The following is authored by the Historical Research Department of the Nation of Islam
August 10, 2019
Jeffrey Epstein was the central figure in Mossad’s blackmail operation, by which they controlled the U.S. government. But through his own malfeasance he had put Israel at risk. That bleak outlook called into play a little-known Talmudic option that is afforded to Jews in such a predicament. In Hebrew it is called din moser (“law of the informer”) and din rodef (“law of the pursuer”), and they are concepts found in the Babylonian Talmud (Tractate Sanhedrin, 73a). These are literally contract killings ordered by Jewish authorities against a Jew that is thought to have betrayed or will betray Jewish interests. The Epstein case had now involved the highest Jewish authorities in America and put their reputations and their constituencies in league with a truly rogue character who had outlived his strategic value.
Scholars have now acknowledged that the 1995 assassination of Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin was just such a din rodef contract murder, ordered by a special court of Israeli rabbis. By conceding to the Palestinians land that many Jews believed was conferred to them by God Himself (in Genesis 15:17), Rabin was said to have betrayed the Jewish people. The assassin, rabbinical student Yigal Amir, justified his act on that very basis, telling police that he was acting on the basis of a rabbinical din rodef ruling. “Once something is a ruling, there is no longer a moral issue,” said Amir.
The Nation of Islam Research Group make a strong circumstantial case that the lynching of Leo Frank—the father of the ADL—was just such a din rodef contract murder (this is discussed in The Secret Relationship Between Blacks and Jews, Volume 3, pages 328-330).
Last, Epstein’s alleged partner in procuring the blackmail bait (young girls) was Ghislaine Maxwell, whose father was Mossad agent and billionaire publishing/media magnate Robert Maxwell (real name: Ján Ludvík Hyman Binyamin Hoch). He was also “suicided” by Mossad—found floating in the ocean near his yacht.
In censoring and deplatforming dissidents, the Tech Tyrants cite no evidence and allow no appeals. Scholars wrongly accused are simply silenced. There's no due process. All the tyrants need do to suppress revisionist history that they hate is to falsely label it hate speech. The media automatically accept the accusation without investigating it.
All of these acts of suppression of knowledge are intended to make the world safe for Zionist and Talmudic deception. The Internet was established for the purpose of the advancement of human knowledge. The attempt to demonize radical knowledge will only make that knowledge more attractive to truth-seekers.
YouTube’s censorship bears the hallmarks of a Soviet tribunal. Notice that no quotes from the allegedly offending videos are presented as evidence of “hate.” Why not? Because the raison d’être for our lectures and addresses is the exposure of hatred against marginalized human beings. No contrary evidence need be presented. It is enough that we are accused by the neo-Stalinists. Their accusation makes us guilty. Facts are irrelevant. If this isn’t tyranny, what is?
Yesterday we shipped a case of Judaism’s Strange Gods: Revised and Expanded to Pastor Chuck Baldwin in Montana. His secretary reports that they can’t keep up with the demand. Furthermore, The Nation of Islam is producing a 50 minute anti-racist video consisting of a seminar hosted by their distinguished Historical Research Department featuring this writer's intensive talk analyzing the Talmud and other racist rabbinic texts, to a gathering of some two hundred Black Muslim scholars in Chicago last February.
The ban on our videos and books tend to demonstrate that the ADL and similar unregistered agents of the Israeli terror state who pressure YouTube, have something to hide.
They cannot answer informed critics of Talmudic and Kabbalistic dogma and the Israeli holocaust against the Palestinians, so they resort to despotic censorship. This betrays a terrible weakness and vulnerability on their part.
Seventy-five years ago today, June 6, Pastor Earl Jones of New Mexico and his brother, landed on the beaches of Normandy. His brother didn’t make it. Pastor Jones lived to teach this writer a thing or two, including that no matter how many bullets are flying, you keep moving forward.
Cardinal Blase Cupich of Chicago has condemned liberal Catholic priest Fr. Michael Pfleger, pastor of St. Sabina church for hosting a speech on May 9 by Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan. The Cardinal says he is “shocked” by Farrakhan’s criticism of the Babylonian Talmud. Cupich is horrified that Farrakhan dared to: “suggest... that ‘Talmudic thought’ sanctioned pedophilia and misogyny.”
All of the statements concerning the Talmud of Babylon which Minister Farrakhan made were accurate. Truth is not an issue in the controversy.
