Welcome Information Connoisseurs

Welcome Information Connoisseurs

Friday, January 25, 2019

"Occult Renaissance" book: read first 95 pages free!

The Occult Renaissance Church of Rome

The standard disinformation of many so-called “traditional Catholics” is that the decline of the Church only began with the rise of the masonic French revolution in 1789, was beaten back by Popes Pius IX, Leo XIII and Pius X, and then emerged in full flower with the Second Vatican Council of the 1960s.

The truth is, during those three pontificates the Church was in hock to the Rothschilds and not withstanding the pious texts and double-talk from these pontiffs, they continued the Renaissance papal legacy of enabling the renting of money (usury) while protecting Rome’s sub-rosa Kabbalistic command ideology upon which Freemasonry is founded. Therefore, contrary to the nonsense peddled to dupes by writers who have not done their homework, the core conspiracy against the Church was not interrupted or obstructed by these popes. In fact, it only grew stronger, including massive child molestation rings which were not exclusive to the hedonistic era of the 1960s and ‘70s or our post-modern era.

Popes Pius IX, Leo XIII and Pius X were masters of deception who spoke and wrote against greed while they kept the engine of usury intact.  They spoke and wrote against Freemasonry while they maintained the Kabbalah, the source of masonic rituals, as the fount of the esoteric theology of the papal hierarchy.

The Roman Catholic Church was infiltrated and eventually overthrown by the Church of Rome in the sixteenth century, not in the twentieth. The subversion obtained a foothold circa 1450, more than 300 years before the French revolution, with the founding by the Medici of the Platonic Academy in Florence, of which Savonarola was among its most dynamic opponents. Of course he was executed by papal order.

These and many more shocking, revolutionary revelations are laid out in 723 pages of The Occult Renaissance Church of Rome

Not one Catholic newspaper, be it Culture Wars, The Remnant, National Catholic Register, or Catholic Family News has dared to review this book. They have no answer so they suppress it. The “traditional Catholic” sheeple are not interested in having their world of comforting myths turned upside down, so the old Zionist tactic of the “silent treatment” has been put into play, in the expectation that The Occult Renaissance Church of Rome will sink into obscurity.

• All of the Introduction

• All of Chapter One: "More Catholic than the Pope"

• Part of Chapter Two: "Neoplatonic Hermeticism"

Our problem is that we don’t provide enthusiasts with what they want to hear. Too many people don’t wish to learn anything new, they only want confirmation of their bias. This is particularly true in the matter of religion. They forget that Jesus Christ is truth and where there is truth, He is there. 

In undertaking a study of the 1947 death in Los Angeles of Elizabeth Short, the “Blue Dahlia murder,” in conjunction with the January 28 TNT television miniseries (“I Am the Night”), we came across this description of her diabolic killer:

He had a gift for manipulating intelligent people by telling them exactly what they want to hear.

If there’s a better profile of the devil I haven’t seen it. 

Satan is an enchanter. He always tells you what you want to hear. If you wish to be charmed, he’s your man.

Whereas others have a different vocation — that of obstreperous, intractable disenchanters, upon which the road to reality is paved. What a lonely road it is. 

Michael Hoffman 

Monday, January 21, 2019

Those Catholic kids and the American Indian

Those Catholic kids and the American Indian

A textbook case of racial tension encouraged by the System

Divide-and-conquer is the preferred tactic of the Sanhedrin

By Michael Hoffman | www.RevisionistHistory.org

The latest media tempest-in-a-teapot concerns Catholic teenagers from Kentucky set upon by the media and made to star in the perpetual Hate-Whitey videodrome, wherein, whether it’s a Gillette shaving commercial, or kids waiting for a bus after a pro-life, anti-abortion march in our nation’s capitol, they are cast as KKK/Nazi bigots. Of all the crimes and travesties in our land today, this minor incident between Indians and Catholic school kids is the event that propels the liberal outrage machine. Forget the mass extermination of disabled Down syndrome children with abortion, forget the forced conversion of children in our public schools to disease-inducing anal “gay” sex, forget female impersonators dictating an Orwellian regime on college campuses wherein “he" must be referred to as “she," otherwise the truth-telling offender who terms the ersatz gal a guy, is demoted or fired from the faculty or administration.

 It’s a truism that the inmates are in charge of the asylum. They are well on their way to transforming all of us into insane persons in their corporate world of relentless revolutionary change. Thankfully, the scapegoated, stigmatized Catholic youths are fighting back and showing some backbone, as noted below. That such a pitch of media hysteria could be invoked over a white kid merely staring at a Native American is more than ridiculous. This hyper-sensitivity to the least perceived slight to the new aristocracy of color is a revelation of the degree to which our media masters yearn for, indeed ache for a KKK or neo-Nazi group to attack minorities while the news cameras record it. Shaming white people is Job #1. Instilling self-hate is a psychological warfare device, a type of mental genocide that is underway 24/7 in America. 

