Welcome Information Connoisseurs

Welcome Information Connoisseurs

Tuesday, June 30, 2020

Assessing Mikael Nilsson’s critique of Jordan Peterson

Exposing Jordan Peterson’s Barrage of Revisionist Falsehoods About Hitler and Nazism

By Mikael Nilsson
Mr. Nilsson is a Swedish historian. His latest book Hitler Redux: The Incredible History of Hitler’s So-Called Table Talks, will be out from Routledge in the fall of this year
My assessments follow quotes from Mr. Nilsson's article published in the Israeli newspaper, Haaretz
—Michael Hoffman

Nilsson: "Peterson’s endless barrage of falsehoods includes the outrageous claim that “Hitler was elected” and “by a large majority too. It was a landslide vote; the kind of vote that no modern democratic leader ever gets.” Hitler was not elected, and the NSDAP never received more than 37.27 percent in a free election (in July 1932). A small camarilla of conservative politicians, led by Franz von Papen, convinced President Hindenburg to appoint Hitler as Chancellor in a coalition cabinet."


Nilsson:"Hitler’s Table Talk - 1941–1944 insects are only mentioned twice, once in relation to the Russian people. Furthermore, Hitler’s Table Talk  does not contain Hitler’s words verbatim. It is a collection of edited notes made largely from memory and it has to be treated with the critical skepticism that such a source demands."


Nilsson: "Peterson has repeatedly claimed that Hitler was just 'the mouthpiece of the collective unconscious of the German people.' He says Hitler developed his ideology through a trial-and-error process whereby he kept saying what caused a good response as he was, partly unwittingly, “being molded by the crowd”; he acted out 'the dark desire of the mob.' There is no evidence that supports any of this. And it, too, comes dangerously close to Hitler apologetics." 


Nilsson: "And it is mirrored in his equally misinformed idea that basically all Germans participated in the Holocaust, and that almost every human being has the potential to be a Nazi or even a Hitler. Why is this so pernicious? Because blame placed everywhere is blame placed nowhere."


Nilsson: "And Peterson’s claim ignores the inconvenient truth that many Germans – not least many Jews and Marxists – resisted Hitler. The fact that Peterson systematically ignores those heroes and ordinary people of conscience (who often died fighting the Nazis) is problematic. It suggests some kind of collective rather than individual agency, which ends up flattening Hitler’s own agency and responsibility." 


Nilsson:"Most Germans were not fervent card-carrying Nazis. Any serious historian would state that without Hitler there would have been no Holocaust."

Only partly true. If Goebbels had led Germany, Judaic people would have been mass murdered, and perhaps in even greater numbers than Hitler perpetrated. The same would have probably been true if Heydrich or Alfred Rosenberg had been in charge. A tiny Nazi clique shared Hitler’s criminal eliminationist views of Judaic people. Beyond that handful, mass murder would have been unlikely.  

Read my book, Adolf Hitler: Enemy of the German People.

Nilsson:"Peterson has a long history of equivocating between Nazism and Communism, and suggesting an absolute equivalence between Nazi death camps and, for instance, the Soviet gulag camps. He seems unable to really see the very crucial differences, perhaps blinded by his equally manifest hostile obsession with what he calls “cultural Marxism” or the “postmodern neo-Marxists.”   The railing against “cultural Marxism” (a phrase with a long antisemitic history) is of course something that Peterson, unfortunately, has in common with Hitler and the Nazis. It is his blind spot, and to what degree this hatred of Marxism has influenced his analysis and understanding of Hitler and National Socialism is unknown. 

(End quote. Read more at www.haaretz.com)

The last paragraph quoted from Nilsson is nearly totally false. This is Communist dogma: if you’re a critic of Marxism or Soviet mass murder it is alleged that you have something in common with Hitler, who was also a (sometime) critic. (Hitler briefly served in a Marxist government in Munich).

If you dissent from cultural Marxism, i.e. the anti-family dictatorship exerted by radical feminism, you’re "anti-semitic.” 

And according to Nilsson, "hatred of Marxism" is a "blind spot.” 

All of the preceding statements are absurd. 

Many anti-Nazis, particularly Polish Catholics who valiantly fought Hitler and the Nazis, detested Marxism and rightly so, as do even those honest Leftists who are disgusted by Karl Marx’s underhanded deprecation and libels against, for example, Pierre Proudhon. 

