Rabbi says Notre Dame burned because the Talmud was burned

A RABBINIC CURSE ON NOTRE DAME CATHEDRAL

 A religious duty (“mitzvah”) to burn churches 

Leading Israeli Rabbi Shlomo Aviner says Notre Dame was cursed with fire as divine retribution for medieval French Catholics having burned the Babylonian Talmud

By Michael Hoffman

www.RevisionistHistory.org

Cursing Notre Dame
Israeli Rosh Yeshiva Shlomo Aviner

"Notre Dame Fire May Be Divine Punishment, Says Prominent Settler Rabbi Urging ‘God-fearing Jews’ to refrain from grieving.

"Leading religious-Zionist figure invokes 13th-century Talmud book burning as possible reason for the devastating blaze.

"The conflagration at Notre Dame de Paris that badly damaged the ancient cathedral on Monday was possibly divine punishment, an influential Israeli rabbi said on Wednesday April 17, invoking a 13th-century burning of Jewish scriptures.

"...when answering the question 'So it can’t be said that it was punishment?' the rabbi wrote, 'It is possible, after all. The first big Talmud burning was in Paris, there in the plaza of the Notre Dame Cathedral.'

"Aviner said it was a result of the Paris trial, 'In which Jewish sages in France of that generation were forced into confrontation with the Christian sages. The result was the burning of the Talmud. The Talmud books were brought to the Notre Dame square in 20 wagons...and were burned there, meaning, 1,200 Talmud books.'

"French-born Shlomo Aviner, now the rabbi of West Bank settlement Beit El, also said it is a mitzvah - a deed done from religious duty - to set fire to churches in Israel..." 

Source: Yotam Berger, Israeli newspaper Haaretz, April 17, 2019

"Rabbi Shlomo Aviner, the rabbi of the Beit El settlement and head of the Ateret Yerushalayim yeshiva, said Christianity 'is our number one enemy throughout history.” 

Source: Times of Israel, April 17, 2019

“The great Christian Church in Paris is on fire. Should we feel sorry for that, or should we rejoice, as it [the cathedral] is idolatry, which is a mitzvah to burn?' — Israeli Rabbi Shlomo Aviner

"Several immensely important rabbinic rulers, most prominent among them Maimonides, ruled that churches are places of idolatry and ought to be destroyed. The rulings are very clear."

Source: Mondoweiss

MICHAEL HOFFMAN’S AFTERWORD

Catholic Church of the Loaves and Fishes burned by Israeli arsonists, June 17, 2015, on the site of where it is believed Jesus fed thousands with five loaves and two fishes.

There are numerous buildings in America that bear the name of Rabbi Moses Maimonides, the “sage” who is revered by liberal and Right wing intelligentsia in the West, notwithstanding the fact that Rabbi Maimonides:

•Declared that Jesus got what He deserved when he was killed.

•Taught that Christian churches should be burned. (Maimonides remains the halachic inspiration for church arson to this day).

•Declared that black people are not human (cf. Maimonides, The Guide of the Perplexed [University of Chicago Press, 1963, with an introduction by Leo Strauss], vol. 2, pp. 618-619). 

The Babylonian Talmud itself is the holiest book of Orthodox Judaism, replete with nullification of God’s Biblical law, admonitions to burn Christian books, and lie, commit evil anonymously, and destroy non-Jews. Furthermore the Babylonian Talmud teaches that Jesus was a sorcerer, His Mother Mary a whore, and that Jesus is now in hell burning forever in hot excrement. 

It is important to note that many noble Judaic people object to the contents of the Talmud and have rejected it. 

Even with regard to the adherents of Talmudic Orthodox Judaism, Jesus commanded us to love our enemies and do good to those who persecute us. Only an opponent of Christ would perpetrate attacks on Judaic people. Telling the truth as Jesus did is sufficient; the rest we leave to to God (Romans 12:19).

Judaic people are  themselves victims of Talmudic dogma. For instance, permission for the molestation of infant Judaic girls under the age of three and Judaic boys under the age of nine is granted in the Talmud. This is not a “canard” or a “trope.” This datum is not "taken out of context." It is a readily verifiable, tragic and unfortunate truth. We wish it were not. Presumably it is still ethical and legal to advance human knowledge and publish demonstrable facts.

