Tuesday, July 27, 2010

Oliver Stone, Adolf Hitler and Hypocritical Outrage

Oliver Stone: Jewish control of the media is preventing free Holocaust debate

Outspoken Hollywood director says new film aims to put Adolf Hitler, who he has called an 'easy scapegoat' in the past, in his due historical context

Haaretz (Israeli newspaper) | July 26, 2010

(Michael Hoffman’s observations immediately follow this report)


Oliver Stone

Jewish control of the media is preventing an open discussion of the Holocaust, prominent Hollywood director Oliver Stone told the Sunday Times, adding that the U.S. Jewish lobby was controlling Washington's foreign policy for years.

In the Sunday (July 25) interview, Stone reportedly said U.S. public opinion was focused on the Holocaust as a result of the "Jewish domination of the media," adding that an upcoming film of him aims to put Adolf Hitler and Soviet dictator Joseph Stalin "in context."

"There's a major lobby in the United States," Stone said, adding that "they are hard workers. They stay on top of every comment, the most powerful lobby in Washington.”

The famed Hollywood director of such films as “Platoon" and “JFK," also said that while "Hitler was a Frankenstein," there was also a “Dr. Frankenstein. German industrialists, the Americans and the British. He had a lot of support," Stone told the Sunday Times, adding that "Hitler did far more damage to the Russians than the Jewish people, 25 or 30 [million killed].”

Referring to the alleged influence of the powerful Jewish lobby on U.S. foreign policy, Stone said that Israel had distorted "United States foreign policy for years," adding he felt U.S. policy toward Iran was “horrible. Iran isn't necessarily the good guy," Stone said, insisting that Americans did not "know the full story.”

Stone's comments to the Sunday Times echo pervious remarks by the Hollywood director, regarding what he conceives as the distorted view of figures such as Adolf Hitler and Josef Stalin in U.S. media. Earlier this year, Stone, speaking at the at the Television Critics Association's semi-annual press tour in Pasadena said that "Hitler is an easy scapegoat throughout history and it's been used cheaply. He’s the product of a series of actions. It's cause and effect ... People in America don't know the connection between World War I and World War II," Stone said, adding that through his documentary work he has been able to "walk in Stalin's shoes and Hitler's shoes to understand their point of view.”

"We're going to educate our minds and liberalize them and broaden them. We want to move beyond opinions ... Go into the funding of the Nazi party. How many American corporations were involved, from GM through IBM. Hitler is just a man who could have easily been assassinated," Stone said.

End quote from Haaretz

HOFFMAN’S OBSERVATIONS

The Gevurah/Right wing Republican neocons are running wild with Stone’s remarks, pointing to them as a manifestation of the Chesed/Left-wing’s incomparably perverted true nature. As part of this Left/Right charade, Mr. Stone is being cast as the unconscionable bad guy possessed of depraved indifference to a genocidal maniac (Hitler). This fire is directed by Zionist lapdogs who regard the Palestinian people as lower than dirt and cheer the Orthodox Judaic rabbinate who encourage Israeli  atrocities in Palestine.

Amid the canned outrage approved by New York and Hollywood, let’s ask, where is the outrage over Rabbi Shapira, who declared, "It is permissable to kill the Righteous among Nations even if they are not responsible for the threatening situation. If we kill a Gentile who has sinned or has violated one of the seven commandments – because we care about the commandments — there is nothing wrong with the murder.”

Where is the outrage over Goldwin Smith, Judaic Professor of Modern History at Oxford University, who opined, "We Jews regard our race as superior to all humanity, and look forward, not to its ultimate union with other races, but to its triumph over them.”

Where is the outrage over Noel Ignatiev, Harvard professor: “…The goal of abolishing the white race is on its face so desirable that some may find it hard to believe that it could incur any opposition other than from committed white supremacist…Keep bashing the dead white males, and the live ones, and the females, too, until the social construct known as the white race is destroyed. Not deconstructed, but destroyed.”

