Welcome Information Connoisseurs

Welcome Information Connoisseurs

Wednesday, June 10, 2009

James von Brunn hated Christianity

EDITOR'S NOTE: The following anti-Christian rant has been attributed to James von Brunn, the accused assailant at the "Holocaust Museum." As Christians we are publishing this disgusting statement alleged to be his (from a website called antichrist.net) not because we endorse it (in fact we utterly condemn it) -- but to demonstrate that the seeming Manchurian Candidate James von Brunn was not part of our movement and his deeds cannot be attributed to Christian revisionists.

If this is in fact Von Brunn's authentic writing, then he extols race as much as any rabbi. 
Strange indeed is the degree to which he allegedly fired his gun on cue, timed to support the game plan of the Cryptocracy.

by James W. von Brunn

 As duped Aryan sheep begin to understand the "Holocaust" they also begin to better understand Christianity.  Both have similar origins.  Both have identical objectives.

Saul of Tarsus, after helping friends stone to death a disciple of Jesus Christ, set forth toward Damascus.  As he trudged the dusty road a blinding, excruciating light suddenly crashed his brain.  The world whirled into a crimson vortex.  He heard his own scream, far away.  Then there was quiet.  When he awoke he was lying on the road.  He looked up.  A man in a white cloak was standing there his hands outstretched.  His hands bore deep scars.  Saul trembled with fright.  Then Jesus smiled, pulling Saul upright, saying, "Fear not, Saul of Tarsus, I come to you from our Father."  It was a miracle.

Saul and Jesus earnestly, fervently, joyously conversed with one another.  Arm in arm they tarried there.  Jesus told Saul he was his own.  Jesus was loving, loving, forgiving, forgiving.  Saul became his disciple there and then -- struck by the Holy Spirit.  Finally, following Saul's vows of fidelity, love, and obedience, the visitation ended when, before Saul's wondering awe-struck eyes, Jesus to Heaven in a halo did rise.  It was a miracle.

We are told that this extra-sensory experience, somewhat like an epileptic fit, suddenly changed the hateful, murderer Saul (later, St.  Paul) from a hater of Jesus into a Jesus lover.  Really?

Saul, ten years younger, had not met The Master vis a vis before Jesus' crucifixion.  Had they met earlier Saul probably would have crushed Christ's head with a rock.  Saul, and most Israelis, detested Jesus and his blasphemous ideology almost as much as they detested Romans; more even than they detested Greeks, Babylonians, Assyrians, Canaanites, Egyptians, Persians, et al.  In truth, as bigoted Judeophobes know, God's "Chosen People" hated their God's only Son.

Matthew emphatically states that Israelis so hated Jesus Christ that THEY crucified him (Pope John Paul II, Zionist, said that Matthew is wrong!  What's that?  "The Word of God" is wrong?).

ACTUALLY, on the road to Damascus -- brooding about Rome, relishing the bloody image of the disciple he had stoned to death; sweaty, sore footed, thinking of the blasphemous ravings of the Nazarene -- Saul had an incredible, earthshaking IDEA.  A light-bulb inspiration.  He, Saul -- a Roman citizen -- suddenly realized how he could destroy Rome!  Saul trembled uncontrollably with fear and joy.  He would simply promulgate the insane teachings of Jesus!  What better way to destroy a Nation -- any Nation -- than to undermine her hubris; her gods, ethics, mores, history, her gene-pool -- in short, Saul would DESTROY ROMAN CULTURE.  Then, as night follows day, with her foundations rotted, the Roman Empire would FALL.  Saul decided to begin the HOAX by inventing a miraculous encounter on the road to Damascus with the reincarnated Jesus the Christ!

Toward that end -- no different than Hollywood script-writers today -- Saul created a bogus a la Spielberg docu-drama stuffed with lies, miracles, guilt trips, betrayal, virgin birth, eternal damnation, salvation -- a scenario appealing to the superstitious, vulnerable, ignorant yearning sheep -- he named his hoax "Christianity."

The New Testament was written in Greek.  Paul - who believed the World was flat, that Joshua made the sun stand still, and Jehovah spoke from a burning bush -- wrote one-third of it, perhaps more.  The events described in the 24 Books are often contradictory, fail the time-line, defy both archaeology's and nature's immutable laws, and are suicidal if practiced. 

