The Nazis and Abortion: What are the Facts?

The Nazis and Abortion

What are the Documented Facts?

By Michael Hoffman

Copyright ©2020 by RevisionistHistory.org

According to the Guttmacher Institute, in 2017 alone, 862,320 unborn girls and boys were killed in the USA by abortion. That’s 2,363 killings per day. The shedding of this innocent blood is a curse on America. Jesus said, “Whatever you do to these, the least of my brethren, you do to Me.” (Matthew 25:40). 

Heedless utopians have imagined that America’s wealth and technology would shield it from the consequences of the mass murder of the most helpless and voiceless human beings, whose humanity is denied by neo-Nazi radical feminists and their enablers, just as Rabbi Moses Maimonides in his Guide of the Perplexed, denied the humanity of black people. 

According to the infernal praxis of dehumanization, America can slaughter thousands of children — “useless blobs,” every day— business as usual — and life will still be resplendent for the perpetrators and their tens of millions of accomplices in the corporate board rooms, government and the media. The Guttmacher Institute estimates that by the time they are age 45, twenty-four percent of all American women will have had an abortion. We reap what we sow. God is not mocked! He will purge this land of the blood of His millions of innocent ones who have been sacrificed to Molech. 

On Mar 19, 2020, at 8:11, Brian Ruhe stated:

Michael, Why do you write:"neo-Nazi radical feminists and their enablers"? You know these are Jews and neo-communists. You know Hitler was opposed to abortion. Why do you undermine your credibility to those who have admired your work for so may years? Is there a motivation behind your reckless actions?— Brian Ruhe

The Nazis and Abortion: What are the Documented Facts?

Dear Mr. Ruhe: Don't attempt to hoodwink me with your irresponsible neo-Nazi propaganda. You haven't done your homework. You don't have the documentation and you lose the debate.

According to you, radical feminism is an entirely Judaic and “neo-communist” enterprise. According to you Neo-Nazism is opposed to abortion. Wrong on both counts. 

The incessant immunizing of non-Jews against culpability for the evils which they have massively condoned, aided and participated in, is a serious flaw in the thought processes of the far Right. Irish-American Margaret Sanger was a pioneer in the eugenics movement in the U.S., which is at the root of the Planned Parenthood abortion mentality, and which presaged and complimented the crime of Nazi sterilization of “inferior” people.  

The Nazi mentality is not limited to a time or a place. Wherever we discover a savage reduction of the humanity of any person there we find a revival of Hitler’s ideology, and abortion is the most heinous of all such savageries. Nazism is intrinsically marked by irreformable distinctions between humans and "sub-humans.”

There is a special component to Hitler’s National Socialism which is not negotiable or reformable: Nazism is founded upon a two tier system of human and less than human, and the criterion is racial. The less-than-human person can’t stop being Judaic or Slavic. Like the unborn baby in her mother’s womb, they are targeted because of what they cannot alter. In this important respect, radical feminism resembles Nazism.

With regard to the Nazi movement in Germany, are you aware of the existence of what the Nazis termed the Office for the Promotion of Population Policy and Racial Hygiene? On June 22, 1933, the Nazi Minister of the Interior introduced legislation for the forced sterilization of dehumanized persons.

On July 14, 1933 the Nazis enacted a law, which took effect, January 1, 1934 for the purpose of preventing the future propagation of "lives unworthy of life." 

Among the categories of persons “unworthy of life” subject to be sterilized were chronic alcoholics, epileptics, manic-depressives and the mentally retarded. Before you cheer the latter category, consider that Hitler’s top aide, Martin Bormann, advised the hygiene courts that “political behavior be considered in making a diagnosis of mental retardation.” Implacable foes of the Nazis were thereby potentially subject to categorization as “retarded” and sterilization.  By 1937 Nazi authorities had sterilized approximately 225,000 "lives unworthy of life" inside Germany.

It is beyond ridiculous to suggest that Hitler's Nazis were not involved in the dehumanization of people: the mentally and physically disabled, Judaic and Slavic people. Dehumanization is the root and branch of abortion and the root and branch of Adolf Hitler’s weltanschauung. Do not pretend you are not cognizant of this fact.

