America is under Talmudic law, not Sharia law
By Michael Hoffman
Copyright ©2017. RevisionistHistory.org
My bedtime reading is the Babylonian Talmud. It’s true. I find horror literature relaxing. I take a volume of the Talmud and a pencil and sit on the edge of my bed and study for 20 to 30 minutes every night, secure in the thought that it will not be anytime soon that I run out of material, since the Talmud consists of more than 30 volumes, much of it turgid minutiae about subjects so prurient they boggle the mind (Sanhedrin 82b: “Zimri engaged in 424 acts of intercourse with Cozbi in one day”). It is perhaps the most pornographic “sacred” text of any major religion, with the possible exception of the Tantra of the Hindus.
There are passages in the Babylonian Talmud that probably made Jeffrey Epstein blush. Sanhedrin 69a: “A girl who is three years and one day old whose father arranged her betrothal can be betrothed with intercourse, as, despite her age, the legal status of intercourse with her is that of full-fledged intercourse. And in a case where the childless husband of a girl three years and one day old dies, if his yavam (brother) engages in intercourse with her, he acquires her as his wife...as despite her age she is legally considered to be a married woman.”
Defrauding gentiles is another favorite theme. (Sanhedrin 76b: "What is the cause of sin? Returning a lost item to a gentile”).
Apologists who attempt to explain way these ignominious statements often do so by claiming that the Talmud is merely a series of debates without force of law. This deception is usually sold to those who know little or nothing about the Mishnah and Gemara, which comprise the Talmud. The claim about the Talmud being a series of non-binding debates is an insult to our intelligence. While there are many non-negotiable dogmas, the Talmudic religion is mainly predicated upon situation ethics. This explains in part why, in the 16th century, commensurate with Pope Leo X directing the publication of the finest edition of the Babylonian Talmud the world had ever seen, the popes began to enact loopholes in the immemorial Catholic ban on usury. It seems that the situation of usury had changed and that money could now be rented, despite 1500 years of Biblical and Patristic condemnation of this very act. The immutable law of God was eclipsed by man-made laws of convenience. The process is thoroughly Talmudic.
The Babylonian Talmud is indeed a body of law. It is codified by preeminent authorities such as “the Rambam” (Rabbi Moses Maimonides), author of the Mishneh Torah; Rabbi Joseph Karo, author of the Shulchan Aruch, and “the Chafetz Chaim” (Rabbi Israel Meir Kagan), author of the Mishnah Berurah, the legal code centered on the O.C. (“Orach Chayim”) section of Karo’s Shulchan Aruch. There are several other legal authorities, though few have the stature of this trio among the Orthodox Ashkenazi. The source of their binding law codes which micromanage the lives of millions of adherents, is the Talmud of Babylon, that supposed insipid series of mere “debates.”
As you may have surmised from the preceding citations, this writer has been studying tractate Sanhedrin of late, where some of the weightiest matters of halacha (rabbinic law) are propounded. The Sanhedrin volumes cover capital punishment and other forms of penal law, including the eerie concept of the rodef (“pursuer”). It is often bragged that the religion of the Talmud has suspended enforcement of the death penalty. Hence, gentiles don’t have to fear that worshippers of Jesus Christ will be executed for avodah zarah (idolatry), under the Noahide laws; that’s the cover story. The truth is that while the beth din (rabbinic court) does not formally, and as a matter of public action, issue death penalties, they do permit the preemptive execution of a person designated a rodef.
