Welcome Information Connoisseurs

Welcome Information Connoisseurs

Tuesday, July 26, 2011

Anders Behring Breivik: a Judeo-Masonic Terrorist

Anders Behring Breivik: a Judeo-Masonic Terrorist

"Boycott Israel": Labour Youth League summer camp, Utøya, Norway, July, 2011

by Michael Hoffman

In the aftermath of crimes perpetrated by the Cryptocracy's "lone nuts," the controlled media seek to muddy the waters with competing theories, motives, background, ideologies and affiliations acribed to the shooter. In the case of Lee Harvey Oswald he has been presented as pro-Castro and anti-Castro; a CIA agent and a Soviet agent; a pawn of the Mafia and a stooge of the FBI. The JFK assassination itself has been presented as a military coup, a mafia hit, a CIA hit, a right wing hit, a left-wing hit etc. The same game has been played with the source of the cancer pandemic in the United States. It is exacerbated by drinking coffee; on the other hand, coffee prevents cancer; cancer is caused by junk food; on the other hand studies show there is no link between junk food and cancer. The point of all of this deliberately seeded confusion is to discourage us from seeking the real causes of cancer and the actual perpetrators of conspiracy. The end result of this misdirection is that the people tend to beieve that "everything causes cancer;" therefore they continue with their status quo lifestyle. The assassination of John F. Kennedy has been so muddied that there is the tendency to think, "everyone killed Kennedy." Of course if everyone did it, then no one did; at least no one we can trace or indict or bring to justice.

This is the process at work in the media in the case of Anders Behring Breivik. They insinuate that he was a proto-Nazi seeking "white Christian" dominion over Europe. His Israeli-driven ideology is given short shrift; mentioned in passing,and then tossed into the mixing bowl with all the competing theories and claims, and lost therein. The fact is, Breivik sought to exterminate a pro-Palestinian Norweigian island youth camp. As we will see, his terrorism is being applauded in "Israel," despite official, pro forma Israeli condolences to the bereaved.

Judaism despises Europe to its heart. This detestation is a core principle of Orthodox Judaism. After the Israelis have extracted the last ounce of financial support and military muscle from Europe they will delight in seeing it reduced to a burning cinder. Breivik is an ignoramus and his ignorance is shared by millions of our fellow Americans, who believe that the Israelis are the allies of the Christian West. For example, Breivik claims to be a type of medieval Crusader. The Crusaders destroyed Judaics wherever they found them. Their crusade was as much against Judaism as Islam.

Breivik is just a weaponized version of modern Judeo-Churchianity's personnel. They all believe the same double-minded buncombe that Breivik promotes. One characteristic of contemporary western whites is their worship of their executioners. The unbreachable chasm between the Judaic and the gentile yawns before their oblivious eyes. Orthodox Judaism is anti-goyimite in its essence. This essence cannot be seperated from Judaism. Anti-goyimism is the foundation upon which the synagogue is based. The rabbinic texts teach that in the coming era of Judaic supremacy, a Judaic may kill even a "righteous gentile" on a whim. Once they have helped the rabbis and Zionists achieve their world-historic objective there will be open season on the millions of church-going lemmings who at the present time adore counterfeit "Israel.” Modern western men and women are afflicted with a profound death wish. Why? With their contraception, abortion and adulation of the antichrist Israelis, they defy God: "All those who hate Me love death" (Proverbs 8:36).

We need to get beyond symptoms. When the Israelites of old rebelled against God, He turned their land over to hostile, alien peoples. Is something similar happening in the U.S., Canada, Australia and Europe, where the children God wants to send into the world are refused, by means of the birth control and abortion practiced by selfish whites? If it is, then the Muslims are sent by God to plague Europe for its sins. How many children did Breivik have? How many children do any of the other "crusaders" among the Zionist white nationalist parties of Europe have? 

The Zionists desire war to the hilt with Islam; that is, with nearly one billion people -- for generations. The western intelligence agencies shepherd Al-Qaeda today, just as the Rambam, Moses Maimonides, guided the sultan in the thirteenth century; just as the Judaics of medieval Iberia opened the gates to the Christian forts to allow the Muslim armies to attack.

Here below we present documentation related to Breivik's anti-Nazism and Israeli Zionism. We conclude with testimony concerning the enjoyment the Israelis are deriving from the massacre of Norweigian goyim on the island of Utøya and in Oslo. The Israeli state that was founded by terrorism privately delights in terrorism when it is perpetrated on its behalf.

"In numerous online postings, including a manifesto published on the day of the attacks, Breivik promoted the Vienna School or Crusader Nationalism philosophy, a mishmash of anti-modern principles that also calls for “the deportation of all Muslims from Europe” as well as from “the West Bank and the Gaza Strip.” According to the manifesto, titled “2083: A European Declaration of Independence” and published under the pseudonym Andrew Berwick, the Vienna School (http://gatesofvienna.blogspot.com) supports “pro-Zionism/Israeli nationalism.”

"Anders Behring Breivik, who committed the massacre in Norway on Friday in which over 90 people were murdered, spoke out in the past against Islam and said that he is a strong supporter of Israel, Channel 2 News reported on Sunday. According to the report, in an English document he published on the Internet before the massacre, Breivik called himself a strong supporter of Zionism, praised Theodor Herzl the founder of Zionism, and attacked the European political establishment because he saw it as being anti-Israel. Breivik commended Israel for not giving most of the Muslims who live under its control civil rights, as opposed to the various European countries. He also praised Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu for including the Yisrael Beiteinu and Shas parties in his coalition...“It’s time to end the stupid support for the Palestinians and begin to support our cultural cousins – Israel,” Channel 2 quoted Breivik as having written in the document.”