Gee, I’m sorry that I can’t be more “patriotic" and join with "Avodah Zarah" Sarah (Palin) and "Flush Limberger" and the rest of the six-pointed mobsters disguised as Jeffersonian Constitutionalists, in hurling heated epithets at Oliver Stone, when their Zionist heroes are running about advocating killing gentiles while wearing the striped pajamas of Auschwitz inmates.

This theatre of the absurd unfolds against the backdrop of  relentless focus on Islam as the "most evil religion on earth" and a threat to all the other “benign" world religions, such as the warm, fuzzy Judaism whose “holy” book says Jesus Christ is in hell being boiled in feces. With apologies to Sarah and Flush and everyone at The Weekly Standard and Fox Noose, as a Christian I dare not fail to publicly condemn and abominate the disgusting and blasphemous rabbinic religion and still hope for mercy from my Savior on Judgment Day.

Forgetting that Judaism and Islam were allies for centuries, from enforced ignorance about Judaism the faith of Islam emerges as the primary religious menace in the minds of Americans. The reaction against Oliver Stone, who merely pricked the gas bag of the monotonous Holohoax propaganda industry (and then issued the de rigueur apology for telling the truth about it), is out of all proportion because Americans do not study what Orthodox Judaism actually teaches, and care little or nothing for the Nazi-like crimes of the little Hitlers who serve the Israeli war machine while financed by US taxpayers.

Stone says Hitler was a stooge of the corporations. I say he was a stooge of deep cover Kabbalistic Judaism, as manifested in the New Age occult beliefs that were his astrological religion. Dig deeply beneath the Orthodox Judaic surface and you will excavate rabbinic admiration for Hitler as "G-d’s avenging angel" against  the majority of 20th century European Judaics who were in the process of liberating themselves from the prison house of Talmudism. Of this Oliver Stone is as ignorant as any Tea Party tippler.

Michael Hoffman is the author of Judaism Discovered. He writes from Coeur d’Alene, Idaho.

***

22 comments:

The Viking said...

Mr. Hoffman,

Who do you suppose orchestrated Mr. Stone's alleged apology? I notice in this reproduction no retraction is given for the reference made to the United States foreign policy having benefited the Likudnic tyranny. I was on the fence about Mr. Stone, but I think I have since changed my mind. He certainly has some stones--if you will permit the expression.
Let's hope he is capable of obtaining future distribution of his films--albeit those that are worth watching.

"In trying to make a broader historical point about the range of atrocities the Germans committed against many people, I made a clumsy association about the Holocaust, for which I am sorry and I regret," Stone said in a statement released by his publicist. "Jews obviously do not control media or any other industry. The fact that the Holocaust is still a very important, vivid and current matter today is, in fact, a great credit to the very hard work of a broad coalition of people committed to the remembrance of this atrocity -- and it was an atrocity."

http://www.cnn.com/2010/SHOWBIZ/celebrity.news.gossip/07/27/oliver.stone.ew/index.html?hpt=Sbin

Michael Hoffman said...

Apologies that are obviously coerced, made under duress and stress, due to hive-like gang ups, and all of the other intimidation tools in the Zionist arsenal, when obtained from powerful men at the top of their careers, such as Mr. Stone, only serve to confirm his original point about the power and control of the Zionists and their holohoax industry.

Anonymous said...

Dear Mr. Hoffman: I'm now finishing-up reading ur great book, "Judaism Discovered," which I think is of course very good, but not qualitatively better than ur earlier work, "Judaism's Strange Gods," which is a tremendous work for its brevity combined w. incisiveness for subject-matter, and for which u ought to be proud indeed, I think.

So I'd like to ask u a metaphysical question, or perhaps a set of them, but related closely.

U denounce "racism," but doesn't this then deny the DETERMINIST (meaning, in accord w. absolute cause-effect, against the perfectly "free" will) nature of God-created universe/reality?