Before being elevated to his post in Chicago by Pope Francis, Cupich was Bishop of Spokane, Washington. There Cupich allegedly assisted members of the Jesuit order in hiding priests credibly accused of child molestation — with what is said to be the connivance of then-Bishop Cupich they were placed in secret at Cardinal Bea House, a Jesuit residential facility located on the campus of Gonzaga University and near St. Aloysius elementary school [see hereand here].
Farrakhan spoke at the Chicago church as part of a community protest against his having been banned by Facebook and Instagram. In his address at St. Sabina, Minister Farrakhan valiantly defended Jesus and the Blessed Mother Mary from the Talmudic hate speech which is the basis of the halacha or law of Orthodox Judaism. No other national Islamic or Christian leader has been willing to sound the alarm and educate the public concerning this institutionalized, scurrilous vilification of the Messiah of Israel and His Mother. Farrakhan also made reference to the Talmud’s ghastly doctrine concerning sex with children.
According to Chicago’s ABC News outlet (abc7chicago.com), “Pfleger invited Farrakhan to speak at St. Sabina a week after he was permanently banned from Facebook and Instagram for what the platform deemed hateful and even dangerous. Farrakhan spoke for about an hour to a standing room-only audience. Many in the church streamed his remarks live on Facebook.”
Cupich said in a statement, "Without consulting me, Fr. Michael Pfleger invited Minister Louis Farrakhan to speak at St. Sabina Church in response to Facebook's decision to ban him from its platforms.”
CNN reports, “Farrakhan made several anti-Semitic statements during his speech, accusing Judaism of promoting pedophilia and saying that Jews do not like him because he ‘exposes their hatred of Jesus.’ He also said that he had a divine mission to ‘separate the good Jews from the Satanic Jews.”
How is truth a "statement of anti-Semitism”? If the Talmud does indeed grant permission, under certain circumstances, for the sexual molestation of young persons, how does the articulation of that fact constitute an offense against Semitic people? Is this not a salutary warning to them to defend their children against this dogma?
When investigators speak of the molestation of children by Rome’s Catholic clerics, are they making an “anti-Italian statement”? How would Italians or Judaic people —or anyone else for that matter — be harmed by a truth which helps to shed light on the exploitation of children?
"Such statements shock the conscience," Cupich replied. “I apologize to my Jewish brothers and sisters, whose friendship I treasure, from whom I learn so much, and whose covenant with God remains eternal," the cardinal continued.
He’s apologizing because a prominent black leader told the truth in a Catholic Church. This is apparently a grievous offense necessitating groveling of the most obsequious ignobility.
Wiesenthal Center Rabbi Orders Fr. Pfleger’s Removal
The Simon Wiesenthal Center has called on the Archdiocese of Chicago to remove Fr. Pfleger: "How is it that (Farrakhan) was invited to use a prominent Catholic church to denounce 'Satanic Jews' from the pulpit," asked Rabbi Abraham Cooper, the center's director of social action. "It is now up to the leaders of the Catholic church to remove their prominent priest from his hallowed post," Cooper continued.
Apparently there is either no such thing as a Judaic person who is Satanic, or, it is grounds for another ban, this time on Fr. Pfleger, for his guest speaker having called certain Satanists to account. Here we observe an expectation of special immunity, a derivative of Talmudic exceptionalism. When it is not conceded by Farrakhan and Pfleger, then enforcement is demanded.
We live in an era when, to defend the indefensible Talmud from exposure, activists, scholars and religious leaders must be forbidden to speak on social media, officiate at churches or publish on Amazon. The watchword of the “tolerant” is “ban, ban, ban,” because that’s all they’ve got. The facts are on Farrakhan’s side, so instead of debate they suppress. How is human knowledge advanced by such a reactionary process? What we are witnessing is a new inquisition.
It’s an irony missed that a meeting called to protest the censorship and removal of Minister Louis Farrakhan from Facebook may result in the censorship and removal of Father Michael Pfleger from his parish church. There’s no end in sight to the megalomania of the censors who, from their lofty perch of self-righteous rectitude, presume to obstruct knowledge and freedom of speech in the name of “fighting hate.”
The Anti-Defamation League has called Farrakhan, who has led the Nation of Islam since 1977, "quite possibly America's most popular anti-Semite." For the ADL one of his most extreme thought crimes is that "Farrakhan has alleged that the Jewish people were responsible for the slave trade."