The early and medieval Catholic Church did indeed oppose the Talmud, predicated in large part on the testimony of former Judaic Talmud scholars such as the learned Nicholas Donin, who converted to Catholicism and participated in the Paris debate contra the rabbis. 

Centuries later however, during the Renaissance, the hierarchy of the Church of Rome was infiltrated and the popes began to covertly honor and emulate the rabbinic traditions and the doctrine contained in the Kabbalah and Talmud. For example, the finest edition of the Talmud up to that time, the Bomberg edition, was published under papal auspices in Renaissance Venice, 1519-1523. 

These revisionist facts are seldom mentioned in the  media or western academia, the better to keep people ignorant, maintain political correctness and suppress knowledge.

Selections from the Talmud of Babylon:

For Further Study and Documentation:

The Occult Renaissance Church of Rome (723 pages)

Judaism Discovered (textbook, 1100 pages)

The Truth About the Talmud (blog)

_______________

Support our worldwide educational outreach:

Please make a donation to our Truth Mission
_________________

Blaming the Romans and Pilate for Killing Jesus

Updated Holy Thursday, 2022

Scapegoating the Romans 

and Pontius Pilate for Killing Jesus

By Michael Hoffman

www.RevisionistHistory.org

It’s customary around Easter for the corporate media to publicize a Jesus-defaming news story. Ten years ago the New York Times propelled just such a libel, although it was initiated not during Lent, but one week before Yom Kippur, on September 18, 2012. It was headlined, “A Faded Piece of Papyrus Refers to Jesus’ Wife."  

On April 10, 2014, as Good Friday approached, the Times repeated the sordid “Jesus-Had-a-Wife” drivel from a new angle, “Papyrus Referring to Jesus’ Wife Is More Likely Ancient.” The story seemed (at least in our opinion) timed to insult Our Lord and His followers during the most sacred season of the year for the Christians, "Holy Week." This calumny, supported by “scientists,” was afterward shown to be a shoddy academic hoax. 

Almost every year near Good Friday, confusion is sown concerning the death of Jesus, usually put forth by a nationally syndicated, white liberal “Christian” columnist, or a sermon from a Protestant minister, or a priest of the modern “Catholic” Church. They proceed to focus culpability for Our Lord’s crucifixion almost exclusively on the Romans, and Pontius Pilate. A few years ago we were present for a sermon by a Jesuit priest at Gonzaga University in Spokane, Washington who devoted his homily to sparing the Pharisees a single harsh word while alluding to Pilate in no uncertain terms as "a thug."   

According to the politically correct view now in vogue, the Pharisees of 33 A.D. were more sinned against than sinning.  

Among falsifiers on the Right, are two luminaries in the ersatz white “Conservative” firmament:

Former Fox News talk show host Bill O’Reilly promotes the manifestly ridiculous Romans-are-to-blame-for-the-Crucifixion imposture in his book, The Last Days of Jesus. 

He's not alone. On Holy Thursday (April 17) 2014, Andrew P. Napolitano, better known as “Judge Napolitano,” a widely admired figure among “Conservatives," at the website of Lew Rockwell (LewRockwell.com), wrote a column in which he had the chutzpah to state: 

“On the first Good Friday, the Romans executed Jesus because they were persuaded that by claiming to be the Son of God, He might foment a revolution against them...they feared a revolution that would disrupt their worldly power, and so they condemned Him to death by crucifixion.”

Pharisaic Jews are not mentioned anywhere in Mr. Napolitano’s column concerning who is culpable for the Crucifixion of Jesus.

To assert that the Romans bear the lion’s share of responsibility is a contrived argument that serves to appease the media and the shadow government.

The fact that Jesus praised a Roman officer above everyone in Israel (Matthew 8:5-13), and that the Roman administrator Pilate urgently sought to save Christ’s life, calling him a just man, and being threatened by a mob as a result, is washed down the memory hole. 