For if Christ assures us there is such thing as TRUTH (Gosp. JOHN 8:32), then doesn't this indicate OBJECTIVE reality of Aristotle?--such objectivity then providing criterion for all/any truth.

Finally, doesn't such objectivity then lead necessarily to afore-mentioned determinism?

Above then are immediately related questions. Next then is separate question, but still related to above-noted issues. Doesn't fifth of original Ten Commandments refer to racism as virtue, "Honor thy race" (parentage)?

Thanks much for ur attention and advice. A.

Michael Hoffman said...

Anything in the Old Testament must be considered in light of the New Testament. Jesus brought us a more perfect understanding of His Father’s divine plan.

In my reading of the New Testament, John the Baptist and Jesus Christ are clearly exposing and ubnder-cutting the dead-end of race pride, in this case of the Pharisees, but it applies to all of us.

Saying that Honor thy Father and Mother means honor thy race is a stretch.

Racism as an ideological construct is most systematically formed and sustained by rabbinic Judaism. Most of the racial, or in your words, “determinist” movements today have unmistakable characteristics of the Talmudic mentality, even though many (if not most) will claim to execrate the Talmud. They do not see the hidden hand manipulating them.

My understanding is that it is right and ethical to hope that your children, if they choose to marry, will marry the best person from the best family. The criterion for what is “best’ however is decided by surrender to the will of God. I am fond of the Amish folk-belief that where a man and a woman have consecrated their lives to God, it is angels that bring them together for marriage for life.

I have admiration for the role white people of the past, who I think probably were the children of Biblical Israel (lost tribes), have played in spreading the Bible and the Gospel throughout the world, but to add to that historical fact, any sense of biological superiority or determinism is for me pure Talmudic evil.

Contemporary white Americans are another matter entirely, having done a fair imitation of the golem of Prague in their service to the Israeli state, and the Judaic religion which despises and opposes Jesus Christ and His true followers.

Perhaps you approach these matters as scientific issues. Many white racists have as their Faith a type of scientism. I see these matters in terms of salvation. There is no salvation in race; that is a rabbinic delusion.

We are saved solely by doing the will of Yahweh, blessed be his Holy Name, the God of Israel, through the grace of Jesus Christ.

Panem celestiam accipiam; et nomen Domini invocabo.

dolorosa said...

Joel Stein proudly admits the Jews do run Hollywood and his comments are at: http://articles.latimes.com/2008/dec/19/opinion/oe-stein19

Anonymous said...

Okay, but let me ask u this: Would u agree w. Socrates (as Plato quotes him, but I forget exactly the particular dialogue) that "no one does evil (or sins) willingly"?

For isn't it inconceivable someone would do something which he knew would lead to perdition?

And isn't there a serious problem for the definition of "evil"? Thanks again. A.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous #1 references the Socratic Paradox. As I understand it, it is not simply that "no one does evil willingly".

To paraphrase the concept: Those who know good actions will never choose anything but good actions. And those who do not know good actions will never be able to choose good actions.

Unfortunately we have a number of other concepts that have updated these ideas since it was just Socrates sitting around in the ancient world.

The fall from grace, behavioral plasticity, the electro-chemical nature of the brain, render what would have been a nice concept by Socrates, rather meaningless.

Anonymous said...

Which Goldwin Smith are you referring to? Here he is described as an anti-semite: http://cornellsun.com/section/news/content/2009/04/30/goldwin-smith%E2%80%99s-anti-semitism-fuels-anger

Anonymous said...

Someone in the Diaspora must have dug up some old dirt on Mr. Stone

Anonymous said...

