Rorate Caeli writes:
____________________
Pope forbids Franciscan order from offering traditional Tridentine Mass without special permission of the hierarchy
"...our interest in this matter is not so much related to the internal workings and troubles of a particular order... but to the extremely grave precedent the Braz de Aviz Decree sets for the rights recognized (not created!) in Summorum Pontificum, and to the way the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith and the Pontifical Commission 'Ecclesia Dei' (and the Apostolic Signatura, by the probable limitation of appeal) were short-circuited in a matter of their competence.”Michael Hoffman’s comment on the preceding: Is it not true that 'traditional Catholics' support papal absolutism, indeed papal dictatorship? Absolute power corrupts absolutely, ergo don’t be too shocked when the people’s liturgical rights are steamrolled by the supreme monarchy that is the papacy. You have a revolutionary serving as pope. He will use the power you and other 'traditional Catholics' concede is his, to violate what are Biblical, apostolic and patristic rights that he has no divine right to derogate or abrogate. Without a mechanism to discipline a pope when he departs from his role as guardian of the faith of Jesus Christ, only masochists would complain about the blows that will inevitably come from a Jacobin pope with a revolutionary agenda to impose. Thanks for this are due in part to the author of Summorum Pontificum, our latter day “Celestine V” (Benedict XVI), who seems destined for the same fate in The Inferno which Dante Alighieri assigned to the other Celestine.
____________________
Pope forbids Franciscan order from offering traditional Tridentine Mass without special permission of the hierarchy
With an Afterword by Michael Hoffman
____________________
Franciscan group forbidden to use traditional liturgy
CWN - July 29, 2013
http://www.catholicculture.org/news/headlines/index.cfm?storyid=18607
http://chiesa.espresso.repubblica.it/articolo/1350567?eng=y
The Franciscan Friars of the Immaculate have grown rapidly, and became especially prominent in traditionalist circles. But the group has also been torn by internal disputes-- including disputes over liturgical practices. The Congregation for Religious has now issued a decree that installs an outsider-- a Capuchin, Father Fidenzio Volpi-- as acting superior for the order.
The decree also states that the Franciscan Friars of the Immaculate must use the ordinary form of the liturgy. Any use of the extraordinary form must be explicitly authorized by Church authorities, the decree states. This special rule, which applies only to the Franciscan Friars of the Immaculate, marks a departure from Summorum Pontificum, in which Pope Benedict XVI ruled that priests are authorized to use the extraordinary form for their private Masses without any further approval from superiors.
The decree bears the date of July 11, 2013, the protocol number 52741/2012, and the signatures of the prefect of the congregation, Cardinal Joao Braz de Aviz, a focolarino, and of the secretary of the same congregation, Archbishop José Rodríguez Carballo, a Franciscan. Carballo enjoys the pope's complete trust. His promotion as second-in-command of the congregation was backed by Francis himself at the beginning of his pontificate. It is difficult, therefore, to think that pope Bergoglio was unaware of what he was approving when he was presented with the decree before its publication.
The astonishment stems from the fact that what is decreed contradicts the dispositions given by Benedict XVI, which for the celebration of the Mass in the ancient rite “sine populo" demand no previous request for authorization whatsoever: "Ad talem celebrationem secundum unum alterumve Missale, sacerdos nulla eget licentia, nec Sedis Apostolicae nec Ordinarii sui.
The fact is that one pillar of the pontificate of Joseph Ratzinger has been cracked. By an exception that many fear - or hope - will soon become the rule.
There is a thorough pro-and-con dispute over the “Summorum Pontificum” in a book hot off the presses by Professor Pietro De Marco of the University of Florence and the liturgist Andrea Grillo: Ecclesia universa o introversa? (Edizioni San Paolo, Cinisello Balsamo, 2013).
In criticizing the motu proprio of Benedict XVI, Grillo rejects even its prescriptive validity. Because in his judgment, the ancient missal prior to Vatican Council II has been abrogated. And therefore there is no longer any reason that could justify its use. Grillo teaches sacramental and liturgical theology at the Pontifical Atheneum of Saint Anselm in Rome.
Michael Hoffman's Afterword
What do we say about a man who has been granted the authority to tyrannize, as Pope Francis is doing? The media paints him as an avuncular, "humble" liberal, while they ignore his politically correct inquisition against the ancient Tridentine Mass. Are we doing our duty to God when we respond to this papal tyranny by saying that he is a bad pope or an anti-pope, as it has been said of at least three of the past four popes since 1960? Or might it not be time, at two minutes to midnight on the clock of destiny, to at long last question whether or not giving absolute power to any man --be he pope or potentate-- to nullfy and overthrow, with Leninist revolutionary ferocity, every noble or venerable rite that sanctified millions before him? Does the pope have the "right" to send souls to eternal perdition? We are not afraid to state that it is high time that Catholics rethink the absolute power that was granted to popes incrementally -- during the same centuries which saw the popes grant incremental permission for the mortal sin of usury. If Catholics refuse to think freely on this point with their God-given faculties of reason, they will have only themselves to blame as the popes of the revolution continue to dismantle, with a zeal equal to inquisitorial Protestant tyrants of the past, the Catholic faith of their fathers.
***
4 comments:
Any unjust 'law' is not a law. These behaviors which we have witnessed since his election are not surprising. He deplored sacrality in his see and barely followed the letter of the law when the Motu Proprio was foisted upon the Catholic world. Though imperfect in its equivocation of the two liturgies, it was an injection of culture into the remnant of the Church. Bergoglio will do what modernists do while convincing the world to love him; marginalize the lovers of truth and tradition.
The FI community as a whole has taken religious reform and traditional Catholicism to an extreme that it was not meant to be taken to. The definition of a virtue is a balance between two extremes; since the superiors of the order cannot seem to find a balance the Pope is doing them the favor of helping them out.
Is the Holy Spirit confused? Did God make a mistake when he selected Francis? I love Pope Francis. He has my complete trust and obedience. I am also a regular worshiper at a local community of FIs. The community is very holy, involved in pro-life and pro-family issues. The homilies are very deep and inspiring. Thank God for the guidance he provides through his vicar POPE FRANCIS!!!
its so unfortunate that things are
the way they are. there are many things not
understood by the faithful. All through history a Pope
continues tradition and rite of his predecessor. its so
unfair when we have a Papal Father who is currently
changing things to suite some people instead of God.
check from the day he was elected, he have been
breaking traditions all in the name of poverty. Am not
talking of him using buses, that's humility. Now look at
this. how can a Pope reject the sacramental that is
meant only for Popes and choose the one meant for
Cardinals. How can a pope wash the feet of women
(Jesus Christ himself had many disciples but he choose
twelves and all men whom he washed there feets). How
can a pope refuse to bless 5, 000 journalists because
he is feeling for there conscience for many are not
catholics. recently he wrote against pope Benedict XVI
motus proprio. he banned all Priests of Franciscans of
the Immaculate from celebrating the traditional
tridentine mass rite and changed there supperior. Too bad
Post a Comment