In the final analysis, let us not imagine that the Zionist ruling class actually cares about the welfare of non-whites. They are merely cannon-fodder on the road to a neo-Bolshevik America. The Israelis have butchered tens of thousands of native people of color in Palestine without any sustained exposure or protest from the U.S. media. The Orthodox Judaic religion teaches that black people are a divinely designated slave race (cf. the Midrash on Genesis in the Soncino edition), and sub-human (cf. Moses Maimonides, The Guide of the Perplexed, vol. 2, in the Shlomo Pines edition). These rabbinic dogmas have caused the black race untold suffering and misery throughout history. 

Meanwhile, the Cryptocracy has used the white race as its golem in Afghanistan, Syria and Iraq. 

The Cryptocracy manipulates people of color to serve as golem in the United States, disseminating a view of American history that portrays the majority of whites as whip-wielding tormentors of colored people in bondage, when the truth is that the vast majority of whites in early America were, as Congressman David Wilmot termed them, “the sons of toil.” Many arrived in this country in chattel bondage, not dainty “indentured servitude.” 

The clandestine objective of crowding whites into ever more narrow psychological categories of self-abnegation and erasure, is to inflame them into lashing out desperately with inchoate violence that can be exploited to further justify ever greater encroachment by the government on our immemoral rights, and the escalation of increasingly intense negative caricatures of conservative white people issuing from the salons of Hollywood and New York. 

The only ones who will emerge mostly unscathed from this contrived race war will be the same ones who emerged largely unscathed to rule in Vladimir Lenin’s Bolshevik Russia, a century ago. 

Whites, Blacks and Native Americans cannot be allowed to join together in opposition to the empire of usury which is choking life on this planet. Divide-and-conquer has always been the watchword of the Sanhedrin. Whites with their affinity for Neocon war-Zionism, and Blacks with their partiality for the Democratic party of sodomite supremacy, non-educating public schools and unlimited cheap labor from south of the border, remain unconscious, easily manipulated golem of the six-pointed System.

In addition to the report below, we recommend Rod Dreher’s incisive analysis here: https://www.theamericanconservative.com/dreher/the-covington-catholic-bonfire-at-the-stake/

