Michael Jackson: Whiteface Star of the Alchemical Minstrel Show

by Michael Hoffman | www.RevisionistHistory.org

We pause in our round-the-clock defamation of Iran to bring you, Michael Jackson.

Our Zionist-controlled media have temporarily shifted from hysterical denunciation of Iran to pious genuflection before the altar of an androgyne.

To the extent that Iran has been demonized, Mr. Jackson is being canonized -- as "the" iconic American entertainer. How strange and at the same time, revelatory.

No white actor may wear blackface today, but Mr. Jackson --who reputedly was once a Black man- -wore permanent whiteface thanks to modern surgery and chemicals. His visage was reportedly collapsing faster than his finances. Where are the photos? Why the coverup?

I don't lament the demise of blackface "entertainment" by white performers, for, as William N. Grimstad documents in his classic work, "Talk About Hate," the lowbrow shtick of vaudeville and movie "coon song" blackface was a Judaic art-form perfected by Sophie Kalish ("Sophie Tucker" the "World-renowned coon-shouter"), Asa Yoelson ("Al Jolson"), Edward Israel Iskowitz ("Eddie Cantor") and Joe Yule ("Mickey Rooney"), promoted by moguls like Louis Lazar ("Louis B. Mayer") and Max Aronson ("Bronco Billy Anderson"), and such early Zionist movie studios as Selig Polyscope.

Jackson was a mirror image of this degraded process, only instead of white greasepaint he resorted to permanent bleach. Was he a Black impersonation of a White transvestite? Or was his alchemy an elaborate fantasy-in-life --a desire to deceive himself into thinking he had actually become a kind of public White aristocrat? In the midst of the idolatry that has followed his death, no one seems to be asking these questions, even as Jackson is portrayed as the focus of the adulation of Blacks the world over. If that's the case, one can only conclude that most Blacks wish they were White. Yet that conclusion seems dubious, to say the least.

Jackson was the first race-change personality on the world stage. Sad to say, he was sick physically, mentally and spiritually. From his dalliances with young boys to his occult persona as "Captain Eo," he was the exoteric manifestation of the esoteric putrefaction exuded by a rootless, soulless, deracinated and boastful capitalist System, which demands that conservative nations like Iran follow its degenerate example or face media-generated hate and if all else fails, Israeli bombs.

The same talking head moralists who saw little but wretched evil in the Muslim Iranian government, adore Jackson as if he were the Second Coming. It is even said that Mr. Jackson was "The voice of America." Jackson as ambassador and voice of the USA? Perhaps in this 21 century, but not in the preceding one; that distinction is still held by the classically educated Harry Lillis "Bing" Crosby, who sold more records than Elvis and the Beatles combined, was a star of radio and movies, winner of the Academy Award, and a culture-bearer, not a culture-distorter.

Jackson is not fit to shine Crosby's golf clubs and I say that not because Jackson was a once and future African-American hermaphrodite and pederast in whiteface. Crosby promoted talented Black singers and entertainers throughout his career, and rightly so. Satchmo and Nat would have rushed Jackson to the nearest priest or shrink and pitied and prayed for him along the way.

Today Jackson is the god of the Chamber-of-Commerce-dump-for-cheap-labor-Chinese-junk, otherwise known as the USA. Jackson symbolizes the "joys" of our "capitalist way of life": the freedom to scarf hormonally-enhanced chicken at KFC while watching your ten-year-old daughter have her childhood stolen by Hannah Montana and "Madonna."

Way out here in the boonies of north Idaho, where this writer makes his home, it's not exactly Norman Rockwell country anymore. As Brer Rabbitt said when asked if he knew of a place so far away there was no trouble, "There ain't no place that far away." Idaho certainly has its share of modern troubles. But many of the people of Idaho are committed nonetheless to reviving the America of old that God once shed His grace upon, and the sudden reanimation of the Michael Jackson circus strikes us as perverted and delusional.

If Jackson is the face of America, then America no longer exists, except in places like Idaho and Montana --while New York and Hollywood bear the same relation to America that Michael Jackson's collapsing nose and bleached skin do to the proud Black men and women he insulted with his mission of becoming the leopard that can change his spots and the Ethiopian who can change his skin.

But let us not feel smug or superior. We live in a scientific era where cloned meat and genetically-altered corn are fed to our children; where "pro-life" Republicans massacre Muslim and Arab civilians; where the worst ideas are touted as the best ideas; where heads is tails. In such a mixmaster milieu, why wouldn't Black be White, and male be a simulacra of female, and Michael Jackson the king of American culture and the star of the alchemical minstrel show that has become a religion for the masses?

Copyright©2009 RevisionistHistory.org

Hoffman is a former reporter for the Associated Press and the author of Judaism Discovered

***

The Invention of the Jewish People

A sizable portion of my research has been aimed at those people and institutions throughout history who have automatically taken the word of self-described "Jews" that they are in fact descendants of the Jews on the Bible, based on the following "evidence": their own say so. (Historically, the Catholic Church fell particularly hard for this masquerade).

Their say-so has never been enough for this writer and I am shocked at how entire theological and political architectures have been erected around the baseless assumption that Israelis, Zionists, and Talmudists from Brooklyn, are certainly the descendants of the Jews of the Bible.

Has anyone read Rev. 2:9? Rev. 3:9?

In autumn, Verso Press will publish in English, Shlomo Sand's The Invention of the Jewish People. (400 pages. Cloth ISBN-13: 978 1 84467 422 0. US$34.95)

Sand is a historian at the University of Tel Aviv. He demonstrates that today’s "Jews" are mostly not the descendants of Biblical Israelites. They are descended in large part from Khazars who converted to rabbinic Talmudism ("Judaism").

You can pre-order the book.

Here is the press release from the publisher:

Leading Israeli historian evaluates the national myth of the Jewish exile from the promised land

All modern nation states have a story of their origins, passed down through both official and popular culture, and yet few of these accounts have proved as divisive and influential as the Israeli national myth. The well-known tale of Jewish exile at the hands of the Romans during the first century AD, and the assertion of both cultural and racial continuity through to the Jewish people of the present day, resonates far beyond Israel's borders. Despite its use as a justification for Jewish settlement in Palestine and the project of a Greater Israel, there have been few scholarly investigations into the historical accuracy of the story as a whole.

In this bold and ambitious new book, Shlomo Sand shows that the Israeli national myth has its origins in the nineteenth century, rather than in biblical times — when Jewish historians, like scholars in many other cultures, reconstituted an imagined people in order to model a future nation. Sand forensically dissects the official story — and demonstrates the construction of a nationalist myth and the collective mystification that this requires.

A bestseller in Israel and France, Shlomo Sand's book has sparked a widespread and lively debate. Should the Jewish people regard themselves as genetically distinct and identifiable across the millennia — or should that doctrine now be left behind and if the myth of the "Jewish state" is dismantled, could this open a path toward a more inclusive Israeli state, content within its borders?

Praise for The Invention of the Jewish People:

"The Invention of the Jewish People is an indispensible challenge and a very complex intellectual exercise … a more secure society [than Israel] would include the book in the core curriculum of its school system…" — Avraham Burg, former Chairman of the Jewish Agency for Israel, Yedioth Ahronoth

"The reader will have understood the message: what this well-documented and fearless book explodes is the myth of a unique Jewish people, miraculously preserved, in contrast to all the other peoples, from external contamination … [Sands'] conclusions, which are prudently formulated, nonetheless lead one towards a sole solution: the construction of a secular and democratic Israel." — Jacques Julliard, Le Nouvel Observateur

Shlomo Sand studied history at the University of Tel Aviv and at the École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales, in Paris. He currently teaches contemporary history at the University of Tel Aviv.