Now let us turn specifically to the Nazi laws and directives on, and practice of, abortion. The Nazi legal machinery was intended to protect "the Aryan race" from being aborted. The law had no other intent and certainly not, as you would seem imply, to protect all human beings from dehumanization and the scourge of abortion. 

For example, on September 8, 1933 the Nazi Berlin Council of Physicians stated that "proceedings will be taken against every evil-doer who dares to injure our sacred healthy race."

There were no “proceedings" legislated to protect "Jews," Slavs, or the mentally or physically disabled from being aborted. How could there be, when the disabled and “retarded” were to be sterilized.

Paragraphs 219 and 220 of the Nazi penal code, promulgated May 26, 1933 appear to refer to a universal ban on abortions in general. It is entirely deceptive. We know from the minutes of the meetings of the aforementioned Berlin Council of Physicians that a loophole was created whereby Nazi "medical specialists, appointed in each municipal district of Berlin, were to review every case in which an attending physician deemed an abortion necessary." 

If you had some grasp of this history, you would know that Nazi permission for “abortions for eugenic indications” (the euphemism for abortion of Judaic and Slavic infants, among others), varied from one “hereditary health court” to another, and that certain hereditary health courts held that such abortions were “exempt from punishment.”  

Furthermore, following a Nazi legal ruling dated July 18, 1935, the dehumanization represented by sterilization was permitted to be combined with the dehumanization of abortion: sterilization and abortion could henceforth be performed concurrently. 

Dehumanized Judaic people were not protected by or included in the Nazi laws contra abortion. 

Their dehumanization had been legislated into German law by the Reichstag (passed unanimously) on September 15, 1935. The “Law for the Protection of German Blood and Honor” (so-called “Nuremberg Law”), banned marriages between German-Judaics and German gentiles. Judaic genes were officially deemed unfit for marriage with non-Judaic Germans.

In line with this officially legislated loss of fully human status, abortions among Judaic women in Nazi Germany were allowed under the rubric of “a racial indication,” consistent with National Socialist anti-Judaic ideology. By March, 1939, six months before Hitler was to invade Poland, a Nazi policy directive noted that “restrictions on abortion does not apply to Jews.” 

Repeatedly in Nazi law and jurisprudence we see that the intent of Nazi anti-abortion law was for one purpose alone: outlawing that which “impairs the vitality of the German volk” (cf. the law promulgated March 9, 1943, subparagraph 5 to paragraph 218). 

Nazi law contra abortion was never intended to apply to or protect unborn Judaic, Polish or Slavic babies from abortion. Russian and Polish women were often “persuaded” to request an abortion.

By Directive of March 6, 1941, Polish farm workers (male and female) were prohibited from sexual relations with Germans under penalty of death. Furthermore, women toiling in Nazi labor camps were permitted abortions (cf. the secret Circular from the Reich Health Ministry of April 5, 1943, allowing female Ostarbeiterinnen to procure abortions on demand).

Claiming that Hitler banned abortion is just the kind of precipitate generalization that gullible Right wingers have imbibed, “Wow, Hitler, was opposed to abortion. He couldn’t have been so bad after all.” 

If there is any mental incapacity nowadays it is among those Nazi-sympathizers who continue to believe only what they want to believe, and then become infuriated at those who pursue the path of revisionist history that demolishes their mythical notions with facts from the documentary record. 

My readers depend upon me to attempt, to the best of my ability, to furnish them with the truth, and by the grace of God, I will continue that endeavor without fear or favor.

Michael Hoffman is the author of many books Adolf Hitler: Enemy of the German People. He edits the periodical, Revisionist History®, published six times a year. 

Michael's essay, “Documenting Hitler: Our Dissenting Enterprise” is available online as a public service.

On the Contrary is made possible by donations from truth seekers.

________________

Trump for President

Trump for President

1. From Fr. George Rutler

2. From the Editor

1. From Rev. Fr. George Rutler, with a few comments from your editor interspersed in boldface:

...Our federal government has intimidated religious orders and churches, challenging religious freedom. The institution of the family has been re-defined, and sexual identity has been Gnosticized to the point of mocking biology. Assisted suicide is spreading, abortions since 1973 have reached a total equal to the population of Italy, and sexually transmitted diseases are at a record high. Objective journalism has died, justice has been corrupted, racial bitterness ruins cities, entertainment is degraded, knowledge of the liberal arts spirals downwards...

