Welcome Information Connoisseurs

Welcome Information Connoisseurs

Saturday, July 04, 2020

Concept of freedom for every human was born in the U.S. July 4

The Concept of Freedom for Every Human Being was born in these United States on July 4, 1776

"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. 

 The Declaration of Independence

The freedom that Washington, Jefferson and the other patriots sowed eventually lifted all boats. It took time, but the concept of freedom for every human  endowed by God and irrevocable by government   was born in these United States on July 4, 1776

Whether they were deists or orthodox believers, this emancipation of man and woman derived from a milieu saturated in principles of Gospel liberty. Freedom was born in the minds of Americans who, from cradle to grave, inhabited a society and culture where the struggle to have “No King but Jesus,” resonated with the power of a dynamo. 

By Michael Hoffman
Copyright©2020. All Rights Reserved

The recent upheaval in our streets has sometimes been dubbed the “1619” protests in a tip of the hat to the “1619 Project” published by the New York Times, which is woefully inadequate as history. For example, the 1619 Project suppresses the significant Judaic part in the enslavement of black people. The magisterial three volume history penned by black scholars that does study these matters, The Secret Relationship Between Blacks and Jews, was banned by Amazon during Black History Month, in February, 2019.

When it takes up the ideology of white supremacy, the "1619 Project omits all mention of the pivotal influence of the rabbinic Midrash and Rabbi Moses Maimonides in shaping savagely racist Judaic and gentile attitudes which dehumanized black people and furnished the specious justification for their brutalization in the holocaust that constituted the black experience of slavery in the United States

The rabbinic Midrash consigns black people to the role of inevitable enslavement as a matter of divinely established heredity (nowhere does the Bible say this). 

Maimonides, for whom countless buildings in America are named and whose marble plaque hangs in a place of honor in the halls of Congress, taught that black people are “irrational animals” and “lower than human” in his celebrated text, Guide of the Perplexed.

Thomas Jefferson on the History of White Slavery

Jefferson’s views on slavery were drawn from the classical world of Greece and Rome, where in many cases the majority of the slaves were white. In his Notes on the State of Virginia (1781) Jefferson wrote of the history of the oppression of white slaves (p. 151): 

“...in this country the slaves multiply as fast as the free inhabitants. Their situation and manners place the commerce between the two sexes almost without restraint. The same Cato, on a principle of economy, always sold his sick and superannuated slaves. He gives it as a standing precept to a master visiting his farm, to sell his old oxen, old wagons, old tools, old and diseased servants, and every thing else become useless...It was the common practice to expose in the island of Aesculapius, in the Tyber, diseased slaves, whose cure was like to become tedious….

“We are told of a certain Vedius Pollio, who, in the presence of Augustus, would have given a slave as food to his fish (fed his slave to the fish), for having broken a glass. With the Romans, the regular method of taking the evidence of their slaves was under torture….When a master was murdered, all his slaves, in the same house, or within hearing, were condemned to death….they were of the race of whites. 

“That a change in the relations in which a man is placed should change his ideas of moral right and wrong, is neither new, nor peculiar to the color of the blacks. Homer tells us it was so 2600 years ago... ‘Jove fix’d it certain, that whatever day makes man a slave, takes half his worth away.’ But the slaves of which Homer speaks were whites.” 

We cannot fully or adequately comprehend slavery in America without 1. taking into account the complacency with which the Founders viewed the enslavement of whites in antiquity and 2. without considering the extent to which Queen Elizabeth I’s empire established the buying and selling of sub-Saharan Africans as an important base of the economy. Let us recall too that Elizabeth was steeped in Renaissance Kabbalism, under the influence of her Protestant “Astrologer Royal” John Dee, the British empire’s occult founder.

Jefferson’s Ethics vs. the Barbarism of Maimonides

Undoubtedly Jefferson’s racist assessment of the intellectual and moral disabilities of black Africans played a key part in the acceptance of their bondage. Compared to Maimonides however, our future third president made that assessment reluctantly, with many qualifications, and one could almost say, in the fear of God: 

Notes on the State of Virginia, p. 153: “The opinion, that they are inferior in the faculties of reason and imagination, must be hazarded with great dissidence. To justify a general conclusion, requires many observations...let me add too, as a circumstance of great tenderness, where our conclusion would degrade a whole race of men from the rank in the scale of beings which their Creator may perhaps have given them. 