Mr. Nilsson makes some valid points concerning Hitler’s record and Jordan Peterson’s sloppy disregard for certain facts, but Nilsson is in danger of seriously detracting from his credibility with his doctrinaire Marxism. Nothing feeds the alt-right narrative like a double-standard. Defeating neo-Nazism requires the avoidance of any appearance of biased political partisanship.

There is the whiff of the thought cop in Nilsson’s writing. For instance, he turns the phrase “revisionist history” into a pejorative. Why is that? Moreover, he regards the failure to sufficiently employ the “Holocaust” neologism as a sign of sinister thinking. 

Yet he makes no protest over the fact that holocausts that meet the dictionary definition (death by fire), such as occurred in the bombing of Tokyo, Hiroshima, Nagasaki, as well as Hamburg, Dresden and nearly every major German city, are almost never termed a holocaust.

Hitler’s reign of evil was a disaster for not only Judaic and other targeted people, but for Germans and Germany, and one can find unbiased, reliable evidence for these facts in Adolf Hitler: Enemy of the German People.

Saturday, June 20, 2020

Freemason Albert Pike’s Graven Image Toppled

Freemasonry’s “Supreme Commander”
Albert Pike’s Graven Image 
Toppled into the Dust

On the eve of the Summer Solstice, the  graven image of Albert Pike, the chief of 19th century Freemasonry and Satanism in America, has fallen and burned in Washington D.C. 

Read more: Our complete report has been published in the July issue of Revisionist History® newsletter 

Friday, June 12, 2020

Will Freemason Albert Pike’s Statue be removed?

Will Freemason Albert Pike’s Statue be Removed in Washington D.C?

By Michael Hoffman

In the Soviet-like frenzy to erase historical memory and generate amnesia, Nancy Pelosi’s Congress is hellbent on pulverizing the remembrance of things past. 

The move is on to raze every statue to a Confederate in Washington D.C., which begs the question, will Albert Pike’s monument also fall?

Pike was a Confederate general and the Supreme Commander of the Scottish Rite of Freemasonry Southern Jurisdiction, the most powerful masonic organization on earth. 

His book, Morals and Dogma espoused Satanism. 

Hundreds of thousands of whites were (and are) his disciples. 

His statue in our nation's capitol honors Satanism, which probably means that the diabolic U.S. Congress, recognizing a fellow-traveler, might leave it untouched, even while it razes other statues.

Our proposal: keep Pike’s monument intact. Place a plaque prominently next to it containing the statement: "This statue to a masonic Satanist testifies to the hold a powerful secret society has exerted over our nation.”

Freemasonry is Kabbalism for Goyim

Revisionist history reveals that Kabbalism was first infiltrated into the West in "Catholic" Florence in the late 15th century. You will search in vain for a Renaissance or post-Renaissance papal encyclical condemning it. Pope Leo XIII's famous denunciation of Masonry carefully avoided Kabbalah, which is tantamount to writing about the origin of the automobile without mentioning the internal combustion engine. 

From Pico della Mirandola to Cardinal Henri de Lubac, for more than five hundred years the Church of Rome has been the deep cover center for Kabbalism among the goyim

Pike's satanic Freemasonry was ancillary fungus, generated by a far deeper, papal rot. Natural slaves (see Aristotle's tripartite division of humanity), will never be able to handle these radical truths. True sons and daughters of Augustine, Aquinas and Dante, will. 

Read The Occult Renaissance Church of Rome for the documentation. 

Tuesday, June 02, 2020

Archbishop Viganò protests Freemasonry and Pope Francis

Archbishop Viganò protests the One-world religion of Freemasonry and the “infernal” Pope Francis

By Michael Hoffman


Last May 8,  Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò released an “Appeal for the Church and the world to Catholics and all people of good will,” which was also signed by Cardinal Gerhard Müller, former Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, and several other cardinals and bishops. In it, he said there is “reason to believe, on the basis of official data on the incidence of the epidemic as related to the number of deaths, that there are powers interested in creating panic among the world’s population with the sole aim of permanently imposing unacceptable forms of restriction on freedoms, of controlling people and of tracking their movements. The imposition of these illiberal measures is a disturbing prelude to the realization of a world government beyond all control.” 

Michael Hoffman's comment: In my opinion every word of the preceding is true, and commendable.