...Sands blow over the ruins of churches St. Augustine knew in North Africa where the Cross is now virtually forbidden. By a blessed irony, a new church is opened every day in formerly Communist Russia, while churches in our own formerly Christian nation are being closed daily. For those who bought into the seductions of politicians’ false hopes, there is the counsel of Walt Kelly’s character Pogo: “It’s always darkest before it goes pitch black.”

It is incorrect to say that the coming presidential election poses a choice between two evils. For ethical and aesthetic reasons, there may be some bad in certain candidates (including Trump), but badness consists in doing bad things. The Evil (of Mrs. Clinton) is different: it is the deliberate destruction of truth, virtue and holiness.

...At one party’s convention (the Democrats), the name of God was excluded from its platform and a woman who boasted of having aborted her child was applauded. It is a grave sin...to become an accomplice in objective evil by voting for anyone who encourages it (abortion), for that imperils the nation and destroys the soul.

It is also the duty of the clergy to make this clear and not to shrink, under the pretense of charity, from explaining the Church’s censures. Wolves in sheep’s clothing are dangerous, but worse are wolves in shepherd’s clothing. While the evils foreseen eight years ago were realized, worse would come if those affronts to human dignity were endorsed again. In the most adverse prospect, God forbid, there might not be another free election... (end quote)

2. Michael Hoffman: 

Donald Trump has shot himself in the foot on so many occasions I have lost count. If he declares ‘It’s a disaster!” one more time I’m going to howl in anguish at his impoverished vocabulary. 

His playboy remarks in the past about women are disgusting, and his links to the Israelis are very troubling. 

I don’t believe in voting for the lesser of two evils, but as Fr. Rutler suggests in his remarks above, Trump may be bad, but he is not evil. I agree. It seems that Trump had an epiphany in 2015 and in many respects has turned his life around. Moreover, he has sounded themes suggestive of ending America’s catastrophic “World Policeman” role, which defies one of the dearest dogmas of the New World Order. He does not want to go to war with Russia over Ukraine. He will not shoot down Russian planes over Syria in a U.S.-declared “no-fly” zone.

Most of you already know he will likely appoint Constitutionalists to the Supreme Court, fight the “Free Trade” giveaways, and slow or halt the immigration invasion.

As for his Israeli connections, let us desist from our boy scout illusions. No one who wants to have a winning chance at being President of the United States can publicly be seen to want to crush the Israeli lobby, or end our alliance with that bandit state in the Middle East.

Putin plays a more sophisticated version of this gambit. He has passed laws against doubting homicidal gas chambers in Auschwitz, and he has made friends with Rabbi Lazar and the Chabad of Moscow. In Putin’s case he is infiltrating the Israeli lobby in Russia, a thought that seldom occurs to our side, so little are we accustomed to counter-intelligence offensives. We who have been infiltrated countless times can’t conceive of a Christian such as Putin doing the same to the enemy. Ah, but he is doing so - putting in motion a strategy of which Alexander Solzhenitsyn approved, before he died. 

Trump is no Putin. His alliance with the Israeli lobby is political opportunism; there’s no grand strategy. Whether he can disengage from the “Jewish state” using the power of the Presidency remains to be seen. With God’s help he could.

Trump is bad in many ways, but he is not evil. I accept Fr. Rutler’s distinction on that theological point. 

Hillary Clinton is a fiend. Need I say more? Most of you are familiar with her criminal curriculum vitae.

Leadership is a precious thing. Too many of us confine ourselves to arm chair warriorship in front of our computer screens, trading data back and forth on the Satanism of this world. Yet without a man or woman who can stand in the streets and command the cameras and the headlines, and come even 3/4s of the way toward what we think and believe, we are doomed to retreat. 

Mr. Trump has been a lightning rod reinvigorating American nationalism and the original dream of this country as initiated by the Founders 240 years ago. He has given millions of Americans hope and energy on the road to the Second American Revolution. Win or lose the election, the legacy of his rebellion will live on. 

