News of Israeli leaders who advocate rape suppressed by media

Creating Fake News through Omission 

The mass media manufacture fake news not only by commission —broadcasting or printing lies—but by omission—sowing ignorance, and creating false impressions by suppressing news-worthy facts the public has a right to know.

By Michael Hoffman

www.RevisionistHistory.org

The Israeli military’s Chief Rabbi, Eyal Karim

Two of the most egregious instances of this type of fake news involve the celebrated Zionist Left wing "newspaper of record," the New York Times, which has refused to report that Israeli Prof. Mordechai Kedar of Bar-Ilan University, (1) and the Israeli Military's Chief Rabbi Eyal Karim (also spelled "Qarim"), advocate raping Arab women. 

The Times regards the unconscionable pronouncements of the Chief Rabbi and the Israeli university professor as not worthy of reporting. 

Rabbi Karim and Prof. Kedar’s views subvert the mainstream media narrative, in that they radically undercut the fake news image of the rabbinic religion as a supremely ethical and humane pillar of western civilization. 

To protect this incessantly propagated disinformation, the Times suppresses the fact that rape advocacy is derived from rabbinic law. Rabbi Moses Maimonides, the supreme halachic authority among the Ashkenazim, ruled that a Judaic soldier may rape a Yefas To’ar (female goy captive) when he is not actively fighting a battle (cf. Hilchos Melachim 8:3). 

Moreover, according to Judaic scholar Dov S. Zakheim (in Meorot vol. 6, no 1, p. 5),  “It is the consensus of many halachic decisors (judges of rabbinic law) that the yefat to’ar can be subject to involuntary intercourse...” The Israeli military’s chief rabbi agrees.

This is the despicable rape advocacy of Eyal Karim, the current Chief Rabbi of the Israeli Army, which the New York Times will not report:

“The wars of Israel […] are mitzvah (divinely blessed) wars, in which they differ from the rest of the wars the nations (goyim) wage among themselves. Since, essentially, a war is not an individual matter, but rather nations wage war as a whole, there are cases in which the personality of the individual is “erased” for the benefit of the whole. And vice versa: sometimes you risk a large unit for the saving of an individual, when it is essential for purposes of morale. One of the important and critical values during war is maintaining the army’s fighting ability […] 

"As in war the prohibition against risking your life is broken for the benefit of others, so are the prohibitions against immorality and of kashrut (kosher). Wine touched by gentiles, consumption of which is prohibited in peacetime, is allowed at war, to maintain the good spirit of the warriors. Consumption of prohibited foods is permitted at war (and some say, even when kosher food is available), to maintain the fitness of the warriors, even though they are prohibited during peacetime. 

Just so, war removes some of the prohibitions on sexual relations (gilui arayot), and even though fraternizing with a gentile woman is a very serious matter, it was permitted during wartime (under the specific terms) out of understanding for the hardship endured by the warriors. And since the success of the whole at war is our goal, the Torah permitted the individual to satisfy the evil urge (yetzer ha’ra), under the conditions mentioned, for the purpose of the success of the whole.” (End quote).

Rabbi Karim’s words would be outrageous even if he were not the chief spiritual teacher and counselor of the Israeli army, navy and air forces which hold in their grasp the nearly helpless captive population of Palestine. 

For the Chief Rabbi to exercise this power and authority having advocated the rape of non-Judaic women, and then having his monstrous doctrine concealed by a curtain of silence from America’s acclaimed “newspaper of record,” and almost the entire Establishment media, is a grave indictment of corporate journalism in the U.S. 

Our indignation increases in view of the fact that the least hint of a rape ideology or praxis anywhere in American life (much less from a high government official), elicits (quite rightly) horror and furious protest. Yet the Title IX activists and Democrat Party feminists have been eerily indifferent concerning the billions of U.S. taxpayer dollars sent to a nation that has as its military's Chief Rabbi a miscreant who justifies the rape of women who are not Judaic.

Notes:

(1) While nothing about Kedar's rape advocacy has ever appeared in the news section of the Times, or in any section of its U.S. edition (which is the most widely read), exactly one sentence was devoted to Kedar's rape advocacy in an editorial published only overseas, in the "International New York Times."  By contrast, concerning a single allegation of rape at Hobart and William Smith Colleges in upstate New York, the Times, which considers itself a journalistic leader in the campaign against rape, published a lengthy exposé, beginning on the front page of its U.S. edition of July 13, 2014. 

When rape pertains to goyim accused of the crime, the Times is in the forefront of reporting it. 

Where Judaic law and Israeli religious and secular leaders are implicated in the institutionalization of rape in the Israeli military and society, the New York Times is guilty of perpetrating fake news by omitting reports of these facts; thereby shielding the reputation of the rabbinic religion and its exponents. 

Zionist Right wing and “conservative" Republican neocon media in America are equally culpable for having disgracefully suppressed these truths for the same manipulative motive — denying the American people factual news about Orthodox Judaism, the Israeli military and Israeli society as a whole. 

For further research:

https://revisionistreview.blogspot.com/search?q=rape 

Michael Hoffman is the author of the books, Judaism Discovered, and Judaism’s Strange Gods. He is a former reporter for the New York bureau of the Associated Press.

