Welcome Information Connoisseurs

Welcome Information Connoisseurs

Monday, February 24, 2020

Hoffman contra neo-Nazism and Hitler in radio interview

Hoffman contra neo-Nazism and Hitler in radio interview

Revisionist historian Michael Hoffman was a guest on Dr. Kevin Barrett's “Truth Jihad” radio program Friday, February 21. It is an approximately one hour conversation deconstructing the Right-wing movement to rehabilitate Hitler. 


Here is Dr. Barrett's synopsis:

Michael Hoffman, author of the new book Adolf Hitler: Enemy of the German People, recently elicited over 600 comments with his Unz Review post mourning the victims of the firebomb holocaust of Dresden. (Read “The People Who Were Burned to Ashes on Ash Wednesday.”) A fair number of comments espoused a pro-Hitler position. The uproar continued as Hoffman received hate mail objecting to his strong disagreements with the neo-Nazi current.


In this interview Michael Hoffman explains: “I recognize that there are plenty of decent people who are confused, or have been spoonfed disinformation—and some of my fellow revisionists are partly responsible, though probably not consciously—that they can be led to believe that Hitler was…what’s circulating right now, the latest propaganda line to recruit people, is that Hitler was the savior of Europe, because had he not invaded the Soviet Union in June 1941, then Stalin would have rolled over Germany and taken possession of Europe. It’s a fairy tale…once you’ve been introduced to it, then you’re escorted to other aspects of the mythology about Hitler, which my book Adolf Hitler: Enemy of the German People (debunks)…”

Thursday, February 20, 2020

Hoffman’s remarks are “radically counter-productive” and “untruthful"

Hoffman’s remarks are “radically counter-productive” and “untruthful”

The following is a reply from a reader to our note on Hate Mail 

Hoffman's rejoinder follows the critic’s e-mail

On Feb 19, 2020, at 9:31, E.P.G. wrote:

"rising attacks on Judaic people and synagogues by mentally fragile persons who have proven susceptible to the whitewashed image of Hitler"

For what it is worth, these attacks you're speaking about are almost uniformly carried out by African Americans in New York city.  I'd be surprised if any of them knew who Hitler was or admired him.  And if any do, I think you have the causation backwards: these people are not attacking Jews because Hitler and neo-Nazis told them to; rather, they like Hitler or sympathize with neo-Nazis because they have personal experience with Jews.  The attacks on orthodox Jews in NYC are in all likelihood motivated by run-of-the-mill ethnic tensions that arise where one ethnic group encroaches, expands or takes over previously diverse communities or communities previously the exclusive preserve of another ethnic group.  

I'm entirely sympathetic to your critiques of National Socialism and Hitler, but the idea that the black individuals attacking orthodox Jews in New York City are being influenced by neo-Nazis or Hitler whitewashing is frankly preposterous.  Even occult processing, methinks, requires a certain level of sensitivity and intelligence that many diverse New Yorkers are fundamentally lacking.  

As it relates to broader instances of "anti-semitic attacks" against Jews, these are almost entirely fabricated by the ADL and SPLC, as you are well aware.  Any time a person posts a flier with the innocuous phrase "its OK to be white" the ADL chalks that up as an "anti-semitic attack." 

 I think it is radically counter-productive (not to mention untruthful) to lend credence to the idea that Jews in America are a threatened or persecuted group.  

They are the most powerful, privileged and secure ethnic group in America.  Of course it is always unfortunate and legitimately deplorable when an innocent person - Jew or Gentile - suffers retribution for the actions of another just because they belong to the same group, however to the extent that Jewish individuals are persecuted in America, it is almost entirely because of the perceived collective behavior of Jews as a group, not because of the influence of "neo-Nazism".  So if you are legitimately concerned about the safety of Jews in America, you should go back to putting the blame where it belongs: on Jewish behavior, not on long-dead and moldering ideologies like Nazism. The only bona fide "neo-nazis" in America are hollywood actors and federal assets.  
____________

Dear Mr. E.P.G.

Your timeline for synagogue attacks is captive only to the most recent events of the past few months. 

It seems you have forgotten the attack on the Overland Park Jewish Community Center in Kansas. There was also the Poway, California synagogue shooting, the Pittsburgh synagogue mass murder, as well as the attack on the synagogue in Halle, Germany. These tragedies are not exactly ancient history.

Not to mention untruthful” allusions, accusing this writer of generalizations, such as saying that "Jews in America are a threatened or persecuted group” — an inexactitude I have never stated. You may traffic in sweeping enormities about “Jews in America.” I do not have the luxury of ill-defined categorizations.