CNN and the rest of the corporate media neglect to report that the Nation of Islam’s erudite history, The Secret Relationship Between Blacks and Jews, a three volume revisionist trilogy on the black slave trade and the Leo Frank case, was banned in February by Amazon, during Black History Month.
According to CNN, “Pfleger, who has long worked with African-American leaders in Chicago, said Farrakhan and the Nation of Islam are respected locally for their anti-violence and anti-drug campaigns. ‘Nobody has done more in the saving of young black men's lives and turning around lives than the Nation of Islam. His respect in the African-American community has been consistent."
“This is a free-speech issue," Fr. Pfleger told CNN. "I don't agree with everything Minister Farrakhan has said. I don't agree with anyone on everything, but we are in a dangerous time when we can no longer have dialogue without demonizing one another."
Before the address, Pfleger said Farrakhan "has been a bold voice against injustice done against black people in this country and his voice deserves and needs to be heard."
Fr. Pfleger reports that e-mail and phone calls have poured in denouncing him for hosting Farrakhan and threatening to withdraw donations to the church and its programs. "If you would have heard and seen the stuff sent and spoken to me over this last week," he said. "I was shocked — and I have gotten a lot of hate in my life. People have told me that they will destroy me."
It is worth noting that reports of Farrakhan’s speech at St. Sabina by CNN, the ADL, the Wiesenthal Center, and the Southern Poverty Law Center, all avoid using the word “Talmud” to describe Minister Farrakhan’s criticisms. For the word Talmud they substitute the phrase, “Jewish writings.” It appears that they have a sense that the Talmud has an unsavory reputation in the minds of many Americans, and for that reason they avoid mentioning it in connection with Farrakhan’s fact-finding.
“It is dangerous to me when we begin to stop free speech and seek to silence prophetic voices. There are many who say they do not like Minister Farrakhan because all they have heard is various sound bites. Perhaps that is why Facebook wanted to ban him — to keep people from hearing his whole talk, his entire message and the truth that he seeks to teach us.” - Fr. Michael Pfleger
Cardinal Cupich’s Statement
Without consulting me, Fr. Michael Pfleger invited Minister Louis Farrakhan to speak at St. Sabina Church in response to Facebook's decision to ban him from its platforms. Minister Farrakhan could have taken the opportunity to deliver a unifying message of God's love for all his children. Instead, he repeatedly smeared the Jewish people, using a combination of thinly veiled discriminatory rhetoric and outright slander. He suggested that "Talmudic thought" sanctioned pedophilia and misogyny. He referred to Jewish people as "satanic," asserting that he was sent by God to separate the "good Jews" from the "satanic Jews."
Such statements shock the conscience. People of faith are called to live as signs of God's love for the whole human family, not to demonize any of its members. This is all the more true of religious leaders, who have a sacred duty never to leverage the legitimacy of their ministry to heap blame upon a group of persons, and never to deploy inflammatory rhetoric, long proven to incite violence. Antisemitic rhetoric - discriminatory invective of any kind - has no place in American public life, let alone in a Catholic church. I apologize to my Jewish brothers and sisters, whose friendship I treasure, from whom I learn so much, and whose covenant with God remains eternal.
I encourage Fr. Pfleger to accept the invitation of the Illinois Holocaust Museum and Education Center to meet with their leadership and dialogue with survivors. And I pledge to continue our work with our city's religious leaders and all people of good will to promote tolerance, respect, and nonviolence. As the Reverend Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. said, "Hate is too great a burden to bear." (end quote from Chicago Cardinal Cupich)
Video clip: See why Zuckerberg banned Louis Farrakhan from Facebook. Minister Farrakhan says what your pope, priests, preachers and TV evangelists have never dared to say in defense of the Holy Name of Jesus, contra the hatred for Him in the Talmud—hatred approved by the System. pic.twitter.com/4AEP3vfd3G
Shame on Amazon, Twitter, Facebook, Paypal and Apple for disgracefully submitting to the ultra-partisan Southern Poverty Law Center's inquisition against freethinkers and dissidents who are demonized and hounded as "haters” by the SPLC, a multi-million dollar Orwellian gatekeeper that aims to make the Internet safe for corporate media orthodoxy. On the contrary, in its early days the Internet provided a welcome and often radical alternative to the corporate-controlled media.
