Talmud’s view of non-Judaic women

Documenting and exposing hate speech:

The Babylonian Talmud’s hateful attitude toward non-Judaic women

By Michael Hoffman 

Copyright©2018 by RevisionistHistory.org

The general tenor of the Babylonian Talmud and cognate halachic successor texts (Mishneh Torah, Shulchan Aruch etc.) is that all non-Jewish women are represented by the acronym NSHGZ, which signifies Niddah, Shifchah, Goyyah, Zona (menstrual filth, slaves, heathens and whores - cf. BT Sanhedrin 81b-82a). 

In Yiddish slang, a non-Judaic woman is a shiksa ( שיקסע) which personifies the corrosive “NSHGZ” stereotype.

Caution needs to be exercised here, however, because the Babylonian Talmud has a low view of women generally, whether Judaic or gentile. 

Admittedly, Orthodox Judaism's view of non-Judaic females is much lower by comparison with Judaic women,  and unreservedly toxic. In Israeli, Judaic-American and Yiddish culture, the popular view of the non-Judaic female is that of a highly promiscuous woman, contrasted with the supposedly more sexually modest Judaic woman. 

This view was in the news in 2018, when a researcher with the Washington Post sifted through Hollywood director Woody Allen’s writings and discovered this nugget by Mr. Allen: 

 “Unlike the Jewish girl the shiksa is not guilt-ridden—not a complainer—she is abandoned, fun-loving, and above all promiscuous. The shiksa will perform any sex act.” (Cf. Washington Post online, http://wapo.st/2DipDJ5 [January 4, 2018]).

In studying the halacha of permissible rape of gentiles, we find an expression from Bar-Ilan University Prof. Mordecai Kedar who is on record stating: “The only thing that can deter terrorists...is the knowledge that their sister or their mother will be raped.” (Kedar is also a research fellow at the Begin-Sadat Center for Strategic Studies at Bar-Ilan).

Though it will be claimed by the usual public relations hacks that Prof. Kedar's monstrous rape/deterrent observation is “condemned by the Jewish tradition” (citing, for example, BT Kiddushin 22), there are rabbinic escape clauses which justify rape of non-Judaic women. 

First, the rape target must be classified as a zonah (prostitute) or a nokri (hostile alien). The supreme Ashkenazic halachic authority, Rabbi Moses Maimonides, rules that a Judaic soldier may rape this type of female POW ("Yefas To’ar") when he is not actively fighting a battle (cf. Hilchos Melachim 8:3). For more on this line of thought consult Judaism Discovered, p. 904. 

Courtesy of Maurice Pinay, we have learned of a text from the Meorot theology journal of Yeshivat Chovevei Torah Rabbinic School, on permissible rape: "It is the consensus of many halachic decisors (judges of rabbinic law) that the yefat to’ar can be subject to involuntary intercourse...”  Cf. Dov. S. Zakheim, Meorot, vol. 6, no. 1 (2006), p. 5. (Mr. Zakheim was Under Secretary of Defense in the administration of George W. Bush, 2001-2004).  

Eyal Karim (also spelled "Qarim”), the Israeli military’s chief rabbi, agrees: "Just so, war removes some of the prohibitions on sexual relations (gilui arayot), and even though fraternizing with a gentile woman is a very serious matter, it was permitted during wartime (under the specific terms) out of understanding for the hardship endured by the warriors. And since the success of the whole at war is our goal, the Torah permitted the individual to satisfy the evil urge (yetzer ha’ra), under the conditions mentioned, for the purpose of the success of the whole.” Cf. https://972mag.com/idf-colonel-rabbi-implies-rape-is-permitted-in-war/39535/

In educating the public concerning the misogyny in the Talmud, we risk yet another campaign by the ADL to have our writing suppressed, based on some fractured distortion of what we are saying. What we are expressing is the preceding documentation. If we are wrong, show us where we are wrong, and we will correct it. But there is a principle that must be defended: without the right to state painful and tragic facts about that which others regard as sacred and untouchable, human learning cannot advance. We will continue to pursue and present knowledge, even at the very real risk of having our presence on the Internet erased by the anti-free speech lobby, which few liberals in charge of social media have thus far found the courage to resist.

