What Pope Francis might have said to the Irish

What Pope Francis might have said to the Irish

By Michael Hoffman

www.RevisionistHistory.org

The chatterbox Pope Francis, who appears to have an opinion on everything, had no opinion in the run-up to the vote in Ireland to end that once-Catholic nation’s ban on the killing of children in the womb. He was silent while the debate raged.

Why does this not surprise this writer? As the author of a 723 page book pioneering the shocking hidden history of the Church, I know that the post-Conciliar Catholic Church is the exoteric fulfillment of the esoteric Hermetic-Kabbalism which seized the papacy in the late 15th century. 

This was a disease of the hierarchy. The Catholic people in general were too alert and militant in their faith to have had this conspiracy revealed to them prior to the 1960s. For 500 years the parish priests, nuns and the lay people in the pews were by and large what medieval Catholics had always been in terms of intolerance toward rabbinic and other types of perfidy, and loyalty to the immemorial Mass.

In the 20th century "The Process” of indoctrination of the masses was put into effect, however. Popes began openly displaying the heretofore hidden Renaissance gnosis, first by trashing the ancient form of the Mass as ordered by Pope “Saint” Paul VI,  who suppressed all resistance as viciously as any Tudor-Anglican monarch. Then under Pope “Saint” John Paul II, entering the synagogue — not to convert the Judaic people and preach Christ crucified, as did Peter and other heroic saints like Vincent Ferrer — but to encourage the assembled Pharisees to continue in their sins while groveling before them by terming them, “Our elder brothers in the Faith” (what faith? — certainly not faith in Jesus).

From those papist craters followed the ersatz "conservative Pope Benedict XVI" who continued the adoration of the self-worshippers in the synagogue. When Benedict abdicated, there emerged a masterpiece of Renaissance occultism brought to full realization in the 21st century, in the person of Italian-Argentine Cardinal Bergoglio, "Pope Francis," the media’s heralded apostle of “luhv”—of everyone and everything except Christ’s loyal followers, except the territorial integrity of a Europe which once brought Christ's Church to its highest fruition, and except the most endangered “refugees" in all the world—the unborn children of mothers tragically seduced by feminism and convenience, in whose wombs there is no “sanctuary."

The pontiff urges compassion for the economic adventurers who cross land and sea to seek their fortune in Britain and Europe while occupying and conquering it for alien creeds, while Francis mocks traditional Catholics for breeding like rabbits — “Some think, excuse me if I use the word, that in order to be good Catholics, we have to be like rabbits — but no,” the pope told reporters in January, 2015.

Fertility and the large families this once prized blessing produced are, according to the “Holy Father in Rome,” not recommended for Catholics, though permissible for immigrant Arab Muslims and African animists. Pope Francis is a coffin-rider. His task is to ruin the Church and depopulate Britain, Ireland and Europe of its indigenous people. Ergo, his eerie silence on the momentous vote last week in Ireland.

He couldn’t address the issue, you say? Yeah, we’ve heard that alibi and we don’t buy it: "If he had spoken out it would have only alienated more voters."

Here’s what the uncharacterically silent pontiff might have said if he truly were a Roman Catholic shepherd preaching truth to media power:

“Dear Irish people: I am Pope Francis. You’ve heard me urge love for gays, transgender, immigrants and homeless. Now I urge you to be merciful and love dehumanized unborn babies. Recognize their humanity and vote no on legalized abortion.”

Thirty-nine words.

Thirty-nine words that in the years ahead might have saved the lives of tens of thousands of the most helpless and the most vulnerable in Ireland. At the very least, those words from the pope would have haunted the weak, though not yet dead conscience of the Irish, and brought to the forefront of the abortion debate the seldom-mentioned issue of dehumanization. 

As I wrote in the New York Times ("Sunday Review" section, April 15, p. 10): “On the day when the unborn child is recognized as a human being with unalienable rights, we will have advanced one giant step toward humanity outside the womb.”

Michael Hoffman is the editor of the informative newsletter Revisionist History, published six times a year (subscriptions and back issues here)

He is the author of textbooks on Judaism that are heavily suppressed and refused advertising space and publicity

The survival and expansion of Michael's Truth Mission depends upon publicity, sales and your donations.  Do you care enough to help?

______________

Molestation facilitator honored by “traditional Catholics"

Updated July 18, 2018

Some “traditional Latin Mass Catholics” have issued a nauseating celebration of the life of a prelatical child molestation facilitator — Cardinal Dario Castrillon Hoyos — who died in May

Cardinal Hoyos

By Michael Hoffman

www.RevisionistHistory.org

From the highly regarded Rorate Caeli blog: “Dario Cardinal Castrillón Hoyos passed away on the 17th of May, 2018, according to the Colombian Bishops’ Conference. He was 88. We ask all of our readers to pray and have Masses said for the repose of his soul...At the very least he was the one most outspoken in defending the rights of Traditionalists in the Church, and the Gregorian Rite itself...