Dissidents smeared by the SPLC become targets for violence and vandalism and are banned from the Internet — as determined by a private spy organization of Stalinist methodology, to which the billionaire Tech Tyrants submit in order to maintain the “reputation of their brand” in the midst of a lynch-mob atmosphere.
Freedom of thought and the advancement of human knowledge are not considerations once a visionary writer or radical speaker is stigmatized with the hate label, which in effect signifies “hated by the Southern Poverty Law Center” — the enemies of freedom of speech.
____________
Michael Hoffman is a dissident historian censored, libeled and witch-hunted by his ideological and political rivals in the SPLC, the ADL and other online thought police organizations to which the Tech Tyrants bow in abject submission.
ADL Head Caught Misrepresenting Michael Hoffman’s Speech to the Nation of Islam
Jonathan Greenblatt, CEO of the ADL, circulated what appears to be a fund-raising letter to members and allies of his infamous thought control organization:
In that letter the ADL leader makes the following flagrantly untruthful statement about the speech of revisionist historian Michael Hoffman on “Saviour’s Day” February 17:
"We can’t stop Farrakhan from spouting lies, but we can make it clear that language like this, and the Holocaust denial claims espoused by his fellow speaker that day, Michael A. Hoffman II, are not acceptable.”
In point of fact, "on that day” (“Saviour’s Day event,” Feb. 17), I did not utter one word of so-called “Holocaust denial.” Watch my speech and see for yourself.
Here is a rare opportunity to expose as liars one of the most powerful Israeli propaganda outlets on earth, in the person of the CEO of the Anti-Defamation League who is now caught red-handed disseminating a demonstrable falsehood.
Mr. Greenblatt is a bigger fool than I thought. In attempting to take the spotlight off the disreputable Babylonian Talmud with which my speech was concerned, he has dug a hole both for himself and the ADL with his laughable fake news about this writer’s February 17 speech to the Nation of Islam.
Here is a God-given opportunity to educate the world regarding the true nature of the unethical and deceitful Anti-Defamation League, which the corporate media touts as the “objective experts” on the Talmud and the Nation of Islam.
On August 13, 2018 Amazon banned Michael Hoffman's Judaism’s Strange Gods: Revised and Expanded, which waspublished in 2011 and sold by Amazon for the past seven years. Along with his much larger study,Judaism Discovered (sold by Amazon since 2008), this book has had an international impact both as a softcover volume as well as a digital book circulating on the Amazon Kindle.
Sales to India, Japan and the Middle East were rapidly growing. The digital Kindle format is particularly important for the circulation of books because it bypasses borders and customs and hurdles over the prohibitive cost of shipping which the US Postal Service imposed on books sent to overseas destinations several years ago (the Post Office eliminated economical surface mail sent by sea; all books now must be shipped to Canada and overseas by very costly Priority Air Mail rates).
Amazon has also banned Hoffman'sThe Great Holocaust Trial: The Landmark Battle for the Right to Doubt the West’s Most Sacred Relic (sold by Amazon since 2010), an important eye-witness account of the historic trial of a dissident publisher in Toronto, which has been cited as a source of information even by the Zionist organizations in Canada. Now this primacy source material on a civil liberties milestone is down the Orwwellian memory hole, at least as far as "earth's biggest bookstore" is concerned. Researchers, students and the public who wish to read it must now take the time and trouble to resort to a rare book search service.
The three banned volumes maintain a high standard of scholarly excellence, had a majority of favorable reviews from Amazon customers,are free of hatred and bigotryand have sold thousands of copies on Amazon.
Out of the blue the author was told that “Amazon KDP” had decided that these three history books were in violation of Amazon’s “content guidelines.” Asking for documentation of the charge results in no response. It is enough that the accusation has been tendered. The accused are guilty until proved innocent, although how proof of innocence is presented is anyone’s guess. There is no appeals process. This is what is known as “Tech Tyranny.”
