Welcome Information Connoisseurs

Welcome Information Connoisseurs
Showing posts with label Nation of Islam. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Nation of Islam. Show all posts

Wednesday, April 07, 2021

ADL's Defamatory Fantasies about Michael Hoffman

 ADL's Defamatory Fantasies about Michael Hoffman  

April, 2021— The Anti-Defamation League (ADL), among the most persistent advocates of censorship and deplatforming of dissenting scholars, has as of April 4, retailed more disinformation and libel concerning this writer in connection with our remarks about the Capitol attack and Noah Green.


Targets of ADL disinformation should know that the ADL’s hysterical claim that this writer is a “notorious Holocaust denier” (stated twice in two consecutive paragraphs of their press release) —  is a brazen prevarication. ADL trusts that their defamatory smear will not be fact-checked.


 I am the author of the book, Adolf Hitler: Enemy of the German People which the ADL dares not mention in its various supposed objective profiles of this writer. In that book I made abundantly clear the horrible suffering which Judaic people experienced in Hitler’s Third Reich.


Moreover, the following statement by this writer appears on our website: 


“We affirm that Judaic people suffered severe and unconscionable persecution during World War II, including mass murder at the hands of the Nazis. We deplore these crimes and the criminal Nazi ideology which inspired and directed them.”


Those are the words of a “notorious Holocaust denier”?


Only propagandists with little or no respect for the truth would attempt to libel Michael Hoffman with that reputation-destroying calumny in light of my actual views documented in my book and on our website.


My real thought crime in the eyes of the ADL is my sustained criticism of Zionist racism, and hate speech in the Talmud Bavli, which I proffered in books such as The Israeli Holocaust Against the Palestinians, and in the latter case, a heavily footnoted, 1100 page textbook in which my support for the freedom and rights of Judaic people is made manifest. My work is pro-Semitic and pro-Judaic.


Individuals, journalists, corporations and governments who accept the ADL’s false witness, are victims of fraud and misrepresentation. Renowned Prof. Noam Chomsky writes that the ADL is “...one of the ugliest, most powerful pressure groups in the U.S...Its primary commitment is to use any technique, however dishonest and disgraceful, in order to defame and silence and destroy anybody who dares to criticize the Holy State (‘Israel’)."


For myself, I am opposed to every form of hate with every fibre of my being. The movement, led by the ADL, to ban my books and cancel my presence online should be seen for what it is: a partisan political effort to repress a legitimate opposing viewpoint and curtail the contribution my scholarship makes to the advancement of human knowledge.


In the April 4 press release the ADL accused me of writing “antisemitic commentary” about the Capitol attack by Noah Green. 


The authors of the ADL press release are so incompetent that they turned the legitimate question I asked on Twitter, “Did the Cryptocracy choose Good Friday to crucify Louis Farrakhan by pinning today's attack on the Capitol on the Nation of Islam?,” into a declarative: “Hoffman’s posts alleged that a ‘cryptocracy’ facilitated the attack to frame Farrakhan.”


Sorry, ADL, I made no such declaration. I asked if the Cryptocracy intended this. Surely ADL “analysts” can read, and surely they can differentiate between a question mark and a period. They are so unprofessional that they failed to do so. Who is gullible enough to be duped by their falsehood?


Over the years Minister Louis Farrakhan has been the recipient of racist attacks and outrageous misrepresentation of his views. The Establishment media have played a significant role in this ritual, and no less so when Noah Green's attack on Capitol Hill was irresponsibly seized upon as an opportunity to further scapegoat Mr. Farrakhan and provide the Right-wing with a black leader to despise. I added my voice to those of many others who noted that members of Minister Farrakhan's Nation of Islam are non-violent, disarmed, and disapproving of any act such as that taken by Noah Green. These are reasonable insights. I should have the right to offer them on social media without being the subject of obloquy by an infamous thought control organization.


Furthermore, how was my commentary “antisemitic” when I made no mention of Jews or semites?  


My question concerned the “Cryptocracy.” Is the ADL suggesting that the Cryptocracy is synonymous with Jews? I have never said so. In truth, in my book Usury in Christendom, in defense of Judaic persons falsely accused of being the principal instrument of the rise in the Renaissance of usury banking, I said the inverse. But that volume is another of my works which the ADL is loathe to cite. They prefer to confect fantasies and make fools of those who believe them.


Too often the ADL does not deal in facts of the documentary record, choosing to traffic in intimidation and branding. By repeating the lie that this writer is a “notorious Holocaust denier” and withholding my actual beliefs and statements, the ADL hopes to scare any individual or group that is facilitating my access to the free marketplace of ideas, into obstructing it.


The process of demonization of writers is an old and ugly one. I hope that ADL’s role will be seen for what it is, and debate and dialogue in service to freedom of inquiry and the advancement of knowledge, will take the place of witch hunting and dehumanization.


For Further Research


ADL Press Release of April 4


The Real Neo-Nazis by Michael Hoffman


The Forbidden Truth: Cancel Culture and the ADL’s Witch Hunt Against Authors


Books:


Adolf Hitler: Enemy of the German People 


Usury in Christendom: The Mortal Sin that Was and Now is Not


Also:


https://revisionistreview.blogspot.com/2020/03/the-nazis-and-abortion-what-are-facts.html


https://revisionistreview.blogspot.com/2020/02/documenting-hitler-my-dissenting.html


Copyright ©2021 by Michael Hoffman
_________________


Thursday, June 06, 2019

YouTube Bans Two Videos by Michael Hoffman

The New Inquisition Heats Up

In the name of promoting “tolerance," YouTube is helping to establish a dictatorship over the mind of man

By Michael Hoffman
www.RevisionistHistory.org

In censoring and deplatforming dissidents, the Tech Tyrants cite no evidence and allow no appeals. Scholars wrongly accused are simply silenced. There's no due process. All the tyrants need do to suppress revisionist history that they hate is to falsely label it hate speech. The media automatically accept the accusation without investigating it. 


The Google-owned online video-streaming service YouTube has announced a new initiative to ban videos that advance human knowledge in ways that the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) of B’nai B’rith disapproves. This thought policing is being deceitfully painted in the controlled media under false pretenses, as a long overdue clamp-down on "neo-Nazis and white supremacists.” We are none of those things.  


This sweeping and inaccurate generalization is intended to mollify civil libertarians who might otherwise protest the ban if they knew that it is aimed at dissenting and non-conforming journalists and historians — which, in fact, it is. 



Meanwhile, we know of influential rabbis at elite yeshivas in the Israeli state who laud Adolf Hitler yet are not the subject of the latest inquisition, or any scrutiny or negative publicity from the American media. Unknown to the public at large, neo-Nazi ideology is supported by the Establishment without interdiction by YouTube, Facebook or other social media.

On June 5 YouTube banned two of our videos:

 “Deborah Lipstadt, Amalek and David Irving” studying racist denigration and violence against historian Irving,

 and:

 “Academic Freedom and Holocaust Denial Newspeak” — an analysis of Orwellian manipulation of language. 

Knowledge and reason are banned.

This follows Amazon’s ban last August on our book, Judaism’s Strange Gods: Revised and Expanded.

All of these acts of suppression of knowledge are intended to make the world safe for Zionist and Talmudic deception. The Internet was established for the purpose of the advancement of human knowledge. The attempt to demonize radical knowledge will only make that knowledge more attractive to truth-seekers.

YouTube’s censorship bears the hallmarks of a Soviet tribunal. Notice that no quotes from the allegedly offending videos are presented as evidence of “hate.” Why not? Because the raison d’ĂȘtre for our lectures and addresses is the exposure of hatred against marginalized human beings. No contrary evidence need be presented. It is enough that we are accused by the neo-Stalinists. Their accusation makes us guilty. Facts are irrelevant. If this isn’t tyranny, what is?

Yesterday we shipped a case of Judaism’s Strange Gods: Revised and Expanded to Pastor Chuck Baldwin in Montana. His secretary reports that they can’t keep up with the demand. Furthermore, The Nation of Islam is producing a 50 minute anti-racist video consisting of a seminar hosted by their distinguished Historical Research Department featuring this writer's intensive talk analyzing the Talmud and other racist rabbinic texts, to a gathering of some two hundred Black Muslim scholars in Chicago last February.

The ban on our videos and books tend to demonstrate that the ADL and similar unregistered agents of the Israeli terror state who pressure YouTube, have something to hide. 


They cannot answer informed critics of Talmudic and Kabbalistic dogma and the Israeli holocaust against the Palestinians, so they resort to despotic censorship. This betrays a terrible weakness and vulnerability on their part.

Seventy-five years ago today, June 6, Pastor Earl Jones of New Mexico and his brother, landed on the beaches of Normandy. His brother didn’t make it. Pastor Jones lived to teach this writer a thing or two, including that no matter how many bullets are flying, you keep moving forward.


_____________

Friday, May 03, 2019

Facebook Censorship: White supremacy of the most hypocritical type

Facebook Censorship: 
White Supremacy of the Most Hypocritical Type

The bold promise of a new liberty online is being circumscribed and narrowed by a thousand incremental acts of suppression, which if it continues, over time will forge an Internet which mirrors the decrepit censorship system it was supposed to surpass and overcome.

By Michael Hoffman
www.RevisionistHistory.org



Actor James Woods and Minister Louis Farrakhan

Facebook is receiving congratulations from the darkest corner of the web for reverting to the discredited gatekeeping of the legacy media and further eroding freedom of inquiry on the Internet, which in its early days gained popularity as an antidote to the very censorship we see Facebook (and Paypal and Amazon) imposing.

When they were all up and coming capitalists, the CEOs of these companies preached freedom of expression. Now that they’ve made it into the billionaire’s club they have abandoned the very ideals which brought them fame and fortune. Their conceit that they are avatars of new thinking for the digital age is now exposed as a cheap trick driven by the college campus nanny doctrine that there must be “safe spaces” erected where “micro-aggression” emanating from radical ideas cannot be allowed to penetrate.

Freedom of speech means nothing if it doesn’t mean freedom for your fiercest rivals in the ideological and political struggle. The Tech Tyrants have a megalomaniacal confidence in their own righteousness, which has increasingly transformed the Internet into a zone of conformity. As Heather Mac Donald notes, “They consider any disagreement with their own political outlook as a manifestation of 'hate,' and as such, fair game for suppression.”

What they ignore in their hubris is that there are few things more disturbing to Americans than suppression of the advancement of human knowledge through the free competition of ideas. Not so very long ago rights for homosexuals and their marriage were offensive topics proscribed by gatekeeping media. Today that suppression appears to modernists like a relic from a dark age, while suppressing conspiracy theorists and black Muslims is hailed as a virtue. It’s a case of the double standard, freedom of speech for me, but not for thee: my radical cause deserves to be publicized, while your radicalism is offensive to my dogma and therefore will be policed off Facebook and eventually, social media in general.

Mark Zuckerberg and his Facebook cohort have banned and removed Minister Louis Farrakhan of the Nation of Islam from Facebook and Instagram. Farrakhan dissents from the conformist narrative about Israeli Zionism and Talmudic Judaism, while having the highest respect for true Jews. He is demonized and expelled by invoking “anti-Semitism.” All it takes is for the charge to be made and under the dictatorship of the Tech Tyrants, the accused is banned without the right of appeal or due process. This is from the playbook of Communist despot Vladimir Lenin and Nazi Judge Roland Freisler.

Last February Amazon banned three magisterial volumes of black history produced by the Nation of Islam’s scholars, The Secret Relationship Between Blacks and Jews. To add insult to injury, this ignominious book-banning occurred during Black History Month. Amazon claims for public relations’ purposes to be an anti-racist organization, yet here we observe the white liberals who own Amazon sneaking through a ban on brilliant and thus far irrefutable works of black history.


Underneath all the slogans and name-calling is the struggle between ideas.  The white nationalists who parade in the streets and fire guns at Judaic people, are too obtuse to perceive that their alleged combat contra Judaism is in truth a losing battle against their own philosophical allies. Talmudism of the “settler" type practiced since the founding of the Israeli state in 1948 is a form of racial-supremacist neo-Nazism. Hitler was under the influence of Kabbalistic and Talmudic ideology from 1919 onward. He was channeling the most ferocious racism on the planet.

Decades ago Hebrew University Prof. Yeshayahu Leibowitz warned of the ascendance of what he termed “Judeo-Nazis.” There are indeed Nazi rabbis teaching young people in the Israeli state today. They convey Hitler’s ideology to their students. For this writer to report it may cause me to be banned. 

Facts have been judged too hot for you to handle and your infantilization is enforced by self-appointed commissars of the news, imitating the old model of gatekeeping perfected by the increasingly obsolete legacy media. This is a betrayal of the very idea of the Internet. In the 1990s John Perry Barlow, one of the earliest advocates of the Internet, witnessed it functioning as a revolutionary alternative to the censorship common to television and the newspapers, "We are now, as a global group, going into a period where the old editorial system, the old way of stomping down consciousness to a bearable aperture is about to get blasted.”

This is less the case in 2019. The bold promise of a new liberty online is being circumscribed and narrowed by a thousand incremental acts of suppression, which if it continues, over time will forge an Internet which mirrors the decrepit censorship system it was supposed to surpass and overcome.

The archetypal representative of that stale, anachronistic system is the New York Times. The Times has judged it not helpful for you to know about the influential Israeli rabbi who promotes the burning of churches, or the Israeli professor who advocates the rape of Palestinian mothers and wives, or the Israeli chief army chaplain who agrees with this monstrous advocacy. 

Mass shooting and bombing of Palestinians by the Israeli military are considered by the establishment media to be unworthy of anything other than the most cursory notice, while violence to a Zionist, whether in America, Europe or the Israeli state, becomes a mini-holocaust of epic proportions, triggering a deluge of tears, legislation and intense media coverage. As the Talmud Bavli decrees, there is one standard for the Holy People and another for the goyim.

For the advancement of knowledge without interdiction by partisan expurgators masquerading as objective journalists, a free and untrammeled Internet is absolutely essential, indeed fundamental to what it means to be fully human. "Human rights” is an empty shibboleth if it does not signify the right to know and argue freely according to conscience, something John Milton proposed in 1644, in his essay Areopagitica. He wrote, “If reading is regulated, then music, conversation, every incident of social life must be regulated too.” Four hundred years later and we have yet to learn what Milton knew.

Facebook, Paypal and Amazon will not suppress the Nazi rabbis or the pro-rape rabbis. Just as Judeo-white supremacy is the covert weapon against blacks in the Nation of Islam who are not willing to submit to the plantation mentality, Nazi ideology and genetic supremacy can be preached with impunity as long as it is done under Zionist or Talmudic auspices. If you understand this, then you know what a mockery is the solemn piety and finger-wagging that accompanies the suppression of heretics like Paul Joseph Watson, Alex Jones and Louis Farrakhan.

Rabbis at the Israeli-government-funded Bnei David academy, an elite yeshiva (Talmud school) preparing Israeli youth for leadership positions in the Israeli army, glorify Hitler and the Nazis and urge the enslavement of Arabs. Don’t ask Wikipedia or the legacy news about these Israeli Nazis. You’re not supposed to know. This is what Facebook, Paypal and Amazon are working toward: a vacuum where Correct Think can safely extinguish vital information that has been damned as hateful by people who hate freedom.

Rabbi Eliezer Kashtiel lectures his students at Bnei David academy as follows: 

“The gentiles will want to be our slaves. Being a slave to a Jew is the best. They’re glad to be slaves, they want to be slaves. Instead of just walking the streets and being stupid and violent and harming each other, once they’re slaves, their lives can begin to take shape....Yes, we’re racists. We believe in racism. There are races in the world and there are genetic traits inherent in nations. This demands that we think how to help them.  There are differences among races....There are nations around us with genetic defects.  The Arab wants to be under Occupation because they have a genetic defect. They don’t know how to run a state. They don’t know how to do anything. Look at how they act.” 

Rabbi Giora Radler, addressed the Bnei David academy youth: 

“Let’s begin by asking the question: was Hitler right or not? He is the most correct person there is. He was definitely right in every word he said. His ideology was correct. There is a male world which fights, which deals with honor and the brotherhood of soldiers. And there is the soft, ethical feminine world which turns the other cheek.”

As noted, Louis Farrakhan respects true Jews, as defined by the Book of Revelation. But he has righteous anger when he sees Palestinian civilians murdered weekly with no tears shed by the white rulers of America. Neither does he suffer gladly black youth being summarily gunned down by members of American police departments which have been trained by Israeli police in the same tactics they use to wantonly take the lives of Palestinian youth. 


The Internet Overlords are heading toward a dictatorship over the mind which they are imposing incrementally, using the pretext of combating white nationalism. (Last time we checked, Minister Farrakhan was not white). 

Combatting the white, Yiddish-Ashkenazi Talmudic extremism that is reviving the Hitler cult and has taken thousands of Palestinian lives is not on the agenda. How can it be, when the driving force behind Facebook’s censorship is its own deeply concealed Judeo-white supremacy?

Our thoughts turn to China and other nations not captive to the Anglo-Zionist networks. American diplomats and newspaper and Internet pundits pompously lecture China on freedom of expression and democracy, presuming, as the British empire did in the 19th century, that the Chinese are dull and slow-witted. Can anyone expect the Chinese to loosen their hold on the Internet when they see American tech tyrants such as Mr. Zuckerberg practicing censorship and limiting free expression?

Facebook boss Mark Zuckerberg is encouraging the closing of minds around the world in the name of opposing racism and hatred. Communist Party boss Xi Jinping censors to maintain “Confucian harmony.” Both are pretexts for thought control and the fear that a political or theological rival might get the best of the argument and win adherents.

Gaslighting Farrakhan presupposes that his support among people of color will decline because Facebook has silenced him. Yet the record shows that he has gone from strength to strength as a result of the attacks of the white power structure. Blacks in America are aware that Minister Farrakhan is being censored because he will not behave on the plantation. Moreover, his defiance is a lightning rod for people of all colors who are fed up with the crushing dominion of money over the free spirit of humanity. 

Mr. Farrakhan’s position in the black community is not dependent on where he’s at in digital cyberspace. He's the visionary who organized and led The Million Man March in the streets of Washington D.C. He is the one who has healed and empowered the black family. He has ennobled the black man and woman in the face of the pernicious hate and racism of the prestigious Rabbi Maimonides, who centuries ago taught the western world that blacks are lower than the level of human. Farrakhan reminds his people that they are the imago Dei, even as Maimonides classed them only slightly above apes. So who is the hater?

Louis Farrakhan’s love for his people cannot be disputed. Telling the black community he is a hater flies in the face of everything they know about him. Meanwhile, buildings are named and statues are erected to Maimonides by the closeted liberal white supremacists who cleverly sear their rivals with the stigma of “hater." 

The world is to be made safe for white supremacist Talmudism by any means, including making a charade of the West’s own hallowed principles of free speech. The blowback has already begun, however. In the HipHop World they are saying, “Minister Farrakhan has been instrumental in quelling beef, guiding the leaders like (rapper) Snoop and mending wounds that have been long-standing in the community. He's a staple. Now, he has said something that people of a certain persuasion may take the wrong way, but what do you think Black people and others or color must contend with daily?”

The history of martyrdom demonstrates that blatantly repressive tactics against women and men who put their life on the line for their ideals will always help to propagate those ideals. Such a man is the Honorable Minister Louis Farrakhan. Zuckerberg, Bezos and the other Internet monopolists will never defeat him.


Copyright©2019 by Independent History and Research

Michael Hoffman is a former reporter for the New York bureau of the Associated Press. His writing has appeared in the New York Times and the New York Review of Books. He is the author of the textbook Judaism Discovered, and a popular condensation, Judaism’s Strange Gods: Revised and Expanded. Mr. Hoffman is managing editor of Revisionist History® newsletter.
_________________

Friday, February 22, 2019

ADL Head Caught Misrepresenting Hoffman’s Speech

Press Release

ADL Head Caught Misrepresenting Michael Hoffman’s Speech to the Nation of Islam

Jonathan Greenblatt, CEO of the ADL, circulated what appears to be a fund-raising letter to members and allies of his infamous thought control organization:


In that letter the ADL leader makes the following flagrantly untruthful statement about the speech of revisionist historian Michael Hoffman on “Saviour’s Day” February 17: 

"We can’t stop Farrakhan from spouting lies, but we can make it clear that language like this, and the Holocaust denial claims espoused by his fellow speaker that day, Michael A. Hoffman II, are not acceptable.”

 In point of fact, "on that day” (“Saviour’s Day event,” Feb. 17), I did not utter one word of so-called “Holocaust denial.” Watch my speech and see for yourself.

Here is a rare opportunity to expose as liars one of the most powerful Israeli propaganda outlets on earth, in the person of the CEO of the Anti-Defamation League who is now caught red-handed disseminating a demonstrable falsehood.

Mr. Greenblatt is a bigger fool than I thought.  In attempting to take the spotlight off the disreputable Babylonian Talmud with which my speech was concerned, he has dug a hole both for himself and the ADL with his laughable fake news about this writer’s February 17 speech to the Nation of Islam.

Here is a God-given opportunity to educate the world regarding the true nature of the unethical and deceitful Anti-Defamation League, which the corporate media touts as the “objective experts” on the Talmud and the Nation of Islam.

— Michael Hoffman

_____________________________




Tuesday, February 19, 2019

My Speech to Louis Farrakhan's Nation of Islam

My Speech to Louis Farrakhan's Nation of Islam

By Michael Hoffman
_______________________________

Note:

The brief, initial report that appeared on this page is superseded by a complete report now published at this link:

MY SERVICE TO THE NATION OF ISLAM

URL:
https://revisionistreview.blogspot.com/2019/02/my-service-to-nation-of-islam.html

Please refer and re-direct to this latest, full-length essay about Michael Hoffman’s mission to the black Muslims of America.


_______________________________


Independent History and Research
Box 849 • Coeur d’Alene, Idaho 83816
E-mail: hoffmanATrevisionisthistory.org 
(Substitute @ for AT in the preceding e-mail address)

Twitter: @HoffmanMichaelA

______________

Monday, March 12, 2018

Farrakhan's Defense of Jesus against Talmudic hatred

On March 11 the Nation of Islam contacted Michael Hoffman to ask if he would corroborate Louis Farrakhan’s recent remarks about the contents of the Babylonian Talmud and its hate speech against Jesus. 

Background

The media often attempt to put Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan on the defensive for “his notorious anti-Semitism.” Since the term anti-Goyimism is not in use to describe Orthodox Judaism’s institutionalized hatred of non-Jews in their most sacred text—the Babylonian Talmud—the staged morality play almost always consists of offended Judaics pointing righteous fingers of accusation at “moral lepers” like Louis Farrakhan. It’s a kind of media-enabled psychological warfare. 

When Farrakhan defends Jesus Christ against hateful insults in the Babylonian Talmud, the ADL, Southern Poverty Law Center and mainstream media term him a “hater," while the Talmudists are cast as the perpetual victims. 

Hate speech against Jesus and bigotry toward his true followers is of little concern to the media. Their universe spins on their mission of suppressing exposure of the sacred hate in the Talmud. In their Wonderland world, anyone like Farrakhan who undertakes that exposure, is a “hater”—educating the public about hate speech in Judaism becomes an act of hate. This is a form of quintessentially Talmudic logic known as “pilpul.”

At present Mr. Farrakhan is at the center of another firestorm of controversy as a few leading members of the Leftist “Women’s March” are refusing to join the witch hunt against him: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/09/us/louis-farrakhan-facts-history.html

Watching Mr. Farrakhan’s brief remarks about the Talmud and Jesus, as part of his “Saviour’s Day” oration last February, I was stung by his final sentence. 

In his speech, Farrakhan accurately cited the exact passage in the Babylonian Talmud that teaches that for his alleged sins, Jesus is in hell being boiled in feces.  

Addressing the Christians of the West he stated, “You wouldn’t even have the courage — the testicular fortitude — to ask them (the rabbis) why did they want to boil the man you call your Savior, in excrement.”

Here is a Muslim despised by Republican Conservatives, doing for the glory of the Holy Name of Jesus what nationally known Christian leaders should be doing. Instead, they cower.

There is almost no public figure with the world renown and audience numbers of Louis Farrakhan who would dare to say what he said. 

Yes, Chuck Baldwin, Texe Marrs, Bishop Richard Williamson, Herman Otten and Dave Barley would do so, and may have have already done so, but they have not the fame or international influence of the Nation of Islam (NOI) leader—and few of us possess Farrakhan’s dramatic oratorical command of the spoken word.

After his remarks on the bigotry of the Talmud resulted in cries of “Bigotry!” from the usual suspects, including aspersions on the accuracy of his Talmud citation, this writer was contacted by the Research Department of the NOI, which is responsible for authoring the magisterial three volume revisionist history of Judaic involvement in black enslavement, The Secret Relationship Between Blacks and Jews. 