The following is by Jonathon Van Maren of Lifesite News

CNN, followed by the rest of the media lynch mob, has reported that a bunch of MAGA-hat wearing kids from Covington Catholic School in Kentucky had swarmed an elderly Native American man at the Lincoln Memorial following the March for Life in Washington D.C., chanting slogans like “build the wall.” 
Social media promptly exploded, with commentators of every stripe condemning the kids for being jackasses (which, if the short video clip released by the media was the entire story, would be the case). A number of pro-lifers followed suit, ostensibly in order to shield the movement from criticism and ensure that the entire March for Life was not tarred by the incident.
Things got ugly quickly. Journalists and pundits began to release photos of the high school boys next to images of white racists mobbing black civil rights activists at lunch counters in the 1960s. Some even compared the boys to the fresh-faced thugs of the Hitler Youth. One writer at Slate.com noted somberly that the facial expression of Nick Sandmann, the now unfortunately famous young man facing off with indigenous activist Nathan Phillips, was familiar because we’d seen his type before: Young, cocksure, powerful – and evil. 
Nobody, apparently, considered the fact that the image was simply one freeze-frame shot of an uneasy and awkward teenage boy thrust into a situation he didn’t know how to deal with. The media and the rest of the progressive mob badly wanted this story to be true: A pack of racist young white Catholic school boys sporting Trump hats following an anti-abortion march mobbing a Native American man? It was just perfect.
Too perfect, as it predictably turned out. Reason was the first publication to release a detailed rebuttal of the narrative, noting that when the nearly two hours of video footage of the incident was viewed – something the media presumably should have done before setting out to destroy the lives of some high school boys – a notably different story emerged.
 Soon thereafter, Nick Sandmann released a statement begging people to hear he and his classmates out. Here it is in part:
I am providing this factual account of what happened on Friday afternoon at the Lincoln Memorial to correct misinformation and outright lies being spread about my family and me.
I am the student in the video who was confronted by the Native American protestor. I arrived at the Lincoln Memorial at 4:30 p.m. I was told to be there by 5:30 p.m., when our busses were due to leave Washington for the trip back to Kentucky. We had been attending the March for Life rally, and then had split up into small groups to do sightseeing.
When we arrived, we noticed four African-American protestors who were also on the steps of the Lincoln Memorial. I am not sure what they were protesting, and I did not interact with them. I did hear them hurl direct derogatory insults at our school group.
The protestors said hateful things. They called us "racists," "bigots," "white crackers," "faggots," and "incest kids." They also taunted an African-American student from my school by telling him that we would "harvest his organs." I have no idea what that insult means, but it was startling to hear.
Because we were being loudly attacked and taunted in public, a student in our group asked one of our teacher-chaperones for permission to begin our school spirit chants to counter the hateful things that were being shouted at our group. The chants are commonly used at sporting events. They are all positive in nature and sound like what you would hear at any high school. Our chaperone gave us permission to use our school chants. We would not have done that without obtaining permission from the adults in charge of our group.
At no time did I hear any student chant anything other than the school spirit chants. I did not witness or hear any students chant "build that wall" or anything hateful or racist at any time. Assertions to the contrary are simply false. Our chants were loud because we wanted to drown out the hateful comments that were being shouted at us by the protestors.
After a few minutes of chanting, the Native American protestors, who I hadn't previously noticed, approached our group. The Native American protestors had drums and were accompanied by at least one person with a camera.
The protestor everyone has seen in the video began playing his drum as he waded into the crowd, which parted for him. I did not see anyone try to block his path. He locked eyes with me and approached me, coming within inches of my face. He played his drum the entire time he was in my face.
I never interacted with this protestor. I did not speak to him. I did not make any hand gestures or other aggressive moves. To be honest, I was startled and confused as to why he had approached me. We had already been yelled at by another group of protestors, and when the second group approached I was worried that a situation was getting out of control where adults were attempting to provoke teenagers.
I believed that by remaining motionless and calm, I was helping to diffuse the situation. I realized everyone had cameras and that perhaps a group of adults was trying to provoke a group of teenagers into a larger conflict. I said a silent prayer that the situation would not get out of hand.
During the period of the drumming, a member of the protestor's entourage began yelling at a fellow student that we "stole his land" and that we should "go back to Europe." I heard one of my fellow students begin to respond. I motioned to my classmate and tried to get him to stop engaging with the protestor, as I was still in the mindset that we needed to calm down tensions.
I never felt like I was blocking the Native American protestor. He did not make any attempt to go around me. It was clear to me that he had singled me out for a confrontation, although I am not sure why.
The engagement ended when one of our teachers told me the busses had arrived and it was time to go. I obeyed my teacher and simply walked to the busses. At that moment, I thought I had diffused the situation by remaining calm, and I was thankful nothing physical had occurred.
I never understood why either of the two groups of protestors were engaging with us, or exactly what they were protesting at the Lincoln Memorial. We were simply there to meet a bus, not become central players in a media spectacle. This is the first time in my life I've ever encountered any sort of public protest, let alone this kind of confrontation or demonstration.
I was not intentionally making faces at the protestor. I did smile at one point because I wanted him to know that I was not going to become angry, intimidated or be provoked into a larger confrontation. I am a faithful Christian and practicing Catholic, and I always try to live up to the ideals my faith teaches me – to remain respectful of others, and to take no action that would lead to conflict or violence.
I harbor no ill will for this person. I respect this person's right to protest and engage in free speech activities, and I support his chanting on the steps of the Lincoln Memorial any day of the week. I believe he should re-think his tactics of invading the personal space of others, but that is his choice to make.
I am being called every name in the book, including a racist, and I will not stand for this mob-like character assassination of my family's name. My parents were not on the trip, and I strive to represent my family in a respectful way in all public settings.
I have received physical and death threats via social media, as well as hateful insults. One person threatened to harm me at school, and one person claims to live in my neighborhood. My parents are receiving death and professional threats because of the social media mob that has formed over this issue. (End quote; emphasis supplied).
Many of the commentators who joined the initial pile-on have begun to retract their statements in view of the evidence. Jake Tapper of CNN tweeted out the rebuttal column by Reason, Scott Adams of Dilbertissued an unqualified apology to the boys and those who were misled by his initial condemnations, and conservatives and pro-lifers who had initially rushed to join those expressing outrage indicated their regret for doing so. A few media outlets such as NBC even released follow-up articles noting their initial mistake. Progressive indignation, however, continues to rage across social media. A few media figures, like Reza Aslan (who last made news for eating a piece of human brain in India), have been doubling down, insisting that it is crazy to believe that nuance might be necessary in a story where MAGA hats are present.
The boys and their families are already facing threats, vile name-calling, and doxing, which is apparently how some vile people show their disapproval of actions they consider unloving. Andrew Hodge, the brother of one of the boys, noted on Twitter that his family and relatives are facing nonstop threats of physical violence, and that nobody contacted his brother for the other side of the story before running with it—and some people are even attempting to contact the college Michael plans to attend in order to destroy his career plans of being a chef. There are many, many people out there right now who are trying to completely ruin the lives of a few high school students, and it is disgusting to watch.
It would be disgusting even if the original story had been true. Utterly wrecking the lives of high school kids because of a moment of indiscretion (and the MAGA hats on a school field trip were a questionable decision) is malicious, counter-productive, and shameful. Those joining social media mobs to supposedly combat evils such as racism are in fact acting in the service of hatred, which is revealed clearly by the fact that they seek only to destroy. The media, of course, gets their clicks and the viral videos and their virtue-signalling and then moves on. Even if the story turns out not to be true, it will have been very profitable for them nonetheless.
I hope we can all learn a lesson from this incident. The media, as usual, is willing to jump at the chance to smear those they have contempt for: Pro-lifers, conservatives, and Trump supporters. We should consider their biases and their track record before we instinctively believe their stories about people they despise, and before we join the social media pile-on. And the media, I hope, can take a long, hard look in the mirror and realize that real people paid real consequences for their irresponsible reporting this weekend. Kids got death threats. Families had their addresses posted online. High school students saw strangers try to destroy their future plans. And it isn’t over yet. That is what happens when the media gets a story wrong. There should be consequences….