Nevertheless, the shamans bought it, taught it, and the illiterate public was coerced, brainwashed, threatened, tortured, murdered, and enthralled.  The Encyclopedia Britannica states that over 6,000 major redactions exist between the Septuagint (translation of Aramaic into Greek) and its St. James biblical translation.

The Gospels profess that only Christians may enter Yahweh's Kingdom of Heaven.  To qualify, among other demands, Christians must LOVE THEIR ENEMIES (Jews); give away their personal belongings; eschew knowledge; judge not, despise nature, abandon earthly pleasures, acknowledge that all YHWH's children are equal; and above all else worship YHWH, the jealous, wrathful, vengeful, unforgiving, genocidal, anthropomorphic tribal god (Jesus' father) created by Hebrews in their image and likeness.  Omnipotent, omniscient YHWH promises Hebrews that they alone shall inherit the earth, that it is commendable to steal from Gentiles, better yet -- kill them.  Whereas Gentiles, if they fail to worship YHWH, are transported straight to Hell.  And it is written, "A little child shall lead them."

These dangerous, imbecilic, concepts, tenets, and teachings, often treasonous, DESTROYED the Roman Empire and drenched the soil of Europe with Aryan blood for almost 2000 years!

The Big Lie technique, employed by Paul to create the CHRISTIAN RELIGION, also was used to create the HOLOCAUST RELIGION ... CHRISTIANITY AND THE HOLOCAUST are HOAXES.

"Christianity" destroyed Roman Civilization.  The "Holocaust" Religion is destroying Western Civilization.  The Aryan gene-pool dies, "unwept, unhonored and unsung." 




mwh said...

Well, if this guy was working for the Zionists, this piece (if he really wrote it) is some kind of decoy text, isn't it?

At any rate, it seems a little overdone to me.

Rough Sawn said...

Perfect! Now if only this man had been stopped BEFORE he acted! Christians have nothing to fear...he wasn't a Christian! Thought crime laws are intended to protect us from crazies like this, a person whose ideology we can all take offense at. It's just common sense after all. Perfectly rational. Neither furthering nor hindering any particular ideology. No winners or losers with these thought crime laws - unless you're crazy. And who thinks crazy people ought to be allowed to hurt folks? Especially innocent (much more innocent than anyone else on the planet, chuckle chuckle) Jews!

Oh good Lord help us if this kind of transparency is going to work.

Anonymous said...

If there is a cryptocratic element, wouldn't they have not written something like this? Is it possible that this guy was co-opted by cryptocratic elements so they couldn't have controlled this.

HallnOates said...

Hey Hoffman,

No joke. This guy's website looks like they tried to resemble yours(http://revisionisthistory.org/page1/news.html):

Emphasis on the part between the Buy Now and Donate buttons towards the bottom saying:

They don't want you to read this book!

I mean even the layout of the page looks similar.

Is James W. von Brunn's Kill the Best Geniles! going to be to Hoffman's Judaism Discovered what The Protocols of the Elders of Zion was to Eisenmenger's The Traditions of the Jews?

It won't be.

Anonymous said...

Von Brunn was a CREATOR who followed ben claussen [creativity movement]

Anonymous said...

thought crime laws target the unpopular thoughts, the ones they wish to surpress. They can never be justified because as soon as you let them in the door for one thing, they will quickly be expanded to quell many other thoughts from being expressed.

mwh said...

Well, I see that -


Has been taken down and replaced with an explanation, part of which reads:

"Obviously I do not condone the actions of Mr. Von Brunn, all day
yesterday I kept coming here, trying to bring myself to remove the page
on anti-Christianity which Mr. Von Brunn had contributed to this site
several years ago. Given the severity of this case, I now feel that it
MUST come down."

Anonymous said...

It's hard to argue with Van Brunn's thesis. Christianity sapped Rome's vitality and vigor and was originally just one of the many strange cults flourishing in the decaying empire. The same universalist dogma that weakened Rome is now destroying America along with "holocaust" induced guilt.

Christianity is as drenched in blood as Islam and Judaism. Charlemagne beheaded 30,000 Anglo-Saxon pagans for their refusal to convert. Let us not forget the millions who perished during the Christian religious civil wars of the middle ages.

