Welcome Information Connoisseurs

Welcome Information Connoisseurs

Saturday, July 18, 2009

Judaic Front Group Secretly Promotes Neo-Nazism

Zionist Front Group Secretly Promotes Neo-Nazism

Nazism has always been a deep-cover black op of Judaism. Hitler was influenced and directed by Kabbalistic-oriented occultists (see this writer's Judaism Discovered and our introduction and bibliography in Eisenmenger's Traditions of the Jews, as well as our investigative report, "The Russian Roots of Nazism" in Revisionist History Newsletter no. 39).

Many of the neo-Nazi groups functioning today are secretly funded by government and Zionist organizations. 

Now we learn that neo-Nazism and its propaganda have been covertly disseminated and encouraged by the powerful "Canadian Human Rights Commission," (CHRC) a Zionist front group effective in silencing Canadian dissidents who are critical of Israeli war crimes, the official World War II liturgy and Canada's immigration policies.

The CHRC was recently documented secretly posing as Neo-Nazi activists and disseminating disgusting propaganda, encouraging hatred of Judaic persons and non-whites.

Only a fearless, Gospel-based, Christ-centered, anti-racist movement that "hates the sin but loves the sinner," and targets ideologies, never people, will have substantial success in exposing the Zionist Fifth column that works behind the scenes sowing disinformation, confusion and violent false flag operations around the world. Beware. Be vigilant!

Neo-Nazi hate, courtesy of the CHRC
By Ezra Levant, National Post (Canada)
July 15, 2009

Last month, a parliamentary committee invited Jennifer Lynch, the head of the Canadian Human Rights Commission, to answer questions about her agency's conduct. She refused to attend, sending in her place a deputy who could not answer key questions put to him by MP (Member of Parliament) Russ Hiebert.

Now that Parliament is safely on summer holidays, Lynch has bravely emerged from her bunker -- the CHRC office actually is a bulletproof bunker -- to accuse Hiebert of getting his facts wrong. But it's Lynch's version that's false.

In her July 11 letter to the National Post, Lynch denies that CHRC staff hacked into the Internet account of a private citizen to cover their tracks as they logged into their memberships in neo-Nazi websites. Lynch says both the Privacy Commissioner and the RCMP (Royal Canadian Mounted Police) "found no evidence to support this allegation."

But that's not true. The Privacy Commissioner's staff did not investigate the hacking -- that is not within their jurisdiction. They only examined "whether the CHRC improperly collected, used, disclosed or retained personal information about the complainant," a different and irrelevant question.

And neither did the RCMP declare that there was "no evidence" to the accusation. They investigated for months. Only when the case led them to a U. S.-based Internet server did they drop their investigation rather than pursue it internationally. That's quite a different thing from exonerating the CHRC.

There was a hearing into the matter, though, at the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal on March 25, 2008. Alain Monfette, Bell Canada's security officer, testified that the CHRC accessed the Internet using that private citizen's Bell account. Lynch's lawyers sat in embarrassed silence -- they did not rebut Monfette's evidence nor even bother to cross-examine him.

As Nelly Hechme, the hacking victim, told reporters, "I merely wanted some answers and maybe a little justice, but that doesn't seem to be the case. I feel like I'm basically being told to just accept it."

Lynch is pretending that Hechme doesn't even exist. But that pales in comparison to Lynch's statement that CHRC staff did not "post hateful messages on the Internet."

In fact, CHRC employees have been active members of neo-Nazi organizations for years, and have published countless anti-Semitic, anti-gay and anti-black comments online. CHRC employees have admitted to this under oath. On the same day Monfette testified about the hacking, CHRC investigator Dean Steacy testified there were no guidelines about what CHRC staff could do using their online Nazi memberships.

Steacy, for example, used his Nazi membership to write encouraging words to a racist group called B. C. White Pride. He praised them, told them their racist posters were "great" and promised to distribute their literature. Your tax dollars at work.

Other CHRC investigators went further. One praised Nazi leaders ( "I still say [Adrien] Arcand is our man!"); called for Canadian police to discriminate against blacks ( "exactly when will white cops understand that they should stand by THEIR race?!"); and trashed a Jewish youth group ( "if people spent the time building fellow WNs [White Nationalists] up rather than tearing them down we'd be dangerous. Unless your goal is to tear people down in which case go join Hillel or something.")

At least 12 CHRC prosecutions have been tainted by CHRC staff or witnesses using agent provocateur tactics like that. They've even written Nazi shorthand for "Heil Hitler".

Steacy testified that at least seven CHRC staff have access to Nazi membership accounts: Steacy himself, his two personal assistants, investigator Sandy Kozak, lawyer Giacomo Vigna, manager John Chamberlin, and former CHRC investigator and current serial witness and complainant Richard Warman.