_______________

Copyright ©2017 by Michael Hoffman

A Judaic woman escapes misogyny and mind control

A Judaic woman flees misogyny and mind control

_____________________

One Hasidic Housewife's Inspiring — and Unusual — Journey to College and Beyond

By Frimet Goldberger

Jewish Daily Forward | January 9, 2014

=  Excerpt  =

...I was born in Kiryas Joel, the exponentially growing epicenter for Satmar Hasidim in upstate New York. I attended the village’s only girls school through 11th grade, which is when Satmar girls graduate and begin preparations for their betrothal. Even before I pulled on my first pair of thick blue tights at the age of 3, I knew that a woman’s role is tending to her husband and children at home. Most women who worked were either supporting the family while their husbands studied in the kollel, the yeshiva for married men; some provided a supplementary income for their growing families. These latter women were the exception, not the rule.

The lives of Satmar women weren’t always so cloistered. My mother was among the first generation of Satmar-educated girls in America. She grew up in Brooklyn’s Williamsburg, the daughter of Holocaust survivors, in those early years when the Satmar community was finding its footing. Her academic and cultural experiences were radically different from mine: New York City public school teachers staffed the English department of Bais Rochel, the Satmar girls school. My mother spoke English with her siblings and peers, read secular literature, visited the library regularly, attended movies occasionally, listened to the radio and dressed fashionably.

As the Hasidic community shifted rapidly toward extremism, so did the curriculum in Satmar schools. Gone were the qualified public school teachers, replaced by recent Satmar graduates. Yiddish replaced English as the language spoken in school. My classmates and I were taught Judaic studies, starting with the aleph-bet in kindergarten and continuing with the weekly parsha, or Torah portion, stories in Yiddish. In maintaining the traditional ban on substantive Torah lessons for girls, biblical studies in Hebrew were forbidden, and knowledge of Hebrew texts was restricted to prayers.

Secular studies were limited to the rudiments, and focused on practical learning for becoming a successful balebuste. Math, beyond simple home budgeting, was considered unnecessary; Shakespeare and other classic or contemporary literature a waste of precious time that could be spent learning how to keep house, and science — aside from raising difficult questions about creation — an abomination. We had no access to the library, the Internet or any secular materials. Our textbooks were highly censored with permanent markers and crayons to block out material perceived as a threat to our sheltered brains.

...One snowy morning in December 2008, my husband and I packed our fragile belongings into our old, tan Buick and headed onto the road. Our destination was Airmont, N.Y. — just a 30-minute drive from Kiryas Joel, but truly a world away.

Our move was the culmination of years of questioning our radical community and the complete conformity required to live and breathe there. The friendships we’d forged with Orthodox couples living considerably less stringent lives outside Kiryas Joel also catalyzed the modest, incremental changes toward our more progressive Orthodox lifestyle. But the straw that broke the camel’s back was an incident the summer before our move, when a group of Satmar modesty enforcers threatened to expel my 3-year-old son from the only boys school in the community if I didn’t shave my head. I went home that night and buzzed off my long hair. But it was too late to go back to a strict Satmar lifestyle. The following morning, my husband and I decided to leave...

[Emphasis supplied] Read more at: http://forward.com/articles/190267/one-hasidic-housewifes-inspiring-and-unusual-j/

Michael Hoffman's Afterword 

Frimet Goldberger writes that the Hasidic Judaics "shifted rapidly toward extremism" after having risen from the ashes of World War II. Actually, the zeitgeist of the 1940s and 50s in America created pressure on the Hasidim to broaden their horizons, just as Goldberger describes. The extremism that was later imposed was a return to what Talmudic Judaism had always been before Christians and gentiles pressured Talmudic Judaics in Europe in the late 18th century to abandon the Talmud's superstition, misogyny, and hatred toward goyim. The result was the "haskalah" and the rise of Reform Judaism. Consequently, what Goldberger witnessed growing up in Satmar was not an anomaly. It was what every Talmudic-observant ("frum") Judaic woman experienced from the mists of antiquity.

Frimet Goldberger writes of her entrance into an allegedly more liberated Orthodox Judaism. Granted, modern Orthodoxy is more permissive and less suffocating than Hasidism, but as long as the Talmudic laws of Niddah are imposed on Judaic women (as they are even among the modern Orthodox), women who are captive to those rules remain slaves of one of the most severe and oppressive forms of micro-management of female behavior on earth. This is another taboo area where the self-censoring establishment media choose not to tread.  (Cf. Judaism Discovered, pp. 729-748, for documentation concerning the Orthodox rabbinic laws of Niddah).

The Zionist media, from the New York Times on down, has nurtured a feminist resistance movement inside Christianity and Islam. They have published many stories undermining Islamic fundamentalism, while much of the establishment media's focus on Talmudic fundamentalist Judaism has consisted in supporting it against critics, and whitewashing its overwhelming misogyny. (Cf. Judaism Discovered, pp. 41 − 44, for documentation of this media double standard).

Evelyn Kaye in her classic, now out-of-print book, The Hole in the Sheet, and Deborah Feldman in her recent work Unorthodox, offer further documentation of the misogyny and mind control of Talmudic Judaism.

_____________

Pope Francis: Judaism is not engaged in idolatry; serves the true God

"Evangelii Gaudium of the Holy Father Francis"

A Palimpsest of Papal Prevarication

By Michael Hoffman • Copyright ©2013 

On Nov. 24 Pope Francis issued an "Apostolic Exhortation." Two sections in the 50,000 word-document are of interest. One is centered on the Money Power, but Francis, like all his predecessors since the Renaissance, merely issues a lot of hot air and toothless semantics. The empty rhetoric will mollify some activists no doubt, but it will do little or nothing to curb the power of the corporate-financier elite or the bought-and-paid for churchmen who have been serving them since the days of the Medici. The only way to curb the Money Power is to restore the infallible doctrine that charging interest on loans of money is a mortal sin and absolution for this sin of theft requires restitution in the form of a return of the ill-gotten gains. Then the Overlords of the Cryptocracy would howl and then Francis would feel their wrath, rather than their adulation.