The Cryptocracy is heavily invested in the mass hypnotism of inevitabilism: projecting the certainty that Hillary will win on Tuesday and that the future is theirs. All that is needed for us to fulfill the Cryptocracy’s fake and flimsy script is to give up, accept defeat and the “inevitability” of their victory, which in truth, is by no means certain. I won’t accept defeat. I don’t believe the pollsters or the mainstream media, and I will be voting for Donald Trump for President, hoping and praying for his victory.

If God does not grant it, then it may be that America deserves the witch, as chastisement on us for sacrificing, through abortion, more than 30 million of His most defenseless, on the Moloch altar of selfish convenience. This nation will never know peace until the abortion scourge is ended. 

Trump for President.

Michael Hoffman is the editor of the periodical Revisionist History, and the author of Secret Societies and Psychological Warfare. He writes from Coeur d’Alene, Idaho.

_____________

Massacre in Orlando: Morality and Mortality

The Massacre in Orlando 

By Michael Hoffman

www.revisionisthistory.org

Orlando terrorist Omar Mir Seddique Mateen was licensed by the state of Florida to carry firearms. His rifle may even have been part of his job. Since 2007 he has been employed by G4S Secure Solutions, a “global” security firm that provided protection to the London Olympics. Until recently, G4S had an Israeli section with 8,000 employees. G4S states on its website that Mateen was “off-duty at the time of the incident.” The Establishment media have shown little interest in reporting on G4S. Why?

Another Alibi for the Gun-Grabbers

Mateen’s access to firearms appears to be the same access enjoyed by tens of thousands of the hired guns who corporations and millionaires employ to ensure their own safety. How then can this be a case for another call for gun control? Hillary Clinton does not want to deny “assault” rifles to the people who protect her, or David Rockefeller, or who guard the Olympics; she isn’t seeking a total restriction on AR-15s. She and her wealthy cronies will always have bodyguards who legally possess high powered “military-style” weapons. She seeks to disarm the people, in whose name the Democrats claim they are working. The peasants are to be denied the weapons which the licensed agents of Her Majesty possess. 

This is the path to a police state, which we saw at work in the now largely forgotten 1993 government massacre of 82 Americans at Waco, Texas which was ordered by Mrs. Clinton’s husband, and in in 1995 in Oklahoma City when a cabal of government agents and patsies bombed the Alfred Murrah building, killing 168 people. Congress then passed numerous laws restricting our freedoms and granting greater latitude to the police to violate our rights, although that was small beer compared to the aftermath of the 9/11 terror attacks and the enactment of the misnamed “Patriot Act.” 

Lady Macbeth’s scapegoating of firearms is part of the script. She prefers to focus less on the Sunni-Salafist Muslim connection, inspired by Saudi Arabia’s Wahhabist theology, which is the ideological engine of the Islamic State (Mateen traveled to Saudi Arabia twice. Imagine if he had gone to Iran instead — sanctions would be demanded instantly). 

The Occult Dimension

With cross hairs fixed on the “pulse” of the nation on June 12, people died at Pulse, a saloon which caters to homosexuals. Two days before, a popular singer was assassinated a few miles from the “Pulse.” S.K. Bain, the subject of the book, Most Dangerous, writes in his blog that Orlando is "roughly 50 miles from Sarasota, Florida, where, on the morning of September 11, 2001, President George W. Bush—whose brother Jeb was governor of the state at the time—sat in an elementary classroom presiding over a black-mass-in-disguise, to which Mr. Bain devoted an entire chapter in his book, 9/11 as Mass Ritual. (For the uninitiated, Google ‘The Pet Goat.”).

Bain states:

... that “unrelated” shooting of Christina Grimmie, a former contestant on “The Voice”, in Orlando two days prior, on June 10th following a performance with the band, ahem, named “Before You Exit”...Unrelated perhaps, but those who study these sorts of things are well familiar with the established pattern of foreshadowing a mass attack with a smaller incident in the exact same locale....The surname Grimmie, by the way, originally derives from the Norse-Viking “Grimr”, meaning “The Fierce One”, who Lucifer most certainly is.