Historic Christianity, faithful to the Gospel narrative, had a very different view of Pontius Pilate. Francis Turretin (1623-1687), was a distinguished professor of theology and the author of the magisterial three volume study, Institutes of Elenctic Theology (which was reprinted as recently as 1994). In vol. II, p. 489-490, Dr. Turretin wrote:

 “…the kingdom of Christ…is conducted in a spiritual manner, recognizes no other honors and resources than righteousness, holiness, peace of conscience, salvation and eternal life; no other arms than the Word and the Spirit; no other fortifications than the protection of God. Pilate had this understanding of it. 

“He (Pilate) clearly perceived that no prejudice could be created from it (the kingdom of Christ) against the empire of Caesar; otherwise he would not only have agreed with the accusation of the Jews charging Christ with rebellion against Caesar, but he would have been the first to think of taking Him out of the way. 

"However, having dismissed this accusation of the Jews and (accepted) Christ’s own confession concerning His kingly office, he (Pilate) pronounces Him just and innocent, and desires Him to be cleared from condemnation (for he knew that for envy they had delivered Him, Matthew 27:18)…" (End quote from the 17th century theologian Francis Turretin).

The disinformation that renders the Romans the main malefactors is also undercut by none other than the Babylonian Talmud itself, in Sanhedrin 43a, where it is stated that the Romans were favorable toward Jesus and did not want to execute him: 

“Rather it must be that the case against Jesus was different, because he had close connections with the non-Jewish authorities, and those authorities were interested in his acquittal.” 

— The Steinsaltz Talmud, volume 17, p. 159 

(Random House, 1998)

 

What is there to debate? We have God’s Word in 1 Thessalonians 2:14-15. This is an unambiguous statement. This Scripture was declared by St. Paul without qualifications of any kind.  

The same is true here:

“The God of Abraham, and the God of Issac, and the God of Jacob, the God of our Fathers hath glorified His Son Jesus, whom you indeed delivered and denied before the face of Pilate, he judging Him to be released.  But you denied the holy and just One, and asked a man-killer to be given unto you, but the author of life you killed ...”  (Acts 3:13-15).

These are the Words of the New Testament. 

Tough-guy O’Reilly told United Press International (UPI) on April 10, 2014: “...kids in public schools should learn about Christianity if they are American children. If they don’t like it, that’s too bad,’ he says.” 

Wow, what a mensch. One question: which Christ is O’Reilly presenting in his history, the Christ of the Gospel or the Christ of the falsifiers? 

The most authoritative rabbi in the western Judaic world is Moses Maimonides, “the Rambam.” He is venerated in the elite media and academia, though few of his gentile enthusiasts have bothered to discover what he actually taught. We regret to report that Maimonides was an unabashed Jesus-despiser. We realize we are not to use those words; that they are politically incorrect and “offensive.” By the grace God, we have no fear of uttering truth however, and in the case of  Maimonides, this is the truth. In his magnum opus, the Mishneh Torah, Rabbi Maimonides wrote: “The Christians are idol worshippers” (Avodah Zara 9:4). 

“Idol worshippers” (true Christians) are subject to severe penalties according to the "Noahide Laws" promoted by every American President from Ronald Reagan forward, under the rubric of “Education Day USA.”

Rabbi Maimonides stated that Jesus was killed “by the court,” a reference to the rabbinic court: “Yeshu the Christian, who imagined himself the messiah and was killed by the court...” (Rabbi Moses Maimonides, Mishneh Torah: Laws of the King 11:4). 

Maimonides is echoing the halacha (rabbinic law) concerning the execution of Jesus as detailed toward the conclusion of tractate Sanhedrin 43a in the uncensored edition of the Talmud Bavli:

Nowhere does the Talmud or Moses Maimonides, the supreme halachic authority for western Talmudists, blame the Romans, as do Popes Benedict XVI and Francis, Protestant "evangelists" and the corporate media.

There are literally thousands of Leftist academics and clerics, as well as Right wing leaders like O’Reilly, Napolitano, Pence, Pompeo, and televised “evangelicals," who minimize the role of Orthodox Phariseeism in the killing of the Son of God, putting the onus on the Romans and Pilate, so as to curry favor with those who exert an inordinate influence on the corporate media. 

Because we are all sinners, it is true that in that sense, all of us are indeed guilty of Jesus’s crucifixion. But there is also the historical, Scriptural fact that the Pharisaic leaders who were the progenitors of Orthodox Judaism and its holiest book, the Talmud of Babylon, were directly responsible for killing Him. Jesus said, “Sin must come, but woe to those through whom it comes” (Luke 17:1). 

Talmudism is in higher repute in Christendom now than ever in history and it is to the Pharisaic theology founded upon it -- and successive texts possessing halachic authority (such as the Mishneh Torah) -- to which our apologetic and educational efforts are centered.

Nothing we teach is a negative reflection on Judaic people in general. It would be diabolic to insult Judaic people as "Christ-killers." Due to our own dreadful sins every one of us is guilty of putting Jesus on that Cross of Calvary and being responsible for His death. 

It is however, incumbent on us as Christians to lovingly correct errors, as did Jesus, John the Baptist and the apostles Peter and Paul. We pray for those who promote the falsehoods of Talmudism. We are not reluctant to proclaim the truth about the Jesus-denying snares and pits into which precious Judiac and other people fall as a result of the continuing influence of the Pharisaic nullification of Scripture, which was virulent in the first century and which has culminated in the 21st century distortion of the Good Friday narrative.

Boldly teaching proscribed Biblical truths is a necessary antidote to prevailing errors.   

Copyright©2022 by Independent History and Research

Box 849 • Coeur d'Alene, Idaho 83816

A Talk by Michael Hoffman: "Introduction to the Talmud and Talmudism" (63 minutes)

Donations are solicited for our Truth Mission 

Michael’s books are available here and here, as well as at this link 

__________________

Buchanan, Buttigieg and Forbidden Love

Buchanan, Buttigieg and Forbidden Love

By Michael Hoffman

www.RevisionistHistory.org

The root of both usury and sodomy is situation ethics, which so-called “Conservatives” have not the vision to discern. Hence, they pen requiems for the past rather than manifestos for the future. 

"Are, for example, the Ten Commandments of the Old Testament, Christian teaching and natural law unchangeable and applicable to all men at all times? Or can some of the ten be consigned to the dumpster of antiquated moral prohibitions? This question has been brought straight into the presidential primaries by Pete Buttigieg, breakout star of the spring of 2019….what Buttigieg is saying is that either God changes his moral law to conform to the changing behavior of mankind or that, for 2,000 years, Christian preaching and practice toward homosexuals has been bigoted, injurious and morally indefensible….In the lifetime of many Americans, homosexuality and abortion were still scandalous crimes. They are now cherished constitutional rights.” 

— Pat Buchanan, “Mayor Pete and the Crackup of Christianity"

In a red meat column this week by Patrick J. Buchanan, he asserts the “unchangeable law” of “Christian teaching” against the spirit of our age.

The big hole in Pat’s thinking is his positing a good old days picture of the past, when abortion and sodomy were illegal. 

But those were not the "good old days” and hadn’t been for centuries. What he means to say is that they were good times in comparison to 2019; relatively speaking.

The crater that Buchanan has fallen through is his failure to address first things, rather than symptoms of the dystopian eschatology that follows from the corruption of original law.

Mr. Buchanan appeals to the law of God with half-measures that ensure more of the same decay and decline. God's law admits of no exceptions, no escape clauses and no situation ethics.

Way back yonder in 1515, when the Italian banking mafia grabbed the Catholic Church by the throat in the pontificate of Medici Pope Leo X, they used the alibi of Monte di pietá (charity toward the poor) to launch a Medici shylock operation. As a result, the immemorial Catholic dogmatic prohibition against taking one penny above the principal as rent for a loan, gradually was diminished and derogated to the point when, in 1830, any sleazy loan shark could be admitted to Communion in the Catholic Church, notwithstanding his “antiquated” mortal sin of usury.

If Patrick J. Buchanan will turn to the First Book of Timothy, at chapter six, verse ten, he will see that according to God’s word, the love of money is the root of all evil.  The permission of the Church for the renting of money (accompanied by the usual Machiavellian feints and double-talk ), marks the original weaponization of that forbidden love.

The permission of the United States government for “Mayor Pete” Buttigieg's forbidden love is a derivative of the Church’s permission for the situation ethics that made it possible for money-renters to receive Catholic Communion in good standing. 

Evil proceeds from the nullification of God’s law, a nullification which is accomplished on the basis that, “The-times-they-are-a-changin’.” 

Dante Alighieri, driven into exile from the medieval mafia fiefdom of Florence, made the connection between these two forms of forbidden love in his Inferno. Dante wrote that usury is as the sin of Sodom. 800 years later and the “Great Books” aficionados on the Right are still clueless. 

Pat can moan his requiem for the good old days, but in fact those days were rotten with the stench of money love and the supremacy of hedge fund operators and other usury parasites who up to this day continue to place the people Jesus bought for a price on that Cross on Calvary, into debt slavery.

So-called “Conservatives" are incapable of getting to the actual root of anything, whether it is the Talmudic nature of the subversion of the West, or the Renaissance papal situation ethics which, long before there was a U.S. Supreme Court or a New York media, turned the loan sharks loose on the people of God. That sodomites were eventually also turned loose is a shock only to “Conservatives."

 Until we have the grace and vision to penetrate clouds of misdirection, we will continue to inhabit the sad, stoop-shouldered ranks of history’s losers, consoling ourselves with the knowledge that wordsmiths such as Mr. Buchanan have crafted for us an eloquent obituary.  

Copyright ©2019 by RevisionistHistory.org

Michael Hoffman is the author of The Occult Renaissance Church of Rome, and Usury in Christendom: The Mortal Sin that Was and Now is Not.

________________

Attempt to Censor Michael Hoffman on Twitter Fails

Attempt to Censor Michael Hoffman on Twitter Fails

Good news! As many of you know, our scholarship is repeatedly targeted for censorship and deplatforming online by the enemies of knowledge and freedom. 

With all the complaints about Twitter in this regard, let’s give Twitter credit for declining today to suppress our April 2 tweet or deplatform us, because we dared to publish an accurate citation from the Talmud.  

Today Twitter e-mailed us as follows:

“We have received a complaint regarding your account, @HoffmanMichaelA, for the following content.

Tweet ID: 1113143468514205696

Tweet Text: How much truth can you handle? 

TALMUDIC DOCTRINE “If a grown man has intercourse with a little girl less than three years old, all agree that it is not a significant sexual act…” 

“The Talmud: The Steinsaltz Edition,” Ketubot 11b, vol. 7 (NY: Random House, 1991), p. 145. #metoo

 We have investigated  the reported content and could not identify any violations of the Twitter Rules (https://support.twitter.com/articles18311) or applicable law. Accordingly, we have not taken any action at this time."

Sincerely,

Twitter 

(end quote from Twitter)

_____

Our enemies endeavor to instill in us despair, defeatism and paralysis, with the objective of removing us from the field of spiritual and intellectual battle. To succumb to this psychological warfare is a sin against the virtue of Hope. God is in charge, not the powers of darkness. If we have faith in Him, then we will sit tall in the saddle and continue to charge, trusting in His Sovereign Will.

_____

Michael Hoffman’s books are sold here, as well as at this link and here  

Michael's speech to the national convention of the Nation of Islam is online here

Donate to our Truth Mission here

______________

Southern Poverty Law Center Lynch Mob

By Michael Hoffman

Read more at wsj.com

Shame on Amazon, Twitter, Facebook, Paypal and Apple for disgracefully submitting to the ultra-partisan Southern Poverty Law Center's inquisition against freethinkers and dissidents who are demonized and hounded as "haters” by the SPLC, a multi-million dollar Orwellian gatekeeper that aims to make the Internet safe for corporate media orthodoxy. On the contrary, in its early days the Internet provided a welcome and often radical alternative to the corporate-controlled media.

Dissidents smeared by the SPLC become targets for violence and vandalism and are banned from the Internet — as determined by a private spy organization of Stalinist methodology, to which the billionaire Tech Tyrants submit in order to maintain the “reputation of their brand” in the midst of a lynch-mob atmosphere. 

Freedom of thought and the advancement of human knowledge are not considerations once a visionary writer or radical speaker is stigmatized with the hate label, which in effect signifies “hated by the Southern Poverty Law Center” — the enemies of freedom of speech.

____________

Michael Hoffman is a dissident historian censored, libeled and witch-hunted by his ideological and political rivals in the SPLC, the ADL and other online thought police organizations to which the Tech Tyrants bow in abject submission.

____________