The "Apostolic Exhortation" also contains a section on Judaism, rendering it immune to missionary activity, which is the non-negotiable demand of the rabbis to which Rome has submitted, as promulgated by Popes John Paul II and Benedict XVI. Hence, there’s nothing particularly new from Francis here, though his post-Vatican II colleagues presented this revolutionary distortion of St. Paul with far more guile and sophistication, whereas Francis blurts it out without much theological embroidery:

247. "We hold the Jewish people in special regard because their covenant with God has never been revoked, for “the gifts and the call of God are irrevocable” (Rom 11:29). The Church, which shares with Jews an important part of the sacred Scriptures, looks upon the people of the covenant and their faith as one of the sacred roots of her own Christian identity (cf. Rom 11:16-18). As Christians, we cannot consider Judaism as a foreign religion; nor do we include the Jews among those called to turn from idols and to serve the true God (cf. 1 Thes 1:9)." [Source: Apostolic Exhortation Evangelii Gaudium of the Holy Father Francis to the Bishops, Clergy, Consecrated Persons and the Lay Faithful on The Proclamation of the Gospel in Today's World].

The historic Church never taught this distortion of Romans 11:29, though it is a fixture of the theology of the soon-to-be-saint John Paul II and the supposedly arch-conservative counter-pope to Francis, Benedict XVI. JP II and Benedict were firmly in the Talmudic/rabbinic camp and Francis is no different. Twisting Romans chapter 11 into a saved-by-race pledge of eternal security is about as anti-Christ as it gets. If the Jews of first century Palestine had an irrevocable covenant with God, why would the Son of God have bothered to incarnate on earth and be crucified for their sake?

Jesus declared to the Jewish Pharisees, whose ideological descendants today are the rabbis of Orthodox Judaism: “If you were Abraham’s children, you would be doing the works Abraham did, but now you seek to kill me, a man who has told you the truth that I heard from God.” (John 8:39-40). 

Why didn’t Jesus speak as the popes of Rome do, and acknowledge the Pharisees on the basis of their flesh, and their racial prestige? Jesus rejected the doctrine of salvation by race. He taught that the children of Abraham are those who do the works of Abraham. 

By Our Lord’s definition, the spiritual heirs of those who have built a religion on the refusal to accept Jesus as the Messiah of Israel, are most certainly not the children of Abraham. The modern popes are guilty of contradicting Christ. They obstinately continue to disseminate the same error as the Pharisees, that the racial prestige of “Jews,” whether of the first or the twenty-first century, is sufficient to qualify them as heirs of the promises which God made to Abraham in Genesis 12:3. 

John the Baptist, the greatest of the prophets (Luke 7: 26-28), declared to the Jews:  “Do not presume to say to yourselves, ‘We have Abraham as our father,’ for I tell you, God is able from these stones to raise up children for Abraham. Even now the axe is laid to the root of the trees. Every tree therefore that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire.” (Matthew 3: 9-10).

“Who is the liar but he who denies that Jesus is the Christ? This is the antichrist, he who denies the Father and the Son. No one who denies the Son has the Father. Whoever confesses the Son has the Father also.” (1 John 2:22-23).

Why are so many persons strongly deluded into believing that those who deny Jesus Christ, are somehow Abraham’s children? Because: "...they refused to love the truth and so be saved. Therefore God sends them a strong delusion, so that they may believe what is false, in order that all may be condemned who did not believe the truth but had pleasure in unrighteousness.” (2 Thessalonians 2:10-12).

Bob Burrdige writes, "In the time between Abraham and Jesus, the tree was the nation of the Jews. In the time after Jesus, the tree is the Apostolic church, God’s Spiritual Israel (see Romans 9:6). As the elect from all nations are evangelized and brought in, the tree grows toward fulness. As the apostate and unbelieving are removed, the tree improves in purity. It is in this way that all of God’s true Israel will be saved. The New Testament Church does not replace Israel. The Church is Israel in her completed form."

This was the infallible official teaching of the Church until the coming of Popes Paul VI, John Paul II, Benedict XVI and the now rather uncouth Francis, who is not quite as adept at accompanying the betrayal of the Gospel with high-falutin' theological dissembling, and therefore the hellish papal doctrine of Jew-worship is more obvious in his pontificate than in previous ones that had undeserved reputations for "conservatism."

We have saved the most flagrant papal lie for last. In Evangelii Gaudium Francis exhorts: "...we cannot...include the Jews among those called to turn from idols and to serve the true God." 

Pope Francis insists that the "Jews" do not follow idols and have not rejected the true God. Really? What did we just read in 1 John 2: 22-23? What are the words out of the mouth of Jesus Himself in John 8: 39-40? And from John the Baptist in Matthew 3: 9-10? All of those Scriptures have to be abolished or explained away in order to claim that contemporary “Jews” are not engaged in idolatry. Moreover, the rabbis are witnesses against themselves in this matter of idolatry:

"Since God already gave the Torah to the Jewish people on Mt. Sinai we no longer pay attention to heavenly voices. God must submit to the decisions of a majority vote of the rabbis.” —Babylonian Talmud, Bava Metzia 59b.

Let's see now, the rabbinic halacha declares that Judaics no longer pay attention to heaven and that God must submit to them, and the pope of Rome declares that Judaism gives service to the true God and is not engaged in idolatry.

The only people who could possibly fall for this risible papal bunkum are those who want to be deceived, who "take pleasure in unrighteousness" and who "refuse to love the truth and be saved." 

Every tree that does not bear good fruit will be cut down and thrown into the fire.

