Secrets of Judaism Revealed on Purim

Secrets of Judaism Revealed on Purim

By Michael Hoffman

A Voice Crying in the Wilderness

Purim revelers in 1593

This Wednesday, February 28 at sunset, begins Purim (pronounced poor-im), the Talmudic festival of revenge on the goyim that is a twisted version of the Biblical book of Esther.

The rabbinic Purim is predicated on a reading of the “Scroll of Esther,” i.e. “Megillah Esther.”

Esther is a problematic book even without rabbinic counterfeiting. It seems to have been written in a void. God is missing from its pages and Jesus never quoted Esther. The name Esther is derived from the Hebrew Nistar which denotes “hidden.” We consign the Book of Esther to the category of a mystery. 

The rabbis chose to add to it significantly, as is their custom with regard to the books of the Hebrew Bible. 

According to their Midrash on Esther, she was married to Mordechai: “Not only was Esther an upright Jewish woman who abhorred the notion of marriage to the goy king Ahasuerus, she was actually already married to Mordechai, who was the greatest sage (master of the oral law) of his generation. Every time Esther went to Ahasuerus, she was literally taken and forced to be with him. Throughout her ‘marriage’ to Ahasuerus, Esther still remained loyal to her true husband, Mordechai. After leaving Ahasuerus’ presence she would immerse in a mikvah (ritual bath) and then secretly rendezvous with Mordechai”

The preceding convoluted fabrication is typical of the Talmudic perversion of the Biblical narrative. 

The megillah states that Mordechai took Esther as a “bat,” a daughter. The rabbis claim that “bat” actually means “bayit,” or home, a euphemism for wife. (Similar absurd wordplay in the Babylonian Talmud [Sota 42b] is used to “prove” that the mother of David’s opponent, the giant Goliath, was addicted to anal sex). 

On Purim it is necessary for the Judaic male to get drunk; he is to become so completely drunk that he can’t discern good from evil —  “No longer distinguish between arur Haman (‘Cursed is Haman’) and baruch Mordechai (‘Blessed is Mordecai’); (Megillah 7b). 

Here is film footage of Orthodox Talmud-followers drunk in the streets of Jerusalem during Purim:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0TebUTVTO4o

More Purim drunks:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VXgRUfkvKSc

Revealing these facts to you puts this writer in jeopardy, in the dangerous category of apikorus (heretic). You are not supposed to be reading these words and I am not to write them.

One of the foods served on the holiday of Purim are “Haman’s ears” (oznei Haman), baked in the form of a pastry. In the Kabbalistic understanding of this minhag (custom), as personified by the Hasidic “sage” Rabbi Zvi Elimelech of Dinov, the hearing of knowledge (da’at) not authorized by the rabbis and which emanates from an apikorus, is a spiritual danger: “Consuming the ears of Haman at the Purim meal symbolizes eliminating wicked opinions —  the evil da'at, which is represented by the hearing ears. This is the particular spiritual threat posed by Amalek, who was the progenitor of Haman.”

It is also the “threat” posed by the apikorus Jesus Christ who said, “He who has ears to hear, let him hear” (Matthew 11:15). 

In the Zionist-influenced media it is the Catholic priest and the pulpit-pounding Calvinist who are made to represent heresy-hunting, and the “ tolerant and loving” rabbis and their communities who are depicted as the targets of the inquisitors, never the other way around; this is a reversal of the actual reality that Jesus spoke of in Matthew 23:30-39.

The religion of the Talmud and the Kabbalah is an anti-Biblical occult system. On Purim the adherents of these texts dress Halloween-style in all manner of grotesque attire. In 2013 New York state legislator Dov Hikind mocked black people by dressing in minstrel blackface and an Afro wig (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VpYJ3funHHw). 

In this film footage dozens of rabbis and hundreds of their followers are gathered for a reading of the Megillah of Esther and what you will observe has nothing to do with the sanctity or the learned gravitas that Steven Spielberg and the controlled media have branded onto our minds in association with Talmudists. What you will see is something akin to unholy pandemonium: 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=74dv4YaYl5o

Every October Protestant fundamentalists vigorously protest and warn against the observance of Halloween, but these faint-hearted folk have few words of protest or warning about Purim. Apparently Judaic souls are not worth the effort.

Megillah (מגילה \ מְגִלָּה‎) is etymologically related to the word galah (גָּלָה): “to reveal.” (Strong’s Hebrew (1540) defines it as: “to uncover”). It can be translated as “Revelation of the Hidden.”

