Welcome Information Connoisseurs

Welcome Information Connoisseurs

Friday, January 22, 2010

More on the Pope's betrayal of the Gospel at the Rome synagogue

 I have added three photos and additional data to the previous reporting on the pope's pilgrimage to the synagogue of Rome on January 17.

"...he powerfully refuted the Jews in public, showing by the Scriptures that the Christ was Jesus."
(Acts 18: 28)
To refute the heirs of the Pharisees now, in 2010, as Paul did in the first century A.D., is a sinful "scourge" according to the "Vicar of Christ on earth," Benedict XVI.

Pope Benedict XVI in the synagogue in Rome, Jan. 17, A.D. MMX

The Pope with his pal, Chief Rabbi Riccardo Di Segni

Opposition to the religion of Judaism (Mark 3:6; Mark 7: 1-8;  Matthew 3:7; Matthew 5:20; Matthew 12:14 & 24; Matthew 15:1-20; Matthew 21:33-41; Matthew 22:15;  Matthew 23: 13, 15, 23, 25-27 & 29; Luke 11: 42-43;  Luke 16:14; John 9:22; John 10:31; John 11:8 & 53-54; John 18:14; John 19:7, 12, 38; Acts 12:3; Acts 13:45 & 50; Acts 14:2 & 19; Acts 17:5; Acts 20:3 & 19; Acts 21:27; Acts 23:12 & 27; Acts 25: 2, 7 & 15; Acts 26:21; 1 Corinthians 1:23; Galatians 2:13;  I Thessalonians 2:14-16;  Rev. 2:9; Rev. 3:9) is a scourge: 

In his speech at the synagogue, which, according to Britain's Catholic Herald newspaper (Jan. 22) was "loudly applauded" by the Judaics who were present, Pope Benedict apologized for the "failings of [the Church's] sons and daughters"* and begged "forgiveness for all that could in any way have contributed to the scourge of anti-Semitism and anti-Judaism."

*"...failings of [the Church's] sons and daughters" e.g. the "failings" of Jesus Christ, the Apostles, the Fathers of the early Church; St. Thomas Aquinas; St. Vincent Ferrer; St. Maximilian Kolbe etc.

Rabbi David Rosen, a key player in interreligious dialogue and a former Chief Rabbi of Ireland, explains the shift in Catholic attitudes to Judaism. He says that there "is no transformation comparable to this development of relationships between Catholics and Jews. To have seen a community first as rejected by God, belonging to the Devil and to then shift to viewing that same community as the authentic roots of Christianity; and as Pope John Paul II put it, 'the dearly beloved elder brother of the Church of the original Covenant never broken and never to be broken', that is a mind-boggling transformation."

"...turning revolutionary moments into institutions"
The visit to the synagogue, Rabbi Rosen says, was turning revolutionary moments into institutions. He said: "By visiting the Roman synagogue Benedict XVI is making it very difficult for a subsequent pope not to pay such a visit. John Paul II's visit could have been a one-off, but now with Benedict XVI's visit there is a sense of continuity."

The applause

Researched and compiled by Michael Hoffman

Hoffman is the foremost Talmud and Kabbalah researcher in the English-speaking world.  He is the author of the 1100 page illustrated book, Judaism Discovered http://www.revisionisthistory.org/page1/page10/page10.html

Hoffman edits "Revisionist History Newsletter" The latest issue is: "Those Who Say They are Jews and are Not"

Subscribe to "Revisionist History Newsletter" in the USA

Subscribe to "Revisionist History Newsletter" in Canada and Overseas http://www.revisionisthistory.org/cgi-bin/store/agora.cgi?p_id=36%C2%A0

Support Michael Hoffman's Truth Mission



Paul Sheldon Foote said...

Prior to this, John Hagee and Jerry Falwell learned that there were limits to which they could dupe even their own congregations in the service of the Zionists. They had to deny any belief in a dual covenant.


After this, the expression "more Catholic than the pope" will no longer be limited to extreme traditionalism.

Readers of Judaism Discovered know that Moses Hess was the founder of Zionism. Nicknamed by early Marxists as the Communist Rabbi, he wrote a book in 1862 advocating Zionism. Hess is buried in Israel today.

Communists have been successful using the deception of liberation theology.

It is a sad commentary when people who claim to be Christians know so little about Christianity as to be duped by anyone, including by Christian Zionist ministers and by the pope.

Anonymous said...



To refute the heirs of the Pharisees now, in 2010, as God HIMSELF does, is a sinful “scourge.”