We are dealing here with lawyers. Therefore, it is necessary to be cognizant of the myriad escape clauses that are native to the Talmudic gestalt. Nowadays no rabbinic court sentences anyone to death? That’s true. Hence, people are murdered without trial. The most notorious recent case is that of Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin, assassinated in 1995 by Yigal Amir, a Talmud student, because Rabin was earnestly endeavoring to make peace with the Palestinians. Amir invoked the halachot of the rodef, i.e the rabbinic law governing a pursuer. Rabin was considered by the Israeli-colonialist settler movement to be a rodef, and hence he was summarily murdered as a preventive act. This is a feature of the Talmudic law governing the “pursuer.” It was conveyed to George W. Bush that the nation of Iraq under Saddam Hussein was a pursuer, and a first strike aggressive war was launched, in accordance with the Talmud, while Protestant fundamentalists and papalist neocons ran about screeching, “Beware, Sharia law is nearly here!”
Pursuers come in all shapes and sizes. They can even be Judaic children. In 1973 Americans were shocked and deeply disturbed when the Supreme Court not only legalized abortion at 12 or 16 weeks' gestation — the Court, in conformity with the Talmud, legalized abortion on demand at any time during the pregnancy, including a few minutes before the baby is born. This abominable crime against the innocent is permissible in those lands where the Talmud exerts dominion.
The relevant halacha is found in the uncensored text of the Talmud Bavli (“Bavli” denotes Babylon), in Sanhedrin 72b, where a mother believes her unborn baby is endangering her life by “pursuing” her. According to the Talmud, this unborn infant rodef can be eliminated at any time during the pregnancy, except when the mother is actually giving birth and the head of the child becomes visible.
“Before the baby is born, it is not considered a living soul, and it is therefore not subject to the halakhot (law) of murder.” — Koren Talmud Bavli: Sanhedrin Part Two (Jerusalem, 2017), p. 155.
Right wing campaigners against the alleged imminent imposition of Sharia law announce that they are defending the “Constitution against Islam.” We have never seen a case where Islamic law profoundly influenced members of the Supreme Court. We have, however, observed repeated Talmudic influence over how the court interprets the Constitution in the modern era. Roe v. Wade is one example. Another is the “discovery” of a Constitutional right to legalize the marriage of sodomites. It goes without saying that the Founders envisioned no such right, just as the Bible made no allowance for a usurping Talmud.
In the religion that is directed by the Talmud, there is no legislature. All laws are made by judicial decision. It just so happens that this is how much of the supreme law of the land is made in America. Another name for “activist judge” is Talmudic judge.
Our nation is under Talmudic law, not Sharia, though immense troops of Protestant and Catholic ignoramuses display their cluelessness as they crusade with intense fervor against a non-existent menace, while oblivious to the cancer eating at the bowels of our nation.
One wants to be charitable. One hesitates to overtax rhetoric and apply the word idiocy to the victims of what is a constantly mutating virus of deception that has hoodwinked them and 99% of the conservative movement. In lieu of such rhetoric, an observation of C. Wright Mills comes to mind, “We are at a curious juncture in the history of human insanity.”
Michael Hoffman is the author of Judaism Discovered, and Judaism’s Strange Gods. He is a former reporter for the New York bureau of the Associated Press.
Hoffman's Failure For Philosophic Analysis
Hoffman admits essence of his entire philosophy in his first sentence, last paragraph, this article, "[o]ne wants to be charitable." Indeed, this is Hoffman's entire and primary impetus--he wants to play the virtuous, the "moral," the "mighty-white," no less than the Pharisees he pretends to criticize.
Indeed, Hoffman would rather be "charitable" (and "mighty-white") than to be TRUTHFUL, in accord w. Christ = TRUTH TRUTH TRUTH, above all (Gosp. JOHN 14:6).
And the ESSENCE of Talmudism is (a) SUBJECTIVISM--law and reality means whatever rabbis say it does, all in accord w. "midrash" (interpretation) and "Oral Law Tradition." (b) Further, the Jews practice a COLLECTIVISTIC subjectivism, a sublime, well-organized, and well-led sort of "group-think," by which Jews co-operate and thus lead the rest of the subjectivists, esp. among the gentiles, which gentiles are far less organized than the Jews, the Jews thus allowed and enabled thereby to dominate and manipulate these subjectivistic gentiles.