Michael Hoffman writes:

"I have admiration for the role white people of the past, who I think probably were the children of Biblical Israel (lost tribes)"

Did this thesis begin with Herbert W. Armstrong, or was it merely popularized by him? In any event, I find it hard to accept the "caucasoids were the lost tribes" argument. Despite your disqualifier, I still find it functionally similar to the Talmudic "saved by race" notion. It also raises deeper questions that exegetes and theologians have not answered satisfactorily. Was the flood in Genesis a local event or a worldwide event? Did humanity exist globally outside of the geographic region of the Bible's setting (especially during the time of early Old Testament history)? What of the souls of those who died in Asia or the Americas after Creation yet before the Ascension? Were Asians or Mongoloids (for instance) one of the tribes, or just a group of other people not referenced by the Bible? How did humans wind up on other continents after the Fall? How did the descendents of Adam and Eve make the journey from the purported geographical region of Eden to Central America? Was an unbaptized Chinese infant born a few hundred years before the Incarnation a child of God?

Just thinking out loud, mind you.

S. Spencer Jones said...

You'd think after Gibson pretended to be a defender of the Christian faith in order to garner attention for his "Passion" film, and then threw Christians under the bus just before the film came out in order to appease his Hollywood masters, that no one claiming to have 'eyes to see' would fall for the sensationalistic marketing tactics coming from the mouths of Hollywood directors.

Stone is no more "one of us" than Gibson.

By invoking Hitler he was merely using sensationalism to draw attention to his latest cinematic opus. And by invoking the idea of "Jewish control of the media" he was implying his movie would reveal inside information being kept from the public eye. It was pure basic marketing gimmickry.

Stone knows that everyone wants to know what's being kept from them. It's human nature. It's a desire as old as the Garden of Eden, when Satan deceived Eve into listening to him by telling her God was holding things back from her, but that he'd be willing to tell her the back story she was missing out on if she'd only agree to "eat" of his fruit (i.e., Gen. 3:1-5).

Likewise, Stone implies his movie will be equally revelatory - even exposing those things which we are not otherwise allowed to know.

Hey, all you have to do is "eat" of Stone's fruit (fork out your hard-earned money to see the movie), and your eyes will be opened. You will know good and evil.

Yeah, right.

In short he was starting a word-of-mouth advertising campaign using a tactic as old as Satan himself. He was drumming up the "buzz," as we like to say in the marketing industry.

Anyone who believes Stone is actually getting ready to "expose" anything of any import in his new movie has not been paying attention.

Guys like Gibson and Stone and Tom Hanks are users -- masters of garnering attention through sensationalism and manipulation of the public mindset.

Sorry, but no one is going to come riding in on a white horse and reveal 'the truth' until the Second Advent.

So quit looking for literary or cinematic salvation, and study the Bible instead. It will tell you everything you need to know about the enemies of God, if you're actually interested in the topic. More so than any book. More so than any movie. More so than any man.

Problem is, most people aren't realy interested in knowing more about the enemies of God. They prefer the sensationalism of man. Mores the pity.

Anonymous said...

I cannot fathom God as a bigot and choosing one race over another. The Torah is a Jewish invention elevating a race of people over all other races in the world. They do not get a free pass in this life because they claim to be chosen. Chosen to do what? Was Jonath Pollard chosen to steal government secrets for Israel? Was Michael Milken, Ivan Boesky, Carl Ican, Irv the liquidator Jacobs, Sir James Goldsmith, Henry Kravis, Kohlberg and a host of other Jewish gentlemen chosen to decimate industry and liquidate pension fund money. Was Dov Zokheim chosen to loot a trillion dollars from the Pentagon when he was comptroller. Was the lobbyist Jack Abramov chosen to loot money from Native Americans and transfer it to his Jewish causes? Was he chosen to call them low lifes and troglodytesas he stole money from them? My point is Oliver Stone has a valid point. They have control and abuse control just like every other race of people who succumb to their lower nature.

Anonymous said...

Judaic Vs. Christian Problem Understood In Strict Philosophic Terms: Truth Vs. Lies; Objective Vs. Subjective

I think we're getting a little too complicated for the correct, hence SIMPLIFIED, vision of large, overall problem, including then esp. the "Judaic" problem (distinguished fm mere "Jew" problem) as our good Mr. Hoffman has it and emphasizes for us.