______

On the Contrary is reader-funded. It is published today thanks to donations from readers like you, and the sale of Hoffman's books, newsletters and recordings. Join other truth-seekers in giving something back for that which you have received, thereby helping to ensure the continuation of this service.

Michael Hoffman • Box 849 • Coeur d'Alene, Idaho 83816 USA 

Donations   |   Bookstore

***

Physician accuses rabbi of circumcision torture infants

WARNING: GRAPHIC VIDEO

Chief physician accuses chief rabbi of circumcision torture of Judaic infants 

In Danish with English subtitles. Approx. 6 minutes.

Is it "anti-semitic" for a courageous Danish physician to defend the human rights 

of Judaic baby boys from Talmudic sadism? 

Who are the “Jew haters”? The people trying to defend Judaic baby boys, or those heirs of the Pharisees who impose their cruel rites upon them?

Caveat:  this video refers to rabbinic circumcision as “Mosaic.” That’s wrong. Moses and the Bible have nothing to do with the painful circumcision procedure mandated by the Talmud and successor halachic texts.

Judaism is Talmudic, not Biblical!

***

Identity of Talmudic molesters protected by District Attorney

"Adjudicated without public scrutiny"

The identity of Talmudic child molesters is protected in New York by the District Attorney

Another outrageous case of preferential treatment

Americans continue to be oblivious to the growing threat of Talmudic law in America and the Zionist supremacy it generates over the rest of us less-than-human gentiles. Here below is another case of the preferential treatment which prosecutors immersed in a Talmudic mentality and ethos evince within law enforcement: one law for the Master Race of Holy People and another for everyone else. Imagine if the identity of Catholic priest-molesters were concealed in this manner? The media outcry would form a sonic boom that would resound from coast to coast.  

--Michael Hoffman, author of Judaism's Strange Gods and Judaism Discovered

______________________________________________________________

Orthodox Abuse Suspects Get Exemption

Brooklyn Prosecutors Deny Request for Identity of Sex Suspects

By Paul Berger • berger@forward.com 

Forward newspaper (New York)

Published April 24, 2012, issue of May 04, 2012

Orthodox Jews charged with child sex abuse in Brooklyn (New York) should have their identities protected because of the community’s “tight-knit and insular” nature, prosecutors claim in a remarkable response to demands for information about the cases.

Rejecting a Forward request under the state’s Freedom of Information Law, the Brooklyn district attorney made the startling claim that Orthodox Jews deserve a blanket exemption from the usual public disclosure rules. Prosecutors claimed that Orthodox Jews are “unique” in that releasing the names of suspects would allow others in the community to identify their victims.

“The circumstances here are unique,” Assistant District Attorney Morgan Dennehy wrote in an April 16 letter to the Forward. “Because all of the requested defendant names relate to Hasidic men who are alleged to have committed sex crimes against Hasidic victims within a very tight-knit and insular Brooklyn community, there is a significant danger that the disclosure of the defendants’ names would lead members of that community to discern the identities of the victims.”

Although Brooklyn District Attorney Charles Hynes has long resisted requests to identify Orthodox sex suspects, the letter is believed to represent the first time his office spelled out why it specifically singled them out for preferential treatment.

Dennehy cited the state’s civil rights laws in denying the Forward’s request for the names of 85 Orthodox Jews arrested on sex charges during the past three years. The Forward made its request in December 2011 after prosecutors announced that scores of Orthodox Jews had been charged under a special program designed to encourage the community to come forward with information.

He did not explain whether prosecutors had concluded that there was anything specific about each of the 85 suspects that might make it possible for others to determine the identity of their victim from the identity of the suspect.

He also did not explain whether such a blanket exemption might be granted to other similarly “tight-knit” communities in the borough. And there were no details about what criteria prosecutors would use to determine whether a particular group should be granted such preferential status.

Dennehy also claimed that revealing the names of abuse suspects could harm the operation of the DA’s special hotline, Kol Tzedek, or Voice of Justice, which was set up to three years ago to encourage Orthodox abuse victims to come forward. Disclosing suspects’ names could cause victims to lose faith in the hotline, which in turn would “interfere with law enforcement investigations or judicial proceedings,” he claimed.

Marci Hamilton, a law professor at Yeshiva University, said that prosecutors’ refusal to release the suspects’ names or other information about their alleged crimes amounts to “enabling” abusers.

“I think they are complicit in what enables these kinds of perpetrators in these kinds of communities if they are going… to refuse to publish names of any child sex predators,” Hamilton said. “When names of perpetrators are made public, their other victims are empowered to come forward and the whole community is given the power to identify and stop them and other predators.”

Hamilton added: “What the DA’s office is doing, unfortunately, is playing right into the hands of the abusers.”

Daniel Mullkoff, a legal fellow with the New York Civil Liberties Union, said there was no good reason to withhold the names of abuse suspects from the public. “In this case, the public has raised concerns about what the district attorney is doing,” he said. “Withholding of this information is without a legal basis and denies access to just the type of information that the public records law seeks to make public.”

In October 2009, Hynes office redacted the names of 26 Orthodox Jews on a list of those charged with sex crimes. A Freedom of Information Law request submitted by the Forward to see those names was refused.

When Hynes last year trumpeted the arrests of 85 Orthodox Jews on sex crimes charges since 2008, he again refused to release the suspects’ names. He cited the need to protect the identity of victims. Yet that same week, Hynes issued a press release publicizing the name of a non-Jewish man convicted of raping his girlfriend’s daughter. Hynes released the man’s name, the neighborhood where he lived and the victim’s age, enough information for any neighbor to identify the girl.