Why not deal with the realpolitik at hand? Because of a few, very high profile atrocities against Judaic people, the perception of the American people is that Judaic people are under siege. It is the perception that is at issue, assuming you are interested in analyses that advance our cause in the face of what has been almost relentless defeat. 

You wrote:

“...you should go back to putting the blame where it belongs: on Jewish behavior”

How the rabbis savor your expression, in all its imprecise, approximate grandeur: “Jewish behavior.” Not Zionist behavior, or Talmudic behavior, but Jewish behavior. Here is your indictment of the whole people, including all those endeavoring to escape Zionism and the Talmud. Thus you confirm an oracle of the rabbis, who impart to Judaic youth the following doctrine: 

"Halacha b'yaduah, ‘Esav sonei es Yaakov.” (“It is a universal law, ‘Goyim [“Esau”] will hate the Jew [“Jacob”] — [no matter what he does]. Hence, according to this rabbinic augury, there is no escape from being a Jew. However benign the Jew tries to become, in the eyes of the goyim, his behavior will always be subject to group libel. This is the teaching of the rabbis of Orthodox Judaism to Judaic youth: you will be hated no matter what you do, so stay loyal to us. 

Hitler served as fulfiller of the rabbinic prophecy. He acted that role with virtuosity. You are doing the same. I have been revealing the blowback from this for almost 20 years, while beseeching our people not to succumb to the Hitlerian stupidity that empowers it. Yet the same hateful, self-sabotaging generalization about Judaics continues to be used by people who imagine they are defying the rabbis, when they are actually being out-witted by them, by obtusely acting parts in their Talmudic theater.

Most people don’t seem capable any longer of engaging in deep study and sustained thought. Social media and cell phones have reduced our cognition to sound bites, videos, slogans, tropes, and memes—compact segments of truncated mentation that enervate our spirits and degrade our powers of reason by offering the illusion of thought and an appearance of fact, while confining us to traversing a perpetual circle of paralysis and self-defeat.

Nazism, you say, is a dead, moldering ideology? Really? Is the movement to rehabilitate the image and reputation of its leader also dead and moldering? To take but one glaring example, can you be unaware of the escalating campaign online by significant websites, web personalities and columnists backed by more than one deep-pockets’ donor, to paint Hitler as the “savior of western Europe” due to his attack on Soviet Russia? That’s only the introductory line in their Hitlerian catechesis. From that absurdity, they proceed to escort the would-be initiate to the revelation that poor, pitiful Adolf was a victim who was not responsible for the apocalypse that befell Germany on his watch, during his murderous dictatorship. 

I wrote a book about the disaster for the German people that was Hitler’s invasion of the USSR, so I need not recite the details in e-mail. You can read it; or not.

If, as you allege, there are few, if any, followers of Hitler outside of Tinseltown and “Federal assets,” who has written and published for more than a decade a glossy magazine promoted by a nationally known populist newspaper that features, on a regular basis, panegyrics to Hitler and his NSDAP?

Who has penned the 100% negative diatribes on Amazon for Adolf Hitler: Enemy of the German People

Who has sparked a whispering campaign since the book came out, alleging that this writer is a “Jew” who is working for the Zionists, and no longer worthy of support? 

Who has boycotted our Truth Mission, canceled subscriptions to our newsletter and stopped assistance since the book was written? 

Who are the editors online who eagerly published our work back then, i.e. prior to the distribution of Enemy of the German People, and are giving us the silent treatment now? Is this a coincidence?

This writer’s life has been a battle from the beginning. There’s nothing unique in that. Many people have a similar experience. When threatened, I work harder. When told to sit down, I stand up. I will not be silenced. The ADL has learned that fact. Now it is time for Hitler’s contemporary promoters to learn it too: by the grace of God, we will issue, in a year or less, a much expanded edition of Adolf Hitler: Enemy of the German People.

In February 2020 the accelerating revival of the Hitler template permits no debate and brooks no dissent—no more than Hitler did 87 years ago in February 1933 from the KDP or the Center Party. If the revival continues to grow, it will spell the continuing negation and defeat of the life-and-death struggle for our rights and a future for our children. Why? Because in the fullness of time, Hitlerism is a self-exploding Kabbalistic mechanism. The people who will mock this esoteric verity are the same goyim who fulfill the rabbinic prophecy of Halacha b'yaduah, ‘Esav sonei es Yaakov.’