There is a nationwide purge underway that amounts to a new McCarthyism — blacklisting and banning politically incorrect speech and history books under the rubric of “hate speech” accusations, initiated in part by the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) and the Anti-Defamation League (ADL). It’s a flimsy pretext for censoring controversial, scholarly books that cannot otherwise be discredited. Therefore, Amazon’s readers must no longer be allowed to view them on the Kindle, and Amazon will not sell them. We consider this censorship of our books a badge of honor. The disgrace is on Amazon for submitting to the appeals of organizations that operate as thought police in "The Land of the Free.” The August 7New York Timesonline confirmed the outsize influence which the SPLC possesses at Amazon. TheTimespublished a revealing piece by David French in which he wrote:
"We live in a world where the Southern Poverty Law Center, a formerly respected civil-rights organization, abuses its past trust to label a host of mainstream organizations (including my former employer, the Alliance Defending Freedom) and individuals as ‘hate groups,...based sometimes on...outright misreadings and misrepresentations of an individual’s beliefs and views...Amazon recently booted Alliance Defending Freedom from its AmazonSmile charity program because of the center’s designation.”
Banning and censorship were not part of Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos’ public philosophy when he founded the company in 1994. Amazon experienced explosive growth in part because it functioned as an intrepid gateway to authentic works of scholarship, however much they were demonized, reviled or condemned by infuriated political or religious factions and pressure groups; that libertarian philosophy of freedom changed beginning in 2017, when Amazon gained a virtual monopoly over the sale of books in the United States.
In addition to our work being hate-free, we note that Amazon sells dozens of hateful Zionist and rabbinic volumes brimming with ferocious bigotry for Palestinians, Germans and goyim in general. For example, in 1997, Daniel Jonah Goldhagen wrote and Amzon began to offer,Hitler's Willing Executioners, one of the most racist books of the modern era. In it, Prof. Goldhagen purported to demonstrate that Nazi mass murder stemmed from aninnate German predisposition to kill Jews.His book promulgates a theory of a genetic homicidal trait infecting the entire German nation.This bigoted trash has a right to be sold. We uphold that right because exposure of its thesis is the most effective indictment of its author. We note thatHitler's Willing Executionersis proudly sold by Amazon and, if the current zeitgeist persists, it will never be banned by Amazon. The target of Mr. Goldhagen's hatred is the German people who hecollectively defamesas a racially tainted ethncity. Consequently, his book constitutes a righteous type of hate— the approved hate that does not offend the Southern Poverty Law Center or the ADL.
The Washington Post has as its motto, “Democracy dies in darkness.” Yet it is in that very darkness where Amazon’s book-banning dwells, due to the apathy of the media and the timidity of the American Bookseller's Association and the American Library Association. To ban books by a vulnerable independent scholar is not exactly a daring move in an age when “hate speech” is any scholarship which challenges someone’s sacred traditions or cherished folklore. The definition is so loose it functions as a one-size-fits-all inquisitor’s sword, and the non-persons who are the victims of this new inquisition are expected to descend quietly into sheol.
Michael Hoffman's critique of Orthodox Judaism constitutes a radical reassessment founded upon the depth of the documents and arguments he marshals in the course of advancing his thesis. The compelling and original scholarship employed in his study of Orthodox Judaism is never “anti-Semitic” or hateful. This would be easy to prove if there were an Amazon “tribunal” fair enough to consider a little something known as evidence.
In both Judaism Discovered (p. 39) and Judaism’s Strange Gods: Revised and Expandedthere are statements addressed “To the Judaic Reader”(photographically reproduced here:pp. 18-19, and here:p. 25),expounding our love and concern for their welfare and liberation. No book of “anti-Semitic hate” would ever print any such charitable and compassionate statements, and these are representative of the entire tenor of the volumes under consideration. Enemies of truth can easily turn to their advantage books containing hatred of “The Jews.” What they have no credible answer to is a critique predicated, as our books are, on a sincere foundation of true Christian love. Boundary-breaking scholarship united to compassionate concern for the welfare of Judaic people is almost unprecedented in this field. This approach makes Michael Hoffman's studies of Judaism among the most powerful and effective because they are free of the “hate speech” which is the pivot upon which turns the machinery of liberal-approved censorship. For that reason, makingJudaism’s Strange Gods: Revised and Expanded,andJudaism Discoveredavailable on the Kindle undercut decades of hatred and libel. Therefore those volumes had to be suppressed.
A Kindle permits anyone connected to the Amazon website to read approximately the first thirty pages of any Kindle book free of charge. Consequently, Hoffman's Judaica research was on display around the world and therefore it was much harder to lie about him and mischaracterize his Talmud and Kabbalah research under those circumstances. Moreover, Judaic people are harmed by this book-banning which creates a special category of informed theological criticism that is banned from the Amazon Kindle and thereby obstructs the advancement of learning. To make an exception for Orthodox Judaism — forbidding the sale of the best scholarship critical of it— does no favors to Judaic people. Many Judaic persons don’t approve of this type of suppression and censorship of books and desire access to our information. We have received letters and e-mail from Judaics who were appreciative of our books and surprised by their evident compassion and concern for “Jews."
