Wednesday, December 15, 2021
Hitler's 1935 Talmud: An Enigma
Sunday, March 07, 2021
Cancel Culture, Craig Heimbichner and the ADL
The Forbidden Truth: Cancel Culture and the ADL’s Witch Hunt Against Authors
By Michael Hoffman | www.RevisionistHistory.org
©2021
How far will cancel culture go to prevent this writer from selling my books?
How long will the ADL (Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith) get away with libeling this writer by claiming that I am anything other than pro-Semitic and pro-Judaic, or that I deny that during the Second World War innocent Judaic people suffered mass murder at the hands of the criminal Nazis and their criminal ideology?
The ADL retails demonstrable falsehoods. Their credibility should be zero, but fear makes it otherwise.
How much longer will the white supremacists at the ADL send U.S. police forces to the Israeli state to learn brutal tactics employed against Palestinian civilians, which are then applied to black people in the U.S.?
How long will Judaic people be captive to Zionism and Talmudism?
Why is it a thought crime to critically study the tenets of the Talmud Bavli?
Why is such study not a legitimate intellectual undertaking for the advancement of human knowledge?
Why must all such studies be demonized? Why can't we speak and write freely on controversial subjects with love and compassion?
Why does the ADL work night and day to interdict the sale of my books? I have a standing offer to the ADL's researchers to either debate, or publish a refutation of my book-length theses line by line. If I am wrong, I will stand corrected. Demonstrate my errors with reason and data.
On the contrary, the ADL works assiduously to pressure corporations to deny me the ability to sell my books and impoverish this writer so that I can no longer research and write. How do such underhanded tactics benefit humanity, or the people's right to know? I am opposed to hatred and extremism, including Israeli and Talmudic extremism and hate speech. Why can't this be discussed on social media?
What does this have to do with Craig Heimbichner, as of this writing, an official with the California Department of Education?
In the course of remarking on Craig's case, according to the Sacramento Bee newspaper of February 25, an ADL spokesman said:
"Heimbichner’s association with Hoffman put him on the Anti-Defamation League’s radar more than a decade ago, said Aryeh Tuchman, the ADL’s senior associate director..."
On their radar.
The ADL spokesman is referring to their domestic espionage apparatus, which spies on American authors in order to defame those who write contra racist Israeli dispossession of the Palestinians and hate speech in the Talmud Bavli. Why should my scholarship make me a target of spying? As a Christian believer I am opposed to all forms of violence and extremism, as I publicly counsel. For instance, to counter the neo-Nazi movement in the United States I wrote the book, Adolf Hitler: Enemy of the German People.
My volume, Usury in Christendom: The Mortal Sin that Was and Now is Not contains a section documenting the scapegoating of Judaic people in the Renaissance for the usurious activities of German and Italian papalist banking. The ADL does not make that fact known to the public or the corporations that it pressures to cancel this writer.
As a historian I follow the data wherever it leads. Hitler was a scourge of humanity, and usury was massively instituted first by members of the Church of Rome, not Judaic persons. That is the truth of the documentary record and any historian worthy of the name bears witness to it.
The ninth commandment of the God I adore — the God of Israel — states: "Thou shalt not bear false witness" (Exodus 20:16). The ADL has massively borne false witness against this writer and many other dissident scholars.
One target of their witch hunt, Noam Chomsky, distinguished Institute Professor at M.I.T., said it best when he wrote that the ADL is “...one of the ugliest, most powerful pressure groups in the U.S...Its primary commitment is to use any technique, however dishonest and disgraceful, in order to defame and silence and destroy anybody who dares to criticize the Holy State (‘Israel’)."
The ADL is the elephant in the cancel culture realm. The Right wing protests that culture while living in dread of fingering the ADL, the grand-daddy of censorship and deplatforming.
When will Americans risk taking a stand for the freedom of scholars to write, and for their opponents to refute them by debate and dialogue in the free marketplace of ideas, rather than smears, repression and censorship?
www.RevisionistHistory.org
Tuesday, May 21, 2013
"Nazarene Judaism” rebrands Jesus Christ according to their counterfeit gospel
Monday, February 07, 2011
The New York Times retails a Talmud hoax - again

We found the latest installment of this perennial (see here) media hoax— published on the website of the New York Times, despite the fact that it is marked "International Herald Tribune" (which is owned by the New York Times Company):
This hoax was first fueled by Steven Spielberg in his movie "Schindler’s List," where it was given credibility, both as dialogue in the movie itself and as the film’s motto, reproduced on countless posters that probably still adorn schoolrooms to this day.
As readers of our textbook, Judaism Discovered (pp. 526-528) know, this is supposed to be a quote from Talmud tractate Sanhedrin 37a, but the Talmud contains no such humanistic, universalist statement.
The uncensored Babylonian Talmud is concerned only with the welfare of fully human beings, i.e. those described in its text as “Jews.”
The actual Talmud text reads: “Whoever saves a single life in Israel, Scripture regards him as if he had saved the entire world” (emphasis supplied).
What is most instructive about this faking is the extent to which the corporate media are sublimely indifferent to correcting the fraud they peddle.
This writer has sent numerous letters of correction to editors, including of the New York Times, alerting them to the truth.
But since the falsified quotation fosters the enhanced positive image which the corporate media seek to propagate concerning Orthodox Judaism’s Talmud, they obstinately refuse to let something as insignificant as mere facts get in the way of their Talmudic PR campaign.
Another contributing factor: no influential person has stood up to offer a challenge to this hoax. We think it’s safe to say that any reasonably literate person who reads the section in Judaism Discovered debunking this deception and then performs a corroborative search in the Steinsaltz Talmud (Random House), can fail to appreciate that the phrase ascribed to the Talmud in the letter reproduced above (and a thousand other iterations published and showcased in media around the world since 1993), is a big lie, which functions as an effective advertising gimmick for the Talmud — depicting it as a warm, fuzzy book of universal love and concern for all.
Will anything ever be done about this? Or will the macabre joke continue to roll merrily along in the media, unchallenged, as it has for nearly a quarter century, since “Schindler’s List” premiered?
What kind of comment is it on human nature, worthy of the bitterest satire of Mark Twain, that the people mindlessly believe and endlessly parrot a statement from a Hollywood movie without any form of corroboration except for publication in the fake news gazette known as the New York Times, and do so with the kind of insufferable self-righteousness that is the mark of this brand of "Holocaust" hype?
***
***
"Gold-plated brass ring with Hebrew inscription from Schindler’s List, presented to Liam Neeson as 'Oskar Schindler' (Universal, 1993) Brass ring with Hebrew inscription in the inside edge, taken from the Talmud, which translated reads 'He who saves one life, saves the whole world.' This ring was presented to Liam Neeson’s character at the end of the film by all of the grateful Jewish workers he had saved from certain death at the hands of the Nazis. Fashioned from gold taken from one of his worker’s teeth, it’s after Schindler receives this ring that he breaks down, remorseful that he did not sell every one of his worldly possessions to save more Jews. An important and highly symbolic piece from the most poignant moment of the film. From the personal collection of Batia Grafka, the film’s prop master...”