“To our reproach it must be said, that though for a century and a half we have had under our eyes the races of black and of red men, they have never yet been viewed by us as subjects of natural history. 

“I advance it therefore as a suspicion only, that the blacks, whether originally a distinct race, or made distinct by time and circumstances, are inferior to the whites in the endowments both of body and mind” (p. 153).

“Hazarded with great dissidence...as a circumstance of great tenderness...I advance it therefore as a suspicion only” 

Jefferson is not establishing a dogma, he is thinking aloud, while making allowance for error and in the fear of daring to do as Rabbi Maimonides did and deny to black people the Imago Dei:

 “... as a circumstance of great tenderness, where our conclusion would degrade a whole race of men from the rank in the scale of beings which their Creator may perhaps have given them.”

There is no foundation in the preceding statement by which the evil Ku Klux Klan praxis, Seedline Identity theology, or neo-Nazi hatred can build a white racist imperium upon. Jefferson’s early views, in 1781, were not intended as doctrine. This intellectual of the Christian Enlightenment wrote his words mindful that they were conditional upon his further observation and study, as we discover when we read the letter he penned in 1809 to Henri Gregoire Washington: 

“I have received the favor of your letter of August 17th, and with it the volume you were so kind as to send me on the Literature of Negroes. Be assured that no person living wishes more sincerely than I do, to see a complete refutation of the doubts I have myself entertained and expressed on the grade of understanding allotted to them by nature, and to find that in this respect they are on a par with ourselves. My doubts were the result of personal observation on the limited sphere of my own State, where the opportunities for the development of their genius were not favorable, and those of exercising it still less so. 

"I expressed them therefore with great hesitation; but whatever be their degree of talent it is no measure of their rights. Because Sir Isaac Newton was superior to others in understanding, he was not therefore lord of the person or property of others. 

"On this subject they (black people) are gaining daily in the opinions of nations, and hopeful advances are making towards their re-establishment on an equal footing with the other colors of the human family. I pray you therefore to accept my thanks for the many instances you have enabled me to observe of respectable intelligence in that race of men, which cannot fail to have effect in hastening the day of their relief; and to be assured of the sentiments of high and just esteem and consideration which I tender to yourself with all sincerity” (emphasis supplied).

To make a cartoon of American history and cast Thomas Jefferson as a “hate-filled, evil white supremacist” who deserves to have his statues dynamited and his Declaration of Independence burned, is the kind of sheer bad faith and ill will of the sort the Bolsheviks visited with similar erasures and rewrites upon Russia. 

The conceit that people living in 1781 were required to exhibit the suffocating political correctness of 2020 lest they otherwise stand accused of monstrous iniquity, is a species of stupidity so abysmal it could only have been concocted on our Orwellian college campuses, corporate boardrooms and the dens of government bureaucrats. 

Let a competent team of historians survey the attitudes toward labor and bondage in 1776 or 1781 of the rabbis of Judaism, the imams of Islam, the chieftains of the Congo and the mandarins of China, and see how many Jeffersons they find among them. Precious few, we’ll warrant.

The freedom that Washington, Jefferson and the other patriots sowed eventually lifted all boats. It took time, but the concept of freedom for every human was born in these United States on July 4, 1776

Whether deists or orthodox believers, this emancipation of man and woman derived from a milieu saturated in principles of Gospel liberty. Freedom was born in America derived not from the Talmud or the Quran, the Bhagavad Gita or Buddha. It was the gift of minds who from cradle to grave inhabited a society and culture where the struggle to have “No King but Jesus,” resonated with the power of a dynamo. 

It was in the air. It was on the printed page. It was inescapable. Colonial and early America were Bible-literate societies to an astonishing degree. America’s gift of the idea of liberty evolved into a framework for gradually achieving freedom for all. 

On the steps of the ladder of liberation the first to gain the benefits of liberty were the free white yeomanry of America, then the enslaved (“indentured”) whites, and decades later, enslaved blacks. The second step has been almost completely erased from our nation’s history. For years this writer has been gathering new research material for a sequel to our book, They Were White and They Were Slaves. Most of this recent research testifies to the fact that the condition of whites in bondage was even more severe and more enduring than what we first detailed in our book. 