I see nothing offensive about honoring the white race as Von Brunn did. That coupled with his hostility to Jews hardly make him a cryptocrat. Every other racial group is loyal to their own kind but white people are supposed to be deracinated and raceless to be deemed worthy in the eyes of Hoffman's corrupt god.

At one time Mr. Hoffman was a defender of white people but has seemed to do a 180 degree turn the last several years and now dedicates most of his time to defending Islam. This is a tragedy for someone as immensely talented as Mr. Hoffman.

Anonymous said...

In response to anonymous 7:14 AM:

There is a part of his/her comment which lends support to the occultic/pagan/New Age "victim-status" in a ADL-styled manner such as "Let us not forget the millions who perished during the Christian religious civil wars of the middle ages."--So much for his/her disdain for the "holocaust induced guilt" that he/she feels is "destroying America", along with the religion which he/she accuses of doing also. Putting Christianity in the same realm as "holocaust induced guilt"!?--To me that is a sign that this person has disregarded their heritage more than one who marries outside of their race for that strange phenomenon known as 'love'.

There would be no "White race" today if it weren't for Christendom & its unifying aspects against every sort of physical & (often but not enough) spritual invasions.

It's Whites with this sort of "I'm so ashamed of my daddy's religion" world view which is helping to further weaken itself as a whole, in my opinion. This world view which is unashamed of everything and anything "White" except for its greatest unifying factor in its peoples entire history, Christianity, is entirely & thoroughly delusional & instantly reminds this reader's mind to a command ideology of the "White" masonic kind.

And it is so amusing, yet so tragic that these sort of anti-Christian, pagan apologists pretend that pagans never went to war or massacred their own "race". It's an amusement to read it, but a tragedy to believe it. All throughout history we know there have been disastrous wars, & there will continue to be more. It is the Law of Christians to love your neighbor, including the enemy but nowhere is there a law to bow down before one's enemy. That in itself makes Christianity a great religion & ideology.

So if it is going to be Christianity which you find most at fault for the decline of the "White race", at least try to decide if it is indeed a weakling's parasitic religion that "...sapped Rome's vitality & vigor", or a raging, militant religion "as drenched in blood as Islam & Judaism". After you make that judgment, think how far the invaders of Europe would have gotten if it weren't for Christianity's power to unite & make a darkened, doulbe-minded populace into a mind singular & wholesome with light.

Special thanks to Michael Hoffman & Craig Heimbichner for awakening my slumbering spirit!


Anonymous said...

Are you surprised? Lots of so-called white nationalists these days hate Christians more than Jews. More and more they're atheist fundies and they love liberals! They want to make sympathy with anti-Israel left who are the same libs that built the culture of discrimination against whites that "white nationalists" whine about.

The white far-right is marching left! Shame, they could have been helpful to white people but they are becoming more like atheist reds
with a pro-white bias. Cointel has got its tentacles in that community.

Anonymous said...

Rome never waged war to impose its pagan religion onto others like Christianity and the other Abrahamic faiths nor did it forcibly convert people to paganism on pain of death. The second Punic war was one of the West's and Rome's darkest hours with her armies destroyed and Hannibal in control of much of the countryside. Yet, pagan Rome refused to surrender and managed to regroup and slowy regain territory before ejecting and totally defeating the Carthaginians. Point being that the West has achieved great things before the advent of Christianity and it can do so again.

I'll concede that Christianity hasn't been all bad for the West but in its contemporary form isn't a bulwark against anything that harms white people. Church leaders stand idly by while Muslims occupy and set Europe aflame while their followers cower in fear. Where's the fight?

You may be an exception but it seeks to obliterate all racial distinctions much like Bolshevism did. Spengler was correct when he opined that Christianity is the grandmother of Bolshevism. The Christian social gospel has much in common with cultural Marxism.

In some cases the church is actively working against white, Western interests. Most Christian denominations oppose white nationalism. More than a few black churches, however, align their interests with black nationalism.

I know many Christians who feel it their life's mission to serve the black and brown race. At one time Christianity opposed racial intermarriage but those days are gone and the religion is returning to its universalist roots.

How, then, is Christianity going to save the white race from itself?