testimony of the past. In Revisionist History newsletter no. 70  which is mainly aimed at documenting the existence of Judaism’s much denied Birkat Haminim ritual curses on Christians   in an excursus we surveyed Judaic-Islamic alliances in medieval Spain, where rabbinic maledictions soared to extreme paroxysms of hatred against Christians, in a manner that was not directed against Muslims. Moreover, the formal rabbinic curses on meshummadim (Judaic converts to other religions, particularly Christianity), do not include any denigration of Judaic converts to Islam. 

In the medieval era, Judaism was able to thrive under Islam while it was severely restricted in Catholic Europe. For that reason among others, the Never Forgive/Never Forget crowd will not rest until Europe is ruined and the European nations severely diminished in population. This is not accomplished by its ISIS pawns alone. The Zionist-influenced media promote abortion, contraception, euthanasia and self-hatred, which are all pandemic in Europe and western nations in general. What ISIS kills physically, modernist ideologies of rabbinic or Zionist provenance that have as their premise the rejection of the authentic Gospel of Jesus and the establishment of counterfeits, kill psychologically and spiritually.

In the current issue of Revisionist History newsletter (no. 85) we study the Rothschild bank as it gained dominion over England in the Victorian era. We document that when the Christian Balkan nations captive to the Ottoman Empire revolted with the help of Tsarist Russia, it was the Rothschilds, with the aid of British Prime Minister Benjamin Disraeli, who backed the caliphate against the Christians, in spite of (or perhaps in approval of) massacres of Bulgarian and Serb Christians by Ottoman militias. 

In our 21st century the Israeli nation has been immune to ISIS attack. The record shows that Israeli hospitals have patched up al-Qaeda and ISIS terrorists and returned them to Syria to help overthrow the Christian-friendly regime of Assad. Netanyahu’s Defense Minister Moshe Ya’alon stated publicly he preferred the victory of ISIS in Syria

Perhaps one day soon our information will obtain sufficient publicity to render these radical truths manifest to many more in America and throughout the world. For the time being, the facts we present are confined to our books and newsletters, this column and Twitter. 

Meanwhile, the rabbis continue to ride high as the media-anointed paladins of western civilization, contrasted with their clandestine false flag, ISIS.

For further research:

Hoffman’s Truth Mission is made possible by donations from readers. Will you help?


Friday, July 22, 2016

Media lie to promote Judaism over Christianity

The following may seem like an inconsequential drop in the sea of media deception that deluges us. Nonetheless, when we have the enemy dead to rights it’s incumbent upon us to hammer them and weaken their fortress of feigned credibility. Every shot counts.

In this case, we observe the Establishment media's typical haughty put-down of Christianity as a troglodyte religion and the promotion of Judaism as ethically superior and enlightened. In fact, the reverse is true.

This reversal is accomplished through lying. The bigger the lie the more likely it is to be accepted by the ignorant and those eager to conform to doctrines promulgated by the corporate media.

Claiming that Judaism teaches a hell (Gehenna) that is only for a short duration and has a brief time limit, compared with the Christian concept of hell, qualifies as a big lie that ought to be blasted to oblivion with the laser weapon of truth. The more we document these lies the more we remove the ground from under the foundation of the liars themselves.

The Establishment Media Compare Judaism and Christianity 

Media Falsehood:

 “As for Gehenna, Mr. Halkin draws a sharp distinction between early Christian hell, a place of unremitting fire and eternal damnation, and Gehenna, where the Talmudists and medieval commentators agreed that infernal punishments can be atoned for and are strictly limited to 12 months.” 

— Esther Schor, “The World to Come,” Wall Street Journal 
July 16, 2016 p. C7; (emphasis supplied). 

The Facts: 

In Judaism Jesus shares his place in Gehenna (hell) with the Roman General Titus. Jesus is punished by being seated in a cauldron of boiling excrement for eternity. The Roman Titus meanwhile, is punished for eternity by being burned to ashes in Gehenna, reassembled and burned again, perpetually. (Babylonian Talmud: Gittin 56b and 57a).             