The creed of the Talmudists is at bottom a farce; an impersonation of the religion of the Bible. Nowhere on earth will this be revealed in greater detail and with more impact than in the rites and ceremonies that will take place beginning at sundown on Purim, and in particular in the ritual of Purimspiel. 

Here is one manifestation of the Purimspiel farce:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Y_83JmStdw

“Nothing is Forbidden during Purim”:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M99LirFGqxc

When the truth about an iniquitous enterprise is conveyed to you, you are doubly under obligation, and doubly convicted if you do nothing with the knowledge.

©2018 by RevisionistHistory.org

Michael Hoffman, a former reporter for the New York bureau of the Associated Press, is the author of Judaism Discovered: A Study of the Anti-Biblical Religion of Racism, Self-Worship, Superstition and Deceit (1,102 pages, Independent History and Research, 2008).

For further study

The File on Purim

A Chronicle of Calamities and Catastrophes

_____________

_________________

Forbidden: The Polish Defense of their Civilization

Forbidden: 

The Polish Defense of their Civilization

By Michael Hoffman ©2018

www.RevisionistHistory.org

When Poles attempt to defend their civilization from defamation,  blackmail is kicked into gear and the media announce that “Jews in Poland feel unsafe.” CNN reports: “Poland's Jewish organizations say the country’s controversial new Holocaust law has led to a ‘growing wave of intolerance, xenophobia, and anti-Semitism,’ leaving many within the community feeling unsafe.”

You can be sure that this “feeling’ will be followed by dopey and disgusting neo-Nazis in the pay and under the direction of Zionists, spray-painting swastikas on Judaic tombs and synagogues in Poland.

When Poles pass laws forbidding defamation of Poland in connection with World War II, it becomes a free speech cause célèbre that is not raised when Britain, Canada, Australia, France, Germany and Austria pass laws forbidding revisionist history and imprisoning writers and researchers.

As we write these words a British citizen, Michelle Renouf, has been arrested in Germany on a charge of Volksvehetzung (inciting the populace), for her speech in Dresden calling the Allied fire-bombing of that city a holocaust (death by fire). Facts are facts, except when they offend The Holy People and the liberal and Neocon advocates of the “Good War” (the 55 million dead in the “good” Second World War). Miss Renouf’s allegedly “criminal” speech may be viewed here:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N1Hrie72Ym8&t=8s

Poland is a Catholic nation that is not entirely under the thumb of the John Paul II style of Talmudic-papalism, of which the current pontiff Francis is but a dutiful son. Many Poles hold in more than contempt Renaissance Catholicism as it evolved in Italy. Poland is a nation capable of returning to its authentic, medieval Catholic roots. This is a hopeful prospect.

All Polish patriots and their friends and allies should engage in this ideological battle with the best resources, and one of the very best is Judaic author John Sack’s magnificent book, An Eye for an Eye, about the Judaic-Communist mass murderer Salomon Morel who was given safe haven from war crimes prosecution by the Israeli government. The murders he perpetrated in Poland counted for nothing (for the relevant halacha cf. BT Sanhedrin 57a). Poland should use Sack’s facts in the information war now underway.

For Catholics and some Protestants this is the season of Lent when we contemplate Christ’s 40 days in the desert and his rigged trial and death at the hands of the Sanhedrin. In one of the rare instances where these two texts concur, the New Testament (Acts 5: 27-31) and the Babylonian Talmud (BT Sanhedrin 43A), both admit that the Pharisaic leadership of the time brought about the Crucifixion of Jesus of Nazareth.

These facts were formerly well known in the whole of Europe, East and West. The Protestant Lord Chief Justice of England, Sir Edward Coke, ruled: “No Christian shall be sold into slavery to a Jew, for it is unlawful that someone who Christ redeemed should be held in servitude by someone who blasphemes against Christ” (77 Eng. Rep. 397 [1608]). 

What would Sir Edward say were he to observe our world today, when entire nations such as Germany, Canada and the United States are in servitude to the Israelis? The legal principle that a Christian believer redeemed by Jesus on the Cross on Calvary may not legally be under subjection to a denier of Christ’s Resurrection, is unheard of in 2018. We are victims of amnesia.

The  holocaust of Jesus Christ on the Cross is hardly observed or mentioned nowadays, in comparison with the “Holocaust” of the self-worshiping Holy People, which is observed weekly and even daily in the legacy media.

