tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21240636.post3461776270841337716..comments2024-03-21T17:13:34.747-07:00Comments on On the Contrary: The Stone in the Synagogue's ShoeMichael Hoffmanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09485741729327325322noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21240636.post-5300600966149141412012-10-25T08:05:56.143-07:002012-10-25T08:05:56.143-07:00Dear Mr. Barta
Taking your allegations one at a t...Dear Mr. Barta<br /><br />Taking your allegations one at a time:<br /><br />1. Edith Stein. The Vatican wanted her included in the pantheon of the saints of Holocaustianity. John Paul II made Auschwitz, and not the Soviet holocaust of Christians, the iconic suffering of 20th century history. To defame the Germans, the Vatican claimed that St. Edith had been “gassed” to death at Auschwitz-Birkenau. If you think there are no disagreements among mobsters, or that such disagreements somehow invalidate their criminality, I beg to differ with you. Disagreeing on points of tactics with the World Jewish Congress is not the same as defying the will of Talmudic Judaism. The religion of Holocaustianity is the religion of Judaism for gentiles. On of its principal sponsors is the modern Roman Catholic Church.<br /><br />2. The Vatican did not “exhaust every avenue” with regard to the SSPX. Had they granted them a personal prelature that made them immune from interference by Tridentine-hating bishops, and had they granted them the freedom of speech to criticize Vatican II in the light of tradition, there would have been an agreement, in my opinion.<br /><br />3. The “Holy See” issued a statement that until Bishop Williamson stopped casting doubt on an opinion of secular history, i.e., that there were no execution gas chambers in Auschwitz-Birkenau, he could not exercize his episcopal functions. How could Williamson reconcile with so draconian an act of despotism, to say nothing of the absurdity of having the Vatican make sacred one side of a debate over secular history?<br /><br />Michael Hoffmanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09485741729327325322noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21240636.post-4057506134731274982012-10-24T23:57:20.191-07:002012-10-24T23:57:20.191-07:00"Bishop Fellay is mirroring the idolatry and ..."Bishop Fellay is mirroring the idolatry and despotism of the German SSPX, which labors under Germany's Muslim-like blasphemy laws ..."<br /><br />It's interesting that you couldn't resist such a snide and unsubstantiated comment.Rahman Hydernoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21240636.post-18894192253987829492012-10-24T18:13:16.584-07:002012-10-24T18:13:16.584-07:00Despite World Jewish Congress outrage at the Vatic...Despite World Jewish Congress outrage at the Vatican's decision to beatify Edith Stein (the Jewish Auschwitz victim convert who had become a Benedictine nun renamed Teresa Benedicta), the Vatican went ahead with the beatification anyhow. This clearly illustrates that the Vatican is not subservient to the will of Talmudic Jews. <br />And even though the Vatican has exhausted virtually every effort to gently draw the SSPX priestly fraternity of traditionalist schismatics back into the Church's fold, the SSPX remains a rogue entity. The suspension of Bishop Richard Williamson was performed by the SSPX, not by the Vatican.<br />But if Bishop Williamson had reconciled himself with the Holy See, no amount of hellfire from the WJC would ever be able to coerce the Vatican into dismissing him from his holy office. The beatification of Edith Stein proves this.<br />As promised by Christ, the Papacy is guided by the Holy Spirit, not by the WJC. The slander Mr. Hoffman's article projects upon the Holy See is unwarranted, and more resembles fiction than actuality.<br /> Louis Bartanoreply@blogger.com