Michael Hoffman 

Copyright©2020
____________

Wednesday, February 19, 2020

Hate Mail

Hate Mail

For those who may care, and for the record, we make public the following:

On February 18, 2020 we received hate mail, written in cursive longhand and signed with the author's actual name, from a suspected agent of the Cryptocracy who termed this writer “another Molech” for having written the book, Adolf Hitler: Enemy of the German People. (Molech was the name of the monstrous Canaanite god of child sacrifice; cf. Leviticus 20:2 and Jeremiah 32:25).

I recognize the letter-writer as being affiliated with at least one of the unindicted 1995 Oklahoma City bombing suspects (there are more than a dozen co-conspirators who were never prosecuted; see here and here)—as well as the mysterious dispersion of the Zündel library in Tennessee.

Since I wrote Enemy of the German People last year, much has changed for our Truth Mission. Other than Zionist and rabbinic attacks, the whispering campaign, boycott, termination of friendships and alliances, and threats we have received, are among the most relentless and intense we have faced in our entire writing career of more than 35 years. These facts and others have led this writer to the detection of a loosely organized neo-Nazi reticulation inside the anti-Zionist Right wing. 

We are witnessing in the U.S. a powerful recruiting effort underway online, through various sophisticated white nationalist and “conservative” front groups, to rehabilitate Hitler and his policies and depict him as a “savior” of Europe against Stalin. 

We wrote the book partly as an antidote to this movement and the rising attacks on Judaic people and synagogues by mentally fragile persons who have proven susceptible to the whitewashed image of Hitler that increasingly prevails in some corners—though by no means all—of the anti-Zionist Right (for how could any sincere opponent of the Nazi-like Israeli state be sympathetic to Nazism?).

It is important to observe that the antidote to extemism and hate online is education and enlightenment, not censorship and de-platforming by self-appointed thought cops who only exacerbate the grievances of marginalized persons, further fueling resentment and violence at the sight of a politically correct monopoly being imposed on an Internet that originally served as a liberating alternative to the legacy media’s tunnel vision. 

Furthermore, the barely concealed unfairness and politicization of the censorship of social media is infuriating, in that seldom do thought cops such as the ADL or the Southern Poverty Law Center work to ban or cancel instances of Talmudic hate speech, or the legion of pro-Israeli spokesmen who espouse the dehumanization and subjugation of Palestinian and Lebanese Arabs. We ought to consider whether the intent of the flagrantly unjust application of censorship is intended as a sub-rosa means for stimulating the anger and hostility of aggrieved nationalists, and pushing them over the edge after dialogue and reason have been shut down.

If the hate mail we received February 18 was supposed to be a warning, it has had no effect whatsoever. By the grace of God, I will continue to research and write in the time allotted me in my tour of duty on this earth. 

Americans who desire peace and freedom for the United States and the restoration of our Republic and its Constitution will never find it in any revival of Jew-hate and Hitler’s murderous dictatorial model of rule.

We devoted a large part of the January issue of Revisionist History® to the fact that "Old Politics Cannot Defeat 21st Century Evil." We teach that, “A genuine movement for liberating the American people from Zionism and Talmudism should be deeply and truly founded on an abiding love and desire to see Judaic people free of the bondage of negative ideologies. This must be a well-publicized, very high profile aspect of our movement’s identity as a peace-loving fellowship.”

Nothing could be further from the spirit of loser-Hitlerism than the preceding path to victory. The last thing the Cryptocracy wants is to see our people victoriously regain the promise of America kindled in 1776, which is why shadowy forces continue to move against this writer and defame, interdict and threaten our Truth Mission. 

Michael Hoffman

In response to this column, a reader has sent e-mail stating that our remarks are “radically counter-productive” and “untruthful.” Here is the reader’s critique, followed by our rejoinder
_____________

Friday, February 14, 2020

We’ve been attacked for writing about Dresden

Due to our Writing on Dresden
There has been an Attempt to Suspend or Deplatform our Twitter Account

As some readers may know, the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith (ADL) and the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), among other powerful thought control lobbies in the U.S., are working overtime to cancel our presence on the Internet.

 They have successfully had us banned from Google’s YouTube after our history lectures were viewed by 178,000 people over more than nine years. 

 We have been banned by the credit card processing giant Paypal even though our customer satisfaction rating at Paypal was among the highest possible. 

• Amazon has interdicted three of our history books.

Now, in response to our writing about Dresden, which we publicized on the social media news forum Twitter, a complaint was filed with Twitter against our fifth installment in the series, “The People Who Were Burned to Ashes on Ash Wednesday.”

Twitter contacted us February 14  as follows:

Hello,


We have received a complaint regarding your account, @HoffmanMichaelA, for the following content.


