THE DEATH CULTURE SPEAKS:
Optimum Population Trust declares children are the problem
By Michael A. Hoffman II | July 13, 2007
Copyright ©2007 RevisionistHistory.org
God says, "All those who hate me love death." That hatred does not get any more elemental than when, under cover of environmentalism, large families are dehumanized and children viewed as a nuisance by cranky baby-boomers who want the right-to-life reserved for themselves alone --and since almost none of them live an Amish lifestyle, who are they to point fingers?
This is the western death culture in action. This is the notion that we're going to have a wonderful world while contracepting children out of it. This is the theory that we can restore our Constitutional Republic by limiting the population growth of Christian families. But the American Founding Fathers (and mothers) were products of family life and family culture; many came from huge families which fostered the very Republican virtues we extol today. We cannot separate those virtues from their family roots and values.
Ah, there goes Hoffman with his darned Xianity again! Au contraire, this is not particularly a Christian issue, it's a matter of the natural law. Much of the West's traditional view of the family is derived from ancient, pre-Christian Rome, starting with the concept of the "paterfamilias." Rome didn't build a civilization with sterile couples.
Once any society decides to do away with children after a certain number have been born, they are declaring their hatred of God and their love of death. The city-of-death, necropolis, was a key component of Pharaonic Egypt and viewed by Kabbalist Dr. John Dee as the desirable outcome of a futurist world, as revealed to him by "incarnate entities." This is diabolic from alpha to omega.
In western society a strong and fortunate woman is defined as the successful CEO of a Fortune 500 corporation, a dazzling professional athlete, a prominent scientist, author, physician, actress, dancer, model or attorney. Yet if we ask each of these "strong women" if they'be willing to bear ten or twenty children, what would be their answer after they recovered from their fainting spell?
Time and again I encounter female historians who describe women of past ages as "worn-out" by childbirth. In a speech in Spokane, Washington Noam Chomsky implied that women who give birth to many children are ignorant: that the more women are educated, the less children they want to have. This is a chauvinist insult to every mother of a large family. Many modern obstetricians view childbirth as a pathology; and so it goes.
This spiritual malady is largely confined to the West and the Chinese government (but not its people). In the non-western world, the strongest woman is the one who has borne the most children, and the luckiest (and sexiest!) is the one who is most fertile. This is nature's law. Modern western pagans have never been more unnatural.
In the alchemical nigredo phase of human processing, we have reversed all that: the strong, fortunate, erotic woman is childless, her womb barren. We honor sterility. What can be the future of a sterile society, notwithstanding its high minded ecological rhetoric and cultural elitism?
We need children to tend the garden that is the earth, but in our sloth, we do a terrible job of teaching them about quality organic food (American pets are fed far better than American children), sustainable agriculture and living simply with a spiritual, non-materialist ethic. Only those who hate God's creation would want to exterminate the potential saints and geniuses who God wishes to incarnate on earth to cultivate His garden! Sometimes it is the fifth or tenth child in a family that will be the great leader, scientist, poet or inventor! How many of these have we already contracepted out of existence, against God's will?
Look around you and blame the condition of the world not on God but on our selfish, blind, unnatural selves. Environmentalists ought to first and foremost be paragons of the natural and nature is green and yearns to conceive! But we are burdened with a fake environmentalism that is sometimes a smokescreen for death-dealing demons.
I know it's not cool to speak in those terms, but facts are facts. Let's face them!
................
TOO BIG FOR THE PLANET?
Having more than two children is bad for the environment, a new report says.
By Joanna Moorhead
July 12, 2007 | The Guardian (Manchester, UK)
http://environment.guardian.co.uk/ethicalliving/story/0,,2124370,00.html?gusrc=rss&feed=29
Should we all be stopping at two? A report this week by the Optimum Population Trust - a thinktank dedicated to reducing population growth and its effects on the world - argues that families should restrict themselves to two children, because it is no longer responsible, or environmentally friendly, to bring three, four or more into the world.