“…he powerfully refuted the Jews in public, showing by the Scriptures that the Christ was Jesus.” Acts 18: 28


rejected Him 1 Kings 8:7
forsaken Him 1 Kings 8:8
served strange gods 1 Kings 8:8
hast not kept the commandments of the Lord 1 Kings 13:13
forsaken the commandments of God 3 Kings 18:18
forsaken the Lord Isaias 65:11
forgotten His holy mountain ( the commandments from Mt. Sinai) Isaias 65:11
didn't listen to Him Isaias 65:11
did evil Isaias 65:11
didn't answer Him Isaias 65:11
chosen the things that displease God Isaias 65:11
forsake God Jeremias 2:13
made up their own religion "that holds no water" Jeremias 2:13
had not done God's work Ezekiel 20:23
cast off His laws Ezekiel 20:23
their eyes were after the idols of their fathers Ezekiel 20:23
defiled Israel with idols Ezekiel 36:16ff
profaned His Holy Name Ezekiel 36:16ff
lying pen of the scribes wrote falsehood Jeremias 8:7ff
they all dealt deceitfully Jeremias 8:10
sacrificed to idols Jeremias 44:23
not walked in His law Jeremias 44:23
disobeyed God's commandments Jeremias 44:23
disobeyed God's Law Baruch 2:10
the people of Israel will deny the Messiah Daniel 9:25ff
no truth in Israel Osee 4:1-2
no mercy in Israel Osee 4:1-2
no knowledge of God in Israel Osee 4:1-2
sacrificed to Baalim and other idols Osee 11:2
covetous in all the Israelites Amos 9:1
departed form the Law Malachias 2:8-12
made void the Covenant Malachias 2:8-12
not kept God's ways Malachias 2:8-12
despised their brothers Malachias 2:8-12
committed abominations Malachias 2:8-12
profaned the holiness of the Lord Malachias 2:8-12
married the daughter of strange gods Malachias 2:8-12


accused by Moses John 5:45-47
adversaries to all men I Thessalonians 2:14
agents of the devil John 8:44
blind Matthew 23:26
blind guides Matthew 23:16, 17, 19, 24
children of Hell Matthew 23:15
children of the devil John 8:44
crucifiers Matthew 23:34
dangerous leaven Matthew 16:6-12; Mark 8:15; Luke 12:1
defectors Matthew 15:6; Mark 7:9, 13; John 5:45, 46, 47
deicides I Thessalonians 2:14-15
dogs Matthew 7:6; Apocalypse 22:16
foolish Matthew 23:17
full of dead men's bones Matthew 23:27
haters of God John 15:24,25
hypocrites Matthew 23:13, 14, 15, 23, 25, 27, 28, 29
idolaters Apocalypse 22:16
iniquitous Matthew 23:28
killers of the just Matthew 23:35
killers of the prophets Matthew 23:37; I Thessalonians 2:14-15
liars John 8:44, 55; Apocalypse 22:16
murderers Matthew 23:31; Apocalypse 22:15
offspring of vipers Luke 3:7
purveyors of fables Titus 1:13-14
serpents Matthew 23:33
sorcerers Apocalypse 22:16
swine Matthew 7:6
synagogue of Satan Apocalypse 2:9, 3:9
unchaste Apocalypse 22:16
unclean Matthew 23:25
vipers Matthew 3:7; 12:34; 23:33
whited sepulchers Matthew 23:27

axe laid to the root Matthew 3:10
cast into the fire Matthew 3:10; 7:19; Luke 3:9
condemned Mark 16:16
cut down Matthew 3:10
in vain do they worship me Matthew 15:9; Mark 7:7
judgment of Hell Matthew 23:33
shall be broken Matthew 21:44
shall be ground into powder Matthew 21:44
the kingdom of God shall be taken from you Matthew 21:43
woe Matthew 23:13, 14, 15, 16, 23, 25, 27; Luke 11:42, 46, 47, 52
wrath Matthew 3:7; Luke 3:7; 21:23; St. Paul in I Thessalonians 2:16
you do not enter the kingdom of Heaven Matthew 23:13

Unknown said...

It is so obvious this man is NOT A TRUE POPE. It is very blatant and in our face.

Excommunicated by Pope Ferrara said...

Wow, another "Papal Masterstroke"!

Anonymous said...

No matter what the Pope does, Catholicism will never be as Jewish as Protestantism. The fact that you, Mr. Hoffman, continuously show how outrageous the Pope's actions are, proves the point: the Catholic faith was the only faith that held the line. And in the Magisterium, the true deposit of the faith, still does.

