The Occult Renaissance Church of Rome
Progress and Perils
By Michael Hoffman
By the grace of God we are about two-thirds of the way though the writing of our forthcoming book, The Occult Renaissance Church of Rome. The skullduggery we are discovering is actually worse than we had anticipated.
One section of the work deals with Reuchlin the “Catholic Humanist” Judaizer, and the papal treachery against his nemesis, Johannes Pfefferkorn, the heroic German-Judaic convert to Catholicism who wrote powerful pamphlets exposing the Talmud. The treachery against Pfefferkorn was put into motion by the Archbishop of Mainz, by the Holy Roman Emperor (who took a bribe from Rabbi Joel of Rosheim), and by usury Pope Leo X, among many others. We have the documentation. This book should prove explosive. Please pray for its success.
We can anticipate the objections from cultists: “The Holy Father didn’t intend to…”
“The Holy Father actually condemned Reuchlin…”
“The Church would never…”
This cult mentality’s apologetic is less compelling under Revelation-of-the-Method Pope Francis, however. He is showing us the tactics of the Vatican for the past 550 years. Formally, Francis does not advocate divorce or deny the indissolubility of marriage, then with his other hand he encourages bishops in South America to admit the divorced and remarried Catholics to communion, “after reflection.” What infant imagines this stratagem is only employed in the modern papacy?
Formally, Popes John Paul II and Benedict XVI did not officially promulgate the doctrine that Pharisaic-Talmudic Judaism is the benign parent of Christianity, then on the other hand by their visits and exhortations and example they did so.
The last resort of the cultists is to state, “But the pontiff did not do these things ex cathedra.”
If by their pontificates the popes enlarged the kingdom of Satan, then that fact alone is enough to demonstrate that the Renaissance and post-Renaissance Church of Rome is not that church against which Jesus said the gates of hell would not prevail.
Sometimes people confuse this writer with a theologian. I am not. I am a researcher in history. God gave us reasoning faculties which, if we are scrupulous, lead us, after investigating and studying the evidence for years, to state that “A” is what happened, not “B.”
Making this assertion about “A,” it does not follow that it is incumbent upon us to say what happened to “B.” Res ipsa loquitur.
Christ’s Church was in Rome prior to the Renaissance, prior to the smoke of usury and the Neoplatonic-Hermetic-Kabbalistic satanism capturing the papacy.
Fact: No pope from 1515 onward restored the 1500-year immutable dogma of Christ’s Church against profit on loans that Leo X had incrementally derogated. On the contrary, many pontiffs expanded and enlarged permission for this heinous mortal sin, sometimes with disgusting, Talmudic-type escape clauses (cf. Vix Pervenit), and sometimes with relentless, incremental steps which made possible the revolution of Pius VIII.
Fact: No pope reversed the march of the Kabbalah through the recesses of the hierarchy of the Church. Leo XIII in his famous denunciation of Freemasonry (Humanum Genus) dared not refer, in the slightest respect, to masonry’s Kabbalistic derivation; he dared not declare that Freemasonry is Kabbalah-for-gentiles, and that its foundation first arose in the West by means of the protection the papacy granted to Count Giovanni Pico della Mirandola, Johannes Reuchlin and their demonic epigones.
But, you will say, “The popes burned Giordano Bruno — and the Talmud!” Yes, and mafia bosses assassinate one another when one attempts to usurp the other. To live and thrive as a Kabbalist-Satanist under the pontiffs of the Renaissance one had to submit absolutely to their authority. This was a pre-requisite. Bruno would not. He saw himself as greater than the pope; that’s the reason he was burned; not for his occultism, which Pico had fully initiated under papal auspices, and the humanist Reuchlin had established within the Church like the rock of Gibraltar. Reuchlin died an honored professor at two papally-chartered Catholic universities.
Fact: no force on earth better extended, preserved and shielded the Babylonian Talmud from the virtual extinction sought for it by St. Vincent Ferrer — the most successful evangelist of the Judaic people since apostolic times; the saintly Judaic converts Nicholas Donin and Johannes Pfefferkorn, as well as the Dominicans of Cologne, and Savonarola in the Florentine Republic — than the Renaissance popes.