According to John Guillebaud, co-chairman of the Manchester-based thinktank and an international family planning expert, a voluntary stop-at-two guideline would allow couples to choose a greener lifestyle; and while the report says that the annual 300,000 net rise in Britain's overall population has several components, including immigration, it believes reducing the number of children in each family would send a signal to the rest of the world that we want to consume fewer of the earth's resources.
So what is the outlook for big families? Rosamund McDougall, a member of the trust's advisory council, says there is no suggestion that Britain should adopt such coercive measures as China's controversial one-child policy. But with 669,531 babies born in England and Wales last year and the birth rate running at a 26-year high of 1.87 children per woman, she says everybody must realise that there are long-term implications in having lots of offspring.
"People think it's all about eco-nappies and hand-me-downs, but it's not quite as simple as that," she says. "You've got to consider the environmental impact across the 80 years that each of these babies is likely to live. We've calculated that each UK child is going to cost the world the equivalent of 620 return flights between London and New York across a lifetime." And then, of course, many of these children will have children of their own....End quote
Click here: HOFFMAN ON MICHIGAN CABLE TELEVISION
..............
Friday, July 13, 2007
Tuesday, July 10, 2007
Report on the Conference with Hoffman in San Jose
By Michael A. Hoffman II
Bruce Leichty, the American lawyer for Ernst Zundel (the jailed homicidal gas chamber skeptic serving five years in a German prison) hosted a two day "Good Information Advocates" conference in San Jose, California last week. It was timed to coincide with the Mennonite Church's national convention, also in San Jose (Leichty is a Mennonite). Thousands of Mennonites were leafletted with invitations to attend. A handful did. The rest of the audience was primarily comprised of this writer's readers and supporters.
Day 1, July 4, featured a survivor of the destruction of the Twin Towers in New York, as well as Dr. Paul Rea (pronounced "Ray"), Professor of Philosophy at St. Mary's College in the Bay area, who offered a well-reasoned and balanced survey of 9/11 doubts, contradictions, anomalies and pitfalls. His was a summation of the state-of-the-art in 9/11 Truth activism. Prof. Rea is no fanatic and entertains all sides of the controversy with insight, wit and humor. He is very much an asset to the movement.
Next we heard, by phone, from a Prof. at Berkeley City College. I will not mention his name because he was not happy with my presence at the conference, based on my Auschwitz homicidal gas chamber skepticism. I was later told that the ADL had contacted him in an intimidating manner and that after they did so, he protested to Bruce for including "Holocaust-deniers" on the website advertising the meeting.
Nonetheless, this professor gave an interesting talk on the "weaponization of information" surrounding 9/11, after first upholding the right of WWII revisionists to speak, write and research freely.
Also on Day 1, Bruce played a tape of a speech I gave a few years ago on the occult/mind-napping aspects of 9/11: "Inside the 9/11 Conspiracy"
http:/www.revisionisthistory.org/cgi-bin/store/agora.cgi?cart_id=8934140.7021*Nu2LL7&product=Audio_CDs
Day 2, July 5, featured the revisionist portion of the conference and opened with presentations by revisionism's grand dame, Ingrid Rimland Zundel, Ernst's loyal wife who courageously soldiers on in behalf of her imprisoned husband, even as she cares for her seriously ill adult son. Her presentation included a showing of a video documentary about Ernst which Ingrid arranged to have shown to Iranian leaders during the revisionist meetings held in Tehran last year.
As the final event, in the evening this writer addressed a small but enthusiastic crowd of about 25 people with the most elaborate and detailed power point slideshow presentation on Judaism I have ever offered. Mr. Leichty was generous with my allotment of time and I spoke from approximately 7:45 p.m. to 9:15 and then took questions until approximately 9:45.
My presentation was videotaped and if the audio and video of the recording are of decent quality we will offer it on DVD(s) at a future date.
Surprise guest Craig Heimbichner, author of "Blood on the Altar," preceded me at 7:30 p.m. with an excellent fifteen minute talk on the OTO (Ordo Templi Orientis--successor group to the Freemasons).