For Christ tells and teaches us all we gotta do to achieve "eternal life" is appreciate God (hence TRUTH, according to Gosp. JOHN 14:6), take God seriously enough, and then treat fellows accordingly (Gosp.s MARK 12:29-31 and MATT 22:37-9).

What Judaics do is to alter these Godly instructions of Christ, saying we should rather do as THEY, Judaics, tell us, they emphasizing themselves as God-like creatures, as Hoffman so well demonstrates.

Specifically then, we observe Judaics have perpetrated the most perfect and sublime of frauds possible to mankind, that of COUNTERFEITING whence they literally enjoy a veritable MONOPOLY upon the creation of money, thus achieving evermore absolute dictatorship of the world as we see presently.

Imagine what u could do if u had exclusive monopoly of this COUNTERFEIT fraud (see RealityZone.com for expo/ref. on US Federal Reserve Bank [Fed] fraud)--a fraud which is practically fool-proof, even at this advanced stage of things.

So we see thus EXACTLY HOW Judaics operate: following upon their lies and fraud-system, they just BUY everything in sight, as by means of bribery--of politicians, judges, juries, lawyers, sheriffs, and police dept.s--and then ESPECIALLY the established Christian churches--every single one of them, as Mr. Hoffman has shown so well.

And if u don't go along w. this bribery, Judaics also control numerous gangs of enforcers and assassins, MOSSAD, FBI, CIA, MI-6, et al.

But the "catch" to Judaics' scam-system is this: EVENTUALLY the COUNTERFEIT game breaks-down as the bribery and expenses get to be too much, and the consequent inflation-rate reaches HYPER-inflationary proportions, as we see presently, USA essentially bankrupt w. a 13 trillion + dollar debt, and growing, USA now not even able to pay the interest, as Ron Paul (CampaignForLiberty.com) explains for us so well.

So my idea is to emphasize for folks how the Judaics operate, they emphasizing a perfectly "FREE" WILL, Judaics typically pretending they're like God, God merely their slave who can't resist loving those Judaics most of all, above all other creatures.

We true Christians, on other hand, are best off as we understand and acknowledge a most absolutely perfect DETERMINISTIC system, this in accord w. strict cause-effect, our sinful human wills NOT perfectly "free," NOT capable of "good-works" (Pelagian heresy).

CONCLUSION: Pt. then is just as it's Christian TRUTH vs. Jew (or "Judaic"--Talmudic) lies, so it's really philosophic matter of determinism vs. perfectly "free" will fallacy/delusion/heresy. In simplest terms then, this converts to Christian OBJECTIVITY (Aristotle) vs. Judaic subjectivism, this subjectivism (and perfectly "free" will) the foundation of Judaics' sublime fraud system. A.

Anonymous said...

The Supreme Court, like Hollywood and Wall Street and most universities and the main stream media and warmaking US foreign policy, is over-Edomed. A nation of
people, the Edomites, utterly condemned by the major writing prophets, ‘became
Jews’ just over a century before the birth of Christ. According to Flavius
Josephus, the Jewish historian who lived just after the time of Christ, 'They
(Edom) were hereafter no other than Jews' (Josephus Antiquities of the Jews,
XIII ix 1; XV vii 9). Yahweh the God of Israel, ‘hated Esau (Edom)’, a
people ‘against whom he has indignation forever’ (Malachi 1:2-4). Ezekiel
refers to Idumea (Edom, also referred to as Mount Seir) as taking possession of
the land and heritage of Israel and Judah (Ezekiel 35:10, 11, 15; 36:2, 5). The
Herodian dynasty at the time of Christ were Edomites, testifying to the takeover
and the word 'Jew' had almost become synonymous with these evil people. Jesus
said to the Jews ‘Because you are not sheep of my flock you do not believe’(John 10:24-27) and 'You are of your father the devil and your will is to do your father's desires.. he was a murderer from the beginning.. he is a liar and the father of lies..' (John 8:44) and 'I know.. the slander of those who say they are Jews and are not, but are a synagogue of Satan' (Rev 2:9, 3:9) Pharisees = 'vipers, serpents'. The Hebrew word Edom means 'red', the color of blood, and so it is unsurprising that Jews are strongly associated with communism and its color red.