“Religions always talk about the one true religion. Now on the Left we have the one true opinion. If you go against that, you do so at your peril…We live in an age where people want to cancel other people and disappear them. Who’s going to be left?” — Bill Maher

_______________________________

Subscribe to Michael Hoffman's Revisionist History® newsletter and start your subscription with the current issue.

_______________________________

Niddah, Shifchah, Goyyah and Zonah

Anti-goyimism in all its multifaceted ugliness and racist evil

www.revisionisthistory.org

Dear Michael,

Apart from you, I know few in this world who would appreciate the irony of my pastor's Sunday sermon yesterday.

His text was Luke 11:37-54, Luke's account of our Lord's excoriation of the lawyers, scribes and Pharisees.  The title of his sermon is referenced in the subject line.  The main point is that we all need to beware of being Pharisees, of course.

In one of the high points of the sermon, he warned that all the world religions and "isms"--all except Christianity--that lead to Pharisee-ism.  Of course, Islam and Buddhism were mentioned. Hinduism and even Roman Catholicism were mentioned.  In fact, I can't think of a major world philosophy or religion that was not mentioned except for one: Judaism!  The very heirs of the Pharisees according to their own literature! Yet like most Christians in our day, it is as if Judaism and Pharisees do not even exist, as if they disappeared in the first century.   But they do exist and they are as strong and corrupt as ever, per our Lord's prophecy in Matthew 12:43-45.

Need Americans, need Christians know about them? Might it have something to do with our culture, our churches, our nation?  I think so.

Thus, I was reminded to encourage you in your latest endeavor to start the center for the study of anti-goyism (The Hoffman Center for the Study of Anti-Goyimism).  I tremble to think that the skill of the lawyers, scribes and Pharisees for stoking hatred of disciples of Christ among the goy to accomplish their purposes indirectly is coming to a head more and more each and every day.  We feel it, the hatred of our culture.  The source needs to be exposed.

I plan to bring the Jewish Encyclopedia reference to the attention of my pastor.  Do you have the exact reference, where Judaism today is said to be descended from the Pharisees of old?

Sincerely,
Ryan G.

Hoffman Replies

Dear Ryan

All of the technical information and citations from Judaic texts on the admission by the rabbinic powers that Orthodox Judaism is the continuation of Pharisaism will be found in the second edition of Judaism Discovered, which I am toiling on at present, in the hope that we will have the funds to publish it in September.

The only reason that the overwhelming and incessant detestation of goyim that is intrinsic to Orthodox Judaism is not better known, is due to the interdiction and suppression of this fact by the media, as for example by the Right wing empire headed by Rupert Murdoch.

(An article today in the Zionist press frets that if Murdoch falls, their propaganda reach will be diminished [“Amid Murdoch Scandal, Some Fear Pro-Israel Media Voice Will Be Muted,” http://www.forward.com/articles/140053/]. As usual, these fears are overblown since the whole of the western media with a few exceptions, are 98% kosher in their spin).

Every now and then a bit of intelligence leaks through the cracks, however. Here is one such instance:

The Limits of Multi-Culturalism
By Christina Patterson
 The Independent (UK)  28 July 2010

“...When I moved to Stamford Hill (a heavily Judaic area of London, England), 12 years ago, I didn't realize that goyim were about as welcome in the Hasidic Jewish shops as Martin Luther King at a Klu Klux Klan convention.

“I didn't realize that a purchase by a goy was a crime to be punished with monosyllabic terseness, or that bus seats were a potential source of contamination, or that road signs and parking restrictions were for people who hadn't been chosen by God.

“And while none of this is a source of anything much more than irritation, when I see an eight-year-old boy recoiling from a normal-looking woman (because, presumably, he has been taught that she is dirty or dangerous, or, heaven forbid, dripping with menstrual blood) it makes me sad.”

Christina Patterson doesn’t know that all female gentiles without exception are regarded in Orthodox Judaism as “menstrual filth, slaves, heathen and whores.” This disgusting litany is expressed by the alphabetic abbreviation NShGZ (“Niddah, Shifchah, Goyyah and Zonah”). You can’t get this information into the western media. They will print anything derogatory about Islam, both real and imagined, but they protect Judaism to the utmost of their ability.

