Monday, September 23, 2013

Kingdom of Kidnappers: British Naval Enslavement of Whites

Now being mailed to subscribers -- Revisionist History Newsletter no. 68


Between 1688 and 1815 about a quarter million white people became the slaves of Britain's mercantile-military sea power. Michael Hoffman furnishes a fascinating new account of this suppressed epoch. Sections include: Enslaving British whites — a vestigial power of the Crown; Admiralty Law comes to shore; Capitalism's alibi for impressment-slavery exposed; State security trumps Liberty; Poor whites as hereditary naval slaves; the Legality of Impressing Seamen.

Also in this issue: NSA Surveillance — Treason to the 4th, 5th and 7 Amendments to the Bill of Rights of the U.S. Constitution. Plus: Machiavelli’s Ideology of Command; Washington Navy Yard Shootings; Wall Street Pays Petraeus; Hoffman’s “Usury” book reviewed by Economist Anthony Santelli, and more.


***

5 comments:

  1. Anonymous10:39 PM

    More and more I believe that the British empire was and continue to be a Zionist empire. Nothing changed.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Received my issue almost upon your announcement online, and I must say this is a spectacular newsletter. It's one of my favorites already, as forays into this miserable history are few and far between. Many thanks!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Michael,

    Would you share your take on the Wed the Sea ritual and the founding of the Maritime index by the 44th Doge of Venice one 'Morino Moriconi' aka Francis of Assisi?

    William Blake's poem for Ascension Day, ie the day chosen for the Wed the Sea ritual, clearly shows his understanding of the Maritime Index. Misery, poverty, poor children, all set in the paradise the Lord hath made, thanks nay curses to the Maritime Index.

    The whore of the waters who buys and sells the souls of men. A canary in the soul mine.

    God bless you in your work. How does this end?

    ReplyDelete
  4. To Eugene:

    The “wed the sea” ritual initiated by the Doge of Venice and seemingly condoned or approved by a medieval pope is a sad pagan affair that should never have happened in a Christian domain.

    However, where I disagree with you is in the attempt to cast suspicion on Ascension Thursday by connecting it to the wed the sea day. Choosing a day on the calendar to commemorate Our Lord’s ascension into heaven can in no way be denigrated because in later years a pagan ceremony was designated for that day. William Blake’s poem has no connection to wed the sea day. It is an indictment of Anglican Churchianity in Britain, where poor white children were enslaved and starved in Blake’s time.

    The information at the link for St. Francis is mostly fantasy and disinformation. Read Thomas of Celano for an accurate account of the life of Francis.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Anonymous1:09 PM

    May I presume, Michael, to respond to Eugene on this, your blog?

    Eugene, thank you for the "Ascended French[man]" link! I've been trying to find the origins of Admiralty Law for a long time.

    May I be so bold as to address your final question? [And that is the final question, isn't it.] Although you will have to have the eyes to see, and the gift of a teachable spirit to understand... your answer is to be found in the most neglected book of scripture: Ezekiel, in the 20th chapter. [Hint: 1. we are still in exile today! and 2. those who masquerade today as Israel, are not.]

    ReplyDelete

WE DO NOT PUBLISH ANONYMOUS COMMENTS!
Your own name or a pseudonym may be freely used simply by beginning or ending your comment with your name or alias when posting your comment. Posting as Anonymous makes debate unnecessarily harder to follow. ANY COMMENT SUBMITTED SIMPLY AS ANONYMOUS WITHOUT ADDING YOUR NAME OR ALIAS AT THE BEGINNING OR END OF YOUR COMMENT WILL BE BLOCKED. Note: we appreciate submissions from people who do not hide behind anonymity, as do many trolls. Anonymous, unsigned comments have a high likelihood of being blocked.

Do not assume that ON THE CONTRARY necessarily agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand.

By clicking on the publish your comment button, be aware that you are choosing to make your comment public - that is, the comment box is not to be used for private and confidential correspondence with contributors and moderators.