Tweet ID: 1227727600702746624


Tweet Text: Dresden Holocaust Remembrance Day 5: “The People Burned to Ashes on Ash Wednesday” Churchill and Roosevelt tossed a match into Dresden as casually as a drooling meth addict would torch an apartment building for revenge on the landlord who had evicted him. [https://revisionistreview.blogspot.com/2020/02/dresden-holocaust-remembrance-day-5.html]  

We have investigated the reported content and could not identify any violations of the Twitter Rules (https://support.twitter.com/articles/18311) or German law. 


Accordingly, we have not taken any action at this time.


Sincerely,


Twitter
______________

This time Twitter resisted the attempt to suspend or ban our access to our 6,500 followers. What will happen next time?


Notice at the end of Twitter’s message it says our tweet has not violated any German law. Michael Hoffman is a citizen and resident of the United States, but his Twitter communications must conform to the laws of the government of the foreign nation of Germany, which apparently has jurisdiction over tweets composed and transmitted in America?

Our situation is precarious. Pressure is regularly being applied to suppress our Truth Mission online. The enemies of the advancement of knowledge have no answer to our work: they can’t refute it and they fear debating us, so they continue to chip away at what access remains to us on social media.

 Don’t let them render us invisible! Your donation helps us fight back. Please consider sending a financial gift today for the survival of our Truth Mission. Thank you.

Michael Hoffman


______________

Thursday, February 13, 2020

Dresden: Prayers for the Living and the Dead

Holocaust in Dresden 
Prayers for the Living and the Dead


February 13 and 14, 2020: we call to mind the unquenchable fire unleashed on a German city. 

We supplicate for the victims of ego. 

And the pity of it is, our prayers are made ever new, because war is a perpetual racket. 

By Michael Hoffman

[Five Days of our Dresden Holocaust Commemoration are online in installments: Day One, Day TwoDay Three, Day FourDay Five]

The bombing began seventy-five years ago today, Shrove Tuesday, 1945. From the point of view of the homicidal maniacs in London and Washington it was an auspicious day for killing German mothers and children— they would be traveling to and from the carnival festivities prior to the start of Lent on that doomed day in Saxony. 

In our time, February 13  and 14, 2020 are days for grieving, rather than scientific, historiographical or statistical argument and analysis. We undertook that work in the preceding five days.

Today and tomorrow we pray for the living and the dead (as a Catholic I pray for the dead, as some older Anglicans do. Please, I am not a theologian and do not wish to entertain a debate on the matter; consider it a poetic act).

In the 1980s German television filmed a documentary series. In English the title would be something like “No Roof Over the Reich” (my German is awful and I won’t hazard a translation). Back then, survivors of the Dresden holocaust, obviously still devastated people even forty years later, testified in that documentary to the horror they had lived. There was a group session in one film segment and one lady survivor, God bless her heart, lit into Churchill’s prestige with great passion, crying out that he had remorselessly ordered the bombing of hospitals, schools, homes and churches. “No Roof Over the Reich” should be made available for streaming and on DVD, and translated into other languages besides German. It contains genuine holocaust testimony from anguished, shattered survivors, without any temporizing or weasel words.

In the 1990s, the families of this writer and the late revisionist Jack Wikoff met in Dresden, New York on February 14. We observed silence, lit candles and meditated. Months later in that very same hamlet on the shores of Seneca Lake, I encountered three young tourists from Dresden, Germany.  I apologized to them for America’s part in the bombing. They seemed startled and were nearly speechless.

Today and tomorrow are not days for many words. Silent contemplation. Consideration of what type of world we inhabit, where some victims have far more rights and incomparably more remembrance and commemoration than others. 

What are the “lessons of the Holocaust”? 

What are the lessons of Dresden? 

One lesson would seem to be the ravages wrought by the egos of the victors, confident in their own righteous and unlimited wrath.  

For this writer, some insight into the infinitude of that ego is found in the volumes that have devoured my days and nights:  I have spent hundreds of hours reading and studying, more perhaps than I should, the two-tiered human / less-than-human teaching of the Babylonian Talmud, which drifted into the echelon of the Church of Rome through the mandate Medici Pope Leo X gave to the master printer Daniel Bomberg in Venice (despite his name, Bomberg was a gentile), to create the finest Talmud edition ever published. From there, the two-tiered human / less-than-human mental fog materialized as “Catholic” Hermeticism and Kabbalism, then Rosicrucianism, and “Protestant” Freemasonry. The two tier system is not confined to one wing of Christendom, nor is it proprietary to the Left or the Right. It is a universal solvent for the destruction of the soul. 