When Churchianity mentions the death of Jesus from the pulpit, it is almost always emphasized that the Romans bear the lion’s share of the blame. At this juncture these turncoat priests and ministers convict themselves — showing themselves to be the Bible-hating liars that they are: Jesus Christ declared to Pilate that those that delivered Me unto thee hath the greater sin.” (John 19:11).

The modern world conspires to qualify, modify and mitigate, like a shyster lawyer, the guilt of the founders of the religion of rabbinic Judaism for the death of the Son of God. 

The Talmud, Mishneh Torah, Nizzahon Vetus, and hundreds of other sacred rabbinic texts and synagogue rites such as the Birkat ha-Minim, curse and mock Jesus, considering him an idolater, a Balaam, an Egyptian magician, and the son of a whore, who is forever boiling in excrement in hell. Furthermore, these outrageously pornographic and disgusting sacred texts of Judaism repeatedly state that the followers of Jesus are deserving of death.

Despite its cultivated media image as an assembly of pious wise men who have been unjustly persecuted, Judaism is one of the most vengeful religions, if not the most vengeful. A sense of the depths of its never-ending, profoundly twisted hatred can be gleaned from the most pathological of all the accounts of Jesus in the Babylonian Talmud: “Jesus shares his place in the Netherworld (hell) with Titus and Balaam, the notorious arch enemies of the Jewish people. Whereas the Roman Titus is punished for the destruction of the Temple by being burned to ashes, reassembled, and burned over and over again, and whereas Balaam is castigated by sitting in hot semen, Jesus’ fate consists of sitting forever in boiling excrement.” 

What kind of religion depicts Jesus Christ being tortured in hell in scalding feces forever? This is a religion that is not content to have the Roman General Titus reduced to ashes — he has to have his ashes reassembled and burned again and again in perpetuity — the thought of which apparently has induced in generations of rabbis paroxysms of glee. 

These facts about the pathological contents of Talmud tractates BT Gittin 56b-57a, have been heatedly denied or explained away by Judaism’s public relations machine for many decades and even centuries. It is only very recently that our books and newsletters have unmasked these formerly deeply concealed truths concerning the degree to which we have been deceived and subverted. Yet few in the West are interested in these matters —the survival for our heritage under imminent threat from the theology of Talmudic Judaism. 

Conservatism Inc. —  broadcast on Fox News and taught at Hillsdale College in Michigan, and elsewhere — pretend that rabbinic Judaism is the ally of Western Civilization. The majority of the Right wing in America accept this appalling fraud. 

In eastern Europe is it different. If our books, newsletters and columns were in the Polish or Hungarian languages, they would sell in the hundreds of thousands. 

May God grant the Poles, Hungarians and other nations in the East now resisting Antichrist, knowledge, courage and victory in their struggle with the spiritual serpent that seeks the final destruction of Christian Europe by substituting Auschwitz for Calvary. 

_______________

The New York Times online for Feb. 21 attacked conservative Catholic Polish society with a “news” report by Steven Erlanger:

"Poland’s Nationalism Threatens Europe’s Values, and Cohesion"

You may read this NY Times article free of charge here:

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/02/20/world/europe/poland-european-union.html

This is Michael Hoffman's e-mail to the author:

Dear Mr. Erlanger 

I picked up on the subtle signaling in your “news report” which effectively is telling us what to believe about Poland (rather than stating facts objectively and permitting the reader to decide)  — i.e. that the resurgent Poles are reactionaries who we should fear.

I will quote from one paragraph in your report: "People go to church several times a week, priests tend to give passionate, political sermons, and state and church media give a partisan version of events.”

This statement is supposed to make us hiss and boo on cue. Actually it is an appallingly biased “partisan version” of Polish Catholicism. 

Suppose a Judaic region had been described by your newspaper thus: "People go to synagogues several times a week, rabbis tend to give passionate, political sermons, and state and synagogue media give a partisan version of events."

Anti-Catholic prejudice has a long and ignoble history; it is unfortunate that you have exacerbated it with your New York Times report on Poland.

Sincerely, Michael Hoffman

______________

Hoffman is the author of Judaism Discovered, as well as Judaism’s Strange Gods.

______________

Mr. Hoffman: “Whether you realize it or not, the value of your work does not come from the fact that you happen to have written it. The value has always come from the careful way that you research your material.”  - B.W., Illinois, Feb. 10, 2018

______________

The People Who Were Burned to Ashes on Ash Wednesday

The People Who Were Burned to Ashes on Ash Wednesday

By Michael Hoffman • Copyright©2018-2020

Dresden, Germany, February, 1945

It was Shrove Tuesday, 1945 in the magnificent German art city of Dresden, which was packed with helpless Christian refugees fleeing the Red Army of the Stalinist USSR. Dresden’s native Lutheran and Catholic children, dressed in their festive Saxon folk costumes, were aboard a train taking them home after Mardi Gras parties at different points in the far-flung city. Still merry from the night’s festivities, they cavorted on the train prior to Ash Wednesday, February 14, and the solemnities that would be observed even in wartime, in memory of the passion and death of Jesus. In the sky Allied fighter planes caught sight of the civilian train and opened fire on the children inside, whose blood was soon pouring out of the wreckage.

This carnage registers almost not at all in the American mind. The holocaust in Dresden, lasting two days and killing at least 100,000 people, like the atomic holocaust in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, usually merits not much more than a few sentences or a single paragraph in the back pages of metropolitan newspapers, unlike “Yom HaShoah (יום השואה) Holocaust Remembrance Day,” in April, which is observed with countless civic, educational and media events, hosannahs, apologies and genuflections, from the Vatican to the White House. The barely remembered German and Japanese victims of Allied war crimes were of the wrong race and religion.

In the spring of 1945, after prosecuting the bombing holocaust against every major German city, and with the end of the Second World War in sight in Europe, Winston Churchill began to consider his reputation in the post-war period, when the memory of the 500,000 German innocents he ordered incinerated could come back to haunt him and stain his prestige. On March 28, 1945 he issued a deceitful, back-stabbing memo blaming the mass incineration on his own Bomber Command and by insinuation, upon its commander Arthur Harris, whose force would be denied a post-war campaign medal, and Harris a peerage. Harris and Bomber Command had been only following Winston Churchill’s explicit orders, yet Churchill attempted to shift responsibility onto the corps of airmen who had suffered among the highest casualties of any branch of the British military.

Churchill, like many others, endeavored to blame Germany for being the first to saturate civilians with terror-bombs —at Guernica in Spain on behalf of Franco’s forces, and in Rotterdam, during the war with Holland. In both cases Churchill stated that thousands had been killed. Even one death is regrettable of course, but less than 100 people were killed in Guernica according to historian David Irving, and less than a thousand in Rotterdam, when the Luftwafe accidentally struck a margarine factory and the flammable liquid burned houses nearby. Churchill had said “thousands” died in Guernica, and that 30,000 perished in Rotterdam, which is more than what Deborah Lipstadt says died in the two-day inferno in Dresden (the absurdly low figure of 25,000 is now the officially fixed count to which the “news media” comform without deviation).

The Germans had pledged not to be the first to bomb civilian centers in Britain. Churchill had hoped they would carpet bomb London to give him the excuse to silence the large peace movement in England which was dogging him in 1940, at a time when the Germans had not dropped a single bomb on London, almost a year after Britain had declared war on Germany. The British Prime Minister obtained his pretext toward the end of August, 1940, when a lone, wayward German bomber “lost its way flying up the Thames” river. It had orders to attack an oil refinery, but instead dropped its bombs on London’s East End. No one was killed thankfully, but Churchill was elated. He had the excuse he needed to massively retaliate against Berlin, knowing Hitler would respond in kind, and that the British peace movement would vanish in the smoke and flames of the “Battle of Britain” and the “Blitz.” Churchill ordered a hundred bombers to attack Berlin. Royal Air Force (RAF) commanders warned him that the Luftwaffe would do the same to London. 

At this juncture we pause to contemplate the bloody treason that was at the heart of Churchill’s soul: he wanted as many of his own English civilians in London to die as possible, so he could point to their deaths as the justification for a total war against Germany, and he succeeded in his objective. 

Some of the victims of the Allied holocaust in Dresden

To this day the war crime the leaders of Britain and the United States perpetrated in Dresden is justified on the basis of the tired fable that “Germany did it first to Rotterdam and Guernica,” and “Look at the terror the Germans visited upon London.” Nothing that occurred in Guernica, Rotterdam, or for that matter London, begins to even approach the scale of the holocaust that the firebombs of the air forces of Churchill and Franklin Roosevelt inflicted on Dresden.