Hynes even refused to name 14 Orthodox people who were convicted of sex crimes, 10 of whom pleaded guilty. They were sentenced to between one month and 20 years in jail. Although some of those cases were covered in the media, several were adjudicated without public scrutiny.

End quote from Forward

__________________________________________

This On the Contrary column is made possible by your donations and the sale of our books, newsletters and recordings. Tell a friend about us!

__________________________________________

The Other Side of the Talmud Debate

Michael Hoffman Refutes a Defense of the Talmud

Unless (or until) it is removed by Chabad.org, as of March 18, the following link will take you to a  20-minute video of a lecture given at Oxford University by Dr. Asaf Yedidya: “NAZI ATTACKS ON THE TALMUD: ANTI-SEMITIC READINGS OF JEWISH TEXTS.” 


Dr. Yedidya is "lecturer in Jewish History at the Center for Jewish Studies at Bar-Ilan University." 


You should watch Dr. Yedidya's lecture first, and then the following 19-minute response to the lecture by Michael Hoffman.



Christian scholar Michael Hoffman’s response to Dr. Asaf Yedidya’s lecture

In his reply, Hoffman points out the use of misdirection and censored texts in the Oxford lecture and the inaccuracies and omissions employed in order to demonize Talmud critics and uphold the alleged benevolence of the Talmud Bavli. Hoffman documents Talmudic racism and homicide by quoting from the Gemara itself, as well as rabbinic authorities having the status of Posek Ha-dor and Gadol Ha-dor.

 Michael Hoffman is the author of the Amazon Kindle book, Judaism Discovered and a condensed paperback version for the general reader, Judaism’s Strange Gods. For more information visit www.revisionisthistory.org

***

Special Nevada Caucus for Talmud believers

Yes, you read it right. A special Republican caucus has been added in Nevada to accommodate frum (Talmud-“observant") Orthodox Judaic persons who can’t vote until sundown Saturday, after their rabbinic, works-righteousness “sabbath” concludes.

And get this, just in case you thought there was a smidgen of favoritism at play here (perish the thought), the special Shabbat vote will be held at the Dr. Miriam and Sheldon G. Adelson Educational Campus in Las Vegas, a K-12 school named for the Zionist-fanatic casino billionaire and his Israeli wife.

Mr. Adelson, as many of you perforce know, in addition to having donated $11 million to a Super Pac dedicated to Newt Gingrich, is a Palestinian denier: he says the Palestinians never happened and this denial of the existence of an entire people, unlike the heinous thought crime of “Holocaust denial," has not detracted from his media cred one iota.

I asked my colleagues here at the On the Contrary office in the foothills of the Bitterroots, if they would lay aside their checkerboard and cease feeding Bertha (our wood stove) long enough to give me their cynical assessment of this development. Messrs. Cal and Ez stopped for a few moments to opine that the Nevada GOP’s decision to hold the extra caucus at the Adelsons' own school for Orthodox Judaics was probably finagled by ol’ Sheldon himself, as a way of rigging the caucus for Newt, since most Talmudists are wild about Gingrich's itchy Middle East trigger finger, and the fact that he shares Mr. Adelson’s expert opinion about the non-existence of the Palestinians.

Many Orthodox Judaics regard Ron Paul as the nemesis of their war-Zionist interventionism, consequently the special Nevada caucus for Orthodox Judaics-mainly (if not only), bodes ill for Dr. Paul and the integrity of the primary process itself.

***

The Contraception-Crazy Obama Administration

In other news, Cal and Ez say they have the inside skinny on Obama’s contraception rule, the one wherein he has banned religious institutions from exempting birth control from their employees' health insurance plans.  Cal and Ez say this Health and Human Services (H&HS) mandate was put into place at the urging of First Lady Michelle Obama, who has decided to stop having children herself.

It’s also predicated on the media’s claim (initiated by a recent report in the New York Times), that many female and youthful Catholics (Catholics are supposedly more irate about this mandate, although any Biblically-faithful Christian should be), are allegedly either indifferent to funding contraception or support it outright; e.g. H&HS director Kathleen Sibelius, who is an alleged Catholic and also happens to be the bureaucrat who is enthusiastically enforcing the government's conscience-suppressive contraception insurance command.

According to reporter Carol E. Lee, writing in the Feb. 2 Wall Street Journal (p. A6): “Democrats, including the Obama campaign, want to keep the focus on contraception and reproductive health, a debate for which they believe the battle lines are so clear there is little risk of alienating potential Catholic supporters...Catholics...are split on issues such as access to contraception.”

Whoa there, Carol E. Lee, is the issue really “access” — a ban on the sale and distribution of contraception, as you write?

Is it not actually an issue of coercing Christian hospitals and schools into subsidizing their employees’ use of contraception? Why are you trying to confuse us, Carol?

Carol E. Lee continues: “The calculus among Mr. Obama’s political advisers, people familiar with their deliberations said, is that support for the decision among women and young voters — including Catholics and Hispanics—outweighs any potential loss.”

If Lee’s sources are correct, then the Obama administration is betting on a revolt on the part of voters who are Hispanic and Catholic young people and women, against Biblical truth and Catholic law, in favor of the culture of death.

“Contraception and reproductive health” is their indoctrinating mantra — and they call themselves “feminists."

Pregnancy is a disease? True, that was the male-chauvinist obstetricians’ view in the 1960s and 70s, but it has been replaced by an entire birth-affirmative movement led by midwives.

Obama makes birth control easily available to American women and then uses the "declining American birth rate" and "aging American population” clichés as a pretext for calling for open borders and amnesty for illegal aliens, who we supposedly need to replenish our population. What a fraud!