One must dig deeply in the archives because white slaves are nearly always mislabeled “servants.” Recently we found a military law imposed in 1756 on the American colonies by King George II (1683-1760), entitled, “An Act for the Better Recruiting of His Majesty’s Forces.” It was promulgated from Boston. Under this act, white slaves were seized from their owners and forced into the Redcoat’s army. 

How do we know they were slaves and not servants? By reading the protest of their owners against the king’s law, such as in Pennsylvania where the opposition was worded in terms of the army’s conscription of “a great number of bought servants.” 

The objection was to the interference with the legal property and rights of the owners of the whites in bondage, constituting a “manifest and grievous injustice.” To distinguish themselves from their white slaves, their petition was signed “the Freemen.” (Humble Address of the Representatives of the Freemen of Pennsylvania [to Lt. Governor Robert Hunter Morris], February 11, 1756).

After the American Revolution the British Crown could no longer dump white slaves in America under the “Transportation” of “felons” laws. These “felons” subject to capital punishment or enslavement in the colonies, were often English male and female shoplifters who had pilfered food or clothing, or poachers who had killed a deer or a hare on an aristocrat’s property. After 1786 they were shipped to “Botany Bay” (Australia). Their white skin did not prevent the merciless suffering inflicted upon them. 

Their enslavement is concealed by the juggling of words. Like the American white slaves misnamed servants, our potential outrage is mollified by the application of the term “convicts” to the white slaves of Australia. Approximately 160,000 were transported and placed in bondage in Australia, or Van Diemen’s Land (present day Tasmania). 

These “convicts” performed slave labor, and the females among them often toiled under the additional penalty of suffering enforced whoredom. These whites were regularly whipped. At the dreaded white slave camp of Port Arthur in Tasmania they were used as beasts of burden to pull passengers in a railway. 

In the face of these revisionist facts we find ourselves overwhelmed with contempt at the liberals’ idea that all the white people in that era were members of the “Master Race,” possessed of “white skin privilege.” To have credibility this hoax must exclude all considerations of class in the British empire, wherein destitute and indigent whites were regarded as a barely human, hereditarily tainted class. 

We know the identity of the members of the Master Class then and now, and they are not and never were white Christian slaves and paupers. 

This essay originally appeared in Revisionist History® no. 104 (September, 2019). Subscribe here.

Michael Hoffman is a professional historian and the author of nine books. His new history of the ruling class war on its own people, Hanging Poor Whites, is due for publication in early 2022.

Tuesday, June 30, 2020

Assessing Mikael Nilsson’s critique of Jordan Peterson

Exposing Jordan Peterson’s Barrage of Revisionist Falsehoods About Hitler and Nazism

By Mikael Nilsson
Mr. Nilsson is a Swedish historian. His latest book Hitler Redux: The Incredible History of Hitler’s So-Called Table Talks, will be out from Routledge in the fall of this year
My assessments follow quotes from Mr. Nilsson's article published in the Israeli newspaper, Haaretz
—Michael Hoffman

Nilsson: "Peterson’s endless barrage of falsehoods includes the outrageous claim that “Hitler was elected” and “by a large majority too. It was a landslide vote; the kind of vote that no modern democratic leader ever gets.” Hitler was not elected, and the NSDAP never received more than 37.27 percent in a free election (in July 1932). A small camarilla of conservative politicians, led by Franz von Papen, convinced President Hindenburg to appoint Hitler as Chancellor in a coalition cabinet."


Nilsson:"Hitler’s Table Talk - 1941–1944 insects are only mentioned twice, once in relation to the Russian people. Furthermore, Hitler’s Table Talk  does not contain Hitler’s words verbatim. It is a collection of edited notes made largely from memory and it has to be treated with the critical skepticism that such a source demands."


Nilsson: "Peterson has repeatedly claimed that Hitler was just 'the mouthpiece of the collective unconscious of the German people.' He says Hitler developed his ideology through a trial-and-error process whereby he kept saying what caused a good response as he was, partly unwittingly, “being molded by the crowd”; he acted out 'the dark desire of the mob.' There is no evidence that supports any of this. And it, too, comes dangerously close to Hitler apologetics." 