“He celebrated more Pontifical Masses according to the 1962 Missal than his predecessors as PCED President, including the Solemn Pontifical Mass that he celebrated in Santa Maria Maggiore on May 24, 2003 in the presence of 5 other Cardinals, an Archbishop, 2 Bishops and 3,000 faithful. It was the first Solemn Pontifical Mass according to the 1962 Missal to be celebrated in any of the Major Basilicas since the liturgical reforms of Paul VI. 

"To mark the coming into effect of Summorum Pontificum he celebrated a Solemn Pontifical Mass in the Lower Church at the Basilica of the Holy House of Loreto on September 14, 2007. As late as 2013 and 2016 he celebrated Pontifical Masses for the annual Summorum Pontificum Pilgrimage to Rome. 

"His cordial attitude towards the Society of St. Pius X was indispensable to forming the necessary atmosphere for the resumption of the dialogue between them and the Vatican. Again and again he underlined that the SSPX is neither schismatic nor heretical...”

Source: https://rorate-caeli.blogspot.com/2018/05/in-memoriam-dario-cardinal-castrillon.html#more online May 19.

It doesn’t matter to these obsessive Latin Mass advocates that Cardinal Hoyos is on record congratulating French Bishop Pierre Pican for not notifying the police about a priest, Rev. Fr. René Bissey, who was molesting boys. He wrote to Bishop Pican: 

“I congratulate you on not having spoken out to civil authorities against a priest,” wrote Cardinal Dario Castrillon Hoyos, who at the time was prefect of the Congregation for the Clergy. “You have done well and I am delighted…” 

Cf. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/8624763.stm

Hoyos’ statement is the legacy of the secret, “higher soul” Kabbalistic doctrine that infiltrated the Church beginning in the Renaissance: that because of a “mark” conferred upon the souls of priests at their ordination, they have a higher type of soul than the Catholic laity (cf. The Occult Renaissance Church of Rome, a book given “the silent treatment” by “conservative” and  “traditional Catholic” editors and journalists).  

Hence, for the sake of the alleged higher-souled priest, the molestation of little boys ought to be covered up and a bishop who, in the words of Cardinal Hoyos, in charge of all priests throughout the world, the guilty priest is to be protected from the police.

"...some adverse publicity"

Una Voce, the Latin Mass advocacy group in Britain, stated as follows: "In 2010 there was some adverse publicity surrounding Cardinal Castrillón Hoyos which culminated in a widely-publicized withdrawal from celebrating the Mass at the national shrine in the USA. The Federation President wrote to His Eminence to express his support..." - Gregorius Magnus (Una Voce magazine), June, 2018, p. 15.


The freakish priorities of some “traditional” Catholics are beyond degenerate. As the  homage to Hoyos  by Una Voce and Rorate Caeli illustrates, what matters above all is not the innocence of children, but the proliferation of the Mass. 

In an April 22, 2010 radio interview, Cardinal Castrillon said that he did not regret writing in 2001 to congratulate a French bishop for not informing police about an abusive priest. He said that for a bishop to inform on a priest would be like a father testifying in court against a child. “Why would they ask that of the Church?” he said.  Source: Catholic Culture.org

In 2018 nothing has changed about the molestation of children by the papalists; the rhetoric has been altered, and yes, whatever investigations and prosecutions necessary to placate a public now on the alert, have been implemented. But the diabolic doctrine remains in place and the Vatican, along with many (though not all) “traditional Catholics,” continues to bestow high honors on molestation facilitators such as Hoyos, and before him, the fugitive from justice Cardinal Bernard Law. 

When the public furor over molestations dies down, the molestation epidemic will resume, because it is inherent to the Hermetic-Kabbalistic post-Renaissance Church of Rome. Woe to those who share in these transgressions against children by making an idol out of advocacy of the Latin Mass while ignoring the corrupt of the earth who promote it for Machiavellian purposes.

Ignoramuses imagine that the “traditional Catholic Church of the great popes of yesteryear” fought the Talmud and totally defeated its theology. This was true of the pontiffs of the medieval True Catholic Church. It was subverted and overthrown beginning under the Medici popes however, starting with Leo X, who promoted the publication of the Talmud and protected the advocates of the Kabbalah (Pope Leo was not unique in this regard as the hidden record of his successors demonstrates).

The best edition of the Babylonian Talmud produced in world history up to that time was published with the blessing and assistance of Pope Leo X and his co-conspirators. 

Recall that the Talmud in BT Sanhedrin 54b absolves the Judaic adult male from all sin, and exempts him from all responsibility in the matter of molesting boys under the age of nine. This halacha was confirmed by the supreme legal authority in Ashkenazi Judaism, the “Rambam” — Rabbi Moses Maimonides, in his Sefer Kedusha, Hilchot Issurei Bia (1:14).

You know you are in the realm of the Talmud when you encounter a two tier legal system: one law for the privileged class and another for everyone else. This is the very root of tyranny: the Communist Party members and the non-communist people; the Judaic adult male and little children; the Church of Rome’s priests and children.

As a researcher investigating these recondite matters for the past 20 years, one would expect that my work would be welcomed, publicized and promoted by those who claim they are fighting for Jesus Christ. Instead, I am censored and suppressed at almost every turn by those claiming to be on God’s side in the fight for Truth. 