And note satanism is (extreme) subjectivism, the "philosophy" by which one makes oneself God, holding that consciousness/mentality is the genesis of all reality, the Jews merely colluding upon a collectivistic version of this subjectivism, Jews thus dominating the more nihilistic, dis-organized, individualistic subjectivist gentiles.
Such then is the philosophy, sociology, and psychology of Talmudism, extreme subjectivism and satanism, and the effect upon the corrupt gentile culture, originally founded upon Christianity and TRUTH (= Christ), truth understood as only meaningful as it is based upon the OBJECTIVE reality, objectivity a necessary philosophic assumption, that objective reality understood as God-given and -created.
Thus the necessary pretext to subjectivism (hence Talmudism/Judaism) is MORALISM, the fallacious and hereticalist idea of "good-evil," which doesn't exist in a God-given world of strict determinism and absolute cause-effect, the only will being God's will, there being no possible human "free"-will, humans being sinners, incapable of "good" which doesn't exist, there being no possible or conceivable premise/criterion, known to Christianity and St. Augustine as Pelagian heresy, equating to Pharisaism.
apsterian said "... the necessary pretext to subjectivism (hence Talmudism/Judaism) is MORALISM, the fallacious and hereticalist idea of "good-evil," which doesn't exist in a God-given world of strict determinism and absolute cause-effect, the only will being God's will, there being no possible human "free"-will, humans being sinners, incapable of "good" which doesn't exist, there being no possible or conceivable premise/criterion, known to Christianity and St. Augustine as Pelagian heresy, equating to Pharisaism."
That is the view of a Calvinist, i.e. not a Christian.
It would be great if we would confine our comments to the topic of the column: the ramifications of the revelation of the Talmudic laws cited, their impact on the Sharia debate and on the conservative family values, and Constitutional patriot, movements, as well as the Catholic neocons and Protestant fundamentalists who have been misdirected away from the influence of rabbinic halacha by the Sharia hysteria.
Why do online comments so often veer off-topic and become an opportunity to debate issues that are not germane to the subject at hand?
Whether Calvinism is Christian or not has very little (if any) relevance to the question of the dominance of Talmudic law over America. Those who wish to reignite the fratricidal Protestant-Catholic wars of religion should do so in some forum other than the comments section of this Talmud/Sharia exposé.
Thanks Michael. Seems to me that any of the comments regarding the nature of the Talmud, or it's interpretations, or some irrelevant "Christian" debate change the reality of what you state here.
Concesus, manipulation, power plays - it is all irrelevant when the RESULT is a law compliant to the Talmud
Talmudism/Subjectivism Prevails And Dominates In Hubris And "Western Decline"
Well Hoffman: the obvious pt. to my original essay, above, is Talmudism = subjectivism, and this subjectivism is given pretext by the hubris of Pharisaism, fallacious moralism of non-existent and hereticalist "good-evil," Pelagianism, according to St. Augustine. There's no "free" will for the human to ever not be a sinner. Humans are doomed to sin and must depend upon God's grace and mercy.
So the pt., once again, is Talmudism (subjectivism) prevails and rules to extent the gentiles and Christians ACCEPT the Talmudic PREMISES of subjectivism, which is to say, specifically, Pelagian heresy, the fallacious moralism of "good-evil" in the obsession for virtue-signaling as we see in this day--ESPECIALLY in the matter of "racism" which the Talmudists and partisans of George Soros use to CENSOR and suppress free speech and expression, making use of MONOPOLIES which get tax-payer -provided subsidies and favorable regulation, like the various present platforms, including YouTube and Google.
Charles Martel merely begs question as to WHAT is Christianity, which is worship of truth (= Christ, Gosp. JOHN 14:6) against satanic lies (JOHN 8:44). Christ clearly rejected and repudiated Jew/Pharisaic subjectivism and "midrash" (interpretation) in Gosp.s MARK ch. 7, and MATT ch 15.