By sheer numbers, the Canadian Human Rights Commission has more Nazi members than the tiny Canadian Nazi Party did when it briefly existed in the 1960s.

If real police and prosecutors behaved this way, they would be suspended and any criminal charges tainted by such misconduct would be stayed. Not so at the CHRC, which lacks an internal affairs office or written operational policies. It doesn't even have a code of ethics.

It's become so embarrassing that even the tribunal -- the kangaroo court that rubber-stamps CHRC censorship prosecutions -- has ended its silence. Four months ago, the tribunal examined some of these comments, including one denouncing Jewish politicians as "scum." "I do not see any acceptable reason for [Richard] Warman to have participated on the Stormfront or Vanguard [neo-Nazi] sites," wrote the tribunal. "It is possible that his activity in this regard could have precipitated further hate messages in response ... The evidence in this case of his participating on Internet sites similar to the Northern Alliance [neo-Nazi] site is both disappointing and disturbing."

It's a scandal that the CHRC joins Nazi groups on the taxpayers' dime. But instead of recognizing the problem and fixing it, Lynch is trying to cover it up. The Prime Minister needs to intervene. It's time Stephen Harper fired everyone with a Nazi membership at the CHRC, along with the woman who is permitting their bigotry.

(Emphasis supplied) Ezra Levant blogs at ezralevant.com



Anonymous said...

Your work in hugely important, but permit me to offer what may appear to be a criticism ...

Much as Hitler was a momentary has-been, a smokescreen for underlying messianic-controlled Jewish globalism and communism, there is a similar big-picture versus the smaller tactical ones that most people are missing.

History will eventually show that, like Hitler and WW-II, the Old Testament and New Testament are (were) but momentary has-beens.

In short, Christianity, as an expression of a self-reflexive harmonic philosophy, about justice and proportionalities between man and our Creator, then finding happy and successful expression in Egypt, Africa and Greece, a remnant of it now “known” to us as “do unto others as you would have them do unto you,” PRE-existed both the Old Testament, and its self-proving concubine, the New Testament.

Concurrent with, and in competition with, the upward looking, self-reflexive, and individually liberating harmonic philosophy, which I call pre-existing Christianity in the sense that this view of mankind's relationship with our Creator pre-existed the reactionary construct of (Tut)Moses, was the downward looking, and anti-harmonic philosophy of the Babylonian usurers.

All of the squabbles between the Old Testament (and its pre-existing but hidden root system, the Talmud) and the New Testament branches, are small tactical ones. They are smokescreen squabbles. They are inconsequential swirlings of leaves -- mere dust devils.

Notwithstanding the appearance of a successful street organizer for Platonic-Egyptian philosophy, who was later renamed by Talmudic rabbis as Jesus Christ, and reconstructed by them as one of their own in order to subsume and bury his resurrection of pre-existing Christian teachings, the New Testament is, absent a Jeffersonian razor blade, a branch grown from a tree of lies. The New Testament is a branch grown from one of the biggest and most reactionary and strategic lies of all ... the Old Testament.


Expressed through Egyptian and Greek cultures, both in economic competition with the Babylonians, barbarians and Khazars, the core teachings of Christianity pre-existed the literary construct we now “know” as the NT. The NT and its proclaimed root, the OT, were both fabricated, as the same time, with the same deceptive intention, by Babylonian (later Roman Catholic) printers and usurers, as a protective REACTION against the then pre-existing and ever emergent forces of Christianity, as expressed through ancient Greek and Egyptian cultures.

Of course its Babylonian-Roman Catholic writers were smart enough to have the NT validate all the predictions they had carefully woven into the OT, and vice versa. They were also smart enough to “spice up” their story (that is that Jesus was a Jew -- and that Christianity is a branch grown out of Judaism -- LIES!) by repeated and timely insertions of small delicacies of poetic truths. The presence of these small morsels of truth does not set aside the larger strategic picture ... Christianity, as a teaching, as a philosophy on self-reflexive harmonics and a proportional relationship between individuals and our Creator, pre-existed the Mosaic construct.

The OT was a Babylonian reaction against teachings which pre-existed the OT, and Christianity, as a philosophy of “do unto others as you would have them do unto you,” pre-existed the Babylonian reaction.

Much as you construct a big picture around Hitler and WW-II, so might we also consider that the OT, and its fair-haired concubine, the NT, were a unified Babylonian reaction against pre-existing Christianity.

Anonymous said...

That was an excellent observation and one with which I totally agree with. From my own past 29 years of studying the ancients works through metaphysics, astrology and hermetics I believe you are "right on" in your analysis. Thanks for a great post.