The Nation of Islam asked if I would corroborate Mr. Farrakhan’s remarks about the contents of the Talmud, and its statements about Jesus. The result is the article below, which is reprinted on the website of the Nation of Islam, where you can also find a nearly two minute video excerpt of Farrakhan’s stirring defense of Jesus. 

This writer is certainly no Muslim, but I am a Bible reader and believer. I have noted how often the Scriptures speak again and again of the vital importance of the holy name of God, whether in reference to Yahweh or His Divine Son:  

“Your sins are forgiven you for His name’s sake.” (John 1: 2:12). 

“I will sing praise to the name of the Lord Most High” (Psalm 7:17). 

“How excellent is your name in all the earth” (Psalm 8:1). 

“Those who know your name will put their trust in you” (Psalm 9:10). 

“In the name of God we will set up our banners” (Psalm 20:5).  

Meanwhile, the Talmud has placed the banner of Jesus in hell and the ministers of Churchianity are o.k. with it. 

Farrakhan is confronting today’s so-called Christians with the appalling fact that they hold in good repute a religion that splatters the Holy Name of Jesus with excrement. Other than some Church of Satan cult, I can’t think of any other creed on earth that would stoop so low or be more deserving of exposure, even as we offer Christ’s love to the Judaic people who are in bondage to its iniquity.

For all the derision of Muslims in Right wing churches and culture, I daresay that Mr. Farrakhan, notwithstanding his Islamic faith, shall perhaps reach Paradise long before many of his “Christian” detractors, who cannot summon the “testicular fortitude” to unmask the religion that teaches to generations of Judaic youth, such filthy and depraved fantasies about our Savior.

Are you listening, Mike Pence?


“The Nation of Islam Research Group asked Talmudic expert Michael Hoffman to view the clip and give his opinion on the veracity of The Minister’s statement about the Talmud. His response is below"



Farrakhan’s Truth about the Talmud

By Michael Hoffman
©2018 RevisionistHistory.org

The Babylonian Talmud tractate Gittin, which Minister Louis Farrakhan quoted truthfully and accurately in his Savior’s Day speech last February, is concerned in part with the fulfillment of Jesus Christ’s prophecy concerning the destruction of the Temple of Jerusalem by the Romans, due to the transgressions of the Jews: 
“Jesus came out from the temple and was going away when His disciples came up to point out the temple buildings to Him. And He said to them, “Do you not see all these things? Truly I say to you, not one stone here will be left upon another, which will not be torn down...Therefore when you see the Abomination Of Desolation which was spoken of through Daniel the prophet, standing in the holy place then those who are in Judea must flee to the mountains” (Matthew 24: 1-2; 15-16).

The “Abomination Of Desolation” was the Roman Army. Jesus was warning that in less than forty years it would advance to besiege Jerusalem, and that His followers were to flee to safety, which is what they did, leaving the unbelieving Jews to suffer the consequences. 

Because the creed of Orthodox rabbinic Judaism is one of unrelenting revenge, the Roman General Titus, who personally directed the destruction of the Temple in 70 A.D., is forever an object of hatred, second only to Jesus himself. The rabbis of Orthodox Judaism have never forgiven Titus for commanding the legions who fulfilled Christ’s prophecy and destroyed the Temple at Jerusalem, along with the Jews who maintained that corrupt and doomed system. The revenge of the rabbis upon Titus is to tell nonsensical lies about him in the Talmud. 

Few Christians or Muslims are aware that in the Babylonian Talmud Jesus shares his place in hell with the Roman Titus, who is depicted as being chastised for the destruction of the Temple by being burned to ashes in hell, reassembled, burned, reassembled and burned again—for eternity (Gittin 56b). In another depraved lie, Jesus is portrayed as being punished for “leading Israel astray” by forever remaining seated in a cauldron of boiling excrement in hell (Gittin 57a). According to the law (halahca) of Talmudic Judaism, “Anyone who mocks the words of the sages will be sentenced to boiling excrement (ŚŠŚ•ֹڐָŚ” ŚšŚ•ֹŚȘֵŚ—ַŚȘ).”