Nilsson: "And it is mirrored in his equally misinformed idea that basically all Germans participated in the Holocaust, and that almost every human being has the potential to be a Nazi or even a Hitler. Why is this so pernicious? Because blame placed everywhere is blame placed nowhere."


Nilsson: "And Peterson’s claim ignores the inconvenient truth that many Germans – not least many Jews and Marxists – resisted Hitler. The fact that Peterson systematically ignores those heroes and ordinary people of conscience (who often died fighting the Nazis) is problematic. It suggests some kind of collective rather than individual agency, which ends up flattening Hitler’s own agency and responsibility." 


Nilsson:"Most Germans were not fervent card-carrying Nazis. Any serious historian would state that without Hitler there would have been no Holocaust."

Only partly true. If Goebbels had led Germany, Judaic people would have been mass murdered, and perhaps in even greater numbers than Hitler perpetrated. The same would have probably been true if Heydrich or Alfred Rosenberg had been in charge. A tiny Nazi clique shared Hitler’s criminal eliminationist views of Judaic people. Beyond that handful, mass murder would have been unlikely.  

Read my book, Adolf Hitler: Enemy of the German People.

Nilsson:"Peterson has a long history of equivocating between Nazism and Communism, and suggesting an absolute equivalence between Nazi death camps and, for instance, the Soviet gulag camps. He seems unable to really see the very crucial differences, perhaps blinded by his equally manifest hostile obsession with what he calls “cultural Marxism” or the “postmodern neo-Marxists.”   The railing against “cultural Marxism” (a phrase with a long antisemitic history) is of course something that Peterson, unfortunately, has in common with Hitler and the Nazis. It is his blind spot, and to what degree this hatred of Marxism has influenced his analysis and understanding of Hitler and National Socialism is unknown. 

(End quote. Read more at www.haaretz.com)

The last paragraph quoted from Nilsson is nearly totally false. This is Communist dogma: if you’re a critic of Marxism or Soviet mass murder it is alleged that you have something in common with Hitler, who was also a (sometime) critic. (Hitler briefly served in a Marxist government in Munich).

If you dissent from cultural Marxism, i.e. the anti-family dictatorship exerted by radical feminism, you’re "anti-semitic.” 

And according to Nilsson, "hatred of Marxism" is a "blind spot.” 

All of the preceding statements are absurd. 

Many anti-Nazis, particularly Polish Catholics who valiantly fought Hitler and the Nazis, detested Marxism and rightly so, as do even those honest Leftists who are disgusted by Karl Marx’s underhanded deprecation and libels against, for example, Pierre Proudhon. 

Mr. Nilsson makes some valid points concerning Hitler’s record and Jordan Peterson’s sloppy disregard for certain facts, but Nilsson is in danger of seriously detracting from his credibility with his doctrinaire Marxism. Nothing feeds the alt-right narrative like a double-standard. Defeating neo-Nazism requires the avoidance of any appearance of biased political partisanship.

There is the whiff of the thought cop in Nilsson’s writing. For instance, he turns the phrase “revisionist history” into a pejorative. Why is that? Moreover, he regards the failure to sufficiently employ the “Holocaust” neologism as a sign of sinister thinking. 

Yet he makes no protest over the fact that holocausts that meet the dictionary definition (death by fire), such as occurred in the bombing of Tokyo, Hiroshima, Nagasaki, as well as Hamburg, Dresden and nearly every major German city, are almost never termed a holocaust.

Hitler’s reign of evil was a disaster for not only Judaic and other targeted people, but for Germans and Germany, and one can find unbiased, reliable evidence for these facts in Adolf Hitler: Enemy of the German People.

Saturday, June 20, 2020

Freemason Albert Pike’s Graven Image Toppled

Freemasonry’s “Supreme Commander
Albert Pike’s Graven Image 
Toppled into the Dust

On the eve of the Summer Solstice, the  graven image of Albert Pike, the chief of 19th century Freemasonry and Satanism in America, has fallen and burned in Washington D.C.  

This could not have happened in decades past. 

Hallelujah! Satan’s kingdom is falling. 