***

What if Joan of Arc were an American alive today?

"Joan fought and died to preserve the identity and particularity of a sovereign place; she dedicated herself to the unique and irreplaceable soul of a country. She did not believe that it was right for her country to be--as it had already become in part and was dangerously close to becoming --a fiefdom of the kingdom of England."

Donald Spoto, Joan: The Mysterious Life of the Heretic Who Became a Saint (HarperCollins, 2008), p. xv.

One could change the words slightly in the preceding passage and describe the struggle for the soul of contemporary America against predatory capitalism, open borders, cheap immigrant stoop labor and being made a fiefdom of Red China and Israeli Zionism and Judaism.

Today Joan would be labeled neither a saint nor a heretic, but a "militant extremist" and "racist terrorist." She was none of those, of course, but the capitalists and the cheap labor lobby, through their media, demonize any true patriot. Joan's patriotism was heaven-sent.

***

Talmud permits judicial deviation from the Constitution

Attention conservatives, strict constructionists and all those opposed to judicial "activism" and who want to see the Constitution restored as the law of the land: the Talmudic Tradition embodies a wide range of principles that permit judicial deviation from Constitutional law

"Judicial Discretion in Talmudic Times and the Modern Era"

by A. David Pardo (Law offices of Foley Hoag LLP)

7 Cardozo Pub. L. Pol'y & Ethics J. 429-454 (2009)

The abstract states:

In this Article, I explore judicial discretion under Halakhic law, Anglo-American law, and Israeli law. In Part I, I compare the differences in treatment of judicial discretion between the Palestinian Talmud and the Babylonian (Bavli) Talmud. In Part II, I explore judicial discretion in the modern era. In Part III, I argue that the Babylonian Talmudic conception of judicial discretion is forthright about the existence and need for discretion, thus avoiding the doctrinal problems that inhere in the Palestinian Talmud. Moreover, I argue that the Bavli should serve as a model approach for coming to terms with the discretion that inheres in our Anglo-American judicial system, which is indispensable for the administration of justice.

The notion of discretion in the exercise of governmental powers is one that vexes scholars and the public alike. Is the mere existence of discretion the first stop on the road to judicial tyranny? Or is it an indispensable element in the pursuit of justice?

Some consider discretion to be “the law of tyrants: It is always unknown: It is different in different men: It is casual, and depends upon constitution, temper, passion. In the best it is oftentimes caprice: In the worst it is every vice, folly, and passion, to which human nature is liable.” This view is codified in an oft-cited provision of the Massachusetts Constitution.

It is also reflected in an engraving on the side of the United States Department of Justice building, in Washington, D.C., summarized by five words: “Where law ends tyranny begins.” Yet, in our system of government, where law ends tyranny need not begin. Where law ends, discretion begins, and the exercise of discretion may mean either beneficence or tyranny, either justice or injustice, either reasonableness or arbitrariness . . . . No government has ever been a government of all laws and not of men . . . . Every government has always been a government of law and of men.

The study of discretion in the judicial process has generated countless treatises and jurisprudential theories. These studies, naturally, analyze this concept from a contemporary perspective that is rooted in modern Anglo-American law. Judicial discretion, however, is not a new concept or one that is unique to democratic societies. Indeed, it is an issue that has divided post-biblical societies in Ancient Israel. Furthermore, the methods developed by rabbis in the Talmudic era are as relevant now as they were then, in understanding and accepting judicial discretion in our democratic society.

(Emphasis supplied)

Hoffman's note: if anyone has a complete copy of Mr. Pardo's article I would like to have it.

For further reading

"Justice Scalia Cites the Talmud: An Exegesis"

Judaism Discovered: A Study of the Anti-Biblical Religion of Racism, Self-Worship, Superstition and Deceit

***

CIA Coup Attempt in Iran

Links:

1. Iran's Election

2. CIA Coup in Iran

3. "Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Sunday extended the tenure of Mossad chief Meir Dagan for an eighth year, a testament to the spymaster's perceived success in waging shadow wars against Iran and its allies."

4. Zionist tells Iranians: "Time to shift strategies"

TIMES REPORTER MICHAEL SLACKMAN WANTS THE IRANIAN ECONOMY CRIPPLED

Using the tactic of quoting unnamed sources, the New York Times advises Iranians to go on national strike to damage their nation's economy:

"...one question political analysts and opposition members were beginning to ask was if it was time to shift strategies, from street protests to some kind of national strike.... a strike would be immune to the heavy hand of the state and could wield leverage by crippling the already stumbling economy..."

--Zionist Michael Slackman, NY Times, June 22, 2009

Reply by Mr. Slackman:

Dear Mr. Hoffman ...(T)here is no conspiracy. If you read the story carefully, you will see that Mr. Moussavi is directly quoted as calling for a strike if he is arrested. The analysts were wondering if that would be the case. Thank you, Michael Slackman

Rejoinder by Hoffman:

Dear Mr. Slackman: I did read "carefully" and you are either having a hallucination or your employer, the NY Times, altered your story after I exposed it. Nowhere in your original article as it first appeared on the NY Times website* is there any quote attributed to Moussavi calling for a strike. Moreover, Moussavi said nothing about "crippling the Iranian economy." That was your suggestion and you ought to take responsibility for it. Sincerely, Michael Hoffman

Background:

"Ali Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani remains a formidable figure in Iranian politics with a network of well-placed allies straddling the reformist and moderate conservative camps. If any one leader is able to force a re-run of last Friday's disputed poll, it may be the two-term former president nicknamed the "shark"...The super-rich Rafsanjani, his family, and his supporters in the reformist Kargozaran party make no bones about helping finance and direct Mir Hossein Mousavi's campaign to topple Ahmadinejad, whom they despise. ...Rafsanjani remains unpopular with many Iranians who believe the corruption claims (against him) and blame him for a murderous, covert campaign to silence dissidents at home and abroad during his 1989-97 presidency..."

--The Guardian

"...crook, cynic, capitalist and Iran-Contra arms dealer, Hashem Rafsanjani." --Richard Seymour

*Slackman's article as it first appeared on the NY Times website:

Unrest in Iran Sharply Deepens Rift Among Clerics

TEHRAN — A bitter rift among Iran's ruling clerics deepened Sunday over the disputed presidential election that has convulsed Tehran in the worst violence in 30 years, with the government trying to link the defiant loser to terrorists and detaining relatives of his powerful backer, a founder of the Islamic republic. The loser, Mir Hussein Moussavi, the moderate reform candidate who contends that the June 12 election was stolen from him, fired back at his accusers on Sunday night in a posting on his Web site, calling on his own supporters to demonstrate peacefully despite stern warnings from Iran's top leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, that no protests of the vote would be allowed. "Protesting to lies and fraud is your right," Mr. Moussavi said in a challenge to Ayatollah Khamenei's authority. Earlier, the police detained five relatives of Ali Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani, a former president who leads two influential councils and openly supported Mr. Moussavi's election. The relatives, including Mr. Rafsanjani's daughter, Faezeh Hashemi, were released after several hours. The developments, coming one day after protests here in the capital and elsewhere were crushed by police officers and militia members using guns, clubs, tear gas and water cannons, suggested that Ayatollah Khamenei was facing entrenched resistance among some members of the elite. Though rivalries have been part of Iranian politics since the 1979 revolution, analysts said that open factional competition amid a major political crisis could hinder Ayatollah Khamenei's ability to restore order. There was no verifiable accounting of the death toll from the mayhem on Saturday, partly because the government has imposed severe restrictions on news coverage and warned foreign reporters who remained in the country to stay off the streets. It also ordered the BBC's longtime correspondent in Tehran expelled and ordered Newsweek's correspondent detained. State television said that 10 people had died in clashes, while radio reports said 19. The news agency ISNA said 457 people had been arrested. Vowing not to have a repeat of Saturday, the government on Sunday saturated major streets and squares of Tehran with police and Basij militia forces. There were reports of scattered confrontations but no confirmation of any new injuries by evening. But as they had on previous nights, many residents of Tehran clambered to their rooftops and could be heard shouting "Death to the dictator!" and "God is great," their rallying cries since the crisis began. It was unclear whether protests, which began after the government declared that the conservative president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, had won re-election in a landslide against Mr. Moussavi, would be sustained in the face of the clampdown. Amateur video accounts showed at least one large protest gathering, on Shirazi Street, though it was unclear how long it lasted. But in the network of Internet postings and Twitter messages that has become the opposition's major tool for organizing and sharing information, a powerful and vivid new image emerged: a video posted on several Web sites that showed a young woman, called Neda, her face covered in blood. Text posted with the video said she had been shot. It was not possible to verify the authenticity of the video. The Web site of another reformist candidate, Mehdi Karoubi, referred to her as a martyr who did not "have a weapon in her soft hands or a grenade in her pocket but became a victim by thugs who are supported by a horrifying security apparatus." Accounts of the election's aftermath in the state-run press suggested that the government might be laying the groundwork for discrediting and arresting Mr. Moussavi. IRNA, the official news agency, quoted Alireza Zahedi, a member of the Basij militia, as saying Mr. Moussavi had provoked the violence, sought help from outside the country to do so and should be put on trial. The Fars news agency quoted a Tehran University law professor as saying that Mr. Moussavi had acted against "the security of the nation." State television suggested that at least some of the unrest was instigated by an outlawed terrorist group, the Mujahedeen Khalq, which does not have a strong following in Iran. Mr. Moussavi was not seen in public on Sunday but showed no sign of yielding. In his Web posting, he urged followers to "avoid violence in your protest and behave as though you are the parents that have to tolerate your children's misbehavior at the security forces." He also warned the government to "avoid mass arrests, which will only create distance between society and the security forces." The moves against members of Mr. Rafsanjani's family were seen as an attempt to pressure him to drop his challenge to Ayatollah Khamenei — pressure that Mr. Rafsanjani's son, Mehdi Rafsanjani, said he would reject. "My father was in jail for five years when we were young. We don't care if they keep her even for a year," Mehdi Rafsanjani said in an interview, referring to his sister, Ms. Hashemi. Mr. Rafsanjani was deeply critical of Mr. Ahmadinejad during the presidential campaign, and is thought to have had a strained relationship with Ayatollah Khamenei for many years. But he remains a major establishment figure, and the detention of his daughter, albeit briefly, was a surprise. In Ayatollah Khamenei's sermon on Friday, in which he backed Mr. Ahmadinejad and threatened a crackdown on further protests, he praised Mr. Rafsanjani as a pillar of the revolution while acknowledging that the two have had "many differences of opinion." Last week, state television showed images of Ms. Hashemi, 46, speaking to hundreds of people to rally support for Mr. Moussavi. After her appearance, state radio said, students who support Mr. Ahmadinejad gathered outside the Tehran prosecutor's office and demanded that she be arrested for treason. Mr. Rafsanjani, 75, heads two powerful institutions. One, the Assembly of Experts, is a body of clerics that has the authority to oversee and theoretically replace the country's supreme leader. He also runs the Expediency Council, empowered to settle disagreements between the elected Parliament and the unelected Guardian Council. The Assembly of Experts has never publicly exercised its power over Ayatollah Khamenei since he succeeded the Islamic Revolution's founder, Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, in 1989. But the increasingly bitter confrontation between Ayatollah Khamenei and Mr. Rafsanjani has raised the prospect of a contest of political wills between the two revolutionary veterans. In a sign that the crisis in Iran threatened to spill far beyond the nation's borders, the speaker of Parliament, Ali Larijani, on Sunday called for reconsidering relations with Britain, France and Germany after their "shameful" statements about the election. State radio reported that Mr. Larijani, who has his own aspirations to one day become president, made his comments in a speech to the full Parliament. Mr. Larijani's position, which reflects the anti-Western orientation of the hard-liners in charge, could further undermine President Obama's efforts to reach out to Iran and begin a diplomatic dialogue. The United States severed ties with Iran 30 years ago. In Washington, Mr. Obama resisted pressure from Republicans who have called his response to the Iranian crackdown too timid. On Saturday, Mr. Obama stepped up his criticism of Iran's government, calling it "violent and unjust," and said that the world was watching its behavior. Mr. Obama has argued that a more aggressive White House stance against the Iranian government crackdown would be used by Tehran as anti-American propaganda. "The last thing that I want to do is to have the United States be a foil for those forces inside Iran who would love nothing better than to make this an argument about the United States," Mr. Obama said in an interview with Harry Smith of CBS News broadcast Friday. "We shouldn't be playing into that." In an interview broadcast Sunday on Iranian television, Foreign Minister Manouchehr Mottaki said that officials were examining the charge of voting fraud and expected to issue their findings by the end of the week. But like Ayatollah Khamenei, Mr. Mottaki appeared to have already judged the vote as clean and fair. He said the "possibility of organized and comprehensive disruption and irregularities in the election is almost close to zero," according to Iran's English-language Press TV. At the same time, serious new questions about the vote's integrity were raised outside of Iran. Chatham House, a London-based research organization, released a study done with the University of St. Andrews challenging the Iranian government's declared results, based on a comparison with the 2005 elections as well as Iran's own census data. The study showed, for example, that in two provinces where Mr. Ahmadinejad won a week ago, a turnout of more than 100 percent was recorded. The study also showed that in a third of all provinces, the official results, if true, would have required that Mr. Ahmadinejad win not only all conservative voters and all former centrist voters and all new voters, but up to 44 percent of formerly reformist voters. With the police on the streets demonstrating a willingness to injure and even kill, one question political analysts and opposition members were beginning to ask was whether it was time to shift strategies, from street protests to some kind of national strike. It was unclear if the opposition had the support or organization, especially within the middle class, to carry out such a measure, but a strike would be immune to the heavy hand of the state and could wield leverage by crippling the already stumbling economy, analysts said.

END QUOTE

***

The End of Zionism

The End of Zionism

by David Lindsay

Once you admit that there is, or even that there could be, a place called Palestine, inhabited by people called Palestinians, then it is all over. But then, as we shall see, it was all over anyway.

Netanyahu was elected by those opposed in principle to a Palestinian state, but now says that he will accept one if it is “demilitarised” (unable to defend itself) and recognises “an undivided Jerusalem” as the capital of Israel.

Imagine what he would say if a Hamas politician, having been elected by those opposed in principle to a Zionist state, said that he would accept one if it were demilitarised and recognised an undivided Jerusalem as the capital of Palestine.

As for the Jewish identity of Israel, what Jewish identity? Anyone is now classified as a Jew provided that they are not an Arab. Russians Christians, Russian Nazis, East Africans with their religion based on the Old Testament brought by Christian missionaries, Peruvian Indians “converted to Judaism” (or is it Mormonism?), absolutely anyone at all.

And then there are those who regard the godless Zionist State as wholly illegitimate, yet are perfectly happy to live on its largesse (so that they do nothing except study, a very far cry indeed from the integration of scholarship and more conventional labor by their very recent ancestors, an integration usually held up as a glory of Judaism) while not only refusing to serve in that State’s Defense Force, but even raising their hands against the teenage conscripts who do.

But when it was decided to give the Jews (or the secular Ashkenazim, anyway) a separate portion of what has been one of the most multiethnic places on earth since the Year Dot, then a potentially never-ending chain of events was set off. There is no love lost between the Judean People’s Front and the People’s Front of Judea, so each of them will want its own soon enough.
After all, drawing as they do on traditions mediated by, in, through and as ethnically different groups of Jews (so much for “all one people”), each of the ultra-Orthodox parties in Israel already has its own school system and what have you, in addition to the exemption from military service and the lavish welfare spending on them.

But they are not satisfied. Given the history, how can they be? If you can show that you are sufficiently (even if not terribly) different, then you get your own little statelet, however dangerously, unjustly or absurdly drawn or constituted.

What with the Ethiopian Jews, those listed above, and all the rest, this will never end.

Or, at least, it will never end until a line is drawn under Zionism, the population (and thus the character) of Israel and Palestine is declared to be exactly as it is, the Law of Return is duly repealed, and any wildly impractical Palestinian demand for a corresponding right of return is blown out of the water.

Nothing less will do.

And that really is the end of Zionism, as such, once and for all.

The American Conservative, June 18, 2009

***

Internet freedom for Iran but not for the West?

U.S. Media's Self-Congratulatory Campaign for Internet Freedom in Iran Turns a Blind Eye on Australia, Canada and Britain

and to Israeli "closed military zones"

by Michael Hoffman | RevisionistHistory.org

It's embarrassing.

The media's orgy of self-congratulation, that is. Each night on national news shows, foreign correspondents have appeared on screen to breathlessly pledge their undying commitment to reporting the demonstrations in Iran while insisting that the Iranian government must allow for full press and Internet freedoms.

Our gorge rises in the face of this nauseating hypocrisy from these pompous gate-keepers.

Canada and Australia are sending citizen-journalists to prison for daring to use the Internet to ask tough questions about Holocaustianity, the West's sacred cow.

In Australia, PhD. philosopher Frederick Toben is facing several months in prison for defying the government and publishing his scientific and technical data about Auschwitz on the Internet.

In Canada, defense attorney Doug Christie can reel off numerous cases of fines and prosecution for skeptics and dissenters in that nation who used the Internet. In Britain a Catholic group faces prosecution for Internet throught crimes.

Canadian resident Ernst Zündel, twice tried in Canadian courts for "Holocaust denial" fled to the U.S. for safe haven against criminal charges he used the Internet to publish revisionist documents on his Zundelsite web.

The U.S. deported Mr. Zündel back to Canada where he was imprisoned for more than a year in solitary confinement. The Canadians then rendered him to Germany where he was sentenced to five years imprisonment.

In occupied Palestine the Israelis regularly declare Jenin or Gaza "closed military zones" so they can butcher the indigenous people without the inconvenience of reporters and cameras. This horror occurred as recently as last January. The U.S. media routinely complies with this "closure" and apathetically sits by while Israeli atrocities are committed secretly and then denied publicly (a form of holocaust denial which is everywhere legal).

If and when the American media report on the Zündel or Toben cases it is with a strong tenor of approval of their repression. In those cases control of the Internet is perceived as a necessary evil, in order to achieve a higher good.

After Manchurian candidate James von Brunn attacked the entrance to the U.S. Holocaust Museum in Washington D.C., the rabbis of the Simon Wiesenthal Center, which has enjoyed NGO status with the federal government -- in an end run around the First Amendment -- urged Internet Service Providers to deny service to websites that question the existence of execution gas chambers in Auschwitz; meanwhile the prestigious New York Times published a column on its web page questioning how far America should go with its traditional Internet freedom, when in Europe, people's "dignity" and "reputations" are better protected against "Holocaust deniers."

The Israeli-tilting American media despise the Islamic Republic of Iran and therefore pose as Internet freedom campaigners as part of their crusade to initiate a more Zionist-friendly nation. High-minded democratic principles have nothing to do with it.

"Our" media are pleased to see Internet outlaws like Zundel behind bars in Germany and Toben headed to prison in Australia. They abide with disgusting docility by the Israeli regime's mission to perpetrate collateral damage in private by declaring Palestinian territories "closed military zones."

Christiane Amanpour, Anderson Cooper, Bill O'Reilly, the New York Times and the other stars of the media corral are perfectly content when their political opponents and marginalized dissidents are punished for using the Internet to advance unpopular and radical ideas. They see no evil in such repression.

It's only evil when Iran does it.

Then our media mandarins mount the barricades, shaking their fists and shouting to the housetops their willingness to brave the fires of hell itself in order to help liberate the Iranian people.

How inspiring! How noble!

***

James Von Brunn: Rabbi of the White Race

James von Brunn: The Shimon ben Yohai of "The White Race, " and His Contribution to Holocaustolatry

by Maurice Pinay

Manchurian candidate, James von Brunn has prepared the altar. Now comes the procession of Catholic bishops to incense the idol of Holocaustolatry, once again. The liturgical season of "The Holocaust" never ends.

James von Brunn, like the rabbis, is an anti-Christian racial determinist. He's mentally programmed to behave in an anti-Christian rabbinic manner. Like the rabbis, who teach that "Amalek" is a genetically programmed enemy of "The Jews" and cannot be reasoned with and therefore must be killed, so does James von Brunn believe that "The Jews" are genetically programmed enemies of "The White Race" and cannot be reasoned with and therefore must be killed.

In essence, there is no difference between James von Brunn and Rabbi Shimon ben Yohai who he paraphrased in the title of his book, Kill the Best Gentiles. But one of these race haters is sainted while the other will live in infamy in accordance with the crazy double-standards of this crazy, racist world, which the (Catholic) bishops honor above all.

Cardinal George sanctifies the "hallowed space" of the U.S. Holocaust Museum and calls for more "education" against every kind of bias (except pro-Judaic bias, of course). No, Cardinal George, the world needs the Gospel, the teachings of Jesus Christ which your elder brothers are attempting to destroy with their "education" and Holocaustolatry.

***

Question about Von Brunn's relations with cryptocracy

From a reader:

Dear Michael,

Your essay about von Brunn is very interesting re; the cryptocracy and all the coincidences. Von Brunn was a well known internet gadfly that sent out a news list of Jewish related items. Maybe this was a case of it is what it is, or was this man the whole time in the employ of the cryptocracy? The fact that he decided to do this act near the end of his life would indicate he may have really been a lone nut. 

By the way, how the heck does one get into a Washington museum with a rifle in full view?

Best,
R.W.

***

Dear R.W.

I don't say that Von Brunn was in the employ of the Cryptocracy - their best sleeper agents don't even know they are in fact agents.

I don't wish to speculate on how I think Von Brunn may have been brought in or triggered.

I will speak hypothetically, however. The psychological profile of a man who believes he is a genius (Mensa membership) would be that he would imagine that he cannot be fooled. Such a disposition gives the man the hubris to take into his confidence an agent of the Cryptocracy who he thinks he has accurately evaluated as a fellow authentic sympathizer. Such an agent can then become someone he admires or trusts and this agent can then shepherd him toward "making history" and "doing more than just talk," and helps or encourages him to select a high profile target and a significant date.

I have no such information about Von Brunn, however.

Nevertheless, we should keep an open mind rather than simply accepting Von Brunn as the System wants us to view him -- as an end-of-life lone nut who happens to have a "hate dossier" in his background. The way the Feds shadowed Ted Kaczynski while the Unabomer crimes were transpiring has left me very cynical about the notion that a perp like Von Brunn -- who once was convicted of having attacked the Federal Reserve bank --was not under some sort of government surveillance. 

"Government surveillance" is sometimes a euphemism for what is known as remote guidance, which uses twilight language and symbolic cues, much like a hypnotist, but on a far more sophisticated and esoteric level. These methods are a specialty of the Cryptocracy and are so recondite that many people dismiss the possibility of their use or effectiveness, which is part of their power.

If you would like to know more you can consult my book on these matters, Secret Societies and Psychological Warfare.

This just in: Von Brunn's father-in-law allegedly was a member of British Intelligence. Another coincidence!

And: "FBI agent Ronald Farnsworth said in a court affidavit that von Brunn, driving a red 2002 Hyundai, double parked outside the museum entrance on 14th Street SW near the Mall at 12:44 p.m., got out of the car and walked toward the building, carrying the rifle at his side. Johns, a guard at the museum for six years, 'was kind enough to open the door'...D.C. Police Chief Cathy L. Lanier said at a news briefing yesterday.
Von Brunn 'raised his rifle, aimed it at [Johns] and fired one time,' hitting the guard in the upper left side of his chest, Farnsworth wrote, adding, 'The defendant continued through the door and raised his firearm as if to fire again." Washington Post, June 12, 2009

My question is, how often does a policeman casually open the door to a secure facility for a man carrying a rifle? Was Officer Johns set up? Had he been told in advance to expect an elderly man carrying a prop to enter the museum and to allow him to do so? You will notice that once Von Brunn had created a "Holocaust" martyr by shooting Johns, he was immediately neutralized. 

Sincerely,
Michael Hoffman

***

Evidence of the rabbinic influence on Pope Benedict

"...some hermeneutical consequences are derived regarding the way to interpret Scripture, which can indicate still today the just path for a correct reading of sacred Scripture. It is a matter, in fact, of discovering the meaning hidden in the sacred text..."

Benedict XVI

"On John Scotus Erigena"

Wednesday General Audience, June 10, 2009

This statement about finding the "hidden meaning" is a reflection of Benedict's contact with rabbinic/Talmudic exegesis in which the literal meaning of the Biblical text is almost never the actual meaning.

Jesus Christ declared that He spoke nothing in secret! (John 18:20). 

Why then does the pope imply otherwise? 

This pontiff has certainly been enchanted by the rabbis.

***

James von Brunn hated Christianity

EDITOR'S NOTE: The following anti-Christian rant has been attributed to James von Brunn, the accused assailant at the "Holocaust Museum." As Christians we are publishing this disgusting statement alleged to be his (from a website called antichrist.net) not because we endorse it (in fact we utterly condemn it) -- but to demonstrate that the seeming Manchurian Candidate James von Brunn was not part of our movement and his deeds cannot be attributed to Christian revisionists.

If this is in fact Von Brunn's authentic writing, then he extols race as much as any rabbi. 

Strange indeed is the degree to which he allegedly fired his gun on cue, timed to support the game plan of the Cryptocracy.

CHRISTIANITY and the HOLOCAUST
by James W. von Brunn

http://www.antichrist.net/vonbrunn.html

 As duped Aryan sheep begin to understand the "Holocaust" they also begin to better understand Christianity.  Both have similar origins.  Both have identical objectives.

Saul of Tarsus, after helping friends stone to death a disciple of Jesus Christ, set forth toward Damascus.  As he trudged the dusty road a blinding, excruciating light suddenly crashed his brain.  The world whirled into a crimson vortex.  He heard his own scream, far away.  Then there was quiet.  When he awoke he was lying on the road.  He looked up.  A man in a white cloak was standing there his hands outstretched.  His hands bore deep scars.  Saul trembled with fright.  Then Jesus smiled, pulling Saul upright, saying, "Fear not, Saul of Tarsus, I come to you from our Father."  It was a miracle.

Saul and Jesus earnestly, fervently, joyously conversed with one another.  Arm in arm they tarried there.  Jesus told Saul he was his own.  Jesus was loving, loving, forgiving, forgiving.  Saul became his disciple there and then -- struck by the Holy Spirit.  Finally, following Saul's vows of fidelity, love, and obedience, the visitation ended when, before Saul's wondering awe-struck eyes, Jesus to Heaven in a halo did rise.  It was a miracle.

We are told that this extra-sensory experience, somewhat like an epileptic fit, suddenly changed the hateful, murderer Saul (later, St.  Paul) from a hater of Jesus into a Jesus lover.  Really?

Saul, ten years younger, had not met The Master vis a vis before Jesus' crucifixion.  Had they met earlier Saul probably would have crushed Christ's head with a rock.  Saul, and most Israelis, detested Jesus and his blasphemous ideology almost as much as they detested Romans; more even than they detested Greeks, Babylonians, Assyrians, Canaanites, Egyptians, Persians, et al.  In truth, as bigoted Judeophobes know, God's "Chosen People" hated their God's only Son.

Matthew emphatically states that Israelis so hated Jesus Christ that THEY crucified him (Pope John Paul II, Zionist, said that Matthew is wrong!  What's that?  "The Word of God" is wrong?).

ACTUALLY, on the road to Damascus -- brooding about Rome, relishing the bloody image of the disciple he had stoned to death; sweaty, sore footed, thinking of the blasphemous ravings of the Nazarene -- Saul had an incredible, earthshaking IDEA.  A light-bulb inspiration.  He, Saul -- a Roman citizen -- suddenly realized how he could destroy Rome!  Saul trembled uncontrollably with fear and joy.  He would simply promulgate the insane teachings of Jesus!  What better way to destroy a Nation -- any Nation -- than to undermine her hubris; her gods, ethics, mores, history, her gene-pool -- in short, Saul would DESTROY ROMAN CULTURE.  Then, as night follows day, with her foundations rotted, the Roman Empire would FALL.  Saul decided to begin the HOAX by inventing a miraculous encounter on the road to Damascus with the reincarnated Jesus the Christ!

Toward that end -- no different than Hollywood script-writers today -- Saul created a bogus a la Spielberg docu-drama stuffed with lies, miracles, guilt trips, betrayal, virgin birth, eternal damnation, salvation -- a scenario appealing to the superstitious, vulnerable, ignorant yearning sheep -- he named his hoax "Christianity."

The New Testament was written in Greek.  Paul - who believed the World was flat, that Joshua made the sun stand still, and Jehovah spoke from a burning bush -- wrote one-third of it, perhaps more.  The events described in the 24 Books are often contradictory, fail the time-line, defy both archaeology's and nature's immutable laws, and are suicidal if practiced. 

Nevertheless, the shamans bought it, taught it, and the illiterate public was coerced, brainwashed, threatened, tortured, murdered, and enthralled.  The Encyclopedia Britannica states that over 6,000 major redactions exist between the Septuagint (translation of Aramaic into Greek) and its St. James biblical translation.

The Gospels profess that only Christians may enter Yahweh's Kingdom of Heaven.  To qualify, among other demands, Christians must LOVE THEIR ENEMIES (Jews); give away their personal belongings; eschew knowledge; judge not, despise nature, abandon earthly pleasures, acknowledge that all YHWH's children are equal; and above all else worship YHWH, the jealous, wrathful, vengeful, unforgiving, genocidal, anthropomorphic tribal god (Jesus' father) created by Hebrews in their image and likeness.  Omnipotent, omniscient YHWH promises Hebrews that they alone shall inherit the earth, that it is commendable to steal from Gentiles, better yet -- kill them.  Whereas Gentiles, if they fail to worship YHWH, are transported straight to Hell.  And it is written, "A little child shall lead them."

These dangerous, imbecilic, concepts, tenets, and teachings, often treasonous, DESTROYED the Roman Empire and drenched the soil of Europe with Aryan blood for almost 2000 years!

The Big Lie technique, employed by Paul to create the CHRISTIAN RELIGION, also was used to create the HOLOCAUST RELIGION ... CHRISTIANITY AND THE HOLOCAUST are HOAXES.

"Christianity" destroyed Roman Civilization.  The "Holocaust" Religion is destroying Western Civilization.  The Aryan gene-pool dies, "unwept, unhonored and unsung." 

[END QUOTE]

Related article: Now Playing at the U.S. Holocaust Museum - the Lone Nut (What a "coincidence"!) 

***

Now Playing at the "Holocaust Museum" - The Lone Nut

(What a "coincidence"!) 

by Michael Hoffman  

Copyright©2009 RevisionistHistory.org

Today another "lone nut"has changed the course of history. Like "lone nut" James Earl Ray and "lone nut" Sirhan Sirhan, as well as "lone nuts" Arthur Bremer and Ted Kaczynski, James von Brunn now joins the ranks of the Cryptocracy's hit parade. What a "coincidence"!

With his shooting at the U.S. Holocaust Museum, Von Brunn has reinvigorated the old 20th century Black/Zionist coalition, on the very day when African-American U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder was due to visit the museum to hear a reading of the script of "Anne and Emmett," a play about Anne Frank and Emmet Till. What a "coincidence"!

The author of the "Anne and Emmett" play is Janet Langhart Cohen, the Black wife of former Secretary of Defense William Cohen who directed American forces during the NATO holocaust against the churches, monasteries and people of Christian Serbia in 1999. What a "coincidence"!

Von Brunn has acted a part in the self-fulfilling prophecy of The Holocaust mythos, by reenacting it in miniature. By doing so he will enter the museum's canon of devil goyim who can't seem to resist attacking symbols of Judaic culture and innocence. He has victimized the eternal victims, squaring their vision of themselves as forever hated and perpetually persecuted. What a "coincidence"!

The religion of Orthodox Judaism is designed so as to capitalize on and benefit from any violent attack on it or it adherents. Without such violence from outsiders, attacks are sometimes orchestrated from within.

During the regime of Republican President George W. Bush, the "threat from the extreme Right" was de-emphasized by the Cryptocracy. White crusader golem were needed to support and staff the war in Afghanistan against Muslims, and the war in Iraq against Arabs. With those goals now pretty much accomplished and a Black Democrat in the White House, the powers-that-be seem to have decided to reanimate the "extreme Right wing threat" and raise it back to the marquee bogeyman role it played during the regime of Bill Clinton, when the Oklahoma City Bombing was mounted by a supposed lone nut duo, but which researchers like David Hoffman (no relation to this writer) have reported was a conspiracy deeply connected to the US government itself -- including to such government front groups as the "Aryan Republican Army" bank-robbery gang and "Aryan Nations."  

Since Americans are saddled generation after generation with a government-mouthpiece media, the lone nut gambit remains forever young in the eyes of those who are dependent for their news on echo-chamber journalists and talking heads who repeat as gospel whatever officialdom happens to declare about the gunman.

Years later, "when the hurly burly's done and the battle's lost and won," the real conspiracy is usually thawed for public consumption. For example, there are few independent thinkers today who believe that McVeigh and his sidekick single-handedly destroyed the Murrah building, or that Ray Killed Martin Luther King, or that Kaczynski was not a patsy like Lee Harvey Oswald.

For now, however, the alchemical processing cooker is on high as the groundwork for the criminalization of "Holocaust' denial" is being established, and the high priests of Holocaustianity are given renewed pledges of unquestioning obeisance by America's governing class and opinion-moulding elite. As the script thickens its plot line, hysterical idolization of all things Judaic, rabbinic and Israeli approaches vertiginous new heights of fawning subservience.

The 400 children murdered last December and January in Gaza by the descendants of "Holocaust' Survivors," have been deposited in the dustbin of history. There never was and never will be an exhibit at the synagogue-masquerading-as-a-museum about the the horrors of the Israeli holocaust against the Palestinians; but it won't be long before the iconic image of a Black policeman who died defending America's most hallowed Judaic shrine, will earn a perpetual memorial there.

Our masters govern by methods that overrule all documentation and silence all arguments: assassination, stealth, treachery, the doublecross and most of all, the inculcation of the doublemind. Their guarantee of last resort comes courtesy of a bullet fired by a "lone nut" who emerges from obscurity to rescue the Cryptocracy's chestnuts from an impending fire, or secure it victory where it would otherwise experience eclipse. What a "coincidence"!

James von Brunn's six-pointed star will forever shine in the Cryptocracy's lone nut firmament.

This column has been translated into Italian

For further research: Synagogue Bomb Plot

Hoffman writes from the foothills of the Bitterroot Mountain range of north Idaho. His work is sustained by donations and the sale of his books and recordings.

***

Justice Scalia Cites the Talmud: An Exegesis by Hoffman

Justice Scalia Cites the Talmud: An Exegesis by Michael Hoffman

Supreme Court Opinion: Caperton v. A. T. Massey Coal Co

In a 5-4 decision released on June 8, 2009, the Supreme Court ruled for the first time that the Constitution can require an elected judge to step aside in a particular case based on campaign spending in state judicial races. The majority ruling in Caperton v. A. T. Massey Coal Co., No. 08-22, was written by Justice Anthony M. Kennedy. Joining Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. in dissent were Justices Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas and Samuel A. Alito Jr.

In his dissent Scalia wrote:

"A Talmudic maxim instructs with respect to the Scripture: “Turn it over, and turn it over, for all is therein.” The Babylonian Talmud, Tractate Aboth, Ch. V, Mishnah 22 (I. Epstein ed. 1935).

"Divinely inspired text may contain the answers to all earthly questions, but the Due Process Clause most assuredly does not.

"The Court today continues its quixotic quest to right all wrongs and repair all imperfections through the Constitution.

"Alas, the quest cannot succeed—which is why some wrongs and imperfections have been called nonjusticiable. In the best of all possible worlds, should judges sometimes recuse even where the clear commands of our prior due process law do not require it? Undoubtedly.

"The relevant question, however, is whether we do more good than harm by seeking to correct this imperfection through expansion of our constitutional mandate in a manner ungoverned by any discernable rule. The answer is obvious."

Hoffman's Analysis

Rabbi Ben Bag Bag in the Mishnah passage cited by Scalia is allegedly referring to constant rabbinic analysis of the Torah. Scalia claims that the rabbi is saying it is necessary to analyze the Torah over and over; by doing so one will discover all truth and wisdom therein. Scalia seems to be stating one can't say the same about a single clause of the Constitution.

The majority of the justices from whom Scalia dissents have ruled that it is their understanding of the “Due Process Clause” that a judge who is obligated to a donor in some circumstances must recuse himself from a case involving the donor.

Scalia "seems" to be saying (one can't be absolutely certain because his writing, far from being "obvious," suffers from the legalese that lawyer-priests routinely use to obscure their judgments), that certain judges treat the Constitution as if it were Scripture. They search a single clause in the Constitution for truth and wisdom like rabbis search a single verse from a "Divinely inspired text."

Scalia's ruling seems to be a species of liberal anarchism: one can't find truth and wisdom in too close a study of the Constitution. He appears to be stating that unlike the Bible, the Constitution is not so authoritative that it contains everything necessary to reach a correct legal decision, and unlike rabbis, who are right to “Turn it over, and turn it over, for all is therein," Supreme Court justices are wrong to put this emphasis on the Constitution.

There are other significant problems with Scalia's employment of the Talmud text in this context, including but not limited to his abysmal ignorance of the Talmud, which probably is due to the fact that he is a goy who studies the Talmud with Chabad-Lubavitch rabbis who are not exactly paragons of integrity when it comes to parsing the mysteries of the Talmud for the sake of the goyim.

1. Within the context of Scalia's opinion we must ask, if the Constitution cannot be relied on to this degree, to what degree can it be relied on and what are the limits of its authority?

2. Since the rabbis falsify the Bible with their Talmudic exegesis, and since their self-ordained mandate to "repair all imperfections" (tikkun olam) is based on the intervention of Judaic brain power to "improve" and "correct" God's supposedly flawed creation, Scalia's analogy fails as a model dichotomy of proper and improper attitudes toward enshrined texts.

3. Based on Scalia's past utterances and the prestige he lends to rabbinic gatherings by his uncritical presence at their meetings, we feel certain that Scalia does not understand how tikkun olam is actually perceived and implemented in the rabbinic universe. He has accepted the rabbinic cover story at face value.

4. Scalia's choice of the obsolete and opaque 1935 Epstein English translation of the Mishnah as his citation for the quote he uses, rather than Jacob Neusner's vastly superior 1988 Mishnah translation (Yale University Press), tends to indicate how atrophied is his knowledge of the Talmud and its variant texts.

5. In point of fact, the particular Mishnah passage cited by Justice Scalia is a description of the "traits of the disciples of Abraham" as compared unfavorably with the "traits of the disciples of Balaam" (cf. Mishnah Abot 5, III; Neusner pp. 688-689).

In the Talmud, Balaam is a codeword for Jesus (see my book Judaism Discovered, pp. 392-395, though this is hotly denied by the ADL and similar Zionist and rabbinic thought police). Consequently, Justice Scalia is quoting what the Mishnah says are character traits which are the opposite of those of the wicked Jesus ("Balaam").

If one does not wish to join the Christians, i.e. the "disciples of Balaam" who "inherit Gehenna and go down to the Pit of Destruction" (Mishnah Abot 5:19), one must, declares Rabbi Ben Bag Bag: "Turn it over and over because everything is in it and reflect upon it and grow old and worn in it and do not leave it" (Mishnah Abot 5:22; this is a complete quotation of the fragment cited by Scalia).

If we examine the verse that precedes Mishnah Abot 5:22  (Mishnah Abot 5:21) we discover that it contains an allusion to the primacy of the Mishnah and the Talmud. Hence, it is not at all clear that the text that Rabbi Bag Bag advises one to "turn over and over" is in fact "with respect to the Scripture," i.e. the Bible, as Scalia implies. It is just as likely, and in this writer's view, more likely, that the rabbi is referring to turning over and over the "Torah" (sic) derived from the oral traditions of the Pharisees (Torah SheBeal peh), such as the Mishnah itself. In which case, whether consciously or unconsciously, Supreme Court Justice Scalia is stating that the U.S. Constitution does not have the authority of the Talmud and does not merit the kind of intense study which the Talmud merits, and this in an anti-Christian context.

Copyright 2009 by Michael Hoffman

Mr. Hoffman's research is funded by donations

***

Vatican's Secret Deal to Keep Silent on Red Holocaust

The Vatican's Secret Shame 

John XXIII and Pope Paul VI's covert agreement to be silent on that other holocaust - The Communist Holocaust

Giacomo Galeazzi reviews for La Stampa the new biography of Paul VI written by Andrea Tornielli, and mentions that what many considered a conspiracy theory was true: there was indeed a secret agreement, led by Cardinal Tisserand, between the Soviet Union and the papacy (under John XXIII) in 1962 - an agreement which Paul VI ("Montini") also respected. As Galeazzi reports:

"In a note of November 15, 1965, in fact, Montini explicitly mentions among 'the commitments of the Council' also that of 'not mentioning Communism (1962)."

The indication of the date at the end of the sentence written by Paul VI refers to the secret agreement, related by Tisserand, between Rome and Moscow. And this would explain why the Second Vatican Council, which dealt with all sorts of issues, relevant and irrelevant alike, ignored the most challenging menace of its time: Communism.

Thanks to Rorate Caeli blog for this data.

***

VIDEO: Zündel Interviews Michael Hoffman on YouTube

Click on this link to watch the video of Ernst Zündel Interviewing Michael Hoffman on YouTube

***

Obama: Baseless, ignorant and hateful

We often tend to forget that "politician" is an old English word for whore. Some of us still cling to the hope that an American president will be an exception to that denotation. After eight years of the bloodthirsty, simian secret society pharaoh George W. Bush, I figured that anybody would be an improvement.

Barrack Obama promised change and to some he seemed like the real McCoy, or rather the real Hussein: peace, prosperity, health care, and to top it off, justice in the Middle East.

Yesterday President Obama was in Egypt to give a "watershed" speech to the Muslim world that was intended to demonstrate that the long, dark night of Israeli hegemony over the United States had come to an end, and that America was initiating a new era marked by fairness to both sides.

Let's be real. Ending Israeli hegemony and being genuinely fair to the Arab nation of peoples which the Orthodox rabbis denominate as "Amalek," would require a revolutionary break with Holocaustianity, the universal, de facto state religion of the Western world.

Obama's visit has parallels with the recent papal trip. Last May 15 this writer analyzed Pope Benedict's Israeli pilgrimage as follows: "For Pope Benedict, Talmudic Judaism and Israeli Zionism do not represent a special category of evil. Rather, he views these forces as merely one of the constituent parts of the Middle East tragedy to which all parties have contributed and are equally to blame. For denunciation of a special category of enhanced evil we must, as usual, look to the World War II-era Germans...

"The pope concluded his remarks with an allusion to one of the central planks of the new Shoah theology concocted by his predecessor: the Orthodox (Talmudic) Judaism that is the religion of the 'Jewish state,' far from being an evil 'regime' that 'propagates an ideology of hatred and racism,' is, instead, one of the 'branches' of the 'olive tree' that nourishes the 'roots' of 'brotherly love.' This is a lie so blatant it is laughable, and so pernicious it ensures the continuing spread of the lore of the Shoah theology from which it emanates.

"Pope Benedict XVI has cloaked the exterminationist ideology of Talmudic Judaism in the habiliments of brotherly love, just four months after that 'love' was showered over Gaza in the form of the the burning gas known as white phosphorus, turning Palestine itself into a gas chamber. But Benedict is oblivious. He contents himself with safety valve criticism of a wall. His callous indifference to a holocaust that only just occurred is a telling indicator of his secret belief in the inherent racial and spiritual superiority of the Israelis over the Palestinians. The myth of the fundamental benevolence of Zionism and Rabbinic Judaism is non-negotiable in the eyes of the Cryptocracy."

There isn't a great deal of difference between Pope Benedict's approach and that of President Obama. Fundamental Israeli religious and political supremacist myths exert cachet for both. Arabs and Muslims need to understand that as long as those myths obtain and impress, neither the Roman pope nor the American president will ever fairly broker a lasting and just Middle East peace.

The gas chamber which the Israelis created in Gaza last December and January is inferior in Obama's eyes to the Buchenwald concentration camp, where no one was gassed. While in the Middle East, Obama would not visit Gaza where 1400 people were murdered only a few months ago. Instead he made a pilgrimage to Buchenwald to contemplate persecution that occurred more than 60 years ago.

The President declared in Cairo that doubting the execution gas chambers of Auschwitz ("denying the Holocaust") is: "baseless...ignorant...hateful." Several hours later this presidential ignoramus was meeting politicians in Dresden, the site of the biggest holocaust of World War II in the European theatre, and had not one word for the tens of thousands of German civilians intentionally burned alive there (in an actual holocaust by dictionary definition: death by fire).

President Obama is the liberal face of the religion-of-Judaism-for-gentiles known as Holocaustianity. Liberal or not, he is a true believer in a supremacist cult that always places Judaic suffering above all others. Therefore, Palestinian suffering in Gaza and German civilian suffering in Dresden can never take the place of Judaic suffering -- both real and imagined -- during World War II.

Obama strolled the once fire-charred boulevards of Dresden with German Chancellor Andrea Merkel, in whose dungeons languish the revisionist chemist Germar Rudolf and the revisionist publisher Ernst Zundel. Obama is obviously contemptuous of their plight. Their human rights -- specifically their right to doubt the reigning myths of powerful religious fanatics -- don't count with Obama.

Barrack Obama knows nothing of gas chambers, either the real ones made of white phosphorus that were used on the Palestinians, or the fakes shown to tourists in the slave labor camp that was Auschwitz. It is he who is ignorant.

He's a liar too. He told the Muslim word that he was a Christian. In this claim he is no more phony than the pope or any of the other grand poobahs of Churchianity who masquerade as bishops, pastors and ministers of the Gospel.

The largest and best organized "denial movement" in the West, after the denial of the Israeli holocaust against the Palestinians, is the movement to deny the existence of Jesus Christ. Revisionist "deniers" of deaths by Auschwitz gassings are minuscule by comparison.

The power of the movement to deny that Jesus Christ ever lived cannot be underestimated. I have been a revisionist doubter of homicidal Auschwitz gassings since the 1970s but only in the past few years have I begun to receive numerous letters and e-mail in this vein: Dear Hoffman: Why do you doubt only one myth? What about the myth of Jesus Christ having been born and lived? Permit me to show you the evidence of the Jesus hoax...

Google is not only the world's largest Internet search engine, it is a massively powerful multinational corporation whose tentacles reach into governments around the world. It is beloved by techno-geeks who view it as a liberating and revolutionary innovator; and it is wealthy beyond the dreams of Midas.

In February of 2006 Google banned two videos from its "Google Video" website. One of these featured this writer's interview with the late Charles Provan in which Mr. Provan stated his belief that execution gas chambers existed, but that at Treblinka Judaic inmates operated the killing gas engines. This dissent from the script could not be tolerated. The second video Google banned was my speech at a David Irving revisionist conference documenting "Holocaust" scribbler Deborah Lipstadt's use of the word "Amalek" as a racist epithet and incitement to murder.

When I appealed their ban, Google told me in no uncertain terms that "Holocaust denial" videos were strictly forbidden and no appeal would be allowed.

Yet Google is one of the foremost purveyors of Jesus Christ denial, in the form of an online advertisement for a DVD, "The God Who Wasn't There," which, in the words of Newsweek magazine, "Irreverently lays out the case that Jesus Christ never existed."

This "irreverent" ad is everywhere in the American media, but in particular it is all over the worldwide web, thanks to Google, which sponsors it. And as noted, this ad is having an impact, especially on the young. I have tried to get Protestant pastors, Catholic priests --anyone-- to take a stand against this blatant and ubiquitous Jesus Christ denial. In most cases I have been rebuffed by the same people who have made a career out of opposing "Holocaust denial." For these "Christians" Jesus Christ denial is simply not an issue. How many thousands, tens of thousands or even more souls have been led to abandon Christ by the sophisticated, heavily-publicized promulgation of the lie that Our Lord never existed?

The "denial" that negatively impacts the master race of Israelis, so-called "Holocaust denial," is light years ahead in terms of the magnitude of outrage and protest it elicits from the pope of Rome, the president of the U.S., the corporate media, Hollywood, our colleges and universities, and our state and local governments, than whatever piddling notice is taken of the denial of the very birth of Jesus that negatively impacts Christians.

The sad, sick spiritual state of our leaders and putative moral guides and shepherds is amply illustrated by this terrible fact about the tipping scales of "denial." Denial of the Son of God is not even an issue for our "Christian" President, who, like the Pope, thunders his anathemas at those who would dare to question the super-sacred Auschwitz gas chamber dogma. The Establishment does not characterize doubts about Auschwitz execution gassings as merely "irreverent" -- but rather as horrible, rotten sin!

We perceive that the god of Obama is found in the church of Holocaustolatry, while Our Savior's very existence is denied with total impunity.

Can there be anything more "baseless" "ignorant" and "hateful"?

Hoffman is the author of Judaism Discovered, a book banned by Amazon.com

***

Bishop Fellay on the case of Bishop Williamson (video)

Videotape of an interview with SSPX Bishop Fellay in Winona, Minnesota on April 5, 2009

Michael Hoffman's Comment on the Interview:

His (extensive) videotaped opening remarks address the case of SSPX Bishop Richard N. Williamson. In his remarks, SSPX Superior General Bernard Fellay does not mention the revolutionary new Catholic "Shoah" theology introduced by "Pope John Paul the Great" and confirmed and expanded by his papal successor. Bishop Fellay seems oblivious to this powerfully subversive alien dogma and the extent to which Bishop Williamson's doubts about Auschwitz execution gassings is a very necessary bulwark against it.

What protest does Bishop Fellay have concerning the Archbishop of Paris and Cardinal Sean O'Malley of Boston stating that so-called "Holocaust deniers" cannot be Catholic? Bishop Fellay says nothing. Is this not extraordinary, to be silent toward such a revolutionary new criterion for being Catholic?

Is not the Shoah theology at least as pernicious, if not more so, than the Bugnini theology?  Why then the claim that Bishop Williamson's struggle against it is a mere distraction that detracts from the mission of the Church? 

Bishop Fellay appears to reduce Bishop Williamson's principled stand on this issue to a strictly abstruse historiographical realm, when the spiritual combat over the Talmudic subversion of the Roman Church by means of the newly minted Shoah dogma is of critical importance to the survival of the Gospel of Jesus Christ.

Please see: The New Catholic "Shoah" Theology: Alibi for the Revolutionary Overthrow of the Gospel of Jesus Christ