From Breivik's manifesto:

"And then we have the relationship between conservative Muslims and so-called "moderate Muslims". There is moderate Nazis, too, that does not support fumigation of rooms and Jews. But they're still Nazis and will only sit and watch as the conservatives Nazis strike (if it ever happens). If we accept the moderate Nazis as long as they distance themselves from the fumigation of rooms and Jews? Now it unfortunately already cut himself with Marxists who have already infiltrated-culture, media and educational organizations. These individuals will be tolerated and will even work asprofessors and lecturers at colleges / universities and are thus able to spread their propaganda.

"For me it is very hypocritical to treat Muslims, Nazis and Marxists differ. They are all supporters of hate-ideologies...(page 2-3)...We have selected the Vienna School of Thought (http://gatesofvienna.blogspot.com) as the ideological basis. This implies opposition to multiculturalism and Islamization (on cultural grounds). All ideological arguments based on anti-racism. This has proven to be very successful which explains why the modern cultural conservative movement / parties that use the Vienna School of Thought is so successful...To sums up the Vienna school of thought: Cultural Conservatism (anti-multiculturalism), Against Islamization, Anti-racist, Anti-authoritarian, (resistance to all authoritarian ideologies of hate), Pro-Israel/forsvarer of non-Muslim minorities in Muslim countries, Defender of the cultural aspects of Christianity. (end quote)

In an entry dated “Autumn 2008,” Breivik wrote that he attended a birthday party in Oslo and that:

I noticed a majority of these people were Labour Party sympathisers. I guess they don’t really have a choice considering the fact that they are all climbing the public sector hierarchy. A thought occurred. The judges during WW2 who had party affiliations with the NS (Nazi Party) or any affiliation with the SS, were prosecuted and imprisoned. Is it therefore only fair that judges of high rank with party affiliations to the Labour Party and the other parties who support multiculturalism (and therefore Islamisation) is to be considered category B or C traitors? They obviously have a considerable responsibility and should be considered traitors of their people… (end quote).

Breivik signed the manuscript:
Andrew Berwick Justiciar Knight Commander
Knights Templar Europe
Knights Templar Norway

Max Blumenthal: "...in November 2010, the Israeli government...accus(ed) the Norwegian government of 'anti-Israel incitement' for funding a trip for students to New York to see the 'Gaza Monologues' play. Then, the day before Breivik’s terror attack, which he planned long in advance, Norway’s Foreign Minister Jonas Gahr Stor visited the Labor Youth camp at Utoya. There, he was met with demands...to support the Palestinian Authority’s unilateral statehood bid. 'The Palestinians must have their own state, the occupation must end, the wall must be demolished and it must happen now,' the Foreign Minister declared, earning cheers from the audience." (end quote)

Why Breivik doesn't like Nazis
by Rowan Berkeley

"Breivik would consider that the Nazis were completely wrong in considering 'the Jews' to be the primary vectors of European and western political degeneration. He would appear to hold to the concept of 'Judeo-Christian civilization'. The phrase 'Judeo-Christian civilisation' is quite recent: it first appeared in what might be called an official ideological context in 1952, in a speech by then-US President Eisenhower. It has become a watchword among Jewish neoconservative anti-Islamic propagandists since 9/11. To understand the increased salience of this concept, I think we have to see it in the context of the very public swing to the right in zionist politics which started with the first Israeli Likud government in 1977. Up until then, western members of the hard right tended to regard Israel as somewhat 'socialistic'... But from the 1970s onwards, zionist propaganda in the US and Europe completely changed its ...socialistic 'kibbutznik' angle of approach and began instead to concentrate on hard right themes. Gradually, the older idea of 'the Jews' as subversive of the conservative western order was eliminated. Instead, 'the Jews' became symbols of a western conservative defense against 'leftism' and 'liberalism'. This really was the essential message of the neoconservative movement, pioneered in 'Commentary' magazine from 1979 onward." (end quote)

"The overwhelming (Israeli) response is schadenfreude "
"The Norway massacre has touched off a nasty war of words on the Israeli Internet over the meaning of the event and its implications for Israel. And I do mean nasty: Judging by the comments sections on the main Hebrew websites, the main questions under debate seem to be whether Norwegians deserve any sympathy from Israelis given the country’s pro-Palestinian policies, whether the killer deserves any sympathy given his self-declared intention of fighting Islamic extremism ...on Saturday (July 23) in an opinion essay at Ynet (in Hebrew only)...Ziv Lenchner, a left-leaning Tel Aviv artist and one of Ynet’s large, bipartisan stable of columnists...(wrote a column) called “Dancing the Hora on Norwegian Blood.” He argues that the comment sections on news websites are a fair barometer of public sentiment...and that the overwhelming (Israeli) response is schadenfreude, pleasure at Norway’s pain ... that judgment seems pretty accurate...It’s worth noting that at some point late on Saturday several readers found links to Norwegian news sites showing that some kids at the campground where the shooting took place had been brandishing signs a day or two earlier calling for a boycott of Israel." --J.J. Goldberg, Jewish Daily Forward

Thirteen typical Israeli blog responses to the terror attack in Norway

1. There’s no getting away from it, Norway, was always against the state of Israel it’s not new and never will be!! We’re not in favor of the attack but to say that maybe they’ll understand us better after what happened is entirely legitimate!!!

2. Enough demagoguery! The Norwegians and Europe generally are super-anti-Semitic. So 100 people were killed there are 7 billion more people in the world. I don’t pity them they’re my enemies they hate Israel so they have it coming!!!

3. The whole world dances on Jewish blood. Europe is the same Europe and even more anti-Semitic. The killer is right!!! Europe is defeated, Norwegians are becoming a minority.