If we are wrong, show us where we are wrong, don’t signal through censorship that our facts are too explosive to be handled by inquiring minds; that type of suppression will only blowback on the censors.
It’s time that someone, including multi-billionaire Bezos, had the fortitude to stand-up to the virulent book banning lobby that continues to engage in one of the lowest forms of ignorance and superstition known to history: silencing a writer who can’t be refuted by free and fair debate.
Furthermore, to be banned by Amazon is not equivalent to being banned by any other private business. Most publishers will admit that Amazon has replacedBowker Books in Printas the industry’s authoritative guide to what books in English have been printed in the past and what is in print now. Amazon is currentlythereference source. For a book to be forbidden by Amazon renders it largely invisible. It is equivalent to burning the book. So this is not a matter of Amazon exercising the prerogative of private enterprise. Amazon is a monopoly. It has no rival. If your book doesn’t exist on Amazon, then for most people who are not research specialists, your book doesn’t exist. The consequences for the pursuit of knowledge are ominous.
There is a problem here for Amazon as well. The more Amazon excludes books that embody facts and ideas that constitute radical dissent, the more it becomes a narrow censor’s aperture rather than a reliable bridge to the entire range of the Republic of Letters.
Apologists for censorship of radicals and authentic conservatives often claim that no First Amendment rights are violated when Amazon bans books, therefore it is not a civil rights issue, merely an inconvenience of the capitalist system. In the 1950s however, when the privately-owned movie studios banned certain directors, actors and screen-writers judged to be Leftists or Communists, that action on the part of private enterprise was inscribed in the rolls of the culture wars as the infamous “Blacklist,” and we are still reading and weeping over it sixty-five years later. So it depends on whose ox is being gored.
The public should be informed of the disgraceful tactics of the hypocrites who are so fearful of the radical scholarship for which they have no credible answer, that they pressure booksellers to ban the books that contain irrefutable challenges to their sacred dogmas. Human learning is often advanced by means of suppressed facts and ideas. This was formerly a truism in America, up until the rise of the Overlords of social media who seem to be more like a branch of Antifa than an intellectual class invested in discovery and enlightenment.
Knowledge is advanced on the basis that “Error has rights,” for the reason that demonized dissidents banned for supposedly spreading error, are sometimes in fact the bearers of rare discoveries that undercut enshrined dogmas, which appear credible through repetition by the dominant media empire. But the epigram of our time is “Errorhas no rights.” This was the doctrine of the fiery Inquisition, of the head-chopping French Revolution and of the Bolsheviks, Nazis and Maoists.If error has no rights then neither does truth, in that what is denounced as hateful error by the mob is sometimes a destabilizing, necessary and even cosmic truth.
The ban on these three books of ours, particularly the complete ban (Kindle + printed book) onJudaism’s Strange Gods: Revised and Expanded, as well asJudaism Discoveredbanned from the Kindle, represents a signifcant loss to us of revenue. If we don’t somehow make up for this serious shortfall it will imperil our entire enterprise.
This is in God’s hands. Our prayer is that He inspires benefactors to assist us in this our time of need, as well as in the weeks and months ahead as we search for a replacement for what was regular monthly sales income upon which we depended for our Truth Mission.
The greatest loss of course is to minds hungry for knowledge, whether in India, Japan, the Middle East, Europe or here at home. Learning is a right which the book-banning antediluvians have now denied to readers and students throughout the world. God help us all.
Click on the text above to enlarge Order these banned books from the publisher:hereandhere Revisionist historian Michael Hoffman is one of the most controversial scholars of the 21st century. The Southern Poverty Law Center and the ADL seek to shut him down and ban his books becausethey can’trefute his research.
Your donation helps our endangered Truth Mission survive _________________________
REVISIONIST HISTORY® Dedicated to love for allof humanity "Let all that you do be done in love."I Corinthians 16:14 _________________________
Legal Notice Revisionist History® is registered with the United States Patent and Trademark Office as the exclusive trademark of Independent History and Research Box 849 • Coeur d'Alene•Idaho•83816•USA _________________________
Posts