Friday, January 18, 2019

Media Watch: Rigged headline by the Washington Post

Media Watch: 
Rigged headline by the Washington Post

By Michael Hoffman
Former reporter: New York bureau of the Associated Press 
Former media consultant to the New York Times

Washington Post online
Headline on the home page of their website
January 18, 2019, 5:10 pm Eastern:

Quote: "The protest’s theme this year claims that opposition to abortion is 'pro-science' — a branding attempt that the medical community broadly opposes.” 

(End quote from the Washington Post’s home page)

The preceding statement is an online headline in an alleged news story that contains an opinion telling us what to think, rather than providing facts and letting us decide for ourselves. 

Branding attempt” is a derogatory phrase insinuating a propaganda campaign.

Truth is not “branding.” 

Truth is not propaganda. 

Fact: the more science learns about the unborn human being in the womb, the more science demonstrates that the unborn child is in fact human.

Why is the humanity of the unborn child resisted so militantly by supposed “human rights” oriented publications like the biased Washington Post?

For further reading:


Occult Basis of Hitler’s Suicidal Attack on Soviet Russia

The Occult Basis of Hitler’s Suicidal Attack on Soviet Russia

By Michael Hoffman

With regard to our new issue of Revisionist History®. I realize many people who are not neo-Nazis and not generally sympathetic to Adolf Hitler, nonetheless continue to believe that his invasion of Russia in 1941 was a principled crusade against godless Judeo-Bolshevism, in light of the alleged fact that Josef Stalin was supposedly planning an imminent invasion of Germany.

The report in this issue no. 100 of our big newsletter this month (the entire issue is 16,000 words in length — the average book consists of 50,000 words ) —  “A Supernatural History of the Third Reich” — continues our series begun  in issue no. 82, “Did Stalin Want War with Hitler?,” and continued in issues no. 97 and 98.

What I hate with a passion, and I will mince no words here, is when our people, so-called “revisionists,” behave like Talmudic rabbis or Zionists when it comes to defending dusty dogmas they hold precious. 

Hitler’s “noble crusade” in Russia is one such dogma. I too upheld it in the past, but believe it or not, as revisionists we have since revised our view, in light of new evidence. Imagine the transgression this writer has perpetrated! We have dared to revise a sacred belief that is utterly wrong.

We revisionists who have defiantly demanded of the World War II-era Judaics and their legion of supporters and flacks that they revise their claims about Auschwitz homicidal gas chambers, can’t seem to tolerate a revision of the myth that Hitler’s invasion of Russia was one of his most virtuous acts.

The critical responses to issues 82, 97 and 98 have mostly been without historical substance. The supporters of the myth appear to know next to nothing of the factual history of the Ostheer (German army in the East) in the USSR from June to December, 1941 (to take but one period of “Operation Barbarossa”).

Most of the resistance we have received is from people clinging to their “bibles” — Viktor Suvorov’s book, Icebreaker — parroting the mantra, “The Führer had to invade first or the Red Army would have invaded Germany!” 