 Michael Hoffman

We have received objections from readers to the preceding jubilation. One man wrote, "The image of Pike’s fallen statue wasn't toppled by those protesting against Satanism and the NWO. It was toppled by brainwashed millennial, Marxist-trained college kids who are leading us into the NWO!

Another stated, "The rabble who tore it down most likely don’t have a clue about the Masonic associations. To them it’s just another toppled statue of an oppressive 'dead white male' which needed to be done away with as part of the drive to usher in the revolutionary aims of the Left." 

But that’s not the point. 

The point is the humiliating optics for the masonic Cryptocracy

Albert Pike was Supreme Commander of the Scottish Rite of Freemasonry, Southern Jurisdiction, the most powerful masonic organization on earth. 

His Satanic magnum opus, Morals and Dogma, was read by hundreds of thousands of white Masons.

In Morals and Dogma, Pike detailed the true god—or should we say gods—of the Freemasons—the demon deities of ancient Egypt:
"...the BLAZING STAR...Originally it represented SIRIUS, or the Dog-star, the forerunner of the inundation of the Nile; the God ANUBIS, companion of ISIS in her search for the body of OSIRIS, her brother and husband. Then it became the image of HORUS, the son of OSIRIS, himself symbolized also by the Sun, the author of the Seasons, and the God of Time; Son of ISIS, who was the universal nature, himself the primitive matter, inexhaustible source of Life, spark of uncreated fire, universal seed of all beings. It was HERMES, also, the Master of Learning, whose name in Greek is that of the God Mercury. It became the sacred and potent sign or character of the Magi, the PENTALPHA, and is the significant emblem of Liberty and Freedom, blazing with a steady radiance amid the sweltering elements of good and evil of Revolutions, and promising serene skies and fertile seasons to the nations, after the storms of change and tumult… 
"The Blazing Star in our Lodges, we have already said, represent Sirius, Anubis, or Mercury (Hermes), Guardian and Guide of Souls…by its genial influence dispenses  blessings to mankind."  
 Furthermore, Pike's loathing for black people is undeniable. Writing in his Memphis Daily Appeal newspaper, he referred to “the abuse of the privilege of voting by 50,000 ignorant negroes…Tennessee will not always bear the disgrace of negroism.” 

In Pike's poem “Ariel,” in stanzas XXI,  XXII and XXXIX he evinces his vociferous support for the enslavement of black people.

(For the history of Judeo-masonic support for slavery, the Confederacy and the Klan, cf. The Secret Relationship Between Blacks and Jews, volumes 1-3).

Unlike in times past, on June 19 the “Invisible Empire” was unable to keep Albert Pike’s icon from toppling into the dust, in flames. For a symbol-obsessed cabal once supreme in America, this national humiliation is an ominous portent

Freemason-Satanist Albert Pike’s statue was toppled and set afire in Washington D.C. June 19. In 70 A.D. Titus the pagan razed Jerusalem to the ground, fulfilling the Divine Will. Something similar may have occurred with Pike’s graven image, toppled by pagans A.D. 2020. 

Deuteronomy 7:5: “ But thus shall you deal with them: you shall...burn their carved images with fire.

Burning was an Old Testament prescription for idols, implemented by Moses, as well as Asa, Josiah and Jehu. Pikes idol, erected by the Supreme Council" of Freemasons in 1901, stood in a place of honor in our nationcapitol for 119 years and would have probably stood for another 119 years were it up to Churchianity's disgusting poseurs, who rake in the bucks masquerading as Upholders of the Word of God. It was anarchists who fulfilled Deuteronomy 7:5 and 12:1-3, as well as Exodus 20:4, 32:20 and 34:13, not church ministers or those in Holy Orders. No Savonarola emerged from among their complacent, well-fed ranks.

Revolutions devour their own. In 18th century France, Robespierre executed his founding colleague Danton and was, in turn, himself guillotined by his comrades in the French Revolution. Stalin killed hundreds of Judaic Communist leaders who had helped to organize and lead the Bolshevik revolution. 

Now Pike's Thelemic children have coiled and bit their erstwhile patriarch, the celebrated secret society avatar of demonic invasion. 