4. Ha Ha Ha! Europeans, this is your “liberalism."

5. Let them eat what they cooked.

6. Good news for Shabbat (the Sabbath). So may they increase and learn the hard way.

7. Allow me a few moments of pleasure.

8. I’m sorry, it doesn’t move me. From my point of view, let them drown in blood.

9. The boy wanted to send a message. Extreme, yes, but they don’t understand anything else.

10. Coming soon to all the Norwegians. And all the Europeans.

11. You leftists have to be wiped out too. And it will happen soon.

12. Norway's Anti-Semitism did not make it immune.

13. Norway is one of the most antisemitic countries.





Photo source:


On the Contrary is made possible through donations from readers and the purchase of Mr. Hoffman's books, newsletters and recordings.


TWITTER: http://twitter.com/#!/HoffmanMichaelA

E-MAIL: hoffman[at]revisionisthistory.org

PURCHASE a revisionist history book, newsletter, CD or DVD:

Michael Hoffman is the founder of The Hoffman Center for the Study of Anti-Goyimism.
On the Contrary is a public service of Independent History and Research, Box 849, Coeur d'Alene, Idaho 83816 USA. Copyright ©2011

Monday, July 25, 2011

Revelation of the Method in the case of Anders Behring Breivik

By Michael Hoffman


Copyright©2011. All Rights Reserved

Today the New York Times has published an article about right wing anti-Islamic blogs as an inspiration for Breivik's "killing spree."

While these blogs are mostly despicable Talmudic operations, nevertheless, this is a neat way for the Times to distance itself from a highly embarrassing fact which it does not wish to confront -- from July 22 - July 23, the New York Times was part of a larger Zionist Media Conspiracy to Blame Muslims for the Oslo Terror:

In profiling western media coverage of Breivik thus far, some patterns are emerging of interest from the point of view of Revelation-of-the-Method:

1. The Oslo attack is being compared to the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing, which was a clear-cut US government conspiracy on the road to building the police surveillance state which 9/11 cemented.

2. Breivik's alleged manifesto is said to have quoted from Unabomber Ted Kaczyinski's manifesto. As I sought to demonstrate in my book Secret Societies and Psychological Warfare, Kaczynski was a scapegoat who was under FBI surveillance during the Unabombings and who could not possibly have committed all of the attacks attributed to him. After Kaczynski's arrest, the FBI never searched for accomplices. Kaczynski was under the influence of psychiatric medication administered 25 hours prior to his "trial." His Federal-government appointed attorney kept unapproved reporters away from him and never mounted any defense other than a guilty plea. In other words, Dr. Kaczynski, a product of LSD mind control experiments conducted while he was at Harvard University, was used as part of a criminal US government conspiracy.

For those aware of the mechanics of the Revelation-of-the-Method, the media's strong identification of Breivik with the Oklahoma City Bombing and the Unabomber is a type of twilight language. The sub-rosa message? Breivik is part of a conspiracy directed by the western Cryptocracy itself.

Because Americans are notorious for their historical amnesia, this would be a good time to refresh our memory concerning the other July 22 terror bombing -- July 22, 1946:

When recounting shooting sprees it might be useful to recall the one committed on Purim, 1994:

In a search for patterns one must look everywhere. If one looks on a map of Kaczynski's adopted hometown, Lincoln, Montana at the time he resided there, one sees that the location where he chose to erect his cabin was amid the Scapegoat Mountains and the Scapegoat Eatery.

If one looks at images of Anders Breivik, one sees him attired in a masonic apron.

Sometimes in our modern desire for complexity we overlook the significance of the simplest signals.


TWITTER: http://twitter.com/#!/HoffmanMichaelA

E-MAIL: hoffman[at]revisionisthistory.org

PURCHASE a revisionist history book, newsletter, CD or DVD:

DONATE: http://tinyurl.com/4hwh7dz

Michael Hoffman is the founder of The Hoffman Center for the Study of Anti-Goyimism. On the Contrary is a public service of Independent History and Research, Box 849, Coeur d'Alene, Idaho 83816 USA


Thursday, July 21, 2011

Great Holocaust Trial Defense Attorney Doug Christie is Ailing

By Michael Hoffman

Battling Barrister: Canada’s Doug Christie

According to his wife, Keltie writing in her June, 2011 Friends of Freedom newsletter, 65-year-old Canadian Attorney Douglas Christie, the fearless barrister who so ably defended Ernst Zundel in two historic thought crime trials in Toronto in 1985 and 1988, has “prostate cancer of an aggressive grade that has already spread locally outside the prostate.”

Doug is one of the finest men and purest souls it has been my privilege to know. He went far beyond being Ernst’s attorney. He became his friend and a defender of the German people as a whole. In the course of the two trials he had to absorb thousands of facts, hundreds of books and dozens of maps, models and diagrams in order to defend Ernst to the best of his ability. He spent hours in court and then hours at night and on weekends studying with the Zundel defense team, led by Dr. Robert Faurisson of France. A lesser man would have been broken by the stress and the media libel. Doug relished the challenge and stepped into history’s spotlight chasing destiny.

With the brilliant and thorough organization so typical of Mr. Zundel, Doug’s daily after-court briefings in the basement of Zundelhaus were preserved on video. I have included highlights of those briefings in my documentary film, “The Great Holocaust Trial,” (not to be confused with the book of the same name).

After the Zundel trials, Doug continued his career as “the Clarence Darrow of Canada,” although he stands head-and-shoulders above Darrow, who in some respects was an opportunist (Darrow’s finest hour was his defense of Bill Heywood and the IWW in Idaho in 1907; his nadir was the 1924 Leopold-Loeb case).

Mr. Christie went on to represent dissidents, the marginal and the nearly defenseless. Among his most spectacular victories was the 1990 acquittal of Hungarian-Canadian restauranteur Imre Finta, who had been arrested on trumped-up war crimes’ charges. Doug was ably assisted in the Finta case by the equally courageous attorney Barbara Kulaszka.

