The 4 Jacobs and the 2100 Esaus

The 4 Jacobs and the 2100 Esaus

By Michael Hoffman

As background to yesterday’s tragic events in Jerusalem, Prof. Daniel McGowan of Deir Yassin Remembered, has confirmed that the Jerusalem synagogue where the attack on the rabbis occurred, is located on land in the Hasidic Har Nof district of West Jerusalem, that was stolen from the Palestinians 66 years ago. 

Har Nof is on the site of the Palestinian village of Deir Yassin, which was obliterated by Israeli “ Irgun" terrorists on April 9, 1948. More than a hundred Palestinian men, women and children were systematically murdered and the village was razed, so that in 2014 Talmudists could worship themselves in a synagogue, on a site where civilians were massacred and then completely forgotten by a ‘Holocaust’-obsessed world. (“Holocaust" saint Elie Wiesel served as a propaganda writer for the Irgun). 

The NY Times, Wall Street Journal, CNN, CBS, Fox,  ad nauseam, report none of this, even as they express hypocritical outrage that Putin’s Russia is opening more of what they term “propaganda” media outlets around the world; toward their own propaganda they are utterly indifferent.

We detect certain familiar leitmotifs in media commentary on the attack at the synagogue, representative of theological doctrines and fixations of the religion of the Talmud. Yossi Klein Halevi, “senior fellow at the Shalom Hartman Institute in Jerusalem,” writing in today’s Nov. 19 edition of the Wall Street Journal (p. A13), states: “Nothing Israel does or doesn’t do is responsible for provoking young Palestinians to hack to death Jews in prayer."

It is an article of Talmudic faith in these cases of violent interaction with non-Judaic, oppressed populations, that Judaic persons are the blameless targets of the blind hatred of irredeemably evil goyim. 

This formulaic belief is imparted to Orthodox Judaics from their youth: they are of Jacob and all of their enemies are hate-filled scions of Esau — “It is a given law: it is known that Esau hates Jacob” ("Halacha hi beyoduah she’Eisav soneh l’Yaakov”).

2100 Palestinians victims from the summer of 2014 rendered invisible:

“Conflict in Holy Land: The Israeli-Palestinian Struggle...in Recent Months”

— Wall Street Journal, Nov. 19, 2014, p. A8

Hence, as Mr. Halevi insinuated, the Palestinian “Esau" hates without foundation and for no reason, other than the fact that he is constitutionally unable to stop hating "Jews.” Therefore, no crime the Israelis commit against the "Esau-Palestinians," such as the enormous slaughter this summer (now all but forgotten — cf. the graphic above, titled “Conflict in the Holy Land” on p. A8 of today’s Wall Street Journal,) can be part of the victim equation. 

The 2100 dead Palestinian “Esaus" are not victims worth remembering, simply because their lives are worth next to nothing.  Is this an “anti-semitic canard”? If so, was it this writer that made those 2100 dead disappear from almost all news reports that wrote of the motives that led up to the synagogue attack? 

If the 2100 were truly regarded by the controlled media as human beings, then their recent deaths would be included, as part of the in-context background reporting on what contributed to the attack on the rabbis on Nov. 18. Norms of journalism in the US are suspended however, when the dogma of Judaism requires it. What is required is that the lives of the four dead “Jacob-rabbis” be shown to be of infinitely more value and significance, than the lives of the now largely invisible 2100 dead Esaus. 

Not that Americans are not outraged when certain religions engage in superior/inferior dichotomies. The Cryptocracy has given permission to the media and the churches to fill the airwaves and the pulpits with intensive discussion and study of the low status of non-Muslims — the so-called “Dhimmi.” Churches both conservative Protestant and traditional Catholic, have expressed outrage at the inferior status allegedly assigned to them by Islam.

Yet every one of the goyim, from the wretchedly dehumanized Palestinians, to the testosterone-fueled, super-patriot American “friends of Israel,” are all Esau in the eyes of Orthodox Judaism. This is not a cause for concern or alarm however, for either the Church, “our” media, or most Americans. There is instead an incredibly dopey faith in the benevolence of the religion that arose on the premise that the Son of God deserved to be killed. The rot that infects our nation is deeper than we can imagine.

Copyright©2014. All Rights Reserved.

Michael’s Nov. 18 poem, “The Heart of the World Bleeds for the Master Race,” can be read here.

__________________

When the victims are unworthy then holocaust denial is approved

Editor’s note: The denial of the Israeli massacre of Palestinians at Deir Yassin and the complicity of Elie Wiesel, is part of the holocaust denial of Deborah Lipstadt and the brahmins of the Zionist establishment, who, together with their American news media, cry out with Talmudic fury whenever anyone dares to question the magnitude of Judaic victimhood in World War II, but who are themselves party to denying the holocaust of Palestinians in places like Deir Yassin, which they hope will be blotted out from memory.