Twas ever thus. Satan is the enemy of the human race. One of his aliases is בַּעַל זְבוּב, in English, Baal-zebub, "The Lord of the Flies" [cf. David Noel Freedman, The Anchor Yale Bible Dictionary, (1996)]. Read William Golding's eponymous book, or watch the original 1963 movie by Peter Brook. 

At some point there will be a Right-wing reactionary antithesis to the Left-wing revolutionary thesis. 

The antithesis will be backed by "Conservative" and Trump-supporting dupes who can't (or won't) see the hidden hand at work in Trump's white supremacist-Zionism  specifically the rabbinic Midrash on Genesis, as well as the halachic text of Rabbi Moses Maimonides  which have proved to be the primary theological inspiration for the enslavement of black people in the West. A marble icon of Maimonides  is situated in a place of honor in the Chamber of the House of Representatives. The corporate media, and even Black Lives Matter, aren’t concerned.

If the Black Lives Matter people were to emphatically articulate the preceding truths about the Midrash and Maimonides, it would be the start of a real revolution. (This writer conveyed the facts on Maimonides to a seminar of some two hundred black scholars assembled at the Nation of Islam's convention in Chicago, in 2019. To purchase the video of that seminar, see here).

Signs of the Times

Incidentally and for what it's worth, Pike's graven image was toppled into the dirt and burned on June 19, the eve of the Summer Solstice. Over the earth's eastern hemisphere the next day, June 20, coinciding with the Solstice itself, a dramatic solar eclipse was visible, marking perhaps the beginning of the eclipse of the Age of Satan.

Photo of Pike’s fallen statue with a cable-tow rope around its head. It may be a “coincidence” that in Masonry a "cable tow” is hung on the neck of the "Entered Apprentice” initiate. In 1982, Vatican Freemason Roberto Calvi was found hanging from just such a rope under London’s Blackfriars Bridge, in the “ebb and flow of the tides.”

Lastly, don’t be hoodwinked into choosing sides in the phony dialectic process of Left and Right, but rather, “Turn your foot away from evil” (Proverbs 4:27). 

The Right and the Left are both responsible for the ascendance of usury and the reign of the Money Power over humanity. Their vaunted “western civilization” as personified by Winston Churchill, Ludwig von Mises and Albert Pike, is actually western syphilisation. I applaud the fall of the graven images of this usurer’s paradise. May it be a harbinger of the fall of the Cryptocracy itself, which has ruled our nation by assassination, bribery and the massacre of innocents. 

Is it any wonder why many of our youth are angry, however mistaken and misled they may be on many points? They see at least some of the intolerable criminal politics and horrendous financial oppression to which we in our comfortable repose, have accommodated ourselves. We have “waxed cold” (Matthew 24:12). 

The Right-wing is confronting Black Lives Matters and its allies, with issues of freedom of speech and democratic debate. We ask, what freedom, what debate? When not outright supportive, the Right has nonetheless largely been content with the suppression of almost all critical analysis of Israeli war crimes perpetrated on Arabs, along with the systematic Israeli theft of Palestinian land. Furthermore, the vast majority of Rightist pundits exclude from their jeremiads against “the Jacobin censorship,” the draconian censorship of books and videos questioning aspects of World War II Allied dogma. 

With regard to the Israeli state, no radical departure from the Neocon/Zionist party line is permitted in “respectable” American publications or television broadcasts. Journalists and academics who violate this taboo will be out of a job and a reputation. The stench from this decades-long suppression of freedom of speech and open debate has thus far not struck the nostrils of the “Conservatives” who are incensed by the “cancel culture” on the Left. Contemporary “Conservatives” are mostly cowards who conserve nothing of value, except their usury-funded bank accounts.

It’s a shame and disgrace that it took a group of anarchists to remove Pike’s Satanic monument, which had haunted the capitol of the United States of America for more than a century. In Matthew 24: 15-16, referring to the Roman army that would, in the near future, visit God’s justice on the Temple of Jerusalem, Jesus called that army, “the Abomination of Desolation.” A similar “abomination" exacted justice on the graven image of Albert Pike. It could be that God’s hand was in that retributive act as well. His ways are not our ways.

Copyright ©MMXX by Independent History and Research

For further research
Republicans are funding Democratic Congressional candidates