Christie defended newspaperman Doug Collins, a heroic British-Canadian soldier who escaped ten times from German POW camps in World War II. Mr. Collins testified for and wrote columns on behalf of Mr. Zundel. Those columns led to his prosecution. Christie has also defended high school history teacher Paul Fromm, English anti-Talmud campaigner Lady Jane Birdwood, Internet activist Bernard Klatt, Marc Lemire, and dozens of other indigent and media-libeled victims of the new inquisition.

The Zionist lobby has had Mr. Christie in its sights for more than a quarter-century, but his record for probity was so impeccable they could find no pretext by which they could disbar or financially cripple him until 2007, when they were able to exploit a minor procedural technicality related to a law pertaining to “subpoena for documents.” The Law Society of masonic Canada ruled that this most honorable of all Canadian lawyers, in “improperly” processing the documents had been “dishonorable.” He was fined $20,000. He could not be disbarred on that basis alone however, and he continued his law practice.

Doug has given his life to the nearly thankless task of fighting for the free speech rights of everyone from Native Canadian David Ahenakew to a coterie of Christians, Germans, East Europeans, revisionists, skeptics and individualists who refused to be commissared. He has continued to press for justice in the case of Jeff Hughes, a confused and possibly mentally ill unarmed skinhead who was shot to death in 2009 by Canada’s “Mounties” for no discernible reason other than his politics. A case like this does nothing to burnish Christie’s career or fill his wallet. At the risk of sounding maudlin, Doug did it out of love for the memory of this young man who he met once and only briefly at the George Orwell Awards Dinner, which he and his wife host annually in British Columbia. Doug Christie is a traditional Catholic who cares more about living the Gospel than talking about it. The cause of justice for Jeff Hughes is but one example of his Christ-like conduct.

While I do not speak for or represent Ernst Zündel, I will venture to say that if he were not under a de facto gag order in Germany and barred from traveling in the US and Canada, he would use that organizational genius of his to put together an international testimonial dinner for Doug which would be attended by hundreds. There is no one like Ernst on the scene today, but that is no excuse for us to fail to express our gratitude to Mr. Christie for his life of sacrifice and idealism.

Copyright©2011. All Rights Reserved

(Hoffman is the author of The Great Holocaust Trial: The Landmark Battle for the Right to Doubt the West’s Most Sacred Relic).


Wednesday, July 20, 2011

Niddah, Shifchah, Goyyah and Zonah

Anti-goyimism in all its multifaceted ugliness and racist evil

Dear Michael,

Apart from you, I know few in this world who would appreciate the irony of my pastor's Sunday sermon yesterday.

His text was Luke 11:37-54, Luke's account of our Lord's excoriation of the lawyers, scribes and Pharisees.  The title of his sermon is referenced in the subject line.  The main point is that we all need to beware of being Pharisees, of course.

In one of the high points of the sermon, he warned that all the world religions and "isms"--all except Christianity--that lead to Pharisee-ism.  Of course, Islam and Buddhism were mentioned. Hinduism and even Roman Catholicism were mentioned.  In fact, I can't think of a major world philosophy or religion that was not mentioned except for one: Judaism!  The very heirs of the Pharisees according to their own literature! Yet like most Christians in our day, it is as if Judaism and Pharisees do not even exist, as if they disappeared in the first century.   But they do exist and they are as strong and corrupt as ever, per our Lord's prophecy in Matthew 12:43-45.

Need Americans, need Christians know about them? Might it have something to do with our culture, our churches, our nation?  I think so.

Thus, I was reminded to encourage you in your latest endeavor to start the center for the study of anti-goyism (The Hoffman Center for the Study of Anti-Goyimism).  I tremble to think that the skill of the lawyers, scribes and Pharisees for stoking hatred of disciples of Christ among the goy to accomplish their purposes indirectly is coming to a head more and more each and every day.  We feel it, the hatred of our culture.  The source needs to be exposed.

I plan to bring the Jewish Encyclopedia reference to the attention of my pastor.  Do you have the exact reference, where Judaism today is said to be descended from the Pharisees of old?

Ryan G.

Hoffman Replies

Dear Ryan

All of the technical information and citations from Judaic texts on the admission by the rabbinic powers that Orthodox Judaism is the continuation of Pharisaism will be found in the second edition of Judaism Discovered, which I am toiling on at present, in the hope that we will have the funds to publish it in September.

The only reason that the overwhelming and incessant detestation of goyim that is intrinsic to Orthodox Judaism is not better known, is due to the interdiction and suppression of this fact by the media, as for example by the Right wing empire headed by Rupert Murdoch.

(An article today in the Zionist press frets that if Murdoch falls, their propaganda reach will be diminished [“Amid Murdoch Scandal, Some Fear Pro-Israel Media Voice Will Be Muted,” http://www.forward.com/articles/140053/]. As usual, these fears are overblown since the whole of the western media with a few exceptions, are 98% kosher in their spin).

Every now and then a bit of intelligence leaks through the cracks, however. Here is one such instance:

The Limits of Multi-Culturalism
By Christina Patterson
 The Independent (UK)  28 July 2010

“...When I moved to Stamford Hill (a heavily Judaic area of London, England), 12 years ago, I didn't realize that goyim were about as welcome in the Hasidic Jewish shops as Martin Luther King at a Klu Klux Klan convention.

“I didn't realize that a purchase by a goy was a crime to be punished with monosyllabic terseness, or that bus seats were a potential source of contamination, or that road signs and parking restrictions were for people who hadn't been chosen by God.

“And while none of this is a source of anything much more than irritation, when I see an eight-year-old boy recoiling from a normal-looking woman (because, presumably, he has been taught that she is dirty or dangerous, or, heaven forbid, dripping with menstrual blood) it makes me sad.”

