Thursday, October 10, 2013

“Parkland” movie whitewashes JFK assassination conspiracy

The 2013 movie "Parkland" is certainly not a "just the facts" docudrama.

This Hollywood mega-bucks production supports the Establishment myth that there was no criminal coverup in the hospital's trauma room on Nov. 22, 1963.

"Parkland"ignores the testimony of the president's surgeon at Parkland Hospital, Dr. Charles Crenshaw, in his important 1992 book, JFK: Conspiracy of Silence, as well as James Douglass' astute investigative reporting in JFK and the Unspeakable (pp. 307-311).

Don’t be hoodwinked!


Jason said...

Mr. Hoffman,
As a subscriber to the Revisionist History newsletter, may I suggest the next issue focus on the continual obfuscation and cover-up of this tragedy? The fact that there is a major motion picture being released that maintains the facade means this is still an extremely important cover-up for the cryptocracy.

Your knowledge of this subject is vast, and I know that currently you do not have the funds to re-issue "King Kill 33" with bonus material. A newsletter may be at least an ingredient in the antidote to what will likely be a month-long masquerade party this November. I can pretty much guarantee the usual sycophantic media outlets will be trotting out Bugliosi, as will his acolytes harp on about how his tome shuts the case in favor of the Lone Nut theory forever.

You may have other plans, and I fully respect that. Just know that the material you publish is very helpful when discussing this and other issues with open-minded and intelligent folks, and is very much appreciated.

Michael Hoffman said...

Ah, Jason, you are clairvoyant! I am deep into Revisionist History no. 69 devoted to "King-Kill-33 Fifty Years Later.” Watch for it in November and thank you for your encouragement!

GodSend said...

And then there is the FINAL JUDGMENT:

Brian said...

Mr. Hoffman;

I recently purchased two of your books, Psychological Warfare and Usury in Christendom. First class.

Would you be willing to post a comment or two about the stenographer's comment on the House floor about freemasonry and subsequent doctoring of the CSPAN video that aired on FOXNews?