At the conclusion of my talk, one of my questioners was hostile and though I attempted to mollify him and congratulate him on his courage in challenging me before a crowd of my supporters (a position I have occupied in the past as the lone dissenter in a room full of opponents), it did no good, and I am told he complained loudly to the Mennonite organizing committee that Bruce Leichty was sponsoring "hate," even though I must have denounced hatred a half dozen times in the course of my presentation; but there is sometimes no reasoning with indoctrinated people.
Apart from whatever edification my talk may have imparted to the audience, the other benefit was the opportunity to meet old friends and make new ones and this we certainly accomplished in a spirit of conviviality. Thanks to Bruce Leichty for making this possible. He put his reputation on the line, did much hard work and paid for the speakers, transportation, lodging and the venue.
***
Bruce Leichty, the American lawyer for Ernst Zundel (the jailed homicidal gas chamber skeptic serving five years in a German prison) hosted a two day "Good Information Advocates" conference in San Jose, California last week. It was timed to coincide with the Mennonite Church's national convention, also in San Jose (Leichty is a Mennonite). Thousands of Mennonites were leafletted with invitations to attend. A handful did. The rest of the audience was primarily comprised of this writer's readers and supporters.
Day 1, July 4, featured a survivor of the destruction of the Twin Towers in New York, as well as Dr. Paul Rea (pronounced "Ray"), Professor of Philosophy at St. Mary's College in the Bay area, who offered a well-reasoned and balanced survey of 9/11 doubts, contradictions, anomalies and pitfalls. His was a summation of the state-of-the-art in 9/11 Truth activism. Prof. Rea is no fanatic and entertains all sides of the controversy with insight, wit and humor. He is very much an asset to the movement.
Next we heard, by phone, from a Prof. at Berkeley City College. I will not mention his name because he was not happy with my presence at the conference, based on my Auschwitz homicidal gas chamber skepticism. I was later told that the ADL had contacted him in an intimidating manner and that after they did so, he protested to Bruce for including "Holocaust-deniers" on the website advertising the meeting.
Nonetheless, this professor gave an interesting talk on the "weaponization of information" surrounding 9/11, after first upholding the right of WWII revisionists to speak, write and research freely.
Also on Day 1, Bruce played a tape of a speech I gave a few years ago on the occult/mind-napping aspects of 9/11: "Inside the 9/11 Conspiracy"
http:/www.revisionisthistory.org/cgi-bin/store/agora.cgi?cart_id=8934140.7021*Nu2LL7&product=Audio_CDs
Day 2, July 5, featured the revisionist portion of the conference and opened with presentations by revisionism's grand dame, Ingrid Rimland Zundel, Ernst's loyal wife who courageously soldiers on in behalf of her imprisoned husband, even as she cares for her seriously ill adult son. Her presentation included a showing of a video documentary about Ernst which Ingrid arranged to have shown to Iranian leaders during the revisionist meetings held in Tehran last year.
As the final event, in the evening this writer addressed a small but enthusiastic crowd of about 25 people with the most elaborate and detailed power point slideshow presentation on Judaism I have ever offered. Mr. Leichty was generous with my allotment of time and I spoke from approximately 7:45 p.m. to 9:15 and then took questions until approximately 9:45.
My presentation was videotaped and if the audio and video of the recording are of decent quality we will offer it on DVD(s) at a future date.
Surprise guest Craig Heimbichner, author of "Blood on the Altar," preceded me at 7:30 p.m. with an excellent fifteen minute talk on the OTO (Ordo Templi Orientis--successor group to the Freemasons).
At the conclusion of my talk, one of my questioners was hostile and though I attempted to mollify him and congratulate him on his courage in challenging me before a crowd of my supporters (a position I have occupied in the past as the lone dissenter in a room full of opponents), it did no good, and I am told he complained loudly to the Mennonite organizing committee that Bruce Leichty was sponsoring "hate," even though I must have denounced hatred a half dozen times in the course of my presentation; but there is sometimes no reasoning with indoctrinated people.