Thus the Christian society, at first so firm in respect for principle, Christian truth (hence objectivity) above all, gradually gives way in CYCLIC manner of Oswald Spengler's "Decline of the West," the corrupt, "prosperous," degenerate people evermore given to hubris of "good-evil" and virtue-signaling as we see promoted so heavily in the idiot-factories of public "education." Thus the Jews, for example, were given their foot-hold in Palestine as direct object and result of first world war--HOW did that happen that Jews became so immensely powerful and influential?
For meantime, the people of the West were persuaded that "currency" should be substituted for real money, commodity-based, like gold/silver--which allows the criminal enterprise of legalized counterfeiting (the central-bank), the continuing issuance of currency devaluating the currency units already in circulation, the people defrauded and despoiled. Thus the Talmudic monopolists and criminals are empowered and enabled to eventual extermination of the gentile people, as we see by means of Agenda-21 and -30 "population-reduction" policies--and Palestine and its people are ignored and "disappeared."
So I consider my arguments in first essay, above, abstract as they seem, to be actually quite well demonstrated in reality and history, and indeed, also in the scripture too.
Michael, I do not wish to "...reignite the fratricidal Protestant-Catholic wars of religion..." I am merely alluding to the fact that Calvin was a Talmudic zealot who hated the Catholic Church. That's important to me in identifying who the enemies of truth are.
"Our nation is under Talmudic law, not Sharia, though immense troops of Protestant and Catholic ignoramuses display their cluelessness as they crusade with intense fervor against a non-existent menace, while oblivious to the cancer eating at the bowels of our nation."
I agree. That cancer is Talmudic Judaism which has, as its guiding light, Lucifer. Time for the "Protestant and Catholic ignoramuses" to wake up and smell the coffee (or, rather, the brimstone).
On what do you base your allegation that John Calvin was a Talmudic zealot? All that I have read shows him to have been a severe critic and disparager of Judaism.
Read “Usury in Christendom: The Mortal Sin that Was and Now is Not.”
Seems legit. Thank you, Michael, for more food for thought! God bless us all.
Michael: To me, one of great strikes to Talmudic power is for America to rid itself of the Federal Reserve System usury and counterfeit enterprise. To rid the tree, you have to not just strike at the branches. So, Michael, how do we rid ourselves of Talmudic power?
When we reinstate the Biblical ban on renting money (Usury) the Money Power will no longer be supreme.
Then, apparently, either a religious revival sweeps the nation or we elect people in the levers of power who will end the FRS. I don't see any Andrew Jackson types on our horizon, however.
David Norton said, "I don't see any Andrew Jackson types on our horizon, however."
How about a Jackson who was not a freemason?
Great conversation, very educational.
I seems that Judge Roy Moore, whom Michael and Chuck Baldwin are so enthusiastic about, is one of these idiotic ignoramuses. Moore is worried that the Sharia phantom is a danger to America. Moore, Juris Doctor and legal scholar, cites his sources:
Roy Moore: "Well, there's Sharia law, as I understand it, in Illinois, Indiana — up there. I don't know...Jeff Stein: That seems like an amazing claim for a Senate candidate to make.
Roy Moore: Well, let me just put it this way — if they are, they are; if they're not, they're not. That doesn't matter."
https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2017/8/15/16151182/alabama-senate-roy-moore Two assertions that would get Moore, J.D., an F if he cited them in the end notes of an undergraduate college term paper.
Moore needs to read Judaism's Strange Gods, The Revisionist History Newsletter study of Hilkheta Ke Vatra'ei and Elena Kagan, and Michael's blog essay.
Jackson is the only US President to be censored by Congress. His crime? He wanted to create a US National Bank so the US could coin and print it's own money. Washington was a Mason and I think he turned out pretty well and was a benefit to this country. Masonry then and now is an ocean difference.