On September 4, 1940 Hitler gave a speech in which he stated that if the “mad drunkard” Churchill continued to attack Berlin, the Germans were not going to stand by and take it. It was Neanderthal thinking on the führer’s part: you club me over the head and I will club you. Hitler was almost always outfoxed by the clever machinations of the masonic treachery at the heart of Britain’s ruling class. No matter what Churchill ordered, Hitler should have limited his air campaign to British military sites and munitions factories (the Luftwaffe never bothered to attack the factories that built Britain’s Lancaster bombers). 

On September 6 the English people heard the ominous drone of a fleet of Luftwaffe bombers flying up the Thames. Some 3,000 Londoners subsequently died. Now Churchill had what he wanted. You won’t find these facts in the multi-volume history he wrote, or in the pages of the work of the conformist historians. To learn the truth one must read and study the revisionists, particularly the demonized David Irving, the preeminent military historian of World War II in the Atlantic theatre.

Irving’s nemesis, Deborah Lipstadt meanwhile, has taken it upon herself to deny the holocaust casualty figure of 100,000 for Dresden, but God help any one of us who would have the temerity to doubt the Six Million casualty figure of Holocaustianity, or even to apply the word “holocaust” to what happened in Dresden. 

We challenge any reader to collect the legacy media’s descriptions of the bombing of Dresden from the 1990s onward and count how many term it a holocaust. The extent to which we are imprisoned in an Orwellian dystopia of our own making is revealed when we consider the fact that it is regarded as highly insensitive or indeed “anti-Semitic” to violate the self-appointed Newspeak holocaust trademark appropriated by the Holy People, and apply it to the German cities that were incinerated, or to Hiroshima and Nagasaki, even though those war crimes were genuine holocausts by dictionary definition: “Destruction or slaughter on a mass scale, especially caused by fire. Origin: Greek holokauston, from holos ‘whole’ and kaustos ‘burned.”

Even in the liturgy of Holocaustianity it is not decreed that most Judaic victims of the Nazis perished by fire. A half-million German civilians and three-quarters of a million Japanese civilians (including the victims of the fire-bombing of Toyko), were indeed burned to death, yet it is a thought crime to say so. Tell me we are not all cowards for allowing truth itself to be forbidden. We live in Talmudic times.

This writer is sometimes accused, as a researcher in the field of the Babylonian Talmud, of seeing the Talmud where it is not.  It is not so much the Talmudic texts themselves that we observe in our society, but the results of their influence. The single most remarkable dimension of Talmudic halacha is its narcissistic exceptionalism, born of the self-worship it inculcates. Prof. Lipstadt, who has made an career out of stigmatizing anyone who doubts any aspect of the “Holocaust” narrative, as a diabolic “Holocaust denier,” is free to deny, without negative consequences, the holocaust in Dresden, because of her exceptional status as one of the Holy People. She may do as she likes with history, in ways that the rest of us may not. For that reason alone we cannot respect the religion of Holocaustianity. It is not history. It is a product of Talmudic megalomania. Few of us tolerate fanatical egoism from Catholics, Protestants or Muslims. The very idea raises our secular indignation and “Separation of Church (or Mosque) and State!” is our cry, in the face of it. But to shout “Separation of Synagogue and State!” in nations where Holocaustianity is the last truly believed state religion in the otherwise agnostic West, would be unthinkable for anyone who valued their reputation, employment, personal safety, or in Europe, freedom from incarceration.

Beyond the “Jew and gentile” entanglement is the fratricide: Churchill and his top military circle were not Judaic, yet they set afire the medieval cities of their German cousins, who only two generations before had comprised the royal blood within the House of the German-speaking Queen Victoria. 

A thousand years of national and religious wars in Europe had not managed to wreak the destruction which Mr. Churchill and U.S. President Franklin Roosevelt directed against the cultural treasure houses of western civilization, in cities like Dresden. They tossed a match into Dresden as casually as a drooling meth addict would torch an apartment building for revenge on the landlord who had evicted him.

Yet “conservative Christian” American university professors and administrators in institutions of higher learning such as Michigan’s esteemed Hillsdale College, which is the recipient of millions of dollars in donations from “Conservatives” seeking to preserve western civilization, have hallowed Churchill into a paragon of decency, courage and western leadership. This view of this mass murdering vandal is such a defect of vision as to be fatal spiritually, culturally and politically on a national scale.

If the powers that be decided, for example, that Russia needed to be fire-bombed, given sufficient pretext our “Conservatives” would do it all over again in the name of “civilization.” The blood of the innocent in Moscow and St. Petersburg would signify no more to the Hillsdale College type of crusaders than the charred bodies of the civilians in the apocalyptic wreckage of Dresden.

American civilization in 2018 is not worthy of the name. We have the illusion of a civilization, which we cherish for our own aggrandizement and nostalgia. “Conservative” America has made common cause with the Talmudic mentality, as did Antonin Scalia, another of its plaster saints.

As we approach the start of Lent 2020, seventy-five years after the Allies’ mass murder in Dresden, we inhabit the money changer’s house, where Christ on the Cross is sold not just for a buck, but for a bucket of Talmudic vindication.

Michael Hoffman is a professional historian, the editor of the periodical Revisionist History and the author of nine books.

For Further Research

Film footage of the bombing of Dresden

The Destruction of Dresden: The Most Appalling Air Attack of World War II by David Irving. 

The Fire: The Bombing of Germany, 1940-1945 by Jörg Friedrich. This is at present the most comprehensive history.

 Video: “Saturation Bombing in World War II: Who is to Blame?” A speech by Mr. Irving given in London in 2015. Approximately one hour.

Slaughterhouse Five by Kurt Vonnegut. The renowned novelist was an American GI and a German prisoner of war captured at the Battle of the Bulge. He was an eyewitness to the aftermath of the holocaust in Dresden.

_______________

Stephen Cohen’s Defense of Vladimir Putin

Stephen Cohen’s Defense of Vladimir Putin

By Michael Hoffman

In Prof. Stephen Cohen’s speech last December (available on video), defending Russian leader Vladimir Putin, he makes the case that the New York Times, Washington Post and other “prestigious” legacy media are guilty of publishing fake news. Cohen’s speech is a serious deflation of the legacy media's hypocritical hot air balloon accusing its Internet business rivals, such as YouTube and Twitter, of purveying fake news. 

The 28-minute speech by Cohen is on YouTube (start viewing at the 2-minute mark).

The Saker, a Russian historian, analyzes Cohen's speech and Putin's authentic career, in a recent essay. Here's an excerpt from Saker’s analysis:

Putin, speaking about the US, declared, “They don’t want to humiliate us, they want to subjugate us. They want to solve their problems at our expense, they want to subordinate us to their influence“. Putin then added, “nobody in history has ever succeeded in doing this and nobody will ever succeed."

He realizes what absolute disaster, a cataclysm of truly cosmic proportions the break-up of the Soviet Union represented for all the people of the former USSR and what an absolute nightmare it was for Russia to live a full decade as a subservient colony of Uncle Sam. 

This is where various right-wingers and assorted Alt-Righters completely “lose” Putin: he told an assembly of Orthodox Jews that 80-85% of Bolshevik leaders were Jews...Putin ignored the hysterics of Netanyahu about the Russian role in Syria...Jews and Russians are forever joined in their common memory of the horrors of WWII....Russia has very strong ties to the Russian-speaking Jewish communities worldwide.

...Putin is acutely aware of the dangers of nationalism, just as much as he is aware of the dangers of imperialism, and he said so many times: Russia cannot afford any more nationalistic conflicts as they almost completely destroyed Russia in the 1990s. Just look at modern Ukraine and you will see what a Russia torn apart by nationalist ideologies could have looked like, had Putin not cracked down hard on various nationalists (including and mostly Russian ones). 

Far from catering to (an admittedly powerful) Jewish lobby in Russia, Putin is, in fact, trying to assemble as many different peoples and minorities as possible to his project of a New Russia; and that project includes Russian Jews, not only for the sake of these Jews, but mainly for the sake of Russia. The same goes for another crucial minority in Russia – Muslims. They also very much form a key part of the project Putin has for Russia. Of course, racists, nationalists and other less than bright folks in Russia will still dream about expelling all Jews (or Muslims) from Russia. Simply put – that ain’t happening (for one thing this would be physically impossible) and Putin and those who support him will fight such projects with every legal tool at their disposal. Here again, you could say that Putin is a patriotic internationalist. 

End quote from "Saker.” 

(It's worth taking the time to read his entire essay).

Of course Putin certainly is “catering" to the Israeli and Chabad Lubavitch lobby in Russia. 