Apart from whatever edification my talk may have imparted to the audience, the other benefit was the opportunity to meet old friends and make new ones and this we certainly accomplished in a spirit of conviviality. Thanks to Bruce Leichty for making this possible. He put his reputation on the line, did much hard work and paid for the speakers, transportation, lodging and the venue.
***
For German readers: Ein historisches Ereignis!
Das ursprünglich verbotene, deutschsprachige Buch Eisenmengers, "Entdecktes Judentum" ist nun auf CD in Form einer PDF-Textdatei verfügbar. Diese CD enthält sämtliche der mehr als 2000(!) Seiten der ursprünglich zweibändigen, ersten Ausgabe von Johann Andreas Eisenmenger's Werk "Entdecktes Judentum". Dieses Werk wurde nach seiner ersten Veröffentlichung im Jahre 1700 auf Anordnung des hlg. römischen Kaisers beschlagnahmt. "Entdecktes Judentum" stellt die umfassendste und anerkannteste dokumentarische Darstellung des Judentums dar, die jemals veröffentlicht wurde. Bitte beachten Sie, daß der Text in deutscher Sprache ist. Eisenmenger war ein bekannter Gelehrter und hervorragender Professor der hebräischen und aramäischen Sprache an der Universität in Heidelberg. "Entdecktes Judentum" ist ein äußerst seltenes Buch und ist von den Rabbinern gefürchtet. Die wenigen noch existierenden Examplare wurden bis vor kurzem unter Verschluß gehalten.
Man hatte gehofft dieses Werk für immer unzugänglich zu machen. Dank aber unserer Wohltäter und Unterstützer waren wir in der Lage beträchtliche Mittel aufzubringen, um das Buch maschinell abbilden zu lassen. Dieses Verfahren war erforderlich um die brüchigen Seiten des kostbaren Originals vor Schaden zu bewahren. Das komplette Werk Eisenmengers ist nun auf dieser CD in seiner Originalform für alle Zukunft gesichert. Bitte nehmen Sie auch zur Kenntnis, daß die vorliegende Ausgabe auf CD nicht den auf englisch und unter dem Titel "Traditions of the Jews" veröffentlichen Auszügen entspricht.
"Entdecktes Judentum" auf CD bietet eine photographische Reproduktion der ersten deutschen Veröffentlichung des gleichnamigen Werkes von Johann Andreas Eisenmenger aus dem Jahre 1700. Die archivarische Text-CD enthält 2106 Seiten im Format einer PDF Datei. Der Preis beträgt $450
[Bitte beachten Sie daß die CD ausschließlich Text in deutscher Sprache bietet und keinen Ton. Der Versand dieser CD wird von Personal vorgenommen, das nur Englisch spricht. Wir ersuchen daher, etwaige Fragen nur in englischer Sprache an den Versand zu richten].
***
Man hatte gehofft dieses Werk für immer unzugänglich zu machen. Dank aber unserer Wohltäter und Unterstützer waren wir in der Lage beträchtliche Mittel aufzubringen, um das Buch maschinell abbilden zu lassen. Dieses Verfahren war erforderlich um die brüchigen Seiten des kostbaren Originals vor Schaden zu bewahren. Das komplette Werk Eisenmengers ist nun auf dieser CD in seiner Originalform für alle Zukunft gesichert. Bitte nehmen Sie auch zur Kenntnis, daß die vorliegende Ausgabe auf CD nicht den auf englisch und unter dem Titel "Traditions of the Jews" veröffentlichen Auszügen entspricht.
"Entdecktes Judentum" auf CD bietet eine photographische Reproduktion der ersten deutschen Veröffentlichung des gleichnamigen Werkes von Johann Andreas Eisenmenger aus dem Jahre 1700. Die archivarische Text-CD enthält 2106 Seiten im Format einer PDF Datei. Der Preis beträgt $450
[Bitte beachten Sie daß die CD ausschließlich Text in deutscher Sprache bietet und keinen Ton. Der Versand dieser CD wird von Personal vorgenommen, das nur Englisch spricht. Wir ersuchen daher, etwaige Fragen nur in englischer Sprache an den Versand zu richten].