The typical rabbinic and Zionist response to the truthful description by Minister Farrakhan and others of what the Talmud teaches about Jesus, is to lie and say that in this passage the Talmud is referring to “another Jesus,” rather than Jesus of Nazareth: “Many commentaries suggest that some or all talmudic references to Jesus refer to another person” (Koren Talmud Bavli [Jerusalem: 2015], vol. 21, footnote to p. 319).

According to the Anti-Defamation League (ADL), “To agitate Christian readers, anti-Talmud writers often attempt to portray the Talmud as demeaning the figure of Jesus.” 

By the ADL’s reasoning, “anti-Talmud writers” are never scholars who are dispassionately committed to the discovery of the truth about what the Talmud teaches, but rather, they are only agitators who, from impure motives, seek to “portray” the Talmud as “demeaning” Jesus. 

How the ADL arrived at this conspiracy theory is not revealed, but the undercurrent of intimidation is clear: those who speak or write candidly and accurately concerning how Jesus is defamed in the Talmud are seeking to “agitate Christians.” No reputable person would want a career-killing stigma like that attached to his statements and most Christians and Muslims are thereby intimidated from pursuing the truth about the Talmudic depiction of Jesus. Moreover, according to the ADL, “the Talmud only refers to Jesus in a handful of places, and though these references may not reflect the courteous ecumenicism of the modern world, neither are they particularly inflammatory.” (Anti-Defamation League, The Talmud in Anti-Semitic Polemics [New York: 2003], p. 11).

The ADL expects us to believe that depicting the Christian Savior being boiled in feces is not inflammatory, while any critical observation that Mr. Farrakhan dares to utter concerning Judaism is nothing but inflammatory. The hypocrisy is all too familiar.

Long-standing denials by Talmudists and Zionists and their gentile apologists concerning the supposed absence of Jesus in the Talmud, are slowly being discredited after having held sway for centuries. David Klinghoffer elucidated this development in his essay, “What the Talmud Really Says About Jesus”:

 “...the scandalous passages indeed refer not to some other figure of ancient times but to the famous Jesus of Nazareth. What exactly is so scandalous? How about Jesus punished in Hell for eternity by being made to sit in a cauldron of boiling excrement? That image appears in early manuscripts of the Babylonian Talmud, as does a brief account of Jesus’ trial and execution—not by the Romans but by the Jewish high court, the Sanhedrin.” (Publishers Weekly, January 31, 2007).

Mr. Klinghoffer says that the “Jewish community” has been content to let the evil sayings of the Talmud about Jesus “remain obscure and unknown.” His claim is erroneous. The rabbinic “community” actively teaches these viciously bigoted statements about Jesus within their religion, while denying to the world that they are present in their sacred texts. These inconvenient facts must not be suppressed. The admission by Klinghoffer and other Judaic intellectuals that Jesus Christ is indeed targeted in the Babylonian Talmud, has brought with it no substantive analysis of the long record of rabbinic denials and falsification that preceded his revelation, and which continue in some instances, up to the present time. Mr. Klinghoffer is eager to have us pass over Judaism’s system of dissimulation as quickly as possible. 

Christians and Muslims are rightly offended at the disgraceful libels, pornographic scurrilities and hate speech in the Talmud. Louis Farrakhan, virtually alone among public figures in America, has had the courage to defend Jesus against these obscenities. 

Michael Hoffman is a former reporter for the New York Bureau of the Associated Press and the author of nine books, including Judaism Discovered, and Judaism’s Strange Gods.

_______________________

March 14, 2018

From the Nation of Islam



Dear Mr. Hoffman,

We are pleased to report that the article you prepared is the most viewed on our website over the last 3 days. 

We have just posted this article that refers to your work: 

"WHY DO JEWS HATE JESUS AND MARY? Muslims and Christians Revere Jesus and Mary; Jews hate them both.”


Thank you very much.
_______________________

Hoffman’s comment:

Strange Priorities 

While Mr. Farrakhan, who honors Jesus and Mary, is vilified by politicians and the media for allegedly saying “filthy” things about Zionists, the Talmudists and their sacred books may say any filthy thing they like about Jesus and the Blessed Virgin Mary without provoking controversy in the media, or among politicians and “Christian” leaders.

_______________________

Keep Michael Hoffman working in defense of the Truth:
  donate, or purchase one of our publications or recordings
____________________________