Degenerative Occult Programming and Dave Chapelle

Alchemical Process and the Revelation of the Method in the "Conservative" Reaction to Netflix's Dave Chapelle 

By Michael Hoffman 

Copyright©2021 www.RevisionistHistory.org 

Alchemy’s Great Work is in essence the action of dissolution and congealing, expansive dissipation and contracting recomposition.  Cf. Charles Nicholls, The Chemical Theatre

Degenerative occult programming consists in the devolutionary Hermetic-Alchemical process of “Solve et Coagula” whereby once high standards of ethics, civility and deportment are incrementally eroded. Humans become less human and the resulting decay becomes the new normal. Our books: Twilight Language; Secret Societies and Psychological Warfare; and The Occult Renaissance Church of Rome, deconstruct this ritual process. 

The latest example is on Netflix cable television where “comedian” Dave Chapelle’s pornographic patter and misogyny no longer shock. 

His show is being applauded by heavily processed “Conservatives” like Tucker Carlson, Peggy Noonan of the Wall Street Journal, Rupert Murdoch's New York Post newspaper, Townhall's Matt Vespa, and others on the Right who are praising Mr. Chapelle for defending the free speech rights of J.K. Rowling and others amid the debate on “Transphobia.” (Rowling is herself much enamored of transformative alchemy). 

That’s the bait, and the "Conservatives" have taken it, while exhibiting a depraved indifference to the rank pornography in Chapelle's very same October Netflix “comedy show,” wherein the word F—k is the lingua franca of discourse, and his despicable Jesus “prayer,” nauseatingly filthy story about his youthful sexual encounter with a pedophile preacher, and references to nearly all women as “bitches,” are the source of mirth and plaudits. 

Twenty years ago no Conservative in their right mind would offer accolades for such a foul stench. It would have been mind-boggling to congratulate the merchant who peddles this ugly degeneracy. Yet, in 2021 the show is celebrated on the Right, or if not extolled, greeted with the shoulder-shrugging apathy of the frazzled and bestialized inhabitants of the Twilight Language Zone. Witnessing this psychological operation is witnessing history from the ground floor of the laboratory where alchemical process is formulated before our eyes. 

It is not hidden. No masonic handshake or password is required to enter its temple precincts. We're far beyond the era of occult secrets-keeping. The programming is revealed in public to the tens of millions who have access to Netflix. Americans succumb to this operation without caring about how far they are debasing their humanity in what is an unmistakable process of mass occult initiation. They are far gone in a civic magic as obvious as a full moon on a cloudless evening. 

Why can't Americans see it? Ah, but many do see, and they don't care. In this stage of Solve et Coagula they are initiates hogtied to a psychological warfare gnosis imparted by good old American pop culture. What could possibly go wrong?

Historian Michael Hoffman is the author of ten books and the editor of the periodical Revisionist History®. 

His work is made possible by donations from truth seekers

Reader reaction to this column is online here

            _________________

Immigration harms the unprotected Americans

By Peggy Noonan

Wall Street Journal • February 27, 2016 p. A11

Editor’s Note: Miss Noonan is increasingly going off the Wall Street reservation to advocate for the American people and Trump-style populism. In this excerpt from her latest column she shows that stopping migrants, refugees and further immigration are not the human rights issue that the media Right and Left portray it. Here she takes up the human rights of the forgotten who are so powerless they are not even part of the equation, except as an evil shadow on the land. Always overlooked is the impact of immigration on these “nobodies” — the working class in the US, Britain and Europe. They are the Trump supporters. They are the unprotected who are damned by the protected class and their media, be it NPR, CBS, CNN or the NY Times.  

...The protected are the accomplished, the secure, the successful—those who have power or access to it. They are protected from much of the roughness of the world. More to the point, they are protected from the world they have created….I want to call them the elite to load the rhetorical dice, but let’s stick with the protected.

They are figures in government, politics and media. They live in nice neighborhoods, safe ones. Their families function, their kids go to good schools, they’ve got some money. All of these things tend to isolate them, or provide buffers. Some of them—in Washington it is important officials in the executive branch or on the Hill; in Brussels, significant figures in the European Union—literally have their own security details. 

Because they are protected they feel they can do pretty much anything, impose any reality. They’re insulated from many of the effects of their own decisions. 

One issue obviously roiling the U.S. and Western Europe is immigration. It is the issue of the moment, a real and concrete one but also a symbolic one: It stands for all the distance between governments and their citizens. 

It is of course the issue that made Donald Trump. 

Britain will probably leave the European Union over it. In truth immigration is one front in that battle, but it is the most salient because of the European refugee crisis and the failure of the protected class to address it realistically and in a way that offers safety to the unprotected.

If you are an unprotected American—one with limited resources and negligible access to power—you have absorbed some lessons from the past 20 years’ experience of illegal immigration. You know the Democrats won’t protect you and the Republicans won’t help you. Both parties refused to control the border. The Republicans were afraid of being called illiberal, racist, of losing a demographic for a generation. The Democrats wanted to keep the issue alive to use it as a wedge against the Republicans and to establish themselves as owners of the Hispanic vote.

Many Americans suffered from illegal immigration—its impact on labor markets, financial costs, crime, the sense that the rule of law was collapsing. But the protected did fine—more workers at lower wages. No effect of illegal immigration was likely to hurt them personally. 

It was good for the protected. But the unprotected watched and saw. They realized the protected were not looking out for them, and they inferred that they were not looking out for the country, either. 

The unprotected came to think they owed the establishment—another word for the protected—nothing, no particular loyalty, no old allegiance. 

Mr. Trump came from that. 

Similarly in Europe, citizens on the ground in member nations came to see the EU apparatus as a racket—an elite that operated in splendid isolation, looking after its own while looking down on the people.

In Germany the incident that tipped public opinion against Chancellor Angela Merkel’s liberal refugee policy happened on New Year’s Eve in the public square of Cologne. Packs of men said to be recent migrants groped and molested groups of young women. It was called a clash of cultures, and it was that, but it was also wholly predictable if any policy maker had cared to think about it. And it was not the protected who were the victims—not a daughter of EU officials or members of the Bundestag. It was middle- and working-class girls—the unprotected, who didn’t even immediately protest what had happened to them. They must have understood that in the general scheme of things they’re nobodies. 

What marks this political moment, in Europe and the U.S., is the rise of the unprotected. It is the rise of people who don’t have all that much against those who’ve been given many blessings and seem to believe they have them not because they’re fortunate but because they’re better. 

You see the dynamic in many spheres. In Hollywood, as we still call it, where they make our rough culture, they are careful to protect their own children from its ill effects. In places with failing schools, they choose not to help them through the school liberation movement—charter schools, choice, etc.—because they fear to go up against the most reactionary professional group in America, the teachers unions. They let the public schools flounder. But their children go to the best private schools. 

This is a terrible feature of our age—that we are governed by protected people who don’t seem to care that much about their unprotected fellow citizens. 

And a country really can’t continue this way.

In wise governments the top is attentive to the realities of the lives of normal people, and careful about their anxieties. That’s more or less how America used to be. There didn’t seem to be so much distance between the top and the bottom.

Now is seems the attitude of the top half is: You’re on your own. Get with the program, little racist.

Social philosophers are always saying the underclass must re-moralize. Maybe it is the overclass that must re-moralize.

Read more at wsj.com

________