The con game by the corrupt of the earth continues.

For further research:

“Vatican Compares Molestation Scandal to “Persecution of the Jews”

https://revisionistreview.blogspot.com/2010/04/vatican-compares-molestation-scandal-to.html

“The Silent Partner in America’s Molestation Culture”

https://revisionistreview.blogspot.com/2017/11/the-silent-partner-in-americas.html

Your donation = the survival of our Truth Mission

https://revisionisthistorystore.blogspot.com 

_______________

Talmud’s view of non-Judaic women

Documenting and exposing hate speech:

The Babylonian Talmud’s hateful attitude toward non-Judaic women

By Michael Hoffman 

Copyright©2018 by RevisionistHistory.org

The general tenor of the Babylonian Talmud and cognate halachic successor texts (Mishneh Torah, Shulchan Aruch etc.) is that all non-Jewish women are represented by the acronym NSHGZ, which signifies Niddah, Shifchah, Goyyah, Zona (menstrual filth, slaves, heathens and whores - cf. BT Sanhedrin 81b-82a). 

In Yiddish slang, a non-Judaic woman is a shiksa ( שיקסע) which personifies the corrosive “NSHGZ” stereotype.

Caution needs to be exercised here, however, because the Babylonian Talmud has a low view of women generally, whether Judaic or gentile. 

Admittedly, Orthodox Judaism's view of non-Judaic females is much lower by comparison with Judaic women,  and unreservedly toxic. In Israeli, Judaic-American and Yiddish culture, the popular view of the non-Judaic female is that of a highly promiscuous woman, contrasted with the supposedly more sexually modest Judaic woman. 

This view was in the news in 2018, when a researcher with the Washington Post sifted through Hollywood director Woody Allen’s writings and discovered this nugget by Mr. Allen: 

 “Unlike the Jewish girl the shiksa is not guilt-ridden—not a complainer—she is abandoned, fun-loving, and above all promiscuous. The shiksa will perform any sex act.” (Cf. Washington Post online, http://wapo.st/2DipDJ5 [January 4, 2018]).

In studying the halacha of permissible rape of gentiles, we find an expression from Bar-Ilan University Prof. Mordecai Kedar who is on record stating: “The only thing that can deter terrorists...is the knowledge that their sister or their mother will be raped.” (Kedar is also a research fellow at the Begin-Sadat Center for Strategic Studies at Bar-Ilan).

Though it will be claimed by the usual public relations hacks that Prof. Kedar's monstrous rape/deterrent observation is “condemned by the Jewish tradition” (citing, for example, BT Kiddushin 22), there are rabbinic escape clauses which justify rape of non-Judaic women. 

First, the rape target must be classified as a zonah (prostitute) or a nokri (hostile alien). The supreme Ashkenazic halachic authority, Rabbi Moses Maimonides, rules that a Judaic soldier may rape this type of female POW ("Yefas To’ar") when he is not actively fighting a battle (cf. Hilchos Melachim 8:3). For more on this line of thought consult Judaism Discovered, p. 904. 

Courtesy of Maurice Pinay, we have learned of a text from the Meorot theology journal of Yeshivat Chovevei Torah Rabbinic School, on permissible rape: "It is the consensus of many halachic decisors (judges of rabbinic law) that the yefat to’ar can be subject to involuntary intercourse...”  Cf. Dov. S. Zakheim, Meorot, vol. 6, no. 1 (2006), p. 5. (Mr. Zakheim was Under Secretary of Defense in the administration of George W. Bush, 2001-2004).  

Eyal Karim (also spelled "Qarim”), the Israeli military’s chief rabbi, agrees: "Just so, war removes some of the prohibitions on sexual relations (gilui arayot), and even though fraternizing with a gentile woman is a very serious matter, it was permitted during wartime (under the specific terms) out of understanding for the hardship endured by the warriors. And since the success of the whole at war is our goal, the Torah permitted the individual to satisfy the evil urge (yetzer ha’ra), under the conditions mentioned, for the purpose of the success of the whole.” Cf. https://972mag.com/idf-colonel-rabbi-implies-rape-is-permitted-in-war/39535/

In educating the public concerning the misogyny in the Talmud, we risk yet another campaign by the ADL to have our writing suppressed, based on some fractured distortion of what we are saying. What we are expressing is the preceding documentation. If we are wrong, show us where we are wrong, and we will correct it. But there is a principle that must be defended: without the right to state painful and tragic facts about that which others regard as sacred and untouchable, human learning cannot advance. We will continue to pursue and present knowledge, even at the very real risk of having our presence on the Internet erased by the anti-free speech lobby, which few liberals in charge of social media have thus far found the courage to resist.

“Religions always talk about the one true religion. Now on the Left we have the one true opinion. If you go against that, you do so at your peril…We live in an age where people want to cancel other people and disappear them. Who’s going to be left?” — Bill Maher

_______________________________

Subscribe to Michael Hoffman's Revisionist History® newsletter and start your subscription with the current issue.

_______________________________