Michael Hoffman said...

To Anonymous 8:33 a.m.

Your use of "Jewish" is somewhat confusing. Since Christianity was founded by Jews it will always be completely Jewish in that sense.

A more accurate word to convey your meaning might be "Judaized" as in, "Catholicism will never be as Judaized as Protestantism," denoting a reference to the religion of Pharisaic Judaism, rather than to the Jews of our Christian heritage.

However, even in that sense your proposition fails. I realize that there is a popular consensus among some ignorant conservative Catholic writers, including one fairly prominent one operating now, to make the point which you do.

But whoever asserts this generality about "Protestantism" has not read "Judaism Discovered" or this writer's introduction to Eisenmenger's "Traditions of the Jews." If they have, then to maintain credibility they ought to refute the counter documentation I offer.

Renaissance Catholicism, with some honorable exceptions, was a relentlessly Judaizing institution.
Martin Luther, on the other hand, was as opposed to Judaism as any medieval pontiff. For hundreds of years there was nothing in Catholicism to compare with his work, "On the Jews and their Lies."

Moreover, the inaugural scientific scholar and critic of the Talmud and Kabbalah, whose research to this day has never been surpassed, was a Lutheran professor of Hebrew and Aramaic, Dr. Johann Andreas Eisenmenger, author of the magisterial "Entdecktes Judenthum," which was banned by the Catholic Holy Roman Emperor.

Certainly there were individual Protestant denominations that followed the Renaissance Catholic lead in paying obeisance to Talmudists and Kabbalists, but to extrapolate from that fact the generality you propose, is in my judgment an error which leads to a failure to grasp the "past is prologue" aspect of contemporary Catholic relations with Judaism, which did not emerge ex nihilio with Vatican Council II.

Anonymous said...

I appreciate your insight, which is none other than a traditional catholic point of view in recognizing that pharisaical Judaism is a false religion which bears no substantial identity with the true religion of the old testament. They are "Jews falsely so-called." But I'm a little confused by your response above considering your complaints and criticisms were rather vague generalities. The poster to whom which you replied probably meant that protestantism is judaized in the sense that, for example, they vitiate the intrinsic power of the sacraments which leaves them as nothing more than the empty shadows of the old testament rites. Or for example, the penchant of the protestant heretics, especially today, to materialize the gospel. Luther may have written against the Jews in one respect, but his thought it seems was actually infected by their nominalism thereby furthering the decay of religion. To find points of decay within the Kingdom of God, the Roman Catholic Church doesn't really demonstrate anything at all as to the truth of falsity of Her claims. On the contrary, it is rather evidence of credibility in spite of corruption yesterday and even moreso today.

Michael Hoffman said...

To Anonymous 2:03 p.m.

Thank you for your erudite comment.

What you are taking up are points of rather dense theological disputation that are not subject to an "Aha!" moment of recognition for most readers.

The classic Protestant argument has been that Catholicism judaizes on the basis of the allegedly "inordinate" authority it lends to oral tradition, and by its historic reluctance to encourage among the laity the reading of the Gospel in the vernacular, as well as in other areas of dispute.

You have summarized profound Catholic criticisms of Protestantism. This is not the forum for an exchange of deep and abstruse theological controversies between Christians which have continued to rage without resolution for five hundred years.

I continue to believe that the most constructive and meaningful tack is to approach the issue on points which all parties can agree are clearly indicative of rabbinic infiltration, i.e. easily recognizable fingerprints such as 1. Talmudic and Kabbalistic doctrine, 2. publication and dissemination of the Talmud and 3. persecution of Talmudic critics and investigators. The Renaissance Church was heavily compromised in all three respects; a fact of history which most Catholics today have failed to confirm or refute by undertaking any new research.

The jargon "the Judaizing Protestants" has a life of its own, but in view of facts cited in this writer's introduction to Eisemenger's "Traditions of the Jews" and in "Judaism Discovered," it does not have a truth of its own.

There is not much to debate in facing the datum that the Catholic Holy Roman Emperor banned the most scholarly revelation of Judaism ever published, or that Lutheranism was a bulwark against rabbinic Judaism for centuries, or that it was the Renaissance Catholic Church which permitted the first publication of the Talmud in modern publishing history (the Bomberg edition).

Many traditional Catholics regard the behavior of John Paul II and Benedict XVI toward Judaism as a radical departure from that of past pontiffs. This is certainly true prior to the Renaissance but not so in many cases afterward. I have written and lectured fairly extensively on this subject and will not endeavor to repeat myself here. My work is readily available for those who want to seriously consider a radical challenge to the general myth of "Protestant Judaizing."

The type of Protestantism which did lend itself to Judaism, for example, occult Anglicanism, was itself a spin-off from the infernal Renaissance-Catholic project of "baptizing Hermeticism" and promoting a "Christian Kabbalah" (sic).

These matters do not easily lend themselves to the neat dichotomies of the Catholic-Protestant wars of religion. I would suggest that the struggle with Judaism, and in a larger sense with the esoteric diabolism that informs it, is not better comprehended against a backdrop of historic fratricidal warring, but all the more occluded by it, by reason of the failure of both parties to discern the rabbinic hand that played EACH SIDE against the other, Ad majorem diabolus gloriam.

Michael Hoffman

Anonymous said...

Thank you for the reply. My erudition, if there is any to be found, certainly defers to your superior ability.

I see two epistemological areas which are source of great error if we are not careful: the inference and the determination of causes. The former is analysed by logic whereas the latter is the work of wisdom, whether natural or supernatural. I must take issue with both in regards to some of your reply, e.g. what is reason why (the formal object of the act) the emperor forbid this partiuclar work. I would also distinguish more carefully between what emperors did and what the "Catholic Church" did properly speaking. Temporal failings do not amount to the magistracy of the Catholic Church speaking on a particular matter.

People are fond of making hasty generalizations and asserting that the "Church" did this or the "Church" did that when in fact the matter can be resolved into the question of individuals.

I am operating under the assumption that we are dealing with the Church which in fact Jesus Christ, the Messiah, had founded. If this is true, then to rest upon the foundation of indifferentism in an effort to expose the machinations of the Jews amounts to a slap in the face of the same Christ that we desire to exonerate.

Though I agree that the doctrinal differences between Catholic and protestant are not ad rem, I am certain that the theological foundations of this question cannot be ignored without falling into error ourselves. For after all, some could say that Islam is a great balwark against the degradation of some societal morals. Should we infer that the religion itself is pleasing to God? Nor can the identity of the "Mystical Body of Christ" be predicated on who has more vehemently or perfectly resisted the Jews, for that judgment implies others. But if you have any doubt about the matter, you can consult the fathers of our faith as they are to be held out as the rule and measure of the rectitude of our doctrine, not the withdrawl therefrom!

I am certainly interested in reading your book. The only reason I hesitate is because knowledge is not power, rather it amounts to intense suffering in the face of widespread ignorance and confusion!

A final question, some Catholics assert that you are Catholic as well, is this true?

Anonymous said...

To follow up on a previous thought (and then I'll leave it to rest). Imagine the immense absurdity of spending a lifetime battling against the Talmudic foe all the while having swallowed the poisonous pill of religious indifferentism, accepting this devastating and seductive doctrine of Masonry, which is nothing other than the precious child of Talmudism. What a masterstroke of the Devil and the negation of a life's work. Even the most righteous of singular causes is reduced to nothing when theological virtue is lacking. Ah, the indifferentism of the Masons, how efficiently does it vitiate a man's mind and nullify the work of God and the supernatural Messiah.

Anonymous said...

What a radical concept put forth here by Mr. Hoffman. Why don't Chrisitan groups and Catholic groups get together and remove the talmudic 'double mind' from all thought and then put it into play in our daily lives and hold our politicians accountable for it. For instance - no more pro-life president who thinks nothing of carpet bombing non-combatant civilians WOW! This guy must be crazy.

Frankly I stopped paying attention to the Vatican when I saw Paul II receive a bunch of Polish breakdancers. The pontiff sitting on this throne watching a guy spin on his head in the bascilica -

I just stopped paying attention to American protestants when I saw a Christian 'rap' video called 'Gimme that Christian Side Hug' on Youtube. To the sounds of gun shots and police sirens -my chastity was saved when I learned I could avoid all chest/pelvis contact with members of both sexes by turning to the side and patting someone on the back.

Calgon - take me away. God, send the meteor now - please.

MICHAEL said...

a man walked the earth 2000 years ago and he spoke the truth.
He denounced the phariseeès and called them judas goats.
He asserted they led his flock to slaughter.
He commanded his people to not build a house of worship to his father, nor worship false idols.
So here we have a pope, pontificating in the synagouge of satan.
The chicken has come home to roost.
The man who spoke the truth would say to his people, whose laws are written on mind and heart, forgive them, they know not what they do.
I would say this to every post i have read thus far.