June 12th was the birthday of both David Rockefeller and former U.S. President George H.W. Bush.  A Luciferian mass sacrifice and birthday celebration all mixed up into one—now that’s truly diabolical. ...Skeptical on that last point? Chapter 33 of Most Dangerous: A True Story is entitled “Happy Birthday, Mr. President” and details the tragic events of July 6, 2013, on which Asiana Airlines Flight OZ214 (yes, Oz) crashed at the San Francisco International Airport and “Le Train D’Enfer” (“the Train from Hell”) derailed in Lac Mégantic, Quebec, inundating the small community in a sea of burning crude oil. July 6th also just happens to be the birthday of one George W. Bush, 43rd President of the United States. (End quote from Bain).

Investigative Leads

If this writer were tasked with investigating the Orlando massacre we would be closely examining the circumstance of an Orlando police officer “exchanging fire” with the terrorist either prior to his entry to the club, or soon after he entered it.

The New York Times reported on June 14: "Soon after Mr. Mateen first opened fire, he was confronted by an armed security guard who was an off-duty police officer, said John Mina, the Orlando police chief, at a news conference Monday morning. They exchanged gunfire. The security guard was then joined by an unknown number of police officers, the first to arrive on the scene." — Times, June 14, p. A1

Is this not strange? An unknown number of officers arrived on the scene “soon after" the terrorist opened fire and they did nothing to shoot or apprehend the killer until 5 a.m. — three hours later?

We would also be researching everything there is to know about G4S Secure Solutions and how, despite their boast that they thoroughly check their employees to be certain they have impeccable backgrounds, the Muslim Mateen, who had been repeatedly investigated by the FBI for terror connections, had been working for G4S from 2007 until the morning of June 12.

What type of work did G4S’s 8,000 Israeli employees undertake, both in occupied Palestine, the Mideast (Saudi Arabia in particular) and the US and Europe? Was Mateen any part of those missions?

Koran attacked while the Talmud is sacrosanct

On the morning of June 12 FOX News featured a former NYPD detective named Solomon who blamed the Orlando massacre on the Koran. “Just read it, you’ll see” he told the FOX television audience. What if, in the aftermath of an Israeli massacre of Arabs, this writer were to indict the Babylonian Talmud on national TV? We would be hounded off the airwaves in short order. 

Morality and Mortality

What has happened to the America we have known and loved? Mass murder seems to be the order of the day. Shadowy occult forces and symbolism often accompany the horror. America was intended to be God’s New Jerusalem, but beginning in the 1970s Americans began to chop up the defenseless human beings which that same God had sent down into the wombs of millions of mothers. More than 30 million of them chose to massacre their own children and that holocaust, though largely hidden from view, is on-going.

There is a trend on the Left to laud John Brown, the antebellum abolitionist who executed farmers in Kansas in 1856.  In 1859 he led the terror attack on Harpers Ferry, Virginia (now West Virginia), perpetrating more deaths. Brown’s famous terror slogan, “To purge this land with blood” embodied his belief that guilty Americans must suffer bloody terror until slavery was abolished. He believed that the enslavement of black people was a crime that could only be expunged with the blood of an American nation that had condoned slavery. This terrorist theology (Brown was a New Light Calvinist) strikes contemporary Leftist academics as a reasonable one and Brown is a hero to many. 

Few Americans in 2016 would dare to draw from Brown’s blood purge maxim a parallel with the crime of abortion. Anyone who stood today in the media and said that for the lives of millions of unborn babies, America must be purged with blood and suffer terror, would be labeled a monster. Yet it certainly looks like this is what is coming to pass, and the attempts to pretend otherwise and resume the somnambulistic consumer routine of our daily lives, appears to be futile.

Michael Hoffman is the author of Secret Societies and Psychological Warfare and the editor of Revisionist History newsletter. This column is a public service made possible through the charity of donors to Michael’s Truth Mission.

______________

A Warning for Pope Francis

The Pope Francis Praxis • September 25, 2015

 

Compiled by Michael Hoffman • www.revisionisthistory.org

— Contents — 

1. A Warning for Pope Francis

2. On Yom Kippur 

3. In Congress

4. At the United Nations

5. Some of those opposing the pope are themselves suspect

6. Editor’s Note

___________________________

1. A Warning for Pope Francis

 “Woe to you when everyone speaks well of you, for that is how their ancestors treated the false prophets.” — Luke 6:26

___________________________

2. On Yom Kippur

 

Pope Francis told those observing Yom Kippur to “continue in holiness.” If they can be holy without Christ what’s the point of Christianity?

___________________________

3. In Congress:  Not a Word about Abortion while Planned Parenthood sells baby parts 

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/breaking-popes-address-to-congress-not-a-word-about-abortion-only-the-death 

There’s an abortion holocaust underway and the pope mumbles a few veiled words in Congress than can be construed to be vaguely pro-life, but not the word (abortion). In the course of his visit to the United States Pope Francis has hugely energized  pro-abort “Catholics.” 

___________________________

4. At the United Nations: the Pope decries Usury

In his speech today to the United Nations Pope Francis decries “usury” while operating the Vatican usury bank that enjoyed record profits last May:

"Beyond these achievements, the experience of the past seventy years has made it clear that reform and adaptation to the times is always necessary in the pursuit of the ultimate goal of granting all countries, without exception, a share in, and a genuine and equitable influence on, decision-making processes. The need for greater equity is especially true in the case of those bodies with effective executive capability, such as the Security Council, the Financial Agencies and the groups or mechanisms specifically created to deal with economic crises. This will help limit every kind of abuse or usury, especially where developing countries are concerned. The International Financial Agencies are should care for the sustainable development of countries and should ensure that they are not subjected to oppressive lending systems which, far from promoting progress, subject people to mechanisms which generate greater poverty, exclusion and dependence.”

— Pope Francis, United Nations General Assembly, Sept. 25, 2015 

http://thewandererpress.com/breaking/popes-address-to-the-united-nations-general-assembly/

 If Pope Francis was not a hypocrite, he would do more than mouth anti-usury rhetoric as his papal predecessors have been doing for centuries. He would restore the Church’s immemorial dogmatic ban on earning any profit from loans, and require that penitent Catholic usurers make restitution for their ill-gotten gains. Unrepentant Catholic usurers would be refused communion and a Catholic burial. This was the law of the Roman Catholic Church for one thousand five hundred years.  http://amzn.to/1KDztfS  and  http://revisionisthistorystore.blogspot.com/2010/03/hoffmans-revisionist-history-store-dvds.html

___________________________

5. Some of those opposing the pope are themselves suspect: Most prominently the Fox News pundit “Judge Andrew Napolitano” who is disappointed by the fact that the pope criticizes the predatory capitalist god known as “The Market." In other words, the judge doesn’t want the pontiff to even mouth rhetoric against the mortal sin of usury which is the engine of the entire Money Power system that oppresses us. You will recall that in our study of Bill O’Reilly's The Last Days of Jesus opus (which blames Our Lord's death mostly on the Romans), we cite the fact that Mr. Napolitano makes the Romans entirely culpable. Kosher-“Conservatives” constitute false opposition intended to confuse and misdirect.

___________________________

6. Editor’s Note: Since earlier this month when we published our Revisionist History newsletter studying Adolf Hitler’s facilitation of the murder of Gregor Strasser, certain fans of Hitler have canceled subscriptions and pledged to stop sending donations. The continuation of our Truth Mission is in peril.

* * * 

Pope Francis reveals his true face

By Michael Hoffman

www.revisionisthistory.org

In an interview filled with what we can only term theological gobbledegook with nary a reference to the Bible, but loads of mystical vertiginous malarkey, Francis the pope of Rome has come out with unprecedented cold-hearted malice toward defenseless, unborn children.

Let us anticipate the response of his defenders and rejoin in advance: no, the pope was not quoted out of context, or misquoted. We’re going to give you his quote in context; and it is said he was handed a copy of his interview and allowed to check and edit it before its publication in the Jesuit magazine, America.