Christina Patterson doesn’t know that all female gentiles without exception are regarded in Orthodox Judaism as “menstrual filth, slaves, heathen and whores.” This disgusting litany is expressed by the alphabetic abbreviation NShGZ (“Niddah, Shifchah, Goyyah and Zonah”). You can’t get this information into the western media. They will print anything derogatory about Islam, both real and imagined, but they protect Judaism to the utmost of their ability.

If we had total Talmudic law supremacy in the West -- and we have not yet reached that point since people like this writer are not yet dead or in the gulag -- then even Israeli allies and friends of the Talmud among the goyim, i.e. even the “righteous gentiles” would be killed whenever a Zionist felt the need. I give evidence for this fact from their own texts in the new edition of Judaism Discovered.

The rabbinic texts also speak of the necessity to collectively inflict violence from time to time on the goyim, without regard to the innocent. In this way it is said that the goyim are spiritually corrected! A contemporary Zionist made the statement in a rabbinic periodical that Germans are peaceable today only because the “evil of the German people” was “bombed out of them” in World War II. 600,000 civilians were thereby “spiritually corrected.”

Even those who consider themselves experts in this field are unaware that Allied policy in the 1940s and the 21st century was and is driven by rabbinic injunction. Historians may puzzle forever over the doctrine of collective punishment. If they can’t trace its roots to the rabbinic texts, they will never have the ultimate key to the justification of mass murder of civilian populations, whether in the war on Baghdad that began on Purim, 2003, or the Ash Wednesday holocaust in Dresden in 1945.

In consideration of this reality, it seems to me that the lack of a formal institute for the study of anti-goyimism in all its multifaceted ugliness and racist evil, is a scandal. I soldier on in the fulfillment of this goal in spite of the fact that almost no one in what I gingerly refer to as “our ranks” has publicized it, with the exception of Jeff Rense and Deanna Spingola; any more than anyone other than Richard Widmann and the aforementioned Rense and Spingola has publicized or offered for sale the reprinted edition of the book The Great Holocaust Trial.

Meanwhile, Charles, a colleague in Florida, this week forwarded a letter circulating among young people in Europe which asks, what, if anything, has Ernst Zundel accomplished? This is an astonishingly ignorant question made possible by the fact that the story of Zundel’s heroic struggle is lost on the younger generation. Contrary to those omniscient futurists who have declared that the printed page is dead and the Internet alone is sufficient to educate the masses, there is no substitute for a book like The Great Holocaust Trial in bringing the Zundel saga to the next generation.

Furthermore, in spite of selling, with nearly no sustained advertising, nearly 4,000 copies of Judaism Discovered in hardcover in less than three years, the book received exactly one libelous review in the pages of a Catholic magazine. No other publication on earth could see fit to pay heed and review what was a publishing phenomenon in revisionist studies. It’s a bad joke.

The extent of the boycott in “our ranks” against almost anything I write or propose is so intense there is almost no point in pursuing the argument. All I can do is work harder than ever and hope and pray that with God miraculously sustaining my writing, some visionary millionaire will someday step forward to say, let’s give your books the funding and publicity they deserve, and let’s build The Hoffman Center for the Study of Anti-Goyimism. Until then I labor in the trenches, the beneficiary of encouragement and donations from “regular Joes” like Ryan G.

I am a fighter. I don’t know any other way to live. I can’t quit, retire or take a vacation. My inner being won’t allow it. I live by the Gospel and the words of Edmond Rostand in Cyrano de Bergerac, “The enemy has us surrounded. We shall not let him escape.”

The Great Holocaust Trial

Revisionist History Newsletter: “Criminalizing Doubt”

“A Study of Judaism: Live from San Jose Slideshow” (DVD)

TWITTER: http://twitter.com/#!/HoffmanMichaelA

E-MAIL: hoffman[at]revisionisthistory.org

PURCHASE a revisionist history book, newsletter, CD or DVD:

DONATE: http://tinyurl.com/4hwh7dz

PUBLICIZE our website: www.revisionisthistory.org

Michael Hoffman is the founder of The Hoffman Center for the Study of Anti-Goyimism 

On the Contrary is a public service of Independent History and Research, Box 849, Coeur d'Alene, Idaho 83816 USA 

Copyright ©2011

Thursday, July 14, 2011

Sharia Law, Human Shields and the Revelation of the Method

Blinded by Misdirection

By Michael Hoffman ©2011

My book, Judaism Discovered, is sold out in hardcover, with the exception of a handful of autographed copies. There are no funds to reprint it in a costly hardcover edition, as much as we would like to do so. Nearly 4,000 copies were printed since 2008 and if you own one of those books, you have a collector’s item (as of July 14, Amazon.com is selling copies starting at $450).

We will endeavor to print Judaism Discovered in paperback with smaller type and in a more compact edition that will allow us to ship it overseas for a lower air mail rate than the $42.00 the US Post Office was charging us to mail the $45 hardcover (how’s that for economy of scale!). Readers in Europe, Canada and Australia accounted for about one-quarter of the book’s sales. We would have undoubtedly sold more if we could have charged less for shipping (the Post Office abolished the slow but affordable sea mail shipping rates a few years ago). We have not yet raised the funds for the paperback but we will go into debt if necessary to get Judaism Discovered back into print.

I am reorganizing the text so that all subjects covered are contiguous. I am also tweaking the text and updating some sections with new research. I am currently at work on the anti-goyim section, proving the contempt for gentiles from the rabbinic texts themselves. A few days ago I added a new section showing that goyim are considered lower than dogs. To make that case, it is not enough to read the Babylonian Talmud and cite a relevant section. It is a matter of cross-referencing parashas derived from the Talmud, as well as successor texts that have the force of law. By collating that corpus one can prove that in Judaism the dog is way above the goy.