Freemasonry is Kabbalism for gentiles. Its roots are in the Kabbalism of the Renaissance popes of Rome which led to the rise of Johannes Reuchlin and Leo X's papal occult agents (among them Cardinal Viterbo and the Archbishop of Mainz, who secretly sponsored the publication of "Letters of Obscure Men") -- these agents defended Reuchlin against the true Catholic Hoogstraten.
Rosicrucianism arose post-Reuchlin from these networks and their Protestant descendants (the Cambridge Neoplatonists among them). Rosicrucianism prepared the ground for the Judaism-for-gentiles known as Freemasonry. These facts are in this writer's book, "The Occult Renaissance Church of Rome."
Just as there are renegade Catholics in history there are renegade Freemasons. William Morgan was one of these and he was assassinated by his lodge brothers, as testified to by John Quincy Adams and many others.
Andrew Jackson was another such renegade Mason. He fought Nicholas Biddle's National Bank tooth and nail and appointed a true Catholic, Roger B. Taney, Attorney General, so Jackson would have a reliable ally in his fight against the powerful Biddle. At a time when prejudice against Catholics was rife, Andrew Jackson eventually named Taney, who was a strict constructionist, Chief Justice of the Supreme Court.
Taney has been made notorious for his Dred Scott decision. Taney freed his own slaves but he would not do as the Talmudic rabbis do and make law by means of judicial decisions. Tragically, the Constitution permitted slavery and Taney remained faithful to his oath to defend the Constitution as it was written; refusing to be a Talmudic-style "activist judge" such as we have today. For his patriotic loyalty he has been made to bear perpetual derision and contempt. (His statue was recently removed in Maryland).
Revisionist history consists in digging below surface appearances and investigating the official chronicle of the past, which too often we cling to for the sake of our confirmation bias. Follow the truth wherever it leads, even if it leads to conclusions which contradict our cherished myths.
Michael:Thanks for your kind reply. I have both your most recent books and I have enjoyed reading Occult Renaissance. I know a lot about much and I can tell you I only read about ten pages of this book at each sitting because learning this is a punch to my spiritual gut as it is painful but necessary to know the degree of deception that exist in many spheres of life.
The Masons have Blue Lodges for Jews only under the banner of Bnai Birith and they are the highest lodges within the Masonic ranks.
Ahh defend the indefensible...exactly what the Talmud is known for... Let me guess... You are a Rabbi with 3 welfare checks and all the time in the world to rationalize evil. Always consistent.
How fascinating - a subject I know absolutely NOTHING about, I'm a simple guy, but "in my Spititual Gut" this article (or essay) rings true. Perhaps the definition of Talmud (subjection) as one commented are not totally accurate, yet what is happening in my beloved USA is very troubling. Our Foundation of LIBERTY (the Declaration of Independence anyone?) is being eroded through "activist judges" and undermined by despotic legislation at an alarming rate. Subjection is another word for at least a serfdom, and more likely slavery.
Now for "us on the outside" who are caught up in the frenzy of work & raising our kids, loving our wives and living lives focused on healthy respect for our fellow man, it seems to me the corruption in Albany (NY's legislative capitol), Washington D.C. and court decisions based on "Precedent".
The noun precedent means an example from the past that provides evidence for an argument. It is most commonly used in legal circles and, more specifically, can be described as a previously decided case that guides the decision of a future case.
This is what's happening in our "modern" legal system. I think we are being had in a very organized way.
Without further attempts to make my point, thanks for a great article and I'll do some more reading as you suggest sir. For me and my house, Give me LIBERTY or give me death....It's time to declare "we will not comply".
I didn't finish my thought!
Now for "us on the outside" who are caught up in the frenzy of work & raising our kids, loving our wives and living lives focused on healthy respect for our fellow man, it seems to me the corruption such as in Albany (NY's legislative capitol), Washington D.C. and court decisions based on "Precedent" are in sync with one another and leading us in a coordinated effect to a place we don't want to go.
Post a Comment