Putting aside, for the time being, the fact that the Red Army did indeed invade Germany in 1945, and proceeded to nearly obliterate east Germany due to Hitler’s failed 1941 invasion, whether or not Stalin was on the verge of attacking (and we argue in issue. no 82 that he was not), the invasion Hitler undertook was among the most reckless, incompetent, poorly conceived and yes, suicidal attacks in modern western history. 

Moreover, it was fueled largely by Hitler’s training in magic. 

He was set up in this regard to believe occult mumbo-jumbo (we trace this in our study) which had it that the Ostheer would defeat the Red Army on the basis of the triumph of the (magical) will. There was no other foundation for believing victory could be achieved. 

The “Führer” was utterly delusional when he dispatched millions of German youth into the Soviet monster’s jaws, like lambs to the slaughter (180,000 German youth were killed in just the first few weeks of the June invasion). By every measure of military preparedness (and not just the famously inadequate summer uniforms) — tanks, aircraft, fuel, spare parts, trains, food, ammunition — the German forces were hopelessly unprepared. They were tossed into battle with the Soviet war machine in an inconceivable manner that makes no sense unless one comprehends the fact that Hitler was in the grip of the magical gnosis in which he had been initiated since at least 1919.

Revisionist datum: by November of 1941, merely five months (!) after his invasion, Hitler's war in Russia was lost. It had gone from Operation Barbarossa to Operation Masada, i.e. mass suicide.

Even if Stalin had been on the verge of invading Germany, defending against such an invasion would have no connection with anything so megalomaniacally grandiose as seizing Moscow or the USSR’s oil fields. An astute, practical, hard-nosed leader would have been solicitous above all for the welfare of the German people. He would have moved a few hundred miles into the Soviet Union and crushed this invasion force. Then the shoe would have been on the other foot, and Stalin would have had to wage a war on a distant front, maintaining supply lines across the vast expanses of Russia in winter, while the German army would have been close to its sources of replacement troops, industry, supply and transport. 

Issue no. 100 of Revisionist History® is so much more than our research into Hitler's thralldom to the occult. 

•We go into depth on the root of the history of white pauperization and enslavement by studying the revisionist chronicle of the 16th century “enclosures" and the destruction of the monasteries in England.

•We introduce the reader to Karl Marx’s most formidable, hated nemesis, the eminent French anti-usury economist Pierre-Joseph Proudhon; and we recount narratives of the lives of two Christians, one Russian and the other Polish, who survived the holocaust that was the communist Gulag.

For us “revisionist history” signifies just what it denotes: the willingness to revise any conception about the past predicated on the discovery of new facts and evidence, no matter whose sacred cow is violated, whether Judaic or Hitlerian; or any other. Such a vocation is an adventure in learning. Join us!


Thursday, January 10, 2019

“Jews” only highway opens next to giant Israeli border wall

“Jews” only highway opens next to giant Israeli border wall

By Michael Hoffman | www.RevisionistHistory.org

Click on the photo to enlarge

Route 4370 in the Jerusalem area has opened. It’s for “Jews” only. It connects Israeli settlements to Route 1, the Jerusalem-Tel Aviv highway. It’s divided in the middle by a huge border wall which keeps the Palestinian goyim out of Jerusalem. Nancy Pelosi, Chuck Schumer and the US Congress think it’s great.

The head of the Binyamin Regional Council, Yisrael Gantz, who took part in the opening ceremony, called the road “no less than an oxygen line for the region’s residents, who work, study and go out for entertainment in the city. In a successful cooperation venture between the regional council, the Jerusalem municipality and the Ministry of Transportation, access to the capital has been revolutionized,” he said.

When Mr. Gantz says "region’s residents," he is referring to the human beings, i.e. the residents of the Judaic settlements. In Israeli eyes, the non-humans, i.e., the Palestinians may not have free access to Jerusalem. 

The opening ceremony on Tuesday, January 8 was attended by Jerusalem Mayor Moshe Leon, Transportation Minister Yisrael Katz and Minister of Public Security Gilad Erdan. Leon said that the road is a true blessing for residents of the Israeli settlements.

In observing the lofty moral opposition by the Democrats, their media allies and some cheap labor Republicans, to the construction of a wall on America's southern border, one doesn't know whether to laugh or cry. They all support, and direct American taxpayer funds to building and maintaining Israeli border walls, while insisting that such walls would be immoral in America.

There is always one law for the Talmudists and another for everyone else.

Michael Hoffman is the author of the textbook Judaism Discovered, and Judaism's Strange Gods, and the editor of the periodical, Revisionist History®.