The Democrats shoot themselves in the foot on the issues of the deprecation of Second Amendment rights, contraception and abortion. They lose big with that evil agenda. Obama quotes Christ on poverty as a riposte to Mr. Rich Romney. President Obama should be reminded that the “least" of Our Lord’s "brethren” are the unborn babies tossed in dumpsters all over America, more than half of whom are girls. A true Christian and a true feminist would never be complicit in this most brutal of all forms of oppression of the weak and defenseless.

***

The latest issue of our Revisionist History Newsletter is hot off the press, “Freemasons in the American Civil War.”

If there’s still hope that your pastor is not a hireling, or a Baal priest in disguise, why not send him a copy of Judaism’s Strange Gods, so that he might know the truth and be blessed with the audacity to share this important verity with his parishioners or congregation?

***

WorldNetDaily Censors Ad for Books Critiquing Judaism

This advertisement for books critiquing Orthodox Judaism has been banned by World Net Daily:

The ad was suppressed by WorldNetDaily.com (WND) after three days due to unspecified "complaints."

Write to World Net Daily's corporate office:

2020 Pennsylvania Ave NW, #351

Washington, DC 20006

Send a (civil) letter of protest to the editor of World Net Daily:

http://www.wnd.com/contact-wnd/?subject=letter-editor

Michael Hoffman's comment: Empty Tomb Books represents one of the most dynamic groups of intrepid, responsible, Christian conservative activists in North America. If you are a true follower of Jesus Christ and God's Holy Word, there is nothing to fear or censor in Empty Tomb Books. In fact, every faithful Christian would support their right to publish and advertise. Only the forces of Pharisaic-Churchianity, in league with the rabbis of the Babylonian Talmud, would find anything objectionable or deserving of a ban. 

WND's censorship of the "Empty Tomb" advertisement is more evidence that there is no free press for authentic Christians in the American media -- and that includes in the so-called "conservative" media.

***

Iowa Votes for War

By Michael Hoffman

Mitt Romney and Rick Santorum together received 60,000 votes in the January 3 Iowa caucus compared with Ron Paul’s 26,000. Relentless media vilification of Rep. Paul did its job. Jennifer Rubin writing in the Washington Post:

"Several thousand votes behind the leaders was Rep. Ron Paul (R-Tex.), who seemed to lose momentum in the final week of the campaign....Maybe the coverage of his conspiratorial newsletters and loony foreign policy views dampened enthusiasm....Most relieved by Paul's somewhat disappointing finish is the Iowa Republican Party, which dreaded the vilification that would have accompanied a Paul victory, perhaps even threatening the state's hold on the first contest in the presidential primary process. The isolationist segment on the party took it on the chin. With the two front-runners both forceful advocates for a strong national defense, talk of the Republican Party dabbling with isolationism should be muted."

Romney and Santorum seek war with Iran according to Israeli policy dictates. Santorum, like Michelle Bachmann, is a self-proclaimed conservative Christian, who, in reality, is a creature of the rabbis of Orthodox Judaism. As Pennsylvania’s U.S. Senator he regularly pilgrimaged to New York to sit at the feet of the most odious Talmudists and receive their instruction in political chicanery and the need for America to go to war with the perceived Middle Eastern enemies of the Synagogue.

Rep. Ron Paul is the only peace candidate in the presidential contest. I wish there was someone else. Paul’s advocacy of “Austrian School” usury is a grave flaw. But there is no one else. He is the only candidate who sincerely advocates peace, something which the American people overwhelmingly supported from 1918 to 1941; throughout the presidency of Dwight David Eisenhower in the 1950s, and in the aftermath of the Vietnam War in the 70s and 80s, but no more. Having learned little from the killing and maiming of thousands of US troops and a trillion dollars in taxpayer money squandered on the messianic neocon mission of intervening in a thousand-year-old civil war between rival Sunnis and Shiites in Iraq, Americans are still convinced (by the media) that the “Islamic threat” is best countered by a “strong national defense” consisting in maintaining our military meddling in Islamic affairs in faraway Afghanistan, Iran and Arabia; anything contrary to this policy is stigmatized as “isolationism.”

The horrible consequences of a U.S. war with Iran are almost never summoned by the media as a pressing issue for the presidential candidates. War with Iran will make the conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan look like Teddy Bear’s picnic. An invasion of Iran will seriously damage America’s economy for decades, increase our thralldom to Red China and launch us into the permanent war footing which former Vice President Dick Cheney called for when he declared that the “war on terrorism” should proceed for generations. Imagine cursing our children and grandchildren with such a butcher’s bill!

This is the curse that is beginning to take shape as Ron Paul is rejected in favor of a consummate politician like Mitt Romney and a fanatical crypto-rabbi such as Rick Santorum. 

The quality of life in America will continue to decline as our “Homeland Security” police state and war economy sucks resources from education, medical care, Social Security and mass transit.

The people of Iowa and New Hampshire, along with Americans in general, have no clear idea what Talmudic Judaism is, what counterfeit “Israel” represents and how the Talmudic mentality deftly plays Right and Left for the self-destructive ends of an ideology predicated first and foremost on hatred of Jesus Christ and all gentiles. Romney and Santorum are the means for weaponizing that ideology on the international stage, as did George W. Bush to such devastating effect. We can’t afford these men, but perhaps we deserve them.

Michael Hoffman is the author of Judaism’s Strange Gods, published in November by Independent History and Research.