Anti-Zionist said...

It was all orchestrated the whole thing so he will appologise.

Anonymous said...

"We are saved solely by doing the will of Yahweh, blessed be his Holy Name, the God of Israel, through the grace of Jesus Christ."

Michael Hoffman, you wrote the above, and although I have the greatest admiration for your incisive mind and writing skills, I have no idea how you can worship a jewish god. Please don't tell me the term "yahweh" is some generic term for "God" either.

Your worship and belief in a jewish god is why, though I love your writing, I take it all with a grain of salt.

Michael Hoffman said...

To Anonymous 9:59 a.m.

The Esau/Edom dichotomy, as you have explicated it, is part of the racial taint theory, by which certain races of people are forever doomed to be hated, in which case Mary the Jewess could not have been the mother of the Messiah, Simon Peter could not have been Christ’s “rock” and St. Paul could not have been the pre-eminent Christian missionary since they were all Jews.

Yours is a mirror image of what the rabbis teach to Judaic youth: gentiles are Esau, to be hated forever, no matter what characteristics of goodness they may exhibit.

Any person of good will and true faith who, by free choice and grace, converts to the Gospel of Jesus Christ is washed in the blood of Calvary and redeemed thereby.

God does not grant this grace to everyone. He chooses us, we do not choose Him (John 15:16), but since the coming of the Messiah, God’s mysterious choosing is not race-based!

Satan loves to kindle a race war between alleged irreconcilable enemies because conversion cannot be a factor in such a war of irreconcilables, and by this means the efficacy of Christ’s grace is denied.

This is what Joseph Goebbels taught about the Jews of Europe and what rabbinic-influenced ‘Christian’ preachers taught about Black people in the antebellum South. This is what rabbis teach about the Arabs in Palestine today.

Anonymous said...

Michael Hoffman wrote:

"...and what rabbinic-influenced ‘Christian’ preachers taught about Black people in the antebellum South..."

Was the rabbinic influence on these preachers seeded through Dispensationalism and/or Freemasonry? On the other side of the coin, is their any evidence that Lincoln and/or the radical abolitionists (John Brown, Thoreau, Emerson) were influenced by Moses Hess through Karl Marx? Please examine this question in future newsletters or recommend books on it.

ASE- Balt.

Anonymous said...

The real question is whether Oliver Stone is still friends with Arnon Milchan!

Elsa Zardini said...

Exactly Anti-Zionist. And so that we all learn how to behave when the time comes.

Anonymous said...

ASE - though not the answer to your post, Melville takes transcendentalists like Emerson to task in Chapter 35 of Moby Dick (The Mast Head). From what I've gathered, Melville despised the pantheist/transcendental movement.

Anonymous said...

Mel Gibson's art stands on its own merits regardless of any political critique -- just or otherwise -- tha tmight be leveled against him. As for Oliver Stone, his movies are not
remotely of the same quality as
Gibson's in my estimation and to compare the two is in my view a
gross injustice. Stone has shown with his JFK movie how he is willing to be used by the elite to conceal the critical truth while pretending, like Satan in the Garden of Eden, to offer hidden knowledge. Under the pretext of revealing the truth about the JFK assasination, the
Judeo-Masonic nature of the crime was covered-up. Not so with Gibson's Passion of the Christ, which -- despite the omision of one verse of scripture to appease the ADL and company -- still faithfully portrayed the assasination of Jesus Christ by the Christ-rejecting Jewish leadership. Likewise, Apocalyto
is a masterful movie depicting
pre-Christian holocausts and hinting at the Judeo-Masonic "chosenite" con game as
practised by psychopaths throughout history; see
http://heimbich.tripod.com/APOC1984.HTM for a great review of
that movie.