This proof of how the media lie to promote Judaism above Christianity, is offered by Michael Hoffman  


Resources for accurate information about Judaism are available here

Friday, July 08, 2016

Trial By Media Killed the Officers in Dallas

Obamas Rush to Judgement and Identity Politics Contributed to their Deaths

By Michael Hoffman

Shortly before several Dallas police officers were killed by a sniper (or snipers) on July 7, President Obama spoke at a NATO summit in Poland and immediately rushed to judgment by insinuating that officers in Minnesota had done something seriously wrong in their treatment of a black motorist who died as a result of a traffic stop. He stated:

“When incidents like this occur, there’s a big chunk of our citizenry that feels as if, because of the color of their skin, they are not being treated the same, and that hurts, and that should trouble all of us. This is not just a black issue, not just a Hispanic issue. This is an American issue that we all should care about.”

What had “occurred,” Mr. President? How would you know what occurred only hours after the event had transpired?

Some of you may have watched a purported video on Facebook of the shooting of Philando Castile, the black man in Minnesota; this writer did not. Either way, neither Facebook nor the Establishment media is any legitimate medium for trying any suspect, whether cops accused of executing a motorist, or the motorist himself who was, allegedly, a licensed gun owner in possession of a firearm.

The cops in Minnesota and in another shooting in Louisiana, were tried by the media and found guilty. Obama seconded the “verdict” from his identity-politics perch.

Police, like anyone else, are innocent until proved guilty in a court of law. Yet, long before any notorious suspect faces a judge and jury, that suspect is tried in the media. In 1977 David Berkowitz was found solely guilty of the Son of Sam murders in New York City, in the same week in which he was arrested. Newsweek magazine made that erroneous determination long before Berkowitz appeared before a judge. It has since been discovered that Berkowitz was only one of the shooters, and that he was part of a conspiracy by a Satanic cult.

Before Charles Manson was convicted, President Richard Nixon decreed him guilty of the Tate-La Bianca murders. Many to this day believe, wrongly, that Manson ordered the murders or was present when they occurred. Both notions are false, but Nixon’s verdict set the stage for a permanent misapprehension of the facts.

The Establishment media convicted Ted Kaczyinski of being the sole Unabomber long before he faced a judge in court. Kaczyinski did not perpetrate all of the bombings attributed to Unabomber. He had been monitored by the Federal government at the time he was supposedly an underground bomber. The government did nothing to seek other possible suspects or collaborators, and from the time the suspect was apprehended, the mainstream media reported with absolute certainty that Kaczynski was the “lone nut” responsible. 

The United States is saddled with the worst, most conceited, corporate-mouthpiece media in the world, as well as with a President who is as much of an irresponsible blowhard as Nixon, though, to be fair, Mr. Nixon was not speaking n the midst of a racially-charged, powder keg atmosphere.

Mr. Obama was acting morally superior when he questioned whether blacks and whites are treated the same in America in the context of the Minnesota traffic stop. I have a bulletin for him: if the driver in Minnesota had been a gun-carrying, poor white redneck in a pickup truck, the liberal media would have sided with the police, and questioned whether the redneck had somehow threatened the officers with his gun. There would have been no knee-jerk sympathy for the white motorist.

President Obama fuels the sense of entitlement and moral superiority of black Americans. Is this good for our country and national unity? Should any race of people be encouraged toward supremacist self-regard?

The racist terrorist massacre in Dallas is being blamed on guns. If the cops had been mowed down by an automobile, would Detroit get the blame? Obama calls for “gun control” in the wake of Dallas. Shamefully, he does not pause for even a moment to consider the role which anti-White racism played in the mass murder of law enforcement in Texas. He irresponsibly scapegoats the guns which the anti-White hater utilized to do his murderous work. 

Do the whites who are relentlessly derided as hereditary bigots in the Hollywood media have any right to be free from defamation and the resulting hate crimes that occur against them? Does anyone consider the Hollywood factor in our national conversation about race? Certainly not. The so-called “conversation” proceeds from the premise that working class whites without a university indoctrination (“education”), are moral lepers guilty of terrible transgressions such as supporting Donald Trump, the Second Amendment and a wall on the border with Mexico.

Police officers have been murdered in Dallas in part due to a reckless, politically correct President as well as a corrupt media that, in its arrogance, believes it is entitled to try and convict suspects before they face a jury of their peers. This situation must change before more innocents perish and a full-fledged race war is ignited in our nation.

Your donation helps to make Michael’s writing possible.