***

A review of "Judaism Discovered"

Michael Hoffman's Note: The reader may be asking, why publish a review for an out-of-print book? The fourth edition of Judaism Discovered was never printed because we did not raise the approximately $18,000 necessary to print and ship to Idaho a massive, textbook-size hardcover of 1100 pages in the minimum quantity (1,000 books) required by the printer in order to qualify for a decent discount; moreover, just to truck 1,000 copies of Judaism Discovered, which weighs 4.5 pounds per copy, from the plant back east, would cost nearly $2,000.  The book is officially out of print, true. However, a few single copies are still available from us directly. Judaism Discovered is out of print in terms of quantity copies at a reasonably low price. We can't sell you five copies at a wholesale discount. (If you purchase electronic e-books, Amazon offers Judaism Discovered on its Kindle device). We have condensed Judaism Discovered's 1100 pages into an affordable paperback of 381 pages, Judaism's Strange Gods, which also contains new material.

A Review of Judaism Discovered

By Lance Owen

This review is for Judaism Discovered: A Study of the Anti-Biblical Religion of Racism, Self-Worship, Superstition and Deceit (hardcover) by Michael Hoffman. 

The author of this book, Michael A. Hoffman II, is one of my favorite writers. He has written several other books including: Secret Societies and Psychological Warfare, The Great Holocaust Trial (about Ernst Zündel), and Judaism's Strange Gods. He has also written numerous tracts on Freemasonry, and other occult topics. I consider him an expert in these areas. I don't know how to characterize him or his work. It seems like he's a Christian scholar, revisionist historian, and occult expert, all rolled into one! But I'll bet he doesn't like to labeled, so I'll just call him a truth seeker, like myself.

This book is over 1000 pages with nearly 1200 footnotes. He uses quotes from famous Rabbis to make his case, which is, that Judaism is not the Old Testament religion that many believe. It's a mishmash of various pagan superstitions that go back to Babylonian times. It is a religion of racial self-worship. The purpose of this "religion" is to replace Calvary with a lie known as Auschwitz. It must have taken many years to put this book together and it is an astounding achievement. He is very thorough and uses quotes from many older little known texts.

The Talmud

I used to think that the most important book of the Rabbis was the Old Testament. Some would call the Jews, the "People of The Book". This is not true. The Talmud is the book to be studied, along with the Cabala, by orthodox Jews. The Old Testament is relegated to minor status. Why? Well, the Rabbis worship themselves, not Yahweh, the God of the Old Testament. The Pharisees, who were the early Rabbis, murdered the prophets as Jesus told us. The Talmud tells us that the prophet Isaiah was sawn in half! In the Talmud it is said that a Rabbi won a debate with God! The Judaic people are God! Only Jews are human. Gentiles are animals.

The Talmud consists of two parts, the Mishnah and the Gemara. The Mishnah is the codified "Oral Law" passed on by the Pharisees, who were the early Rabbis. With this "Oral Law", the Rabbis can make up anything they want. The Gemara is commentary on the Mishnah.

The Talmud is a book (many volumes) of rules which orthodox Jews should follow. It is full of all kinds of arcane rules which will drive one insane. Like, meat and dairy products should be kept in separate refrigerators. There are toilet rules, and rules with dealing with menstruating women (they should be shunned) and so on.

The Cabala

The Cabala is a book on witchcraft. It is used for cursing people and invoking demons. According to Hoffman, it contains some seventy volumes. I realize that many people will have a problem with that.

The Rabbis routinely curse Christian graves, churches, and the Cross. Orthodox Jews spit on Christians. They won't deny this. But we are not privy to the witchcraft that the Rabbis practice behind closed doors. But thanks to God, they let things slip out. Yitzhak Rabin was cursed by a Rabbi and was dead in a month. That was for signing the Oslo peace agreement. The Rabbis curse countries too.

Treatment of Gentiles

The Talmud clearly states, that gentiles caught reading it should be killed. That has got to be a shocker! When it comes to the Gospels, don't they say, "Spread the good word."? But the hate directed toward gentiles and Christians in particular, permeates this work. It is repeatedly stated that, it is OK to steal from gentiles, as long as Jews are not harmed by doing so. If a gentile strikes a Jew, he deserves death. The gentiles are inferior (a different species) and are not to be treated as equals. Having sex (including rape and sodomy) with children is OK according to the Talmud. Although, it is unclear whether this includes Jewish children. The famous Rabbi, Maimonides, said that Christians should be killed (or not treated by Jewish doctors) when Jews are dominant, and that the Christians are idol worshippers. One Rabbi said that, "Even the best of gentiles should be killed".

Treatment of Jews

Women should sit in the back of the bus, according to orthodox Jews. The Rabbis hate their own people and use them for their own ends. The Rabbis encouraged segregation (ghettos) so that they could control their Jews.

Paganism

In the book, there is a picture of an orthodox Jew holding a chicken over his head, in a ceremony to transfer sins to the chicken! There is also info on the propitiation of the moon goddess Shekhinah (remember Shock and Awe). Rabbis sell lucky amulets to ward off evil. Like, perhaps, the demons that they summon on occasion! They take astrology and Gematria (number/letter combinations important) very seriously.

The Sacred Six Million Number

No, no, no. Not that six million number! The other six million number! Didn't you know? Six million Jews were threatened by Germany during and after World War One! I had a problem with that number ever since I learned about it in high school. Too precise. I mean, if the numbers of the dead were really known, precisely, wouldn't the number be more like five million eight hundred thousand, or six million one hundred thousand? Why six million?