Obstreperous, fiercely independent George Orwell ripped its habiliments to shreds in his fable, Animal Farm. Members of Abraham Lincoln’s inner circle (including Thurlow Weed and William Seward, among others), battled it. Later John F. Kennedy confronted the same dragon, the same secret society dichotomy of insiders who are human, and outsiders who are said to be less so. At the command of official history we are misled into believing that the doctrine’s nearly exclusive exponents were Hitler and his NSDAP. 

How then do we explain the Cambridge Apostles, Britain’s elite secret society? Their members included Gerald Balfour (brother of Arthur Balfour, architect of the Zionist usurpation in Palestine), Victor Rothschild, John Maynard Keynes, sodomite predator Lytton Strachey, and Stalin’s traitors inside the British government (Guy Burgess, Sir Anthony Blunt, John Cairncross, and Guy Liddell). All had been “Apostles,” initiated and indoctrinated ruling class luminaries. These “enlightened” products of the crème de la crème of society, were taught the Talmudic duality that there are two classes of beings on earth, the humans and those who only resemble them. 

The Left would have us believe that this occult conceit is limited to the fever swamp of the Klan and the neo-Nazis. They assume that we too are non-entities, without knowledge of Giovanni Pico della Mirandola and Johannes Reuchlin, without awareness of the Cambridge Apostles, whose self-exaltation was reflected in this eternal Talmudic dualism. In the Cambridge dichotomy, all who were not apostles were “phenomena.” In other words, the Cambridge insiders were the reality, and the rest of us phantoms.

The spirit that coalesced in Babylon is yet older — older than the pyramids where it first found systematized theological foundation in the state religion of the dog-headed deity of the Pharaohs, and of Hermes Trismegistus and goddess Isis, who made their infernal way to the papal apartments in the Renaissance, where they were secretly venerated by turncoat pontiffs and prelates five hundred years before the Pachamama idols fulfilled the same function under Pope Francis.

The tale of the serpent is a long peregrination across the sands of time, from primeval Memphis to Dresden by way of London and New York. Out of that cauldron emanated the fire that roasted the Saxons alive, done in by the dragons of the Anglo-Saxons, a fratricidal, Mephistophelian irony.  

Over the past five days we have endeavored to recall the reality of the Dresden apocalypse through the words of David Irving, John Wear and in the mournful music of Rudolf Mauersberger, which will be played today in Dresden and to which I have harkened as I wrote these words.

In attempting to marshal facts and evidence, analysis and arguments to testify to the fact that Dresden too was a holocaust, we have no way of knowing whether we have failed or succeeded, persuaded or merely antagonized.

1952: Dresden city center still in ruins seven years after the inferno

Where, then, does that leave us over these next two days, as we call to mind the unquenchable fire of hell unleashed on a helpless German city, wherein the dragons flew unopposed, and seared with equal glee the blonde braids from the heads of the German carnival children, and the gray hairs on the heads of their grandmothers?

How many will read our five day commemorative, compared with the audience Prof. Lipstadt, Steven Spielberg, the New York Times and the cable television networks command? Their omission of Dresden from the holocaust roll of sanctified victims leaves no trail. Invisibility by its nature goes undetected. 

Dresden was no holocaust, they say; it is undeserving of the distinction; to state otherwise is “mythology.”

Over the past five days we made a factual case. But that is not where we let the matter rest.

Ultimately, the matter does not rest in “the facts,” as important as they are. Here we claim the sanction of the survivors of the Nazi Judeocide, who have often rejected what they consider the limitations of revisionist reason. 

If we cut through the diversionary rhetoric, in the view of the Establishment, Dresden doesn’t rate as a war crime because the people of that city got what they deserved. If we peer through the circumlocutions and fancy moral embroidery, it comes down to the belief of the Allies in justifiable homicide and collective guilt. 

The people of Dresden were not guilty, of course. But historians Richard Evans, Sinclair McKay, Ms. Lipstadt and the legion of academics who take their cues from them, suggest and hint that they were guilty, and they premise their prosecutorial case on legal reasoning. Circumstantial evidence points to the women, children and elderly males of Dresden being Nazis, or Nazi helpers, or Nazi sympathizers, or their sadly corrupted offspring. But the fact is they were innocent human beings, like innocent Dmitry in The Brothers Karamazov, who looked guilty in the cold glare of courtroom logic. 

So it comes down to who you believe.

Only those who have the intuition of the heart, not the supposed facts marshaled by those who have the eye and ear of Allied prosecutors and their publishing monopolies, know the truth. We intuit that many tens of thousands of German civilians and anti-Communist refugees were burned alive in Dresden. The Dresdeners have been convicted falsely. The super-structure of our adversary’s rationality isn’t sufficient for discerning the truth of Dresden. 