***
Tuesday, July 03, 2007
Britain's "Terror Attacks"
The Mouthpiece Media's Blind Faith in Police Stories Leads to More Government Surveillance and Fear in the US
by Michael A. Hoffman II
Much of the philosophy, tactics and psychological warfare of the West's intelligence agencies and military were pioneered in Elizabethan England under John Dee, Francis Walsingham and William Cecil.
Very little has changed about the British Secret Service since then, except that it has grown ever more diabolic and clever.
Today we see how fragile is our liberty as we enter a period of heightened fears and security in the U.S. based on knee-jerk obedience to ,and faith in, the British tale of recent airport and other "Islamic" attacks.
In all crimes perpetrated by the Cryptocracy which this reporter has investigated, from Son of Sam to the Unabomber, the U.S. media always--I repeat, always--acted as a mouthpiece for the police, and if the police were corrupt or part of the conspiracy, then the "news" is little more than a press release from the invisible empire itself.
Which is what we may be experiencing this week. British police say this or that was perpetrated and we believe, react, get the fear and begin to consider additional ways we can give up our immemorial rights in return for a chimerical "security" based on blind faith in the British police. It's almost an automatic process, like pressing a button.
We know the governments of the West engage in psychological warfare and the planting of false stories. It's an acknowledged part of combat and according to Sun Tzu, the most important part. Yet "our" media have got to be in on the plot because they never ask in the midst of the warfare, how the psychology is being used and where the false stories are being planted.
Those questions are usually only asked after the Cryptocracy has achieved its objectives, "when the hurly-burly's done; when the battle's lost and won." Then it's too late, of course. In the case of Iraq, Bill Moyers asked those questions in a recent "Frontline" PBS TV special, opening with a scene of White House reporters cooperating with Bush in a farcial press conference, instead of exposing it. It was an incredible television moment, but coming after the fact, one has to wonder if it is little more than the fulfillment of James Shelby Downard's cryonic theory of first freezing and then deliberately thawing the truth, on cue, again for purposes of mass demoralization and psychological warfare.
The people of the West are weary of the Zionist crusade against Islam, and equally weary of fanatic Islamic fundamentalism. They would gladly pronounce a "pox on both your houses" and withdraw from the battle. This is worrisome to the Cryptocracy, which is hell-bent on eliminating our ancient personal freedoms and building a gigantic government spying and police apparatus on the Stalinist model, digitally enhanced.
We respond with our pickets, protests, op-eds, columns and get-togethers. But if "our" media are against us, if the people we rely on for information have sold out to the aspiring tyrants, then any time the intelligence agencies of Britain or America want to nullify and overturn all that we have done to build a protest movement and raise awareness, they only have to organize Islamic patsies and nutcases into cells and direct their attacks on public transport and civic symbols. After which the media step up to the plate to slow-cook the panic and stampede the herd. This is from the front page of today's Washington Post:
"After the events in Britain...Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff (was)...asking Americans to keep a careful watch on their surroundings. ...Chertoff and other officials said that security and surveillance have been increased...'It's not just what happened in England and Scotland that has us watching,' another counterterrorism official said. 'We have had some concerns for some time.'...In Georgetown on Saturday night, some restaurants and nightclubs were evacuated after firefighters spotted an abandoned backpack on a sidewalk. And on Sunday afternoon, police set up checkpoints on the access route into Baltimore-Washington International Thurgood Marshall Airport, stopping some cars and trucks for inspection." ("Attempts Seen As Model for New Attacks On U.S. Soil, "Washington Post, July 3, 2007; p. A1).
Chertoff announces, "Security and surveillance have been increased." Gotcha! Protest as we may, a couple of police reports, however rigged or overblown, of attacks and attempted attacks across the sea in Britain, cause the American people to come under increased surveillance by their government.