***

Forget Deir Yassin -- Its Victims were “Unworthy”

By Professor Daniel McGowan

mcgowan@hws.edu | April 9, 2011

Sixty three years ago today Palestinian civilians were massacred at Deir Yassin on the west side of Jerusalem. The terrorists were Jews from The Irgun and the Stern Gang. The village buildings still stand within clear sight of Yad Vashem, the most famous “Holocaust" memorial.

There is no marker, historical plaque, or even a sign post to commemorate the Deir Yassin massacre, which was the most pivotal event in the Naqba, the 1948-49 dispossession of Palestinians and the beginning of the brutal ethnic cleansing that continues today, largely with American support.

The “Holocaust" Industry ensures that Jewish victims are worthy of remembering. In countless films, memoirs, novels, articles, museums, memorials, and educational programs Jewish victimhood is recounted over and over again. Professional victims like Elie Wiesel cast and recast the “Holocaust" narrative so that the world will “never forget” and consequently will ignore the apartheid conditions imposed on over half of the population living within the borders Israel now controls.

 The irony that Wiesel worked for the terrorist Irgun and steadfastly refuses to apologize for the massacre his employer perpetrated is never exposed in our Israeli-centric media.

No comparable organization or dedication exists on the Palestinian side, partly because the power of “worthy” victimhood is not recognized and partly out of fear of charges of "anti-Semitism."

When Sarah Palin put on her Star of David necklace and toured Yad Vashem three weeks ago she pandered to Jewish power and to the memory of “worthy” victims. Had Palin visited Deir Yassin or even mentioned its name, she would have ended her career in American politics.

 The same has been true of all obligatory visits by American politicians including Clinton, Giulani, Huckabee, and Romney.

***

Peter King endorses Irgun terrorists who wiped out the village of Deir Yassin

Congressman: Muslim Terror Bad; Judaic Terror Good

In the last paragraph of this article you will see Mr. King’s endorsement of the Irgun terrorist organization that wiped out the village of Deir Yassin in 1948, slaughtering approximately 100 villagers. Mr. King believes that this atrocity was “legitimate."

For Lawmaker Examining Terror, a Pro-I.R.A. Past

By Scott Shane | New York Times | March 8, 2011

WASHINGTON — For Representative Peter T. King, as he seizes the national spotlight this week with a hearing on the radicalization of American Muslims, it is the most awkward of résumé entries. Long before he became an outspoken voice in Congress about the threat from terrorism, he was a fervent supporter of a terrorist group, the Irish Republican Army.

“We must pledge ourselves to support those brave men and women who this very moment are carrying forth the struggle against British imperialism in the streets of Belfast and Derry,” Mr. King told a pro-I.R.A. rally on Long Island, where he was serving as Nassau County comptroller, in 1982. Three years later he declared, “If civilians are killed in an attack on a military installation, it is certainly regrettable, but I will not morally blame the I.R.A. for it.”

As Mr. King, a Republican, rose as a Long Island politician in the 1980s, benefiting from strong Irish-American support, the I.R.A. was carrying out a bloody campaign of bombing and sniping, targeting the British Army, Protestant paramilitaries and sometimes pubs and other civilian gathering spots. His statements, along with his close ties to key figures in the military and political wings of the I.R.A., drew the attention of British and American authorities.

A judge in Belfast threw him out of an I.R.A. murder trial, calling him an “obvious collaborator,” said Ed Moloney, an Irish journalist and author of “A Secret History of the I.R.A.” In 1984, Mr. King complained that the Secret Service had investigated him as a “security risk,” Mr. Moloney said.

In later years, by all accounts, Mr. King became an important go-between in talks that led to peace in Northern Ireland, drawing on his personal contacts with leaders of I.R.A.’s political wing, Sinn Fein, and winning plaudits from both Bill Clinton and Tony Blair, the former president and the British prime minister.

But as Mr. King, 66, prepares to preside Thursday as chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee at the first of a series of hearings on Muslim radicalization, his pro-I.R.A. past gives his many critics an obvious opening. The congressman’s assertions that 85 percent of leaders of American mosques hold extremist views and that Muslims do not cooperate with law enforcement have alarmed Muslim groups, some counterterrorism experts and even a few former allies in Irish-American causes.

Mr. King, son of a New York City police officer and grand-nephew of an I.R.A. member, offers no apologies for his past, which he has celebrated in novels that feature a Irish-American congressman with I.R.A. ties who bears a striking resemblance to the author.

Of comparisons between the terrorism of the I.R.A. and that of Al Qaeda and its affiliates, Mr. King said: “I understand why people who are misinformed might see a parallel. The fact is, the I.R.A. never attacked the United States. And my loyalty is to the United States.”

He said he does not regret his past pro-I.R.A. statements. The Irish group, he said, was “a legitimate force” battling British repression — analogous to the African National Congress in South Africa or the Zionist Irgun paramilitary in British-ruled Palestine. (End quote; emphasis supplied).

***