If we had total Talmudic law supremacy in the West -- and we have not yet reached that point since people like this writer are not yet dead or in the gulag -- then even Israeli allies and friends of the Talmud among the goyim, i.e. even the “righteous gentiles” would be killed whenever a Zionist felt the need. I give evidence for this fact from their own texts in the new edition of Judaism Discovered.

The rabbinic texts also speak of the necessity to collectively inflict violence from time to time on the goyim, without regard to the innocent. In this way it is said that the goyim are spiritually corrected! A contemporary Zionist made the statement in a rabbinic periodical that Germans are peaceable today only because the “evil of the German people” was “bombed out of them” in World War II. 600,000 civilians were thereby “spiritually corrected.”

Even those who consider themselves experts in this field are unaware that Allied policy in the 1940s and the 21st century was and is driven by rabbinic injunction. Historians may puzzle forever over the doctrine of collective punishment. If they can’t trace its roots to the rabbinic texts, they will never have the ultimate key to the justification of mass murder of civilian populations, whether in the war on Baghdad that began on Purim, 2003, or the Ash Wednesday holocaust in Dresden in 1945.

In consideration of this reality, it seems to me that the lack of a formal institute for the study of anti-goyimism in all its multifaceted ugliness and racist evil, is a scandal. I soldier on in the fulfillment of this goal in spite of the fact that almost no one in what I gingerly refer to as “our ranks” has publicized it, with the exception of Jeff Rense and Deanna Spingola; any more than anyone other than Richard Widmann and the aforementioned Rense and Spingola has publicized or offered for sale the reprinted edition of the book The Great Holocaust Trial.

Meanwhile, Charles, a colleague in Florida, this week forwarded a letter circulating among young people in Europe which asks, what, if anything, has Ernst Zundel accomplished? This is an astonishingly ignorant question made possible by the fact that the story of Zundel’s heroic struggle is lost on the younger generation. Contrary to those omniscient futurists who have declared that the printed page is dead and the Internet alone is sufficient to educate the masses, there is no substitute for a book like The Great Holocaust Trial in bringing the Zundel saga to the next generation.

Furthermore, in spite of selling, with nearly no sustained advertising, nearly 4,000 copies of Judaism Discovered in hardcover in less than three years, the book received exactly one libelous review in the pages of a Catholic magazine. No other publication on earth could see fit to pay heed and review what was a publishing phenomenon in revisionist studies. It’s a bad joke.

The extent of the boycott in “our ranks” against almost anything I write or propose is so intense there is almost no point in pursuing the argument. All I can do is work harder than ever and hope and pray that with God miraculously sustaining my writing, some visionary millionaire will someday step forward to say, let’s give your books the funding and publicity they deserve, and let’s build The Hoffman Center for the Study of Anti-Goyimism. Until then I labor in the trenches, the beneficiary of encouragement and donations from “regular Joes” like Ryan G.

I am a fighter. I don’t know any other way to live. I can’t quit, retire or take a vacation. My inner being won’t allow it. I live by the Gospel and the words of Edmond Rostand in Cyrano de Bergerac, “The enemy has us surrounded. We shall not let him escape.”

The Great Holocaust Trial
http://tinyurl.com/3kwablo

Revisionist History Newsletter: “Criminalizing Doubt”
http://revisionisthistorystore.blogspot.com/

“A Study of Judaism: Live from San Jose Slideshow” (DVD)
http://revisionisthistorystore.blogspot.com/2010/03/hoffmans-revisionist-history-store-dvds.html

TWITTER: http://twitter.com/#!/HoffmanMichaelA

E-MAIL: hoffman[at]revisionisthistory.org

PURCHASE a revisionist history book, newsletter, CD or DVD:
http://www.revisionisthistory.org/page7/page7.html

DONATE: http://tinyurl.com/4hwh7dz

PUBLICIZE our website: www.revisionisthistory.org

Michael Hoffman is the founder of The Hoffman Center for the Study of Anti-Goyimism 

On the Contrary is a public service of Independent History and Research, Box 849, Coeur d'Alene, Idaho 83816 USA 

Copyright ©2011