Another section I will be adding to the hoped-for new edition concerns the Israeli book Torat Hamelech (“Laws of the King”), by Rabbis Yitzhak Shapira and Yosef Elitzur, which was published in Israeli-Hebrew last year. It is intended as a guidebook for the Israeli military and its soldiers. It advocates killing Arab children and bombing civilians. Torat Hamelech has received a stamp of approval from the prestigious and influential Israeli Rabbi Dov Lior as well as Rabbi Yakov Yosef, son of Rabbi Ovadia Yosef, spiritual head of the Israeli Shas party and former Sephardic Chief Rabbi, who has called for the extermination of the Palestinians.

I have difficulty believing my own words as I write about this book and the rabbis who authored or approved it. Even I am incredulous because I have to ask myself, if this were really true, then alarm bells would surely be ringing from the White House to Congress, from the studios of FOX News to the editorial offices New York Times.

Well, it is really true and none of that is transpiring because we live in anation suffused with the Talmudic mentality – if not yet entirely under Talmudic halacha (law). If you asked me to name a prime characteristic of Talmudic Judaism, I would respond: one law for the Judaics and another for everyone else.

Consequently, when rabbis issue texts calling on the Israeli army to kill Arab children with impunity and flatten their neighborhoods with artillery shells, missiles and bombs, it is barely a blip on the outrage screen of our government and media. Under the Talmudic mentality, Judaics, and even their dogs, are superior to non-Judaics. This superior/inferior distinction privately resonates with America’s leaders and media executives. Therefore, who cares if rabbis are publishing religious rationales for mass murder? In fact hardly any American is even aware of it.


One of the reasons I have been fascinated since childhood with stage magic and will attend any magic show in my vicinity which I have the time to attend, is in order to study the magician’s misdirection, which is the basis for the successful execution of his illusions.

As on stage, so too in the national theatre that is criminal politics. Two mechanisms of misdirection have been carefully and craftily employed to obscure and impede any serious attention and protest over Orthodox Judaism’s advocacy of mass murder and oppression of Palestinians. 1. The rigged agitation over “Sharia law” – other than in Detroit and Berkeley, the likelihood of Sharia law being imposed on America is about the same as Lady Gaga landing on Mars. Meanwhile Talmudic law, in the form of the misnamed “Noahide Law” (which has nothing to do with the Biblical Noah, who the rabbinic texts malign and mock), is already Public Law 102-14.

Furthermore, American attorneys and judges, as part of their professional continuing education, are regularly solicited to attend accredited legal seminars operated by Talmudic rabbis. These are in fact well-attended by gentile law professors, lawyers and magistrates. The seminars are convened by the Cardozo School of Law in New York City and endorsed by Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, as well as being sponsored by bar associations across the U.S. For example, in Missouri last June, Chabad-Lubavitch (whose rabbis have applauded the Torat Hamelech book), convened the “17th Conference on Talmud and Contemporary Law,” sponsored by the Missouri Bar and approved for Continuing Legal Education (CLE) credit. (See: http://revisionistreview.blogspot.com/2011/05/talmudic-chabad-offers-continuing.html).

America is increasingly coming under Talmudic law, not Sharia law, but this fact cannot be mentioned at any large Tea Party or Christian conservative gathering, or by Ron Paul or Rand Paul, much less by Israeli agents such as Palin, Pawlenty and Bachmann.

How then, if Sharia law is a phantom and Talmudic law a growing reality, is the Right wing focused on the one and not the other? Through the magic of misdirection.

2. A second misdirection is centered on the issue of Palestinian civilian casualties. Try this test: walk up to a Fox News-loving Right-winger and ask him or her, “What about Palestinian casualties?” Nine times out of ten the response will be, “The Israelis can’t help it; the Arabs use their own people as human shields.”

The fact that the targeting of Arab civilians is mandated by the rabbinic texts is not acknowledged and will not be considered. Muslim and Arab goyim are too low on the scale of humanity to merit any concern whatsoever about their well-being or welfare. One mechanism for dismissing their humanity is this misdirection about “human shields.”

The rabbinic book Torat Hamelech and its sister text Mishnah Torat Hamelech, are not outside Judaism. They are not an aberration or extremist exaggeration. Orthodox Judaism believes in collective guilt and collective punishment. It teaches that any person (man, woman or child) in a country that is against Judaics and supports war against Judaics, is a rodef (homicidal “pursuer”) and should be killed. Any non-Judaic who violates one of the Seven Noahide laws (laws considered binding on all human beings), is subject to the death penalty. The majority of Judaism’s sacred texts teach these views.

Orthodox Judaism, being built on deception and founded by lawyers, is however, riddled with loopholes and escape clauses for every occasion, intended to misdirect the goyim. If Judaism Discovered offers any service to humanity it is in its elucidation of how these loopholes and escape clauses function, where they are to be found, and how and when they are employed.

Zionism is at a crossroads in history as it obtains ever more control over the minds of Europeans (in reaction to Muslim immigration), and in America, where Talmudic Judaism is linked to family values and identified as God’s genetic race.

The Talmud teaches that in times of Judaic supremacy its doctrine of contempt for gentiles need not be hidden. It teaches that in all other times it must be concealed. “Religious-Zionist” rabbis among the Israeli settlers believe that Zionist power has reached a sufficiently high level to justify the candor of a book like Torat Hamelech. Other more cautious rabbis strongly disagree and counsel a resumption of the usual cover story, that Orthodox Judaism is a religion of universal love.

Rabbi Barry Leff is one of the latter. He is charged with maintaining the cover story and condemning Torat Hamelech by quoting a handful of escape clauses by obscure rabbis which look as though they contradict Torat Hamelech. This game has been played before by operatives such as Shmuley Boteach, Michael Jackson’s rabbi.