And as the panic increases and the herd begins to stampede in earnest, any American liberty can be curtailed or suspended "for the short-term" "during this emergency" and the media will report it with a straight face, exactly as George Orwell, a former BBC reporter, prophesied in "1984."
We need to see the media as an arm of the government and hold in contempt first, the prostitutes and crooks who produce and edit the news at the top, and then the reporters like Michael R. Gordon of the New York Times and Karen DeYoung at the Washington Post, as well almost the entire staff of Fox television and many of the other TV networks, and even National Public Radio, who serve as the mouthpieces and raise no skeptical queries in the midst of these secret police operations.
Until the media have about as much credibility as the government, and are made to bear responsibility for the totalitarian control system which the Cryptocracy is toiling to impose on us in the name of "fighting terrorism," we are entirely at the mercy of any police agency, from London to New York, who choose to set-up a "terror" attack.
How dare you question the police, Hoffman!? Well, if the police are always truthful and correct in their accusations and arrests, why do Britain and America have an adversarial justice system, defense lawyers, a jury? Why not simply believe the police and prosecutors in every case and have the judge rubber-stamp their claims in the way the media are rubber-stamping them now?
It seems almost too elementary to have to remind ourselves that our ancestors jealously guarded the rights of the accused because too often the police and prosecutors, being human rather than gods, erred, or were on the take of a wealthy baron, or had a personal score to settle.
In the 21st century, with all our alleged sophistication, this is apparently too difficult a reality for our media to grasp. They have devolved into simpletons who paddy-cake in unison with the badges, every time the police issue a bulletin, arrest a suspect or level an accusation. The mayor of Salt Lake City calls this the "obedience culture." But St. Peter said we are to obey God rather than man, a fundamental truth now lost in the "security" frenzy that makes a mockery of the risks our forefathers took for the freedom and independence of this land, on July 4, 1776.
Copyright ©2007 RevisionistHistory.org
***
To have Mr. Hoffman's essays and columns e-mailed to you free-of-charge or obligation, send an e-mail to: HoffmanWire-subscribe@topica.com When you receive Topica's e-mail in response to your subscription request, simply click on your reply button; that's all there is to it. You need not visit Topica's website in order to subscribe. You may easily unsubscribe, hassle-free, at any time.
***
by Michael A. Hoffman II
Much of the philosophy, tactics and psychological warfare of the West's intelligence agencies and military were pioneered in Elizabethan England under John Dee, Francis Walsingham and William Cecil.
Very little has changed about the British Secret Service since then, except that it has grown ever more diabolic and clever.
Today we see how fragile is our liberty as we enter a period of heightened fears and security in the U.S. based on knee-jerk obedience to ,and faith in, the British tale of recent airport and other "Islamic" attacks.
In all crimes perpetrated by the Cryptocracy which this reporter has investigated, from Son of Sam to the Unabomber, the U.S. media always--I repeat, always--acted as a mouthpiece for the police, and if the police were corrupt or part of the conspiracy, then the "news" is little more than a press release from the invisible empire itself.
Which is what we may be experiencing this week. British police say this or that was perpetrated and we believe, react, get the fear and begin to consider additional ways we can give up our immemorial rights in return for a chimerical "security" based on blind faith in the British police. It's almost an automatic process, like pressing a button.
We know the governments of the West engage in psychological warfare and the planting of false stories. It's an acknowledged part of combat and according to Sun Tzu, the most important part. Yet "our" media have got to be in on the plot because they never ask in the midst of the warfare, how the psychology is being used and where the false stories are being planted.
Those questions are usually only asked after the Cryptocracy has achieved its objectives, "when the hurly-burly's done; when the battle's lost and won." Then it's too late, of course. In the case of Iraq, Bill Moyers asked those questions in a recent "Frontline" PBS TV special, opening with a scene of White House reporters cooperating with Bush in a farcial press conference, instead of exposing it. It was an incredible television moment, but coming after the fact, one has to wonder if it is little more than the fulfillment of James Shelby Downard's cryonic theory of first freezing and then deliberately thawing the truth, on cue, again for purposes of mass demoralization and psychological warfare.
