Archbishop Viganò protests Freemasonry and Pope Francis

Archbishop Viganò protests the One-world religion of Freemasonry and the “infernal” Pope Francis

By Michael Hoffman

www.RevisionistHistory.org

COVID 19

Last May 8,  Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò released an “Appeal for the Church and the world to Catholics and all people of good will,” which was also signed by Cardinal Gerhard Müller, former Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, and several other cardinals and bishops. In it, he said there is “reason to believe, on the basis of official data on the incidence of the epidemic as related to the number of deaths, that there are powers interested in creating panic among the world’s population with the sole aim of permanently imposing unacceptable forms of restriction on freedoms, of controlling people and of tracking their movements. The imposition of these illiberal measures is a disturbing prelude to the realization of a world government beyond all control.” 

Michael Hoffman's comment: In my opinion every word of the preceding is true, and commendable.

FREEMASONRY AND THE "INFERNAL PARODY"

Archbishop Viganò also mentioned in a May 29 letter “the top levels of the Hierarchy” (who are) “openly placing themselves at the service of the Prince of this world, adopting the demands made by the United Nations for the globalist agenda, Masonic brotherhood, Malthusian ecologism, immigrationism.”

He argued that “a single world religion without dogmas or morals, according to the wishes of Freemasonry” is currently being created. Speaking of Pope Francis, Viganò said “it is obvious that Bergoglio, along with those who are behind him and support him, aspires to preside over this infernal parody of the Church of Christ.” 

Michael Hoffman's comment: 

Archbishop Viganò has been living in hiding, allegedly in fear of assassination, since his August 2018 letter accusing Pope Francis of not enforcing the sanctions placed upon then-Cardinal Theodore McCarrick, a homosexual predator whose crimes were facilitated by recent popes.

The question to ask is whether the archbishop is as naive and unschooled as he appears. Can we trust him? Is he for real or playing a part in the ancient Vatican game of good cop/bad cop and Right/Left dialectic, whereby seeming opposites are actually serving the same Master? 

We pose the question because in resurrecting the old Leo XIII rhetoric against Freemasonry, Viganò compounds the errors of omission which Leo himself propagated. Freemasonry is in fact the offspring of the Church of Rome's revolutionary Renaissance occultism. It grew out of the prisca theologia of the Neoplatonic-Hermeticism and Kabbalism which arose in the Church beginning in Florence in the 15th century, under Medici patronage, and was never dislodged. 

In this writer’s book, The Occult Renaissance Church of Rome, the documentation is presented for those who have eyes to see. For now we will point to Pope Leo's glaring omission: he cited Freemasonry as the opponent of the Church, but as all competent students of the occult know, Freemasonry in its essence is Kabbalism. About Kabbalism Leo XIII said nothing in his encyclicals contra Masonry. How could Leo and his army of Catholic scholars with access to the legendary Vatican archives, have missed the elephant in the room? Was this simply a mistake, or an indication of the deep cover and protection which Rome has afforded the Kabbalistic theology for more than 500 years?

Sincere campaigners on the Left who oppose usury banking and money worship in Rome, see in Right-wing figures like Viganò the possibility of a hidden hand of sponsorship by reactionary occult forces, such as the Knights of Malta, as well as Italian racketeers who desire to keep the usurious Vatican Bank functioning as their private money laundry. 

We do not know that the archbishop is culpable for any of the preceding. He is, however, guilty of manifesting grotesque ignorance of masonic origins, which are to be found in the Renaissance Church itself. Until that fact is known, Viganò's protests are a band-aid and little more. At this late hour, to work successfully for victory requires the articulation of radical truth.

I will address a familiar objection: "Oh, but Hoffman, the Freemasons despise the Church." 

Correct. Like Pepsi despises Coke, IBM despises Microsoft, and Ford detests Toyota. This rivalry does not signal they are not all working for the same objective — commerce — the marketing of products (soda pop, computers and vehicles) in the acquisitive competition to gain the most profit. 

Freemasonry is a Thelemic Counter-Church, competing with the Church of Rome for members and power. In itself, the rivalry between the two is no proof that they do not serve the same Master. 

When the Gambino crime family made war on the Genovese crime family did it signify that one faction was opposed to the Mafia? No, of course not. They were both mafia, contesting for money and power. 

The same is true of the “war” between the post-Renaissance Church of Rome and the masonic lodge. Don’t believe it? Study the 723 pages of The Occult Renaissance Church of Rome. Don’t have the time or inclination? In that case, your lassitude and incomprehension disqualify you from the debate. Opposition to our research predicated on obstinate ignorance does not persuade or impress.

Furthermore, over the course of more than five centuries, from the pontificate of Alexander VI to that of Francis,  the secret theology of that "infernal parody of the Church of Christ” — the post-Renaissance papacy — is the gnostic belief that all religions descend from a single primal truth. 

One World masonic conspiracy inherited its syncretism from the Renaissance "Catholicism" that clandestinely spread it among the upper echelons of the hierarchy and intelligentsia. True believers too pious or lethargic to investigate this harsh truth are cursed (2 Thess. 2:9-12), to continue to play bit parts in the solve et cogaula psychodrama now enveloping the West.

Copyright ©MMXX by Independent History and Research 

For further research:

Viganò's statement

Buy The Occult Renaissance Church of Rome

Pope John Paul “the Great”  — Canonized Saint of the Bipolar Church of Rome

_________

Right wing agents of disinformation

The Right wing continues to promote the delusional and subversive myth that Talmudism is the ally of Christian conservatives

By Michael Hoffman

Updated April 29, 2020

Our colleague in Denver, Mr. J.P.J., writes to allege that the “traditional Catholic" Matt family newspaper The Remnant states:

“Interior Minister Manuel Valls announced that the French government has begun monitoring certain groups for ‘religious pathology,’ including, you guessed it! traditional Catholic organizations...as Valls put it, ‘these traditional Catholics as well as radical Muslims and ultra-Orthodox Jews want to live separately from the modern world,” and are thus examples of religious extremists who under the new secular policy will be disbanded if the government deems them to suffer from “religious pathology.”

In the undated photocopied excerpt from The Remnant I could found no analysis of this statement by the secularist Valls except The Remnant editor’s prediction that all these religious groups are threatened with being disbanded by the government of France.

This statement by the editor of The Remnant, when published at face value, as a bald fact, is misleading and deceptive and demonstrates no knowledge of history or religion.

The roots of French secularism are in the French Revolution. The roots of that masonic revolution pre-date The Enlightenment and can be traced to Rabelais’s Abbey of Thelema and its infamous motto that there is no other law other than, "Fais ce que voudras” (Thomas Molnar translated this in the parlance of the hippies—as “Do your own thing”).

The occult being mostly lies, this saying does not mean what it says. It actually denotes, in practice, total freedom for the occultists and total bondage for the rest of us. Now the question should be asked, is Orthodox Judaism of the occult imperium of Thelema and Freemasonry, or not? 

The answer is, that the Thelemic freedom for occult tyranny extends to Orthodox Judaism because Orthodox Judaism in its black-hatted Hasidic incarnation is the repository and cultivator of the books of the Kabbalah, from which Thelema, and Freemasonry itself, are derived.

Therefore, it is more than obtuse to take the statement of France’s Interior Minister Manuel Valls as if it were completely truthful rather than deceitful, and draw the conclusion that both “traditional" Catholics and Orthodox Judiacs are to be persecuted by the masonic government of France. 

As long as the masonic government of France stands, Talmudism will thrive. Long after "traditional Catholicism" and conservative Protestantism have been dismantled in France, the houses of worship of the Chabad-Lubavitch will stand untouched. One does not need to construct an elaborate schema of historical or theological arguments and treatises to make this point. It is a truism for anyone who has made any kind of serious study of the subject from independent, scholarly sources.

What we actually have from the Donald Trump, Fox News, neocon-Republican, is the fake martyr duality: “We Christians and the poor, persecuted Talmud-followers, are about to be put up against the wall by the forces of Leftist secularism!” Stuff like this is beneath contempt. People who spout it at this late date are mentally challenged.

Mr. J.P.J. further informs us that the “Christian” right wing conspiracy radio host Stanley Monteith has fashioned a theory that at the pinnacle of the occult cryptocracy one finds not the Sanhedrin but "anti-semitic Satanists who plan to persecute all fundamentalists whether Muslim, Christian or Jewish.”

In response to Mr. Monteith, we quote from footnote 402 on p. 360 of this writer’s book Judaism Discovered:

The common fiction among Right wing "Christians" and Republicans is that "religious Jews" are not the problem, but rather that liberal and Leftist ones are. This fable is sown by Ben Shaprio, Dennis Praeger, Michael Medved, Rabbi Daniel Lapin, "Dr. Laura" (Schlessinger) and many others, the implication being that true believers in the Talmud are not as much of a threat to Christianity as are liberals. Asa far back as 1933 the eminent T.S. Eliot promoted this fallacy in a statement to an audience at the University of Virginia(published the next year in After Strange Gods): "...reasons of race and religion combine to make any large number of free-thinking Jews undesirable." Remarks like Eliot's are fixtures of a mystical fear and dislike of the Enlightenment intellectual when he happens to be of Judaic descent, a WASP snobbery that delights the rabbis in that it causes Judaics who break away from Talmudic solidarity to regret having done so, since they are rebuffed by the T.S. Eliot types among the goyim. Personally, all we would ask of a Eliot’s undesirable "free-thinking" Judaic is disengagement from tribal loyalty and the sense of entitlement which is a hallmark of the Talmudic mentality. Judaic free-thinkers meeting those criteria are infinitely preferable to Talmudic censors, liars, bigots and killers.

Mr. Monteith is channeling the party line of legions of conservative goyim who serve as Talmudic propagandists. Islamic fundamentalist Wahhabism and Talmudic fundamentalism are indeed enemies of truth and freedom, while the fundamentals of the Gospel of Jesus Christ are at the root of our western heritage of freedom. 

To conflate two soul-withering tyrannies with the glorious freedom of Christianity on the specious commonality of a mutual “fundamentalism," is to support the continued thralldom of Islamic fundamentalists and Talmudists to a most severe taskmaster who is the opposite of God.

The Orthodox religion of Talmudic Judaism is derived from the pagan soothsaying traditions of ancient Babylon. Can anyone seriously contend that God is happy with those traditions? Does God favor Babylonian idolatry and occultism? 

Superstitious rabbinic fundamentalism is a form of darkness and bondage to strange gods that has nothing in common with the followers of Christ. If Monteith, The Remnant and the Right wing in general  had read our books rather than boycotting them, they would know this truth.

As usual, I issue a challenge to these sadly befuddled “leaders” — debate!

But they can’t debate. They have no answer. 

Their little fiefdoms are built on censorship and blacklisting of facts put forth by damned researchers like this writer. All they can hope for is that their followers never encounter our books.

Why doesn’t this shock me? Because I have read I Timothy 4:1-2.

Copyright©2020. All Rights Reserved
www.RevisionistHistory.org
________