Rabbi Leff argues that, “Underlying Torat Hamelech is a philosophy that demeans the value of the non-Jew as a human being. Yes, there are sources in the Torah that support this approach, but they are all referring to idol worshipers. This clearly does not apply to monotheists such as Christians and Muslims.”

Rabbi Leff is correct about the rabbinic halacha on Muslims. They are not hated as idol-worshippers. Tthis is one reason why rabbis allied with Muslims for centuries in Spain and the Middle East against Christians; a history almost never mentioned today. The rabbis despise contemporary Muslims because many of them will not acknowledge the legitimacy of the Israeli land grab in Palestine, or submit to the Israeli claims to religious and racial superiority. In using the same armed resistance methods of the anti-Nazi partisans of World War II, the Palestinians and Lebanese become rodef in the eyes of the Orthodox rabbis.

Where Leff is being less than truthful is in his claim that Judaism does not consider Christians to be idol-worshippers. Christianity is judged to be idol worship by every major halachic authority from Maimonides to the Chafetz Chaim. Idol worship is a death penalty offense under the “Noahide” laws. Jesus himself is frequently referred to as an “idol” in popular Orthodox Judaic literature. Rabbi Leff insults our intelligence with his farcical claim.

As it turns out, the discovery of what Judaism really is and really teaches is more than ever relevant, pertaining as it does to the direction of our foreign policy and national destiny, as well as the Faith of Jesus Christ as presented to us in our churches, where too often a false Christ and a false gospel are proffered. The Noahide law proscribes the worship of Jesus, it does not oppose a church that fakes such worship.

Which side does history favor, the coverup rabbis like Leff, talking with a forked tongue in the age-old pattern? Or the new, Revelation-of-the-Method rabbis who publish Torat Hamelech, with its upfront advocacy of how their troops should behave when they’ve got the goyim in their sights?

If I were a betting man, I’d put a fat wager on the Revelation-of-the-Method, the operating principle of which is: we tell you what we’re going to do to you, and if you do nothing about it, our power over your mind will be increased exponentially.

That’s the state of the affairs in our time, when almost everyone is chasing after one side issue after another, blinded by every manner of illusion. In the kingdom of misdirection, the magician is king.


Resources and Suggestions for Activists and Researchers

E-MAIL: hoffman[at]revisionisthistory.org

PRAY for us: John 15:16

PURCHASE a revisionist history book, newsletter, CD or DVD:

PUBLICIZE our website: www.revisionisthistory.org

Michael Hoffman is the founder of The Hoffman Center for the Study of Anti-Goyimism 

On The Contrary is a public service of Independent History and Research 
Box 849, Coeur d'Alene, Idaho 83816 USA 

Copyright ©2011


Saturday, July 09, 2011

Anti-semite? What about anti-goyimite?

Introducing The Hoffman Center for the Study of Anti-Goyimism

By Michael Hoffman  

"A dreamer is one who can only find his way by moonlight, and his punishment is that he sees the dawn before the rest of the world."  Oscar Wilde 

Perhaps some of you have wondered about the debut of The Hoffman Center for the Study of Anti-Goyimism and desire more details concerning it.

It bears mentioning that The Vidal Sassoon International Center for the Study of AntiSemitism (http://sicsa.huji.ac.il/) was established "as an interdisciplinary research center dedicated to accumulation and dissemination of knowledge necessary for understanding the phenomenon of antisemitism. The Center engages in research on antisemitism throughout the ages, focusing on relations between Jews and non-Jews, particularly in situations of tension and crisis."  

The Center is based at the Hebrew University in Jerusalem and funded in part by the multi-millionaire cosmetics' baron Vidal Sassoon, CBE (Commander of the Order of the British Empire).

The purpose of the Sassoon Center is two-fold: to gather active intelligence on the movements and personnel around the world stigmatized as "antisemitic," and to paralyze any leader or movement that exposes Judaism, Talmudism or the Israeli state by tarring them with the career-ending "antisemitic" label.

Turning the Tables

I have never been interested in being confined to a category or placed on the defensive.  As far as categories go, I have always sought to turn the tables by thinking completely outside the box and crafting a new epistemology. Toward that end I coined the term "Judaic" to replace the appellation "Jew" as a description of rabbis and Zionists who lay claim to an awe-inspiring self-description with little or no evidence to substantiate their presumption.

Judaism offers race-based divinity to those of whom it is said are the descendants of the Old Testament patriarchs. We see echoes of this in Judeo-Churchianity, where the insinuation that “Jews” are saved by their racial prestige is a powerful undercurrent. 

What salvation is there for impostors, however? For those who reject Jesus Christ and think they are Jews, but in genetic reality they are not Jews? (Rev. 2:9; 3:9). This dilemma is almost never considered. There is a snare wrapped within it –  the huge superstructure of fraud, demonic pride and misdirection built upon the notion that many or most of the followers of the religion of Judaism and the inhabitants of the Israeli state, are “Jews” descended from Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, and thereby saved, or at the very least, ennobled, by virtue of their supposedly exalted genealogy, and entitled to certain immunities and prerogatives. 

There was a quasi-magical awe in which self-described “Jews” were viewed in medieval Europe, one of the few “Ace” cards they held at that time, and one which they exploited masterfully and to great effect, no less than now among the Republican Right wing. The whole thing is as absurd as a band of Calabrians in Italy claiming to be owed deference, or rulership over Rome, because they insist they are genetic descendants of the Caesars. 

