tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21240636.post8366473796563995197..comments2024-03-21T17:13:34.747-07:00Comments on On the Contrary: A Judaic woman escapes misogyny and mind controlMichael Hoffmanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09485741729327325322noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21240636.post-18443417343026458742014-02-03T08:30:24.558-08:002014-02-03T08:30:24.558-08:00Yes, on Audio CD you can purchase the introduction...Yes, on Audio CD you can purchase the introduction to Martin Luther’s views on Judaics and Judaism, at this link: http://revisionisthistorystore.blogspot.com/2010/03/hoffmans-revisionist-history-store.htmlMichael Hoffmanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09485741729327325322noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21240636.post-6646143239166077922014-01-13T11:28:03.611-08:002014-01-13T11:28:03.611-08:00Okay, so let me ask a question more straightforwar...Okay, so let me ask a question more straightforward: Is it possible to acquire your own talk, i.e. CD1, without the Luther text? For I presume I will not be able to savour the latter one, even after your introduction.Martin73https://www.blogger.com/profile/13829029913583170285noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21240636.post-86279490865477405902014-01-11T08:40:53.710-08:002014-01-11T08:40:53.710-08:00No, of course, "On the Jews and their Lies&qu...No, of course, "On the Jews and their Lies" is the title, Martin Luther chose. I know and respect your efforts to sever the treacherous mental link between the People of the Synagogue, now generally addressed by the name of "Jews", and the original (Judaen) Israelites, ... even though I have never made out how to follow you in this little effort at semantic warfare in my native German language (!) - even before political correctness figures in.<br /><br />You have answered my question already for the most part by saying that CD number 1 presents your own stance on Luther's text. I guess I am not rash in expecting it to be some kind of ambivalent appreciation.<br /><br />The unanswered aspect of my question relates to a personal experience I had some time ago as I read the piece ("On the Jews ...") from an online publication, and went away disgusted and with the verdict: 'not very helpful ... to say the least!' <br /><br />Now, as I yesterday discovered your recension to an Amazon publication of an (apparently bad) rendition of the work, ... www.amazon.com/Jews-Their-Lies-Martin-Luther/dp/1593640242 ... I got aware that maybe there are ways to present the text in a way as to elicit the typical reactions of disapproval and the smart-aleck condemnation of the possessor of (what counts for) hindsight that we moderners are expected to feel on Luther's regard. <br /><br />So my question is: <br />How widespread is positive censorship or selective quotation in modern portrayal of this work? Is it as with Rabbinic texts, where a single or casual student has practically no chance to unmask the fraud, or is it a minor phenomenon which doesn't affect the substance of what Luther wrote and, therefore, of the verdict we form on behalf of this foundational factor of post-medieval German and European culture?<br /><br />I'd like to have your honest answer, not just (but also) for deciding on whether it's worth to get the CDs. It may well be I have yet to discover to what degree I am still too much enmeshed in the thinking of my time and place to view these matters clearly.Martin73https://www.blogger.com/profile/13829029913583170285noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21240636.post-15875530592740625842014-01-11T08:18:43.182-08:002014-01-11T08:18:43.182-08:00No, of course, "On the Jews and their Lies&qu...No, of course, "On the Jews and their Lies" is the title, Martin Luther chose. I know and respect your efforts to disassociate the People of the Synagogue, now generally addressed by the name of "Jews", from original (Judean) Israelites, ... even though I have never made out how to follow you in this little effort at semantic warfare in my native German language (!) - even before political correctness figures in.<br /><br />You have answered my question already to for the most part by saying that CD number 1 presents your own stance on Luther's text. I guess I am not rash in expecting it to be some kind of ambivalent appreciation.<br /><br />The unanswered aspect of my question relates to a personal experience I had some time ago as I read the piece ("On the Jews ...") from an online publication, and went away disgusted and with the verdict: 'not very helpful ... to say the least!' <br /><br />Now, as I yesterday discovered your recension to an Amazon publication of an (apparently bad) rendition of the work, ... http://www.amazon.com/Jews-Their-Lies-Martin-Luther/dp/1593640242 ... I got aware that maybe there are ways to present the text in a way as to elicit the typical reactions of disapproval and the smart-aleck condemnation of the pretender of possession of hindsight that we moderners are expected to feel on Luther's regard. <br /><br />So my question is: <br />How widespread is positive censorship or selective quotation in modern portrayal of this work? Is it as with Rabbinic texts, where a single or casual student has practically no chance to unmask the fraud, or is it a minor phenomenon which doesn't change the substance of what Luther wrote or of the verdict we form on behalf of this foundational factor of post-medieval German and European culture?<br /><br />I'd like to have your honest answer, not just (but also) for deciding on whether it's worth to get the CDs. It may well be I have yet to discover to what degree I am still too much enmeshed in the thinking of my time and place to view these matters clearly.Martin73https://www.blogger.com/profile/13829029913583170285noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21240636.post-52232436503551750872014-01-11T06:01:25.953-08:002014-01-11T06:01:25.953-08:00I don’t think you are doing so, but please don’t c...I don’t think you are doing so, but please don’t claim that I am the author of a CD set “On the Jews and their Lies.”<br /><br />Counterfeit Israel consists of Khazars masquerading as Jews, ergo I would never use so misdirected a title and for that matter, so sweeping a generalization, as “On the Jews and their Lies.”<br /><br />Rather, I did a dramatic reading, on several CDs, and with an introductory CD placing the words I recited in context while correcting errors, of Martin Luther’s 16th century text by that title.<br /><br />I hope it is still permissible, in these politically correct times, to read aloud from historic texts.Michael Hoffmanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09485741729327325322noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21240636.post-40785528705571893942014-01-11T01:26:48.047-08:002014-01-11T01:26:48.047-08:00May I abduct this thread a bit to ask you a questi...May I abduct this thread a bit to ask you a question, Mr. Hoffman, about what seems to be your most recent publishing activity (though I can't find it in the online store)?<br /><br />It's about the CD-set "On the Jews and their lies"Martin73https://www.blogger.com/profile/13829029913583170285noreply@blogger.com