Here are the pontiff’s documented words, in context. First on homosexuality:

“We need to proclaim the Gospel on every street corner,” the pope says, “preaching the good news of the kingdom and healing, even with our preaching, every kind of disease and wound. In Buenos Aires I used to receive letters from homosexual persons who are ‘socially wounded’ because they tell me that they feel like the church has always condemned them. But the church does not want to do this. During the return flight from Rio de Janeiro I said that if a homosexual person is of good will and is in search of God, I am no one to judge. By saying this, I said what the catechism says. Religion has the right to express its opinion in the service of the people, but God in creation has set us free: it is not possible to interfere spiritually in the life of a person.  

“A person once asked me, in a provocative manner, if I approved of homosexuality. I replied with another question: ‘Tell me: when God looks at a gay person, does he endorse the existence of this person with love, or reject and condemn this person?’ We must always consider the person. Here we enter into the mystery of the human being. In life, God accompanies persons, and we must accompany them, starting from their situation. It is necessary to accompany them with mercy. When that happens, the Holy Spirit inspires the priest to say the right thing.” (End quote).

Where in the catechism does it say the pontiff has no right to judge a homosexual?

What is this pope babbling about when he says, “...it is not possible to interfere spiritually in the life of a person”?

Furthermore, what is “gay” about sodomy? If God, as the pope claims, “endorses the existence” of a person who practices sodomy, how could God ever send that person to hell?

Nowhere does the pope mention a little something known as sin. He offers no reasons for the sodomite to stop sodomizing. After all, God Himself “endorses the existence” of the sodomite. So why not continue in one’s sins? What is the impetus for change?

The pontiff’s documented words, in context, on abortion and contraception:

"We cannot insist only on issues related to abortion, gay marriage and the use of contraceptive methods. This is not possible. I have not spoken much about these things, and I was reprimanded for that. But when we speak about these issues, we have to talk about them in a context. The teaching of the church, for that matter, is clear and I am a son of the church, but it is not necessary to talk about these issues all the time...The church’s pastoral ministry cannot be obsessed with the transmission of a disjointed multitude of doctrines to be imposed insistently...We have to find a new balance; otherwise even the moral edifice of the church is likely to fall like a house of cards, losing the freshness and fragrance of the Gospel.”  (End quote).

Perhaps someone should tell the pope it is not necessary for the post-Vatican II Church to insist only on issues related to the Nazi “Holocaust," anti-semitism and the defense of Talmudic Judaism as possessing an unbroken covenant with God. "We have to find a new balance." Does the pope agree? Would he be caught dead saying that the pastoral ministry cannot be “obsessed” with the Nazi “Holocaust”?

We don't believe, short of a divine miracle, Francis would ever make such a statement, for unlike the dehumanized and marginalized unborn children awaiting the executioner's invasion of their mother's womb, the Nazi "Holocaust" lobby has enormous power on earth. The victims of the abortion holocaust have no such lobby with comparable power on earth.

Let us also not forget that this coffin-rider who calls himself pope is declaring that too much has been said against birth control (contraception). The people who brought the Gospel to the world, who inhabit the nations of Britain, Ireland, Europe, Canada, Australia and the United States, are self-extinguishing due to contraception being winked at by their religious leaders — and now it is minimized by the pope himself. This is incredible. It is totally revolutionary. Even the pope of Vatican II, Paul VI, devoted himself to composing the encyclical Humane Vitae, closing the door forever on artificial contraception. But Francis declares, "We have to find a new balance.” Between what, life and death? (Rev. 3:15).

According to fake prophecies cooked up during the Renaissance and attributed to the medieval St. Malachy, the current Pope Francis is the last pontiff, dubbed, in that phony prophecy, “Peter Romanus.”

We propose a new name for him, Diabolus Romanus.

Hoffman is the author of Usury in Christendom: The Mortal Sin that Was and Now is Not.

***

What about the other American terrorism?

While we congratulate ourselves on how noble we and our “pluralistic democratic” nation are, there is another terrorism, seldom the subject of investigation by the FBI, and never by the corporate media. It is a virtually silent terrorism against the most helpless Americans, and it undercuts our self-righteous image of ourselves as blameless targets of other people’s senseless wrath. Dr. Kermit Gosnell’s alleged atrocities are being minimally reported by the corporate media.

Wall Street Journal, April 17, 2013, p. A8
_________________________________