Why do we take anything the rabbis and their cronies say at face value, absent collaborating data? We can talk about this until we are blue in the face or we can act to withdraw the mechanism whereby this fraud is maintained and substitute the word Judaic for the word Jew. In addition to being a dispassionate, generic description of those who have an ethnic attachment to renascent Phariseeism ("Orthodox Judaism"), and Zionism, "Judaic" disarms the familiar accusation of Jew hate and the special aura of victimhood surrounding that term, which is mined to maximum effect by those who claim its mantle.

Not everyone agrees with my strategy and this is to be expected. Anything new is often attacked and can make those who are stuck in a rut very uncomfortable. They are accustomed to their rut, it is cozy and familiar. They cannot envision a significant advance unless it involves the coming to power of a charismatic national leader of their persuasion. If that scenario isn't realized, they are stranded in limbo while the enemies of truth take command.

To what extent are antisemitism accusations a mask for anti-goyimism? 

The Hoffman Center for the Study of Anti-Goyimism approaches these problems in an entirely new way. First, the Center directs a vigorous offense, rather than a retreating defense. Second, it possesses the energy of an original idea made concrete: how do we account for Judaism's hatred for the goyim (i.e. the non-Judaic nations)? How does this hatred manifest in politics, society, culture, education, business and world affairs? 

The Hoffman Center studies a pivotal question: to what extent are antisemitism accusations a mask for anti-goyimism? 

In playwright David Mamet's new book announcing his conversion to the Right wing, The Secret Knowledge: On the Dismantling of American Culture (http://t.co/2GK08VE), the English people are besmirched as possessing an almost genetic strain of antisemitism. Years ago, Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Shamir declared that Polish people imbibe antisemitism in their mother's breast milk. These hateful characterizations of the English and the Poles reflect the general contempt and bigotry of the Gemara, Mishnah Torah, Shulchan Aruch and Mishnah Berurah for the goyim, yet they are put forth and gain legitimacy as part of an alleged fight against bigotry.

The Hoffman Center aims to expose this hoodwink with facts and documents, not just generalized rhetoric about the Talmud. When the Hoffman Center states that the rabbinic texts teach that goyim are lower than dogs, we will prove our contention chapter and verse. Of course it will be said that we took the texts "out of context." We are prepared to deflate that Pavlovian defense and show with massive documentation that goyim have a status beneath that of dogs in Orthodox Judaism -- and that's far from the only racist dehumanization to which goyim are subjected in the holy books of Chazal (the founding "sages" of Judaism).

Here is the one-way prerogative of the Talmudic mentality: entitlement to bash our eminent authors with the "anti-semite" cudgel, while we respond on the defensive. Our defensive response has been a failure. I'm sick of failure!

Anthony Julius was Deborah Lipstadt's lawyer in historian David Irving's libel suit against her. Mr. Julius is the author of a recent book, Trials of the Diaspora: A History of Anti-Semitism (http://tinyurl.com/3u6qp2l). In its pages he defames Chaucer, Shakespeare and Dickens, among others. His book was reviewed with fulsome praise by the Yale University literary critic Harold Bloom, who wrote: "Julius links anti-Semitism to sadism. He might have done even more with this, since sado-masochism is something of an English vice, and is so much a school-experience of the upper social class." 

An English vice. To say that Shylock's usury or Fagin's fencing of stolen goods are "Judaic vices" is nothing less than rabid Shakespearean and Dickensian antisemitism according to Julius, yet Bloom feels entitled to stigmatize the English as sadomasochist, as a nation which derives pleasure from extreme cruelty. 

As one of the Holy People, Mr. Bloom can libel the English nation with impunity, while the profound insights of Chaucer, Shakespeare and Dickens constitute an "immemorial stench" (Bloom), out of a "sewer" (Julius). 

In his chapter on "The Mentality of Modern English Anti-Semitism," Mr. Julius presents what Prof. Bloom terms, "the puzzle of what appears to be an incessant prejudice, never to be dispelled." 

The concept of goyim harboring never-to-be-dispelled prejudice toward Judaics is a troglodyte dogma taught to bochurim (yeshiva boys). They are indoctrinated from an early age to believe that any opposition to the religion of Judaism is irrational (based on no legitimate grievance) and ineradicable, the assumption being that all opposition to Judaism reflects a hereditary gentile predisposition toward hatred of the Holy People. 

This traditional rabbinic brainwash is expressed as follows: "Halacha hi beyoduah she'Eisav soneh l'Yaakov" ("It is a given law: it is known that Esau hates Jacob;" cf. Judaism Discovered, pp. 463-466). 

Despite their morally superior liberal pretensions, Julius and Bloom are steeped in 2,000 years of Talmudic anti-gentile darkness.

The purpose of The Hoffman Center for the Study of Anti-Goyimism is to elucidate this stream in western académe and media and track the tail of the serpent of hatred and prejudice to its clandestine root in Judaism.


Personnel: one (so far).

Resources: letterhead printed with the name The Hoffman Center for the Study of Anti-Goyimism.

That's it, for now, at least in material terms.

I can dream, can't I?

The Vision

Our starting point: planting the seed of this vision. 

At present, to be honest, there is little chance that my Center will become a brick and mortar institute in the near future, yet I didn't want to live my life without at least sowing in as many minds as I could, this idea whose time has come; one that has incubated in my soul for many years.

So there you have it: merely a letterhead entity envisioned by a dreamer.

Someday, perhaps sooner rather than later, God will see fit to attract support for this dream. If not in my lifetime then in that of the next generation, this Center will become a truly realized venture  -- the axis upon which the most virulent racism that ever arose in the annals of time, will finally have its human rights mask torn away, heralding a new birth of freedom for the people of the West.

Suggestions and Resources for Truth Activists
E-MAIL: hoffman[at]revisionisthistory.org

PRAY for us: John 15:16

PURCHASE a revisionist history book, newsletter, CD or DVD:


PUBLICIZE our website: 

Receive these columns by e-mail:
send "Subscribe me" to