That number has Cabalistic significance. It is ten times six hundred thousand. Six hundred thousand is the number of letters in the Torah (supposedly). That's where the Rabbis got the number (my opinion). The six million number is surely an exaggeration, as many researchers say. But exaggeration is OK, according to the Talmud. For example, didn't Hadrian slaughter 800,000,000 Jews? It's in Talmud! The Holocaust should be debated. But it is not, because the Rabbis would lose. The authorities have reduced the number of dead (mostly Jews supposedly) at Auschwitz by several millions. The current figure is about 1.5 million. But where are the bodies?

Jesus

It is said in the Talmud that Jesus deserved what he got. There was no resurrection. He is burning in Hell in boiling hot feces. The Talmud mocks Jesus and the hatred of Him is incessant. Those who read the Gospels go to hell. Mary was promiscuous and Jesus was a bastard. The New Testament was burned recently in Israel.

Rules for Lying

The Talmud has many rules for lying. God rewards clever liars. The overriding rule is, don't get caught lying.

The Kosher Tax

This is a racket. I can buy Kosher aluminum foil from my grocery store. The Kosher symbol has nothing to do with quality. Even junk food is sometimes kosher. Why should we pay this tax? The Rabbis are probably cursing the food for Gentiles at the same time that they bless it for their fellow Jews.

Noahide Laws

Now this is cause for concern. These laws are for Gentiles. There are seven of them. One of the Noahide Laws says that Idolatry is to be punished by death. Does that mean that those possessing a Christian Cross should be killed? The Rabbis made up the Noahide Laws. They have nothing to do with Noah. One of those laws says that homosexuals should be killed. Perhaps someone should tell the homosexual lobby this bit of info. As far as I know, the homosexual lobby is allied with the Jewish lobby to fight hate. Aren't the Noahide laws hate?

Owen's comments on Hoffman's book

Wow! Buy this book. It is one of the best books I have ever read. I started taking notes from the beginning, and ended up with nearly thirty pages! This review is the most important thing that I have ever written. Hope it gets out there, to make a difference.

Hoffman seems to be one of the few out there in this fight against the Talmudists. Why? The Talmud is full of filth and hate. Why aren't more people talking about it? The mainstream media pretends that Muslims are the problem, not the Rabbis. The laws of our land are slowly being Talmudized.

It's OK to lie to, swear false oaths to (see Kol Nidre), cheat from, and steal from Gentiles. This is clear and spelled out at length in the Talmud. Now the reader can understand why a bunch of Jewish banksters on Wall Street have no problem with looting the USA. Leo Strauss, an orthodox Jew spoke of the "noble lie". Like for example, the Holocaust? A student of his (Wolfowitz) lied to get the US into a war in Iraq. What happens when we believe these lies or don't challenge these liars? Well, do we end up like the US? Everyone reading this must think that something has gone horribly wrong with America. But, the same thing is happening in Canada and Europe. Jesus said that Satan was the father of lies.

Murdering Gentiles is acceptable too. One can now understand how an IDF soldier, or perhaps a settler, can shoot an unarmed Palestinian child and "harvest" their organs to sell on the black market. We know that these things happen. A Rabbi was caught in New Jersey with organs. The Palestinians are considered sub-humans.

I wonder about the obsession with filth in the Talmud. Perhaps this can partly explain the "potty humor" of Jewish "so-called" comedians, like the filthy Larry David who urinated on a picture of Jesus recently on TV. Or, how about the sickening Joan Rivers. After all of these decades she is still around making with the potty humor. She was never funny decades ago and she's not funny now. I don't suppose that Mel Gibson thought she was funny when she said that he should be killed for making anti-semitic comments.

Now we have the trashy Sarah Silverman (heir-apparent to Rivers?). How long are we going to have to put up with her? She was on video making some disparaging remarks about Jesus while pretending to wipe her bottom. Hilarious!! As I write this, there is a pic of her on the net with her pants down sitting on a toilet.

Hoffman says that the Rabbis encourage segregation. Or used to. I have heard this before. In all of my net reading, some things are hard to forget. I remember reading a Yiddish proverb. It went something like this, "Our own Jews are going to destroy us". I did not understand this at the time. But I do now. The Rabbis hate the ordinary rank and file Jew.

I thought that I would mention one more thing. The Rabbis are obsessed with numbers and symbols. This goes back to Pythagoras. Today, his theorem is revered by Freemasons.

Pythagoras and his followers believed that numbers guide the universe. He found out how to construct a five-pointed star using a compass and straight edge. The pagans and the Rabbis attach great importance to this symbol. We now see five pointed stars on the flags of many countries.

After reading this far, the reader must agree, that there is no such thing as Judeo-Christianity. Judaism is the antithesis of Christianity. The Old Testament belongs to Christians, not Jews. The God given laws of Moses have been negated by Judaism. And what about Christian-Zionists? Perhaps they have been brainwashed by the Scofield bible. I hope that the reader will send some of these people a link to this review.

And that leads me to this. I agree with Hoffman, that Judaism is a religion based on deceit. To his credit, it is an ideology which he fights, not a racial group. The Talmud is a book full of extreme hate and filth. However I wouldn't ban it. I just think that we should discuss it.

Thank you Mr. Hoffman. You are very courageous.

Please Note: Hoffman has recently published, Judaism's Strange Gods: Revised and Expanded, which is essentially, a shorter version of the book reviewed here.

Lance Owen Comments to: lowen(at)istar.ca  [change (at) to @]
_______________________________________

To receive these On the Contrary columns by e-mail: send an e-mail to hoffman[at]revisionisthistory.org with the subject: Subscribe Hoffman Wire. You will receive an invitation by return e-mail to which you must reply.

Independent History and Research • Box 849 • Coeur d'Alene, Idaho 83816 USA

***