Will Freemason Albert Pike’s Statue be removed?

Will Freemason Albert Pike’s Statue be Removed in Washington D.C?

By Michael Hoffman

www.RevisionistHistory.org

In the Soviet-like frenzy to erase historical memory and generate amnesia, Nancy Pelosi’s Congress is hellbent on pulverizing the remembrance of things past. 

The move is on to raze every statue to a Confederate in Washington D.C., which begs the question, will Albert Pike’s monument also fall?

Pike was a Confederate general and the Supreme Commander of the Scottish Rite of Freemasonry Southern Jurisdiction, the most powerful masonic organization on earth. 

His book, Morals and Dogma espoused Satanism. 

Hundreds of thousands of whites were (and are) his disciples. 

His statue in our nation's capitol honors Satanism, which probably means that the diabolic U.S. Congress, recognizing a fellow-traveler, might leave it untouched, even while it razes other statues.

Our proposal: keep Pike’s monument intact. Place a plaque prominently next to it containing the statement: "This statue to a masonic Satanist testifies to the hold a powerful secret society has exerted over our nation.”

Freemasonry is Kabbalism for Goyim

Revisionist history reveals that Kabbalism was first infiltrated into the West in "Catholic" Florence in the late 15th century. You will search in vain for a Renaissance or post-Renaissance papal encyclical condemning it. Pope Leo XIII's famous denunciation of Masonry carefully avoided Kabbalah, which is tantamount to writing about the origin of the automobile without mentioning the internal combustion engine. 

From Pico della Mirandola to Cardinal Henri de Lubac, for more than five hundred years the Church of Rome has been the deep cover center for Kabbalism among the goyim. 

Pike's satanic Freemasonry was ancillary fungus, generated by a far deeper, papal rot. Natural slaves (see Aristotle's tripartite division of humanity), will never be able to handle these radical truths. True sons and daughters of Augustine, Aquinas and Dante, will. 

Read The Occult Renaissance Church of Rome for the documentation. 

___________

The people we are to fear

The people we are to fear 

— according to St. Bernadette of Lourdes

By Michael Hoffman

www.RevisionistHistory.org

A  Catholic saint had something instructive to impart about those whom we are to fear.

St. Bernadette of Lourdes was a nun in the convent of the Sisters of Charity in Nevers, France in the year 1870. She was interviewed while furious combat was underway in the north of the country, as the seemingly invincible Prussian army advanced on Paris. 

From the book La Salette, Lourdes, Pontmain: Voyage d'un croyant by Edmond Lafond [Paris: Bray et Retaux Libraires-Éditeurs, 1872, p. 238], published while she was still alive, comes the following account.

A visitor spoke to Bernadette in the convent and asked her:

“Did you receive, in the grotto of Lourdes, or after then, any revelations related to the future and fate of France? Did not the Blessed Virgin deliver any warning for France, any threats?”

Bernadette: “No.”

Visitor: “The Prussians are at our gates; does that not cause you any fear?”

Bernadette: “No.”

Visitor: “There is thus nothing to fear?”

Bernadette:  “I only fear bad Catholics.”

Visitor: “You do not fear anything else?”

Bernadette:  “No, nothing else."

(End quote)

The most dangerous enemies of the Church of Jesus Christ are not rabbis or Moslems. They are "bad Catholics” who, with their situation ethics, enable the ruinous dictatorship of the Money Power by allowing the mortal sin of renting money to dominate the nation’s economy, while rendering it a legitimate, moral business model for Catholics (and everyone else). 

The most dangerous enemies of the Church of Jesus Christ are the “bad Catholic” popes of the past five hundred years who approved (or kept silent) concerning the Hermetic-Kabbalism of Pico della Mirandola, whose Satanic doctrine, spread by himself and his “bad Catholic" papal and ecclesiastical co-conspirators, crept inside the hierarchy and took up residence there, never to be expelled, rotting the Vatican from the top down, beginning on June 18, 1493, with the papal absolution of Pico, and finally emerging, in the full glare of publicity, at the Second Vatican Council, as its papal herald, Cardinal Henri de Lubac, openly acknowledged. 

The most dangerous enemies of the Church of Jesus Christ enacted the masonic doctrine of papal infallibility, instigated by the "bad Catholic" Joseph de Maistre (yes, masonic, a datum not difficult to prove; shock at this fact is a comment on the astonishingly poor state of the history of the Church as presented to dupes by "bad Catholic” authors). 

These are just a few of the documented facts which are profoundly destabilizing to true believers in the mythical orthodoxy of the "bad Catholics" at the top of the Egyptian obelisk, i.e. the post-Renaissance, pre-Vatican Council II pontiffs (as well as their post-conciliar successors). 

Having no credible counter to these and other revisionist facts, the true believer (cf. the eponymous book by Eric Hoffer), continues to cling to a fantasy Catholicism, while attempting to nullify revisionist history with the corrupt tactic of the liberal media: the infamous "silent treatment."

Bad Catholics will do that. It is part of what makes them the people most to be feared. Corruptio optimi est pessima.

_____________

Michael Hoffman is the author of a new revisionist history, The Occult Renaissance Church of Rome. 

_____________

"Traditional Catholic" historians coverup truth

“In the case of Pico della Mirandola’s Judaic handler, Flavius Mithridates, protection and promotion was granted to Flavius by Pope Innocent VIII. With regard to Pico, he was exonerated of all imputations of heresy by Pope Alexander VI’s Brief of June 18, 1493. It is at this momentous historical juncture—which has proved invisible to the approved writers of the “classic Catholic histories,” and nearly three centuries before Rousseau and Kant—that a malevolent spirit was unleashed upon the Catholic world, emerging blatantly in the documents of the Second Vatican Council. No less than John-Paul II’s most revered cardinal-theologian bore witness to this astonishing fact in a book published in France, which was influential among the hierarchy, but otherwise languished in obscurity, neglected by those who insist there is no such phenomenon as a Renaissance occult papacy. The book was never translated into English by any enterprising researcher in all the annals of ‘conservative’ and’traditional' Catholic scholarship until we commissioned a translation of this key text for exposition in our new book, The Occult Renaissance Church of Rome.” 

___________