Archbishop Viganò also mentioned in a May 29 letter “the top levels of the Hierarchy” (who are) “openly placing themselves at the service of the Prince of this world, adopting the demands made by the United Nations for the globalist agenda, Masonic brotherhood, Malthusian ecologism, immigrationism.”

He argued that “a single world religion without dogmas or morals, according to the wishes of Freemasonry” is currently being created. Speaking of Pope Francis, Viganò said “it is obvious that Bergoglio, along with those who are behind him and support him, aspires to preside over this infernal parody of the Church of Christ.” 

Michael Hoffman's comment: 

Archbishop Viganò has been living in hiding, allegedly in fear of assassination, since his August 2018 letter accusing Pope Francis of not enforcing the sanctions placed upon then-Cardinal Theodore McCarrick, a homosexual predator whose crimes were facilitated by recent popes.

The question to ask is whether the archbishop is as naive and unschooled as he appears. Can we trust him? Is he for real or playing a part in the ancient Vatican game of good cop/bad cop and Right/Left dialectic, whereby seeming opposites are actually serving the same Master? 

We pose the question because in resurrecting the old Leo XIII rhetoric against Freemasonry, Viganò compounds the errors of omission which Leo himself propagated. Freemasonry is in fact the offspring of the Church of Rome's revolutionary Renaissance occultism. It grew out of the prisca theologia of the Neoplatonic-Hermeticism and Kabbalism which arose in the Church beginning in Florence in the 15th century, under Medici patronage, and was never dislodged

In this writer’s book, The Occult Renaissance Church of Rome, the documentation is presented for those who have eyes to see. For now we will point to Pope Leo's glaring omission: he cited Freemasonry as the opponent of the Church, but as all competent students of the occult know, Freemasonry in its essence is Kabbalism. About Kabbalism Leo XIII said nothing in his encyclicals contra Masonry. How could Leo and his army of Catholic scholars with access to the legendary Vatican archives, have missed the elephant in the room? Was this simply a mistake, or an indication of the deep cover and protection which Rome has afforded the Kabbalistic theology for more than 500 years?

Sincere campaigners on the Left who oppose usury banking and money worship in Rome, see in Right-wing figures like Viganò the possibility of a hidden hand of sponsorship by reactionary occult forces, such as the Knights of Malta, as well as Italian racketeers who desire to keep the usurious Vatican Bank functioning as their private money laundry. 

We do not know that the archbishop is culpable for any of the preceding. He is, however, guilty of manifesting grotesque ignorance of masonic origins, which are to be found in the Renaissance Church itself. Until that fact is known, Viganò's protests are a band-aid and little more. At this late hour, to work successfully for victory requires the articulation of radical truth.

I will address a familiar objection: "Oh, but Hoffman, the Freemasons despise the Church." 

Correct. Like Pepsi despises Coke, IBM despises Microsoft, and Ford detests Toyota. This rivalry does not signal they are not all working for the same objective — commerce — the marketing of products (soda pop, computers and vehicles) in the acquisitive competition to gain the most profit. 

Freemasonry is a Thelemic Counter-Church, competing with the Church of Rome for members and power. In itself, the rivalry between the two is no proof that they do not serve the same Master. 

When the Gambino crime family made war on the Genovese crime family did it signify that one faction was opposed to the Mafia? No, of course not. They were both mafia, contesting for money and power. 

The same is true of the “war” between the post-Renaissance Church of Rome and the masonic lodge. Don’t believe it? Study the 723 pages of The Occult Renaissance Church of Rome. Don’t have the time or inclination? In that case, your lassitude and incomprehension disqualify you from the debate. Opposition to our research predicated on obstinate ignorance does not persuade or impress.

Furthermore, over the course of more than five centuries, from the pontificate of Alexander VI to that of Francis,  the secret theology of that "infernal parody of the Church of Christ” — the post-Renaissance papacy — is the gnostic belief that all religions descend from a single primal truth. 

One World masonic conspiracy inherited its syncretism from the Renaissance "Catholicism" that clandestinely spread it among the upper echelons of the hierarchy and intelligentsia. True believers too pious or lethargic to investigate this harsh truth are cursed (2 Thess. 2:9-12), to continue to play bit parts in the solve et cogaula psychodrama now enveloping the West.

Copyright ©MMXX by Independent History and Research 

For further research: