Welcome Information Connoisseurs

Welcome Information Connoisseurs

Thursday, November 30, 2017

It doesn't get any more explosive than this

With an Afterword by Michael Hoffman 

“Fury as Russia launches investigation into whether the last tsar Nicholas II was killed with his family as part of a ‘Jewish ritual murder”

— The Daily Mail newspaper 


Bishop Tikhon Shevkunov, who is heading the Russian Orthodox Church commission investigating the execution of the Romanov family.  Bishop Tikhon Shevkunov, who is heading a Russian Orthodox Church commission investigating the execution of the Romanov family. 

Daily Telegraph, Britain: 

Authorities will investigate an anti-semitic theory that the 1918 killing of Tsar Nicholas II was a “ritual murder” following comments by a bishop close to Vladimir Putin. Bishop Tikhon Shevkunov, who is heading a Russian Orthodox Church commission investigating the execution of the Romanov family by firing squad in Yekaterinburg, said at a conference on Monday, November 27, that many members of the commission believe it was a ritual murder that held special significance for Bolshevik commander Yakov Yurovsky and his men. 

“Ritual murder” has in the past referred to a theory that the last emperor was the victim of a Jewish conspiracy, as Mr Yurovsky was of Jewish heritage. 

Russia’s investigative committee said it would look into the claim by Mr Shevkunov, who is reputed to be Mr Putin’s confessor. The announcement drew an outcry from Jewish groups. Rabbi Boruch Gorin, a spokesman for the federation of Jewish communities, told Interfax news agency that this ritual murder investigation was a “shocking” example of “medieval ignorance,” noting that the myth of Jews ritually killing people to extract their blood for matzo bread has figured in anti-semitic propaganda for many decades. 

The controversy comes as Mr Putin for the first time took part in the church’s annual bishops council on Nov. 29. Speaking at the conference, Patriarch Kirill said he had “hard questions” about the Tsarist murder investigation, which they re-opened in 2015, and called on the authorities not to rush it. Yekaterinburg news agency Ura.ru quoted a source close to the church leadership as saying the patriarch feared that the ritual murder allegations could “provoke uncontrollable outbursts of ultranationalism”. 

Patriarch Kirill also said the Russian Orthodox Church had not yet taken a position on the continued analysis of the Romanov family’s remains. Despite DNA testing showing their identity, the church has recognised neither the remains of Nicholas, Alexandra and three children interred in St Petersburg cathedral in 1998 nor the remains of his two other children found in 2007. 


Church officials have said they need to be extra sure of the remains’ provenance since Nicholas II, who was a cousin of King George V, his wife Alexandra, who was a granddaughter of Queen Victoria, and their children were canonised in 2000. Forensic medical expert Dr Viktor Zvyagin told the conference that the remains discovered in 2007 were those of a boy aged 12-14 and a young woman aged 18-19, which would match the ages of Nicholas’ heir Alexei and his daughter Maria. He said he believed that further remains of the two are located nearby. 


Peter Sarandinaki, the US-based descendant of a loyalist general who took Yekaterinburg days after the tsar was killed, said DNA testing he organized of the 2007 remains proved conclusively they were those of Alexei and Maria, but was skeptical more would be found. “The grave of the two children was shallow. It could be that animals might have carried them away but I do believe that most of the bones were destroyed by fire” set by the Bolsheviks, he told The Telegraph. 


From the Daily Mail (UK): “Yakov Yurovsky, the organizer of the execution who was Jewish...” The country’s final emperor was shot with his wife and five children in 1918. Some in Russian Orthodox Church insist he was murdered in a Jewish ritual. Theory was dismissed in 1990s but new investigation will explore it again. Jews have been accused of ritual murder by anti-Semites since Middle Ages. 



Michael Hoffman Reports: 


According to the media, all medieval Catholic eyewitnesses to Judaic ritual murder were liars. Is this not ritual murder denial? Here’s the brainwash we’re expected to accept: we must not believe any Catholic witness to Judaic ritual murder. But we must believe every Judaic witness to gas chamber homicide in Auschwitz. 
Otherwise we are engaged in the sin and crime of “Holocaust” denial

Do you buy it? 


I don’t. 


Human beings ought to be able to freely and fairly investigate and research the murder of Christians by the followers of the Babylonian Talmud. The thought police in the press should stop stigmatizing research and investigation as “hate” or “bigotry." I’ve got a bulletin for the media: truth is not “anti-Semitic.” The media are dismissing the possibility that the murder of the Tsar and his family was a ritual killing, by terming any investigation of Judaic ritual murder as part of “the blood libel myth.” 


Some of the accusations of Judaic ritual murder in the past were indeed mythical and malicious, but not all. For instance, before he was compelled to recant, Israeli Prof. Ariel Toaff (the son of the chief rabbi of Rome), wrote a history book in Italian upholding the veracity of such murders in certain cases. Toaff’s book was translated into English by selfless revisionist scholars. Their faithful translation is based on Toaff’s uncensored first edition. Prof. Toaff’s suppressed book, Blood Passover, is now online, free of charge (it’s a big pdf. file and loads slowly): https://bloodpassover.com/xbp.pdf Blood Passover is of world-historic importance. It is a gift to humanity and the struggle for human rights in defense against religious-based rackets and mind control. 


The commissars of information have also neglected to report that the building where the Tsar and his family were slaughtered — by shechita or otherwise — was left standing for decades, until the USSR fell. It was under Boris Yeltsin, the U.S.-approved strongman, that the site was razed, in the hope that with no Christian pilgrimage site standing, the memory of the people would fade. But this has not proved to be the case. 



Send a donation to keep Michael Hoffman’s information coming. Give back for that which you have received.  Or purchase a revisionist history book or newsletter
_______________

10 comments:

Gordon Pratt said...

Michael Hoffman has said truth is not antisemitic.

Canadian "human rights" tribunals think they know better. These guardians of morality have ruled that truth is no defence. Truth is no defence means one can be convicted of encouraging hate even if every word uttered is demonstrably true.

If the truth encourages hatred does this not imply the objects of hate deserve to be hated? And if the rights industry bans the truth to prevent hatred against (for example) Jews does this not imply the ban imposers fear Jews deserve to be despised?

I do not say Jews deserve to be hated. I have not heard Michael Hoffman say it. But Canadian "human rights" protectors appear to have said they will shield Jews from hate whether they deserve to be hated or not.

With friends like that do Jews need enemies?

CumExApostolatusOfficio said...

@Gordon Pratt: The Jews have their 'friends' on payroll because without them they'd have few to no friends at all. This is the result of decades, if not centuries, of talking out of both sides of their mouths and treating the rest of humanity rather like herd animals to be sent to the abbatoir as needed.

Michael Hoffman said...

To CumExApostolatusOfficio

You are afflicted with the 1930s antisemitism meme wherein you engage in group libel as a supposed advancement of your cause. when in fact the libel discredits you.

Writing about “The Jews” is counter-productive and reprehensible. You say “The Jews” talk out of both sides of their mouths and “The Jews” herd humanity like animals.

This group libel is straight out of the Talmud. Why do you imitate the Talmudic mentality?

Generalizing about all Judaic persons without honorable exceptions being made, smacks of the Hitlerian notion of a biological taint in every “Jewish” person. Failure to distinguish between good and not very good Judaic persons is a grave act of self-sabotage — as well as sabotage of the movement to be free of Talmudic and Zionist tyranny.

It was a Judaic (Noam Chomsky) who invested the most time and energy in personally protesting and lobbying against my having been fired from my job as a reporter with the mainstream media.

What have you done for the Palestinians lately? It is Norman Finkelstein who has relentlessly campaigned to expose Israeli brutality, most recently with his superb new book, “Gaza—An Inquest.” Henry Herskovitz pickets a synagogue in Michigan every week. Alfred Lilienthal was another great friend to this writer and the Palestinians. There are many more I could mention.

Enough with the covert Nazi doctrine! It got the German people totally defeated and it will defeat us all if it ever gains cachet again. The Nazi doctrine is the mirror image of the rabbinic doctrine. If you are truly opposed to the Talmud, stop despising an entire group of people like the Orthodox rabbis despise and generalize about the goyim.

editor said...

http://judaism.is/images/tsar%20kapparot.jpg?crc=107171021

This 1905 postcard anticipated the nexus of Judeo-Communism, kapparot, and ritual murder in designating Tsar Nicholas II as one of Judaism’s white fowl pagan animal sacrifices.

The Hebrew reads: “This is a sacrificial animal so is my cleansing; it will be my replacement and cleansing the victim.”

VERDICT: DEFINITELY A RITUAL MURDER.

Gordon Pratt said...

I tend not to take CumExApostolatusOffico seriously.

Up to about a dozen years ago supporters of the Jewish colony occupying Palestine debated critics of so-called Israel on good sites like iraqwar.ru.

After losing the arguments for a number of years the supporters disappeared to be replaced soon after with virulent Jew haters. The comments of the latter were so extreme that serious people left and iraqwar.ru closed down.

I suspect that somebody decided that if they could not win the argument they would discredit the site.

Does that explain CumExApostolicusOfficio?

apsterian said...


Treason, Pratt, And Hoffman Are The Problem

Well Gordon Pratt: isn't the question then whether Jew hatred is justified, even necessary, in the obligatory war effort? For if Jews are waging war against gentiles and humanity, it would seem humanity must strike back in self-defense.

And we see if ur be-all and end-all is merely prevention of "virulent Jew hatred," even when such hatred is justified and necessary, then all u're doing is to serving the Jew enemy, aren't u?--isn't that treason?

And so what are u and Hoffman now going to say in ur patronizing manner?--"tut tut, we can win the war without 'virulent Jew hatred'"?

And the problem is u neither provide a plan, nor do u give an analysis, merely insisting in the Jews' favor--isn't this simply treason?--what good are u? Ur sort of Jew-friendly advice is what has gotten humanity in the dire straits it finds itself.

So if "serious people," as u describe, aren't interested, FIRST OF ALL, in winning the war against Jews and satanism--how is it u say they're "serious"?--"serious" about what?--hence, serious about TREASON.

Why is it u're more "serious" about preventing "virulent Jew hatred" than u are about the desperate position of humanity, up against Agenda 2030, as we see, poisoning of the food, water, drugs, and vaccines, etc., against the anti-human Jew (which is a redundancy) and fighting effectively and winning the war? With "friends" like u and Hoffman, does humanity need enemies?




CumExApostolatusOfficio said...

To the Editor and Gordon Pratt: Do "good" Jews exist? Yes, humanly speaking, despite the fact that they have not repudiated Judaism, they may perform “good" in that light. However, by virtue of the fact that they have not repudiated Judaism they are not "good". And by virtue of the fact that Judaism teaches that evil is good, those who do not repudiate Judaism, are not "good". Judaism is not a religion. It's a racial supremacist ideology. How is that "good"? Sure, you can point to a few people who have not repudiated Judaism who attempt to shine some light on the fruits of Judaism but that isn't going to help gentiles win any battles, let alone the relentless war waged against gentiles. I don't think anything I wrote was incorrect. People who don't repudiate Judaism (people who refer to themselves as “Jews” or who are known as “Jews”) are not "good" and are playing their part, knowingly, unknowingly, willingly, unwillingly, overtly or covertly, in the war against gentiles. Would I otherwise care a whit about the fact that “Jews” do not accept Jesus Christ as the Son of God? I’d care to the degree that their souls are in peril. Humanly speaking, if Judaism, and thus its adherents (“Jews”) weren’t engaged in a war with gentiles, I wouldn’t have an issue with Judaism or “Jews”. I do take issue with the fact that Judaism teaches evil as good and thus imperils everything it touches. I don’t think that makes me or what I wrote “reprehensible” or a purveyor of “Nazi” doctrine. I think that makes me a realist regarding the dire position we’re in.

CumExApostolatusOfficio said...

Post script: As for what I have done for the Palestinians lately, I’ve been buying most everything you’ve printed in the past however many years you’ve been at this Mr. Hoffman, in an effort to expose Judaism for what it is. Does that qualify at all?

Anonymous said...

Apsterian, few people believe the 9/11 official narrative. As soon as the truth is exposed it will be over.

Popular Religions are dangerous.

Anonymous said...

The official narrative via the government regarding 9/11 is false. More and more Americans are realizing the real lies with real eyes.

Those responsible will be shamed disgraced, discredited and shunned. The government, media, churches and education all have had a part to play in this lie and their cowardess will their undoing.