Putin is a student of Von Clausewitz, Metternich, Machiavelli and Solzhenitsyn all rolled into one riddle wrapped in the enigma that is the Russian powerhouse, which no one detailed better than Dostoyevsky, and as Napoleon and Hitler discovered to their eternal regret.

Anyone who believes the Renaissance papal Church has even one leg to stand on in terms of authentic representation of Christ's ecclesia on earth (and we do not), in our opinion can't object to Putin's statecraft — because in many ways the papist Machiavellian influence is his strongest influence.

Second, neo-Nazis are still fighting World War II and view Putin and Russia solely through that 1940s prism. They have seldom demonstrated the ability to grasp that Hitlerism was understood in Russia as a campaign to eliminate the Slavic people as an independent historical force on the world stage.

 Hitler was viewed as a fool who spared his beloved Britain an invasion by opening a second front in the East in a war he should have known he could not possibly win — as a result he became the biggest loser of the 20th century, along with his prime victims, the German people. 

Russians share one trait with Americans: they can't abide a loser. "Assorted Alt-Righters" can't comprehend the Russian perspective on Hitler: that he almost succeeded in having the German people wiped off the face of the earth.

It was in Communist East Germany in the 1950s-1990s that Germans were preserved from 3rd World immigration, miscegenation, pornography, drugs and other "benefits” of the capitalist Western democracies. To this day it is the former East European Communist nations —  now free to practice the Christianity which the Soviets had forbidden —  that are mounting the only organized government resistance to open borders in all of Europe.

This writer is an anti-communist as well as an anti-usury-capitalist, who notes the failure of the Alt-Right to appreciate that the place of the white race in the world will only be secured by equating our race with peace and justice, not conquest and extrusion. 

The foremost Nazis and Stalinists today are in "Israel" and ISIS. Zionism and Saudi "Wahhabist" Islam are both predicated on mass murder and extrusion of whole populations. 

All politicians deserving of that sordid name, including Mr. Putin, believe that compromise and deceit are virtues in politics. In the sixteenth century, Pope Pius V was ruling an empire of priestcraft, sodomy, usury and Kabbalistic diabolism, yet he helped to organize the naval forces that spectacularly stopped the Ottoman Turk invasion force at the Battle of Lepanto. If the nature of his Renaissance Church is any guide, this pontiff was not a follower of the Gospel of Jesus Christ.  God used him nevertheless to save Europe in that era. How do we explain this head-spinning fact? It surely does not signify that we should share in the pope's transgressions by being yoked to the sainthood brand appropriated for him by his Neoplatonic, Hermetic, Kabbalistic Church (2 Corinthians 6:14-17).

God's ways are not our ways. Whether we are dealing with Putin or Pius V, we are encountering men who we, as Christian believers, cannot personally follow. But neither should we close our eyes to how God may have in the past — or may be now — deploying them. The Bible offers numerous examples of ungodly persons used by Yahweh for some good (for instance, Joshua 2: 1-3; 6: 17-25).  This is a mystery.

If the Old Testament contains mysteries beyond human comprehension, what of our human politics and history? 

A prime example is ancient Rome under the Caesars.  It was none other than this "abomination of desolation” that was utilized by God to fulfill the prophecy of His Divine Son:

"And Jesus went out from the temple, and was going on his way; and his disciples came to him to show him the buildings of the temple. But he answered and said unto them, See ye not all these things? verily I say unto you, There shall not be left here one stone upon another, that shall not be thrown down...When therefore ye see the abomination of desolation, which was spoken of through Daniel the prophet, standing in the holy place (let him that readeth understand),  then let them that are in Judaea flee unto the mountains..." (Matthew 24: 1-2; 15-16).

The Roman Army that marched on Jerusalem in 70 A.D. was God's army. Go figure. The general who commanded that invincible force, Titus, is, in the pages of the Talmud of Babylon, second only to Jesus Christ in terms of the hatred directed against him in that most sacred of all rabbinic volumes. 

We are not asserting by any means that Pius V or Vladimir Putin were, or are, types of Titus. No one has the authority, much less the competence, to make such a declaration. 

We ought to however, temper our judgments concerning history and politics with a humble cognizance of the mysterious ways of Divine Providence.

Michael Hoffman is the editor of the periodical, Revisionist History® and the author of nine books. The continuation of his work is dependent on the charity of truth-seekers and the sale of his writings and recordings.  

____________