If it takes a leap of faith to believe that somewhere in the neighborhood of a hundred thousand innocent human beings suffered mass slaughter in Dresden, then that is what we invoke.

Prayer

This day in February 2020 I see, I feel, I absorb, I take into my innermost being, the fire that does not die.

The fire that traveled from Dresden to Gaza to Beirut and Baghdad, killing the Arab mothers and fathers and progeny, is unquenchable.

Wherever hatred is kindled, wherever the other person is demonized and degraded, there will be found the innocent burning.

We pray for Dresden, for Hiroshima and Nagaski. We remember Beirut in the summer of 1982, when the unopposed Israeli air force, modeling itself after the RAF, bombed hospitals, schools and apartment blocks.

The Cryptocracy is all too ready to bomb us whenever we get out of line. They bombed their own people on 9/11, and they would do it again, to achieve their esoteric objectives.

We pray for the dead of Auschwitz, yes, and of Dresden, because we subscribe to one humanity, in which we all share. This is of Christ.

We supplicate for the victims of ego. And the pity of it is, our prayers are made ever new because war is a perpetual racket; the most profitable there is, after compound interest.

Eternal rest grant unto them, O Lord Jesus, and may the perpetual light shine upon them. Amen.

Michael Hoffman is a German-American writer residing in Coeur d’Alene, Idaho.

Copyright©2020 by RevisionistHistory.org
_______________

Wednesday, February 12, 2020

Dresden Holocaust Remembrance Day 5: Burned to Ashes on Ash Wednesday

SOLEMN DRESDEN HOLOCAUST REMEMBRANCE

DAY FIVE

This is a series of reports by Michael Hoffman, to be issued one per day from February 8 through February 13, 2020

75TH ANNIVERSARY OF THE MASS MURDER OF 100,000 GERMAN MEN, WOMEN AND CHILDREN, FEBRUARY 13 AND 14, 1945

DAY FIVE: FEBRUARY 12, 2020

(Click for: Day One, Day TwoDay Three, Day Four, and Prayers for the Living and the Dead)

This essay first appeared in this blog. It was later reprinted in the Unz Review, where it received more than six hundred comments.

Dresden, capital of Saxony, before the Allied incineration

The People Who Were Burned to Ashes on Ash Wednesday

By Michael Hoffman

It was Shrove Tuesday, 1945 in the magnificent German art city of Dresden, which was packed with helpless Christian refugees fleeing the Red Army of the Stalinist USSR. Dresden’s native Lutheran and Catholic children, dressed in their festive Saxon folk costumes, were aboard a train taking them home after Mardi Gras parties at different points in the far-flung city. Still merry from the night’s festivities, they cavorted on the train prior to Ash Wednesday, February 14, and the solemnities that would be observed even in wartime, in memory of the passion and death of Jesus. In the sky, Allied fighter planes caught sight of the civilian train and opened fire on the children inside, whose blood was soon pouring out of the wreckage.

This carnage registers almost not at all in the American mind. The holocaust in Dresden, lasting two days and killing at least 100,000 people, like the atomic holocaust in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, usually merits not much more than a few sentences or a single paragraph in the back pages of metropolitan newspapers, unlike “Yom HaShoah (יום השואה) Holocaust Remembrance Day,” in April, which is observed with countless civic, educational and media events, hosannahs, apologies and genuflections, from the Vatican to the White House. The barely remembered German and Japanese holocaust victims of Allied war crimes were of the wrong race and religion.

In the spring of 1945, after prosecuting the bombing holocaust in Dresden and aevery major German city, and with the end of the Second World War in sight in Europe, Winston Churchill began to consider his reputation in the post-war period, when the 500,000 German innocents he ordered burned to death could come back to haunt him and indelibly stain his image. 

RAF Marshall Arthur Harris and historian David Irving, March 23, 1962

To distract from his own overwhelming culpability, on March 28, 1945 Churchill issued a cowardly, back-stabbing memo blaming the mass incineration on his own men of Bomber Command, and by implication, upon its commander, Arthur Harris, whose force would be denied a post-war campaign medal, and Harris a peerage. Harris and Bomber Command had been following Winston Churchill’s explicit orders, yet Churchill attempted to shift responsibility onto the corps of airmen who had suffered among the highest casualties of any branch of the British military in the fight against Hitler.

Furthermore, Churchill, like many other unconscionable liars, propagated the lie that Germany was the first to saturate civilians with terror-bombs—at Guernica in Spain, on behalf of Franco’s forces, and in Rotterdam, during the war with Holland. 