The people of the West are weary of the Zionist crusade against Islam, and equally weary of fanatic Islamic fundamentalism. They would gladly pronounce a "pox on both your houses" and withdraw from the battle. This is worrisome to the Cryptocracy, which is hell-bent on eliminating our ancient personal freedoms and building a gigantic government spying and police apparatus on the Stalinist model, digitally enhanced.
We respond with our pickets, protests, op-eds, columns and get-togethers. But if "our" media are against us, if the people we rely on for information have sold out to the aspiring tyrants, then any time the intelligence agencies of Britain or America want to nullify and overturn all that we have done to build a protest movement and raise awareness, they only have to organize Islamic patsies and nutcases into cells and direct their attacks on public transport and civic symbols. After which the media step up to the plate to slow-cook the panic and stampede the herd. This is from the front page of today's Washington Post:
"After the events in Britain...Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff (was)...asking Americans to keep a careful watch on their surroundings. ...Chertoff and other officials said that security and surveillance have been increased...'It's not just what happened in England and Scotland that has us watching,' another counterterrorism official said. 'We have had some concerns for some time.'...In Georgetown on Saturday night, some restaurants and nightclubs were evacuated after firefighters spotted an abandoned backpack on a sidewalk. And on Sunday afternoon, police set up checkpoints on the access route into Baltimore-Washington International Thurgood Marshall Airport, stopping some cars and trucks for inspection." ("Attempts Seen As Model for New Attacks On U.S. Soil, "Washington Post, July 3, 2007; p. A1).
Chertoff announces, "Security and surveillance have been increased." Gotcha! Protest as we may, a couple of police reports, however rigged or overblown, of attacks and attempted attacks across the sea in Britain, cause the American people to come under increased surveillance by their government.
And as the panic increases and the herd begins to stampede in earnest, any American liberty can be curtailed or suspended "for the short-term" "during this emergency" and the media will report it with a straight face, exactly as George Orwell, a former BBC reporter, prophesied in "1984."
We need to see the media as an arm of the government and hold in contempt first, the prostitutes and crooks who produce and edit the news at the top, and then the reporters like Michael R. Gordon of the New York Times and Karen DeYoung at the Washington Post, as well almost the entire staff of Fox television and many of the other TV networks, and even National Public Radio, who serve as the mouthpieces and raise no skeptical queries in the midst of these secret police operations.
Until the media have about as much credibility as the government, and are made to bear responsibility for the totalitarian control system which the Cryptocracy is toiling to impose on us in the name of "fighting terrorism," we are entirely at the mercy of any police agency, from London to New York, who choose to set-up a "terror" attack.
How dare you question the police, Hoffman!? Well, if the police are always truthful and correct in their accusations and arrests, why do Britain and America have an adversarial justice system, defense lawyers, a jury? Why not simply believe the police and prosecutors in every case and have the judge rubber-stamp their claims in the way the media are rubber-stamping them now?
It seems almost too elementary to have to remind ourselves that our ancestors jealously guarded the rights of the accused because too often the police and prosecutors, being human rather than gods, erred, or were on the take of a wealthy baron, or had a personal score to settle.
In the 21st century, with all our alleged sophistication, this is apparently too difficult a reality for our media to grasp. They have devolved into simpletons who paddy-cake in unison with the badges, every time the police issue a bulletin, arrest a suspect or level an accusation. The mayor of Salt Lake City calls this the "obedience culture." But St. Peter said we are to obey God rather than man, a fundamental truth now lost in the "security" frenzy that makes a mockery of the risks our forefathers took for the freedom and independence of this land, on July 4, 1776.
Copyright ©2007 RevisionistHistory.org
***
To have Mr. Hoffman's essays and columns e-mailed to you free-of-charge or obligation, send an e-mail to: HoffmanWire-subscribe@topica.com When you receive Topica's e-mail in response to your subscription request, simply click on your reply button; that's all there is to it. You need not visit Topica's website in order to subscribe. You may easily unsubscribe, hassle-free, at any time.
***
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