Suckers who cannot discern the point at which it was necessary for the sly chess players in the Vatican to shore up the institutional unity of the ecclesiastical bureaucracy by making concessions to powerful conservative Catholic forces, will take the occasional burning of the Talmud in the Renaissance era at face value.
But what does it signify to publicly burn a thousand old and crumbling manuscript copies of the Talmud in the Campo di’ Fiori, when the pope privately made certain that two thousand pristine new copies were reprinted in the finest published edition in history, up to that time?
Moreover, when oppression of working men and women was reaching a crushing point in the nineteenth century and Pope Leo XIII, “the light from heaven,” was called upon to blunt the appeal of Marxism by restating to the world the force of law of the Gospel of Jesus Christ, and the medieval Church’s implacable defense of the worker, the Catholic faithful beseeched the pope, in his encyclical Rerum Novarum, to destroy the basis of the parasitic Money Power by restoring the ancient Catholic ban on profits on loans. Leo declined. No such restoration will be found in Rerum Novarum, which is otherwise filled with fine-sounding rhetoric and palliatives. How could it? At the time the encyclical was penned the Vatican was in hock to the Rothschild bank.
These money facts are found in our 2012 book, Usury in Christendom, which cannot be advertised in “traditional Catholic” publications, or stocked in their bookstores, because the truth hurts.
It's going to hurt considerably more after the publication of The Occult Renaissance Church of Rome; the Rome which has nurtured a child-molester transvestite culture among the hierarchy as far back as St. Peter Damian’s noble jeremiad exposing it.
The robber Church stole the Tridentine Latin Mass from the Faithful and in the 1970s drove a generation of priests for whom it was the Mass of their ordination to depression, alcoholism, mental illness, and suicide. Throughout the history of the post-Renaissance Church it had been the parish priests and the lay people who upheld the Faith, and the “Eminences” and “Holy Fathers” who ravaged it.
Even the pagan kings of the Republic of Rome had been sufficiently honorable to mostly fulfill their duty as the protectors of the commons against the aristocracy, but the popes, i.e. the “kings” of the Church of Rome, betrayed and sacrificed the common Catholic people on the altar of elite conspiracy. From 1470 to 1970 and beyond, twas ever thus.
Excavating this type of revisionist data can be perilous. When, in our Revisionist History newsletter no. 74, (“Right Wing Myths with an Endless Shelf Life”), we implicated the Catholic idol Hilaire Belloc in perpetuating a hoax about English history, we lost about 15% of our subscriber basis and some considerable portion of our donor base.
When, in our Revisionist History newsletter no. 80, “Hitler Had Him Murdered: Gregor Strasser, The German Visionary Who Could Have Led His Nation to a New Birth of Freedom,” we lost another hefty segment of subscribers and benefactors.
In “True and False Heroes,” the cover story of Revisionist History issue no. 83, in which we demonstrated that the right wing idol Antonin Scalia had for decades assisted the Talmudic-Kabbalistic Chabad-Lubavitch rabbinic cult in infiltrating the American legal system and perverting thousands of American lawyers with the Talmud’s legal standards, we lost the support of more readers.
As you can probably appreciate, we are not the John Birch Society or National Review. We don’t have tens of thousands of subscribers or donors. We can ill afford to lose anyone. The publication early next year of The Occult Renaissance Church of Rome, may prove to be the straw that broke the camel’s back, spelling the collapse of our publishing enterprise, which at present subsists “paycheck-to-paycheck,” as economists say with regard to Americans in straitened circumstances.
We operate mailbox-trip to mailbox-trip. Whatever we find when we turn the key on our post office box every week decides the fate of our work, and too many more blows will put us on the unemployment line as surely as if we were toiling for a southern textile plant that just cut a deal with a factory in Red China.
We can’t think of a better way to go down however, than fighting for the facts, and lest we commit a sin against hope, it is also quite possible that those who prize knowledge and have a thirst for truth in history and a desire to put things right, will make this book a success.
Either way, we know that Jesus Christ is above all else, Truth. It is by the power of impostures that Satan rules. Where there is truth, there is Christ and His Kingship. This is our consolation. If we have indeed managed in The Occult Renaissance Church of Rome to unearth the truth, then He is with us — and who can be against us?