In both cases Churchill stated that thousands had been killed. Even one death is regrettable of course, but less than 100 people were killed in Guernica according to David Irving, and less than a thousand in Rotterdam, when the Luftwafe accidentally struck a margarine factory and the flammable liquid burned houses nearby. 

Churchill had declared that “thousands” died in Guernica, and that 30,000 perished in Rotterdam, which is more than what Deborah Lipstadt generally says died in the two-day inferno in Dresden (the absurdly low figure of 25,000 is now the officially fixed count to which the “news media” conform without deviation).

The Germans had pledged not to be the first to bomb civilian centers in Britain. Churchill had hoped they would carpet bomb London to give him the excuse to silence the large peace movement in England which was dogging him in 1940, at a time when the Germans had not dropped a single bomb on London, almost a year after Britain had declared war on Germany. 

The British Prime Minister obtained his pretext toward the end of August, 1940, when a lone, wayward German bomber “lost its way flying up the Thames” river. It had orders to attack an oil refinery, but instead dropped its bombs on London’s East End. No one was killed thankfully, but Churchill was elated. 

He had the excuse he needed to massively retaliate against Berlin, knowing Hitler would respond in kind, and that the British peace movement would vanish in the smoke and flames of the “Battle of Britain” and the “Blitz.” 

In retaliation for the lone Luftwaffe aircraft's non-lethal bombs in London, Churchill ordered a hundred bombers to attack Berlin. Royal Air Force (RAF) commanders warned him that the Luftwaffe would do the same to London.

At this juncture we pause to contemplate the bloody treason that was at the heart of Churchill’s shriveled soul: he wanted as many of his own English civilians in London to die as possible, so that he could point to their deaths as the justification for a total war against Germany, and this Judas succeeded in his objective.

To this day the war crime the leaders of Britain and the United States perpetrated in Dresden is justified on the basis of the tired fable that “Germany did it first to Rotterdam and Guernica,” and “Look at the terror the Germans visited upon London.”

 Nothing that occurred in Guernica, Rotterdam, or for that matter London, begins to even approach the scale of the holocaust that the firebombs of the air forces of Churchill and Franklin Roosevelt inflicted on Dresden and numerous other German civilian centers.

On September 4, 1940 Hitler gave a speech in which he stated that if the “mad drunkard” Churchill continued to attack Berlin, the Germans were not going to stand by and take it. It was Neanderthal thinking on the Führer’s part: you club me over the head and I will club you. Hitler was almost always outfoxed by the sly machinations of the masonic treachery at the heart of Britain’s ruling class. No matter what Churchill ordered, Hitler should have limited his air campaign to British military sites and munitions factories (the Luftwaffe never bothered to attack the aircraft factories that built Britain’s Lancaster bombers!).

On September 6, the English people heard the ominous drone of a fleet of Luftwaffe planes flying up the Thames. Some 3,000 Londoners subsequently died. Now Churchill had what he wanted. 

You won’t find these facts in the multi-volume history he wrote, or in the pages of the celebrated volumes of the conformist historians. To learn the truth one must read and study the revisionists, particularly the demonized David Irving, who personally interviewed many of the key principals of the Second World War in the Atlantic theatre, and authored one of the first studies of the Dresden firebombing, The Destruction of Dresden.

Irving’s nemesis, Deborah Lipstadt meanwhile, has taken it upon herself to deny the holocaust casualty figure of 100,000 for Dresden, but God help any one of us who would have the temerity to doubt the Six Million casualty figure of the “Holocaust,” or even to apply the word “holocaust” to the mass murder by fire in Dresden. 

I challenge any reader to collect the legacy media’s descriptions of the bombing of Dresden from the 1990s onward and count how many of those reports call it a holocaust; I reckon next to zero. Fear of telling the truth is palpable. We live in Talmudic times.

The extent to which we are imprisoned in an Orwellian dystopia of our own making is revealed when we consider the fact that it is generally regarded as highly insensitive or indeed “anti-Semitic” to violate the Newspeak “holocaust” trademark and apply it to the German cities that were incinerated, or to Hiroshima and Nagasaki, even though those war crimes were genuine holocausts by dictionary definition: “Destruction or slaughter on a mass scale, especially caused by fire. Origin: Greek holokauston, from holos ‘whole’ and kaustos ‘burned.”

Even in the official, fixed liturgy of World War II it is not decreed that most Judaic victims of the Nazis perished by fire. A half-million German civilians and three-quarters of a million Japanese civilians (including the victims of the fire-bombing of Toyko), were indeed burned to death, yet it is a thought crime to say that it was a death-by-fire holocaust. Tell me we are not cowards for allowing truth itself to be forbidden. 

This writer is sometimes accused, as a researcher in the field of the Babylonian Talmud, of seeing the Talmud where it is not. It is not so much a case however, that the Talmudic texts themselves are ubiquitous in American society, as is their influence. The single most remarkable dimension of Talmudic halacha is its narcissistic exceptionalism, born of the self-worship it inculcates. Prof. Lipstadt, who has made an career out of stigmatizing anyone who questions any aspect of the “Holocaust” narrative, as a diabolic “Holocaust denier,” is herself free to deny without negative consequences, the holocaust in Dresden. She may do as she likes with history, in ways that the rest of us may not. For that reason alone we cannot respect the Wikipedia version of World War II, conforming as it does to the Lipstadt liturgy. It is not history.

Beyond the “Jew and gentile” entanglement is the fratricide: Churchill and his top military circle were not Judaic, yet they set afire the medieval cities of their German cousins, who only two generations before had comprised the royal blood within the House of the German-speaking Queen Victoria.

A thousand years of national and religious wars in Europe had not managed to wreak the destruction which Churchill and the American President Roosevelt directed against the cultural treasure houses of western civilization, in cities like Dresden. They tossed a match into Dresden as casually as a drooling meth addict would torch an apartment building for revenge on the landlord who had evicted him.

Yet “conservative Christian” American university professors and administrators in institutions of higher learning such as Michigan’s esteemed “conservative” Hillsdale College, which is the recipient of millions of dollars in donations from “Conservatives” seeking to preserve western civilization, have hallowed Churchill into a paragon of decency, courage and western leadership. The canonization of this mass murdering vandal is such a defect of vision as to be fatal spiritually, culturally and politically on a national scale.

If the powers that be decided, for example, that Russia needed to be fire-bombed, given sufficient pretext our “Conservatives” would do it all over again in the name of “civilization.” The blood of the innocent in Moscow and St. Petersburg would signify no more to the “Conservative" crusaders than the charred bodies of the civilians in the apocalyptic wreckage of Dresden.

American civilization in 2020 is not worthy of the name. We have the illusion of a civilization, which we cherish for our own aggrandizement and nostalgia. “Conservative” America has made common cause with the Talmudic mentality, as did Antonin Scalia, another of its plaster saints.

Soon the season of Lent will be upon us. Seventy-five years after the Allies’ Ash Wednesday mass murder in Dresden, we inhabit the money changer’s house, where Christ on the Cross is sold not just for a buck, but for a bucket of Talmudic vindication.

Michael Hoffman is a professional historian, the editor of the periodical Revisionist History® and the author of nine books

Copyright©2018-2020 by RevisionistHistory.org

Due to our Writing on Dresden
There has been an Attempt to Suspend or Deplatform our Twitter Account

As some readers may know, the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith (ADL) and the Southern Poverty Law Center, among other powerful thought control lobbies in the U.S., are working overtime to cancel our presence on the Internet.

They have successfully had us banned from Google’s YouTube after our history lectures were viewed by 178,000 people over more than nine years. 

We have been banned by the credit card processing giant Paypal even though our customer satisfaction rating at Paypal was among the highest possible. 

Amazon has interdicted three of our history books.

Now, in response to our writing about Dresden, which we advertised on the social media news forum Twitter, a complaint was filed with Twitter against our fifth installment in the series, “The People Who Were Turned to Ashes on Ash Wednesday.”

Twitter contacted us February 14 and stated as follows:

Hello,


We have received a complaint regarding your account, @HoffmanMichaelA, for the following content.


Tweet ID: 1227727600702746624


Tweet Text: Dresden Holocaust Remembrance Day 5: “The People Burned to Ashes on Ash Wednesday” Churchill & Roosevelt tossed a match into Dresden as casually as a drooling meth addict would torch an apartment building for revenge on the landlord who had evicted him. [https://revisionistreview.blogspot.com/2020/02/dresden-holocaust-remembrance-day-5.html]  

We have investigated the reported content and could not identify any violations of the Twitter Rules (https://support.twitter.com/articles/18311) or German law. 


Accordingly, we have not taken any action at this time.


Sincerely,


Twitter
______________

This time Twitter resisted the attempt to suspend or ban our account. What will happen next time?

Our situation is precarious. Pressure is regularly being applied to suppress our Truth Mission online. The enemies of the advancement of knowledge have no answer to our work: they can’t refute it and they fear debating us, so they continue to chip away at what access remains to us on social media.

 Don’t let them render us invisible! Your donation helps us fight back. Please consider sending a financial gift today for the survival of out